I want to implement the login/logout (authentication/authorization) system of my Spring 4 MVC application with Spring Security.
Currently I use a very simple hand-made implementation which basically does nothing more than comparing the entered username and MD5 hashed password with the database values by looking up the user by the username using a custom service method and comparing the encrypted passwords.
If the passwords match, the username of the logged in member is saved in the session and a ControllerAdvice looks up the Member object for the user using the username in the session prior to each request. The checkLogin method returns true is username and password match:
#Service("loginService")
#Transactional
public class LoginServiceImpl implements LoginService {
private MemberDao dao;
//more methods
#Override
public boolean checkLogin(String username, String password) {
String hashedPassword = getPasswordHash(password);
return dao.checkLogin(username, hashedPassword);
}
}
This does work but is not a very elegant solution, does not handle different roles and is probably not very secure. Besides I want to become familiar with Spring Security.
Reading the official tutorial for Spring Security (http://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/4.0.4.RELEASE/reference/htmlsingle/#tech-userdetailsservice) the way to go to authenticate against the Login service method does not become clear to me.
The tutorial discusses authentication direct against the database but I cannot find anything about using a Service method to perform the authentication and in my layered architecture, the database is hidden behind the Servoce and Dao (Hibernate) layers.
Also most examples in the tutorial use XML based instead of Java based configuration which I use for my application.
After having search a lot with search engines, I still have not found a tutorial which implements Spring Security in a Spring MVC application using a familiar layered structure using a Service and Dao layer.
Do I need to bypass Service and DAO/Hibernate layers and authenticate directory against the database? Or write a custom authentication-provider implementing UserDetailsService as described in this post?
Spring Security 3 database authentication with Hibernate
And is configuring Spring Security possible with Java based configuration only? I am a bit lost with this issue so I hope for some hints...
Related
I have a REST service, written using Spring MVC. The server is an OAuth2 resource server and I am using the JwtAuthenticationProvider to have the JWT parsed and turned into the Principal. This all works fine.
However, what I really want to do is to load user details from a database, using the username provided from a Claim in the JWT. Then that new Principal should replace or (ideally) wrap the Jwt so that it is available directly from the SecurityContext.
I am really struggling to see how to do this. The JwtAuthenticationProvider does not seem to work with a UserDetailsService. I also looked at doing this with a Converter - but it is not easy to extend JwtAuthenticationConverter because the convert method is final (why?).
So to be very clear, here is what I ideally want to happen:
Bearer token is presented to service.
Parse Jwt and extract claims
Use one of these claims as a key to my user database, where I can look up attributes, entitlements etc
Turn these into a new Principal object which is available in the SecurityContext's Authentication object.
The configure method in my WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter has this:
http.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/api/*").authenticated().and().oauth2ResourceServer().jwt();
I cannot be the only person who wants to use a user database along with OAuth2, so I must be missing something fundamental? I am using Spring Security 5.2.0.
The JwtAuthenticationProvider does not support an UserDetailsService because in theory you are not supposed to have UserDetails in an application that does not manage credentials. I'm not saying that you cannot have any type of user, but the UserDetailsService will not be used or autowired by Spring Security.
You could register a bean of type JwtAuthenticationConverter, do whatever you need in the convert method and return your custom authentication token, like so:
#Component
public class JwtAuthenticationConverterAdapter implements Converter<Jwt, AbstractAuthenticationToken> {
private JwtAuthenticationConverter jwtAuthenticationConverter = new JwtAuthenticationConverter();
#Override
public AbstractAuthenticationToken convert(Jwt jwt) {
var token = this.jwtAuthenticationConverter.convert(jwt);
// build your custom token with the properties from the token above
return customToken;
}
}
I agree with your concerns - and I have found it useful to override Spring's default processing. There is a claims extensibility pattern I use with some providers, where JWT handling is only one part.
I have a Spring Boot code sample that you can run - it uses a custom filter and Connect2Id classes - OAuth integration is described here. Happy to answer any follow up questions if it helps
I am using SpringBoot 2.0.5 and Spring Security OAuth to implement an OAuth 2.0 server and a set of client microservices.
In the AuthServer:
I have implemented the UserDetailsService so I can provide my custom enriched principal.
For the userInfoUri controller endpoint, I return user (my principal) and authorities as a map.
In the Client:
I have implemented PrincipalExtractor to extract and create my custom principal.
For each of the methods I require the principal, I use the following notation:
public List<Message> listMessages(#AuthenticationPrincipal MyPrincipal user)
This works (and I hope it's the right way) but now I'm having an issue to secure methods using scopes.
For example, if I want to have a controller method which is only accessible by another server (using client_credentials), I mark the method with the following annotation:
#PreAuthorize("#oauth2.hasScope('trust')")
But this results in an access error as I think the scope is not being transferred. I have added the scope to the userInfoUri endpoint but am unsure what I need to do on the client side so the scope is picked up.
Any pointers or example code would be very much appreciated.
Im new on spring security and I had some research on authentication ,I saw two options there are some guys posted.First one Jdbc authentication or In memory authentication ,and there are also loadUserByName(UserDetailService).
what is difference between them ,and also what is use case of loadUserByName (UserDetailService)
This is the official reference https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/#jc-authentication
For In Memory Authentication, you have a set of username-password pair hard-coded in your xml/java config class.
In jdbc authentication, you can have a direct database contact to fetch users and authorities, provided you have configured a datasource
You can define custom authentication by exposing a custom UserDetailsService as a bean. You can do whatever functionality to return an instance of UserDetails in loadUserByUsername(). This method is called implicitly to authenticate a user, when creating an authentication.
I'm going to implement a custom authorization based on ([User<-->Role<-->Right]) model and Rights should be compared to controller and method name (e.g. "controller|method").
I used customizing UserDetails and AuthenticationProvider to adjust granted authority (here), but as checked source codes and docs about how customizing the compare of authority I found there is a filter SecurityContextHolderAwareRequestWrapper) that implements isGranted and isUserInRole to compare authority, while the documents say using AccessDecisionManager voters to customize (As I understood). Which one should be used ? Where I have controller and method(action) name to compare authority with them ?
I got confused about Spring security a little. Is there any other resource than official docs that illustrate how it works, I mean sequence of actions and methods and how customize them.
There are several approaches:
Role based, where you assign each user a role and check the role before proceeding
Using Spring security expressions
There is also a new spring acl components which lets you perform acl control on class level and are stored in a database.
My personal usage so far has been 1 and 2, where you only assign roles to users.
But option 3 allows you to create finer grained security model, without having to rebuild your webapp when chaning the security model
Role Based
A role based security mechanism can be realised implementing the UserDetailsService interface and configuring spring security to use this class.
To learn on how to such a project can be realized, take a look at the following tutorials:
Form based login with in memory user database Link
Form based login with custom userdetails service Link
In short spring security performs the following behind the scenes:
Upon authentication (e.g. submitting a login form) an Authentication Object is created which holds the login credentials. For example the UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter creates an UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken
The authentication object is passed to an AuthenticationManager, which can be thought of as the controller in the authentication process. The default implementation is the ProviderManager
The AuthenticationManager performs authentication via an AuthenticationProvider. The default implementation used is the DaoAuthenticationProvider.
The DaoAuthenticationProvider performs authentication by retrieving the UserDetails from a UserDetailsService. The UserDetails can be thought of as a data Object which contains the user credentials, but also the Authorities/Roles of the user! The DaoAuthenticationProvider retrieves the credentials via its loadUserByUsername method
and then compare it to the supplied UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken.
UserDetailsService collects the user credentials, the authorities and builds an UserDetails object out of it. For example you can retrieve a password hash and authorities out of a database. When configuring the website url-patterns you can refer to the authorities in the access attribute. Furthermore, you can retrieve the Authentication object in your controller classes via the SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication().
Furthemore to get a better understanding of the inner workings of these classes you can read the javadocs:
UserDetails - how the user credentials are stored and accessed
AuthenticationManager.authenticate(..) - contract on how AuthenticationExceptions are handled
UserDetailsService.loadUserByUsername(..)- contact on how username lookup failures are handled, e.g. user does not exist
Spel
Instead of checking authorities, SPEL enables you also to check other properties of a user.
You can use these in the URL patterns, but also annotate methods with #Preauthorize.
This way securing the business layer is less intrusive.
ACL Based
The ACL based model was introduced in spring security 3.0, but hasn't been well documented.
Their suggestion is to look at the Contacts XML example, since this one uses their new acl component.
Last this book contains great examples on how to further customize your security wishes.
I'm trying to convert a Stripes web app to Grails. The Stripes app uses Spring Security, but I would like the Grails app to use the Spring Security Grails plugin.
The app already has User and Role (Java) classes that I need to reuse, i.e. I cannot use the Grails domain classes that the s2-quickstart script generates.
The Spring Security plugin docs describe how to use an existing User domain class. The steps seem to be:
define a UserDetails implementation that reads from the existing User domain class
define a custom UserDetailsService implementation that returns instances of (1)
register an instance of (2) as a Spring bean named userDetailsService.
However the docs don't provide any information about how to use an existing Role class and the class that represents the many-to-many relationship between User and Role.
What other steps are necessary to use existing Role, User, and UserRole classes with the Grails Spring Security plugin? Is there any reason for me to run the s2-quickstart script if I don't want to generate any domain classes?
Follow-Up Questions to Burt's Answer
In the end, what you need is a new GrailsUser
Presumably GrailsUser here refers to the custom UserDetails implementation? In my case I'll probably just implement the interface directly. Does something like this seem reasonable?
class UserAdapter implements UserDetails {
private String password
private Collection<GrantedAuthority> springRoles
UserAdapter(User user) {
this.password = user.password
Collection<Role> roles = // load legacy Role objects
this.springRoles = roles.collect { new GrantedAuthorityImpl(it.authority) }
}
// If using password hashing, presumably this is the hashed password?
String getPassword() {
password
}
///////// other UserDetails methods omitted
Collection<GrantedAuthority> getAuthorities() {
springRoles
}
}
I'm not storing the whole User object within UserAdapter because of your warning about storing a potentially large object in the HTTP session.
what you need is.....and a List of GrantedAuthority instances (and the id if it's a GrailsUser)
If I use my own UserDetails implementation as above, then presumably I can ignore this comment about providing an id?
Finally, if I follow the approach outlined above, should I set these properties in Config.groovy and do I need to run the s2-quickstart script (or any others)?
Keep in mind that Spring Security doesn't care where the data comes from, it just needs a UserDetails instance when authenticating with the DAO auth provider and it can come from anywhere. It's convenient to use domain classes and database tables, but it's just one approach. Do what works for your data. In the end, what you need is a new GrailsUser (or some other impl) instance with the username and password set, the 3 booleans set, and a List of GrantedAuthority instances (and the id if it's a GrailsUser).
The simplest thing to do when you have legacy user and role data is to create a custom UserDetailsService. Use GORM, raw SQL queries, whatever you need to get the required data.
Another option is to write your own AuthenticationProvider like Glen did here: http://blogs.bytecode.com.au/glen/2010/01/15/hacking-custom-authentication-providers-with-grails-spring-security.html - although that's a larger solution that also involves a custom filter which you wouldn't need. The DAO provider uses a UserDetailsService but it's fine to create your own that combines the functionality into one class.
It's not a good idea to reuse your User domain class as the UserDetails though. Even if you implement the interface, you'd be storing a disconnected potentially large (if there are attached collections) object in the HTTP session. The POJO/POGO implementations (Spring Security's User class, the plugin's GrailsUser class, etc.) are very small and just a few Strings and booleans.
within the config.groovy file you have to specify your domain classes to use:
grails.plugins.springsecurity.userLookup.userDomainClassName = 'your.package.User'
grails.plugins.springsecurity.userLookup.authorityJoinClassName = 'your.package.UserRole'
grails.plugins.springsecurity.authority.className = 'your.package.Role'
i thinks it's not neccessary to implement your own userDetail service, because spring security uses
SpringSecurityUtils.securityConfig.userLookup
method to determine the domain class you configured before. your domain classes must provide the required fields and relations.