I'm playing with this creative script here: http://www.fmwconcepts.com/imagemagick/transitions/. The plan is to mimic what happens with the script with ffmpeg and generate video with transition effects between pictures. My current understanding is this:
I have two pictures A and B.
I need in between a couple of pictures (say 15) that are partially A and partially B.
To do that I use the composite -compose src-over A.jpg B.jpg mask-n.jpg out.jpg command.
During the process, the mask-n.jpg gets generated automatically that gradually change from all black to all white.
Depends on the mathematically equations, the way the transition effect looks is different.
In one of the example, Fred the author gave this:
convert -size 128x128 gradient: maskfile.jpg
This will generate a image like this:
This is partially black and partially white. For the transition to work, I'll need an all white one and an all black one and a couple of others in between. What's the magical command to do that?
I have re-read your question and I am still not sure I understand, but maybe you want a dark grey to light grey gradient:
convert -size 128x128 gradient:"rgb(40,40,40)-rgb(200,200,200)" greygrad.png
Not sure I understand what you are trying to achieve, but if you want an all black one, use:
convert -size 128x128 xc:black black.jpg
and an all white one:
convert -size 128x128 xc:white white.jpg
and a grey one:
convert -size 128x128 xc:gray40 gray40.jpg
If you want to join them for transitions, use
convert im1.jpg im2.jpg -append result.jpg
or use +append to join side by side instead of above and below.
Consider using PNG instead of JPEG throughout.
Fred tells you how the script works at the bottom of the page you have linked to with some example code.
According to his explanation there is only the one mask images as:
The mask images is gradually made lighter
Related
I have images of old paintings. The paintings are old and dusty with faded colours as shown here.
How do I give any image this type of an 'old' appearance? I couldn't find any filters or openCV functions to achieve this type of look?
EDIT: My question is different as the other one solves the problem using the sepia filter and using the grain effect. I'm not looking for that sort of an appearance. I want my image to look like an old damaged painting. This means that the colours should be faded and it should have an overall dusty appearance.
There's no real need to write any code and use OpenCV, since you can do all that on the command-line with ImageMagick which is installed on most Linux distros and is available for macOS and Windows.
First, fading. This can be simulated by reducing the saturation of an image. So if we start with this Mona Lisa image:
We can fade her using this command to leave the brightness unchanged at 100% of its original value and reduce the saturation to 50% of its original value. I am intentionally "over-egging" everything so you can see it clearly. You should maybe be more subtle.
convert mona.jpg -modulate 100,50 result.jpg
Next, vignetting - or dark corners. You can use something like this:
convert mona.jpg \
\( +clone -fill white -colorize 100 -background "gray(50%)" -vignette 0x15+1+1% \) \
-compose multiply -composite result.jpg
The 0x15 controls the roll-off, or how gradual the change is, so increase the 0x15 if you want a smoother roll-off or go down to 0x5 if you want it harder. The +1+1% means that the ellipse will be 1% smaller than the width of the image and 1% smaller than the height of the image. So if you want a smaller light hole and bigger dark corners, go for +10+10%. The degree of darkening is controlled by the gray(50%) so you can diddle with that till you are happy too :-)
Finally, dust. Best thing is to get a PNG image of some dust, resize it to match the size of your image and overlay it.
First get the size of Mona:
identify mona.jpg
mona.jpg JPEG 403x600 403x600+0+0 8-bit sRGB 57130B 0.000u 0:00.000
So, she is 403x600. Here is a sample of some dust - again, you can be more subtle - I am just being heavy-handed so it shows:
Let's resize the dust to match and overlay it:
convert mona.jpg \( dust.png -resize 403x600\! \) -composite result.jpg
Then you can combine all three effects, fading, vignetting and dust, into a single command:
convert mona.jpg -modulate 100,50% \
\( +clone -fill white -colorize 100 -background "gray(50%)" -vignette 0x15+1+1% \) \
-compose multiply -composite \
\( dust.png -resize 403x600\! \) -composite result.jpg
If you have lots of images to process, you can script the whole lot to be done in parallel very easily with GNU Parallel - see some of my other answers for examples.
Keywords: artificial ageing, image ageing, command-line, command line, ImageMagick, magick, old, old photo, photo effect, convert, dust, scratches, fading, faded.
I would suggest using a style transfer tool, rather than manually coming up with a procedure to mimic the style of an old painting. There are plenty free style transfer tools and libraries available.
I would suggest using OpenCV various filters to create the effect you need. You have to try various filters and try to figure what works for you, But I have suggestions which you can try.
For color, fading try Erode and Dilate with small kernel size.
Next, add some noise, Salt and Pepper will do just fine, also try gaussian filter after applying noise. Salt and Pepper is non-linear noise and Gaussian is a linear filter so it will just spread the noise, but keep the filter kernel small.
Try finding some images of dust, torn page edges (WITHOUT BACKGROUND) like in the following link:
https://www.google.co.in/searchq=dust+png+images&newwindow=1&rlz=1C1CHBF_enIN797IN798&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtq7ZvfPcAhXJO48KHQ2UD0kQ_AUICigB&biw=1536&bih=759#imgrc=_
Keeping alpha transparency in mind, mask these over your images.
With all the things in correct proportion and sequence, You will get your old dusty image.
I am using Montage command-line tool to merge the two jpg images. The output jpg contains the common strip present in the input jpgs. Below is the command to merge two jpgs:
montage -geometry 500 input1.jpg input2.jpg output.jpg
How can I avoid the common area in the output file?
Is there any other tool available to auto-merge the two images?
In ImageMagick, you can simply append the two images side by side or top/bottom.
convert image1.jpg image2.jpg -append result.jpg
will do top/bottom
convert image1.jpg image2.jpg +append result.jpg
will do left/right.
You can append as many images as you want of different sizes. You can use the -gravity setting to align them as desired. If different sizes, then you will have background regions, which you can control the color by using -background somecolor. If desired, you can resize the images by adding -resize 500 after reading the inputs and before the append.
See http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/layers/#append
I suspect you are trying to make a panoramic by stitching two images with an area of common overlap.
So, if we start with left.png:
and right.png:
You probably want this:
convert left.png -page +200 right.png -mosaic result.png
Just so you can see what happens if I change the x-offset and also how to add a y-offset:
convert left.png -page +280+30 right.png -mosaic result.png
If you want to do what Mark Setchell is suggesting, then using -page is probably the best method, if you have more than one image to merge and the offsets are different. If you only have on pair of image, you can overlap them using +smush in ImageMagick. It is like +append, but allows either overlap or a gap according to the sign of the argument. Unlike -page, it only shifts in one direction according to +/- smush. Using Mark's images,
convert left.jpg right.jpg +smush -400 result.jpg
What is the most efficient technique to remove the date that a Camera embeds on any image it takes.
The task is to prepare a script/code/software that shall remove the date from the given input image file (jpeg, png).
Please let me know an optimum way to accomplish this.
Thank you.
Here is an alternative approach to the question. You can determine the average colour of the bottom right corner of the image (size 250px wide x 100px high) with Imageagick like this:
ave=$(convert sign.jpg -gravity southeast -crop 250x100+0+0 -scale 1x1 -format "%[pixel:p{0,0}]" info:)
That will give you the value srgb(199,181,119) for this image. Now you can create a rectangle (200px x 50px) that colour and overlay it onto the image and then blur the edges a little to blend it in:
convert sign.jpg \( -size 200x50 xc:"$ave" \) -geometry +970+780 -composite -region 240x90+950+760 -blur 0x10 out.jpg
I am not sure if you were hoping for something that is forensically indetectable or something that more or less removes the distraction somewhat. Hopefully the latter :-)
A little measuring around shows that the date is located at the following position:
150x40+650+520
i.e. 150 pixels wide by 40 pixels high, located 650 pixels to the right of the top left corner and 520 pixels down from the top left corner.
So, one approach would be to copy the piece of the image directly below that, and paste it on top of the date, which can be done in ImageMagick in one command like this:
convert sign.jpg \( +clone -crop 150x40+650+560 +repage \) -geometry +650+520 -composite out.jpg
That says... take the original image and create a copy of it (+clone), then cut out the piece specified after the crop command command and reset that as though it was the top left corner (+repage). Then paste (-composite) that image at offset +650+520 on top of the original image and save the result as out.jpg.
It is not a beautifully engiineered solution, but may be good enough. It may be desirable to blur the area a little, to help disguise it. Alternatively, it may be possible to select the colours within the date and make them transparent, then to displace the original image a little behind the transparent holes to fill them - I didn't choose that option because it is harder and because you may not like ImageMagick anyway, and there are actually several colours within the date field ranging from browns to golden yellows and selecting them without affecting the remainder of the image might start getting fun!
ImageMagick is free and available for Windows, OSX, Linux etc from here. It is ready installed on most Linux distros anyway.
How can I get the difference between two images? I have the original image. Someone has written on an exact duplicate of the original image. Now, I need to compare the original to the written on image and extract just the writing in image format.
Example: I have a picture of a house. Someone took a copy and wrote “Hello!” on the copy. I want to somehow compare the two pictures, remove the house, and be left with an image of the words “Hello!”.
Is this possible with ImageMagick? I know there are ways to get the statistical difference between images, but that is not what I am looking for.
My own favorites are these two:
compare image1 image2 -compose src diff.png
compare image1 image2 -compose src diff.pdf
The only difference between the 2 commands above: the first one shows the visual difference between the two images as a PNG file, the second one as a PDF.
The resulting diff file displays all pixels which are different in red color. The ones which are unchanged appear white.
Short and sweet.
Note, your images need not be the same type. You can even mix JPEG, TIFF, PNG -- under one condition: the images should be of the same size (image dimension in pixels). The output format is determined by the output filename's extension.
Should you, for some reason, need a higher resolution than the default one (72 dpi) -- then just add an appropriate -density parameter:
compare -density 300 image1 image2 -compose src diff.jpeg
Illustrated examples
Here are a few illustrations of results for variations of the above command. Note: the two files compared were even PDF files, so it works with these too (as long as they are 1-pagers)!
Left: Image with text Center: Original image Right: Differences (=text) in red pixels.
compare \
porsche-with-scratch.pdf porsche-original.pdf \
-compose src \
diff-compose-default.pdf
This is the same command I suggested earlier above.
Left: Image with text Center: Original image Right: Differences in 'seagreen' pixels.
compare \
porsche-with-scratch.pdf porsche-original.pdf \
-compose src \
-highlight-color seagreen \
diff-compose-default.pdf
This command adds a parameter to make the difference pixels 'seagreen' instead of the default red.
Left: Image with text Center: Original image Right: Blue diffs (but w. some context background)
l
compare \
porsche-with-scratch.pdf porsche-original.pdf \
-highlight-color blue \
diff-compose-default.pdf
This command removes the -compose src part -- the result is the default behavior of compare which keeps as a lightened background the first one of the 2 diffed images. (This time with added parameter to make the diff pixels appear in blue.)
While compare does a good job for many applications, I found that sometimes I prefer a different approach, particularly when comparing images which are mostly grayscale:
convert '(' file1.png -flatten -grayscale Rec709Luminance ')' \
'(' file2.png -flatten -grayscale Rec709Luminance ')' \
'(' -clone 0-1 -compose darken -composite ')' \
-channel RGB -combine diff.png
The idea is follows: convert both file1.png and file2.png to grayscale. Then trat the first as the red channel of the resulting image, the second as the green channel. The blue channel is formed from these two using the darken compose operator, which essentially means taking the minimum.
So things which are white in both images stay white. Things which are black in both images stay black. Things which are white in the first image but black in the second turn red, and things which are white in the second but black in the first turn green.
The result gives you a nicely color-coded image where you can easily associate green with the first input and red with the second. Here is an example where I'm using this to compare the output from LaTeX against that from KaTeX (before I fixed some bug to make this better):
You can combine the approaches, using compare to see where something changed and then using the above to see in more detail how it changed.
From ImageMagick 6.3.4, you can use -compose ChangeMask (see also "Removing a Known Background" and following sections).
For example, using IM7 and these images stone.png, diamond_ore.png, and netherrack.png:
magick diamond_ore.png stone.png -fuzz 15% -compose ChangeMask -composite diamond_ore_overlay.png gives:
magick netherrack.png \( diamond_ore.png stone.png -fuzz 15% -compose ChangeMask -composite +compose \) -composite nether_diamond_ore.png gives:
I am trying to remove background color so as to improve the accuracy of OCR against images. A sample would look like below:
I'd keep all letters in the post-processed image while just removing the light purple color textured background. Is it possible to use some open source software such as Imagemagick to convert it to a binary image (black/white) to achieve this goal? What if the background has more than one color? Would the solution be the same?
Further, what if I also want to remove the purple letters (theater name) and the line so as to only keep the black color letters? Simple cropping might not work because the purple letters could appear at other places as well.
I am looking for a solution in programming, rather than via tools like Photoshop.
You can do this using GIMP (or any other image editing tool).
Open your image
Convert to grayscale
Duplicate the layer
Apply Gaussian blur using a large kernel (10x10) to the top layer
Calculate the image difference between the top and bottom layer
Threshold the image to yield a binary image
Blurred image:
Difference image:
Binary:
If you're doing it as a once-off, GIMP is probably good enough. If you expect to do this many times over, you could probably write an imagemagick script or code up your approach using something like Python and OpenCV.
Some problems with the above approach:
The purple text (CENTURY) gets lost because it isn't as contrasting as the other text. You could work your way around it by thresholding different parts of the image differently, or by using local histogram manipulation methods
The following shows a possible strategy for processing your image, and OCR it
The last step is doing an OCR. My OCR routine is VERY basic, so I'm sure you may get better results.
The code is Mathematica code.
Not bad at all!
In Imagemagick, you can use the -lat function to do that.
convert image.jpg -colorspace gray -negate -lat 50x50+5% -negate result.jpg
convert image.jpg -colorspace HSB -channel 2 -separate +channel \
-white-threshold 35% \
-negate -lat 50x50+5% -negate \
-morphology erode octagon:1 result2.jpg
You can apply blur to the image, so you get almost clear background. Then divide each color component of each pixel of original image by the corresponding component of pixel on the background. And you will get text on white background. Additional postprocessing can help further.
This method works in the case if text is darker then the background (in each color component). Otherwise you can invert colors and apply this method.
If your image is captured as RGB, just use the green image or quickly convert the bayer pattern which is probably #misha's convert to greyscale solutions probably do.
Hope this helps someone
Using one line code you can get is using OpenCV and python
#Load image as Grayscale
im = cv2.imread('....../Downloads/Gd3oN.jpg',0)
#Use Adaptivethreshold with Gaussian
th = cv2.adaptiveThreshold(im,255,cv2.ADAPTIVE_THRESH_GAUSSIAN_C,cv2.THRESH_BINARY,11,2)
Here's the result
Here's the link for Image Thresholding in OpenCV