I would like to evaluate the features of pivot grid using simple test html without cmd.
I've read the information from those links but I still couldn't install a working environment
https://docs.sencha.com/extjs/6.0/co...ivot_grid.html
https://www.sencha.com/forum/showthr...out-Sencha-Cmd
http://se.sencha.com/setup-guide/
I've downloaded the core framework ('ext-6.0.1-trial.zip')
and pivot addon ('ext-addons-6.0.1-trial.zip') from sencha site
and unpacked them on my test web server:
www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/ <- framework
www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/package/ <- addon
and tested it calling the pivots in kitchensink example with:
www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/examples/kitchensink/index.html
in such setup they start without errors.
The target location of the addon is a bit strange for me,
I was sure I should unpack addon to the package directory of the framework
www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/package/
but then the kitchensink example doesn't work
(kitchensink calls pivot with ../../../package/pivot )
Now I wonder how should I include framework and addon in own html example,
I've tried something like:
<link href="www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/build/classic/theme-neptune/resources/theme-neptune-all.css">
<script src="www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/build/ext-all.js"></script>
<link href="www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/packages/pivot/build/neptune/resources/pivot-all.css">
<script src="www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/packages/pivot/build/pivot.js"'></script>
<script src="www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/packages/exporter/build/exporter.js"'></script>
The links are ok (no http error) but the simple pivot is not rendered
and framework couldn't load further classes:
[Ext.Loader] Some requested files failed to load.
What is the correct setup of extjs and pivot without cmd?
Thank you,
Annie
Couple things here.
For the KitchenSink, if you open up www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/ in your browser you will be shown an index.html. There will be a green button to show the examples which will point to www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/build/examples/index.html (notice the build dir in there). Then if you click on the KitchenSink it will load from www.mydummy.server.org/lib/extjs/ext-6.0.0/build/examples/kitchensink/ (once again, notice the build dir). This is due to the KitchenSink being a Cmd app which will build to that build dir. The examples dir outside the build dir is the development version of the app which is why we still provide it for the source.
Next, about how to use the pivot grid's Cmd package outside of the Cmd package. we build the Cmd package so if you look in the package's build dir you should see a built JavaScript and CSS file that you can load via <script> and <link> in your HTML.
<html>
<head>
<title>Pivot Grid Test</title>
<link href="http://releases/ext/6.0.1.250/build/classic/theme-neptune/resources/theme-neptune-all.css">
<script src="http://releases/ext/6.0.1.250/build/ext-all.js"></script>
<link href="http://localhost/ext-addons-6.0.1/packages/pivot/build/neptune/resources/pivot-all.css">
<script src="http://localhost/ext-addons-6.0.1/packages/exporter/build/exporter.js"></script>
<script src="http://localhost/ext-addons-6.0.1/packages/pivot/build/pivot.js"></script>
</head>
<body></body>
</html>
Notice I have the exporter.js loading before pivot.js and this mostly works except that I do see something that I'd call a bug for us. In pivot.js, we define Ext.ux.ajax.PivotSimlet which extends Ext.ux.ajax.JsonSimlet (which is in the framework's ux package). This is fine to extend like this but PivotSimlet would only be needed if you want to have simulated data in your application (which most wouldn't unless in dev). Two ways you can fix this, remove that class from pivot.js or include the ux's JavaScript/CSS (however that package contains a lot of code that you may not need).
Thanks a lot for your explanation.
I've added these classes to get an working example:
<script src="http://releases/ext/6.0.1.250/packages/ux/src/ajax/Simlet.js"</script>
<script src="http://releases/ext/6.0.1.250/packages/ux/src/ajax/DataSimlet.js"</script>
<script src="http://releases/ext/6.0.1.250/packages/ux/src/ajax/JsonSimlet.js"</script>
Related
I am trying to run my Dart app in Firefox (v22.0). Here is the app's homepage:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>My 1st Dart App</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/myapp/myapp/myapp.css">
</head>
<body>
<h2>Push the button!</h2>
<div id="sample_container_id">
<input type="button" id="someButton" value="Some Button!" />
</div>
<script type="application/dart" src="myapp.dart"></script>
<script src="packages/browser/dart.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
When I run this as-is, my app runs fine and does exactly what I want it to. But then if I strip out the first <script/> tag (<script type="application/dart" src="myapp.dart"></script>), none of the Dart code executes at runtime. For instance, I have a click handler configured on an HTML button like so:
void main() {
querySelector("#someButton").onClick.listen((e) => window.alert("Hello!"));
}
If I remove the first <script/> tag, then when I click someButton nothing happens.
(1) Why does removing the first <script/> tag "kill" the Dart code? I am using pub build to produce cross-compiled JavaScript, so why should Firefox care about my Dart source file (since FF 22.0 doesn't support Dart natively)?
(2) Does Dart have a recommended <DOCTYPE> declaration, such as transitional, etc.?
Short answer: Look into dart.js to find out what's going on.
Long answer: Dart.js will look for the script: application/dart, if it's running on a browser with DartVM (i.e.: Dartium) it will launch that. Otherwise it will take the script file myapp.dart and change the file to be myapp.dart.js and run that. By removing that script tag, you are removing your dart script which dart.js looks for and as a result your javascript compiled version is never inserted into your document.
Regarding DOCTYPE none is particularly recommended, however since Dart is generally designed for the latest versions of browser and in fact uses HTML5 tags where appropriate it would probably be best to use the HTML5 DOCTYPE as you have in your example.
1) Take a look at what packages/browser/dart.js does.
It first checks if the browser supports Dart, then if the browser does not support Dart, it looks for files with type application/dart and remaps them to point to the correct JavaScript file.
Since you removed your Dart script, dart.js doesn't find it and never remaps it to point to the JavaScript file.
2) Everything I've seen uses the HTML5 doctype: <!DOCTYPE html> but I don't think there is an official guideline.
packages/browser/dart.js checks if the DartVM is available, if not it replaces <script type="application/dart" src="xxx.dart"></script> with <script src="xxx.dart.js"></script>. Assuming you have run dart2js you can do that job manually by replacing the 2 script tags with only <script src="myapp.dart.js"></script>
there's no recommandation.
1) Firefox doesn't care about the Dart source file but pub build does.
If your HTML file doesn't contain a Dart script pub build can copy the file without any processing
otherwise pub build adds JavaScript code that executes instead of the Dart script when the browser doesn't
support Dart.
2) Your doctype is the correct HTML5 doctype and Dart works fine with it.
is there any reason for something to work in page inspector and not in real debug mode?
In particular I'm using fullcalendar.min.js (JQuery plugin) in some tab content and I see it very well in page inspector but when debug the calander is not shown..
in header:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="./../../Content/fullcalendar.css" type="text/css" media="all" />
<script src="./../../Scripts/js/fullcalendar.min.js"></script>
in body:
<section class="tab events-tab">
<section class="events-tab-inner">
<div id="calendar"></div>
</section>
</section>
in console of the web page loading I have the below errors (I'm not sure they are directly related to my calendar thing):
GET http://localhost:3516/SITE/css/images/star-off.png 404 (Not Found) jquery.min.js:2
Invalid App Id: Must be a number or numeric string representing the application id. all.js:56
event.returnValue is deprecated. Please use the standard event.preventDefault() instead. jquery.min.js:3
FB.getLoginStatus() called before calling FB.init(). all.js:56
GET http://localhost:3516/SITE/css/images/star-off.png 404 (Not Found) jquery.min.js:2
Based on your console output that you've included above, it seems that there are a few errors. Not sure why they would work in page inspector and not debug though. It seems like it should be breaking everywhere. Let's approach each error one by one:
1. Invalid Image Paths
It appears that you may be using jQuery UI for some features within your code. The jQuery UI suite contains images located in the /images directory when you download the .zip file that the CSS references as background-images. These images are expected to be nested on directory in from the location of the CSS file. For example,
[CSS Directory]
-> jquery-ui.min.css
[images]
-> star-off.png
-> ...
-> etc.
The only way to change this structure is to modify the relative urls within the minified jQuery UI CSS file.
2. Facebook JavaScript SDK error
I have never personally used the Facebook JavaScript SDK. However, that is what it appears you are using. From the error it sounds like you never initialize the Facebook object via FB.init() before you call FB.getLoginStatus(). Try this:
<script type="text/javascript">
/* Locate your FB.getLoginStatus() call and place FB.init() before it */
FB.init();
FB.getLoginStatus();
</script>
Other than that, you may need to refer to their documentation for how to properly initialize the FB object for use.
Hope this helps. Good luck and happy coding! :)
I am using asp.net mvc3. I have two script files on my web site like these:
<script type="text/jscript" src="/SiteName/lib/jquery/menus.js"></script>
<script type="text/jscript" src="/SiteName/lib/jquery/dialogs.js"></script>
These are real paths for these two .js files where the SiteName directory is on the root of my website.
Now when the site rendered, i want to be these pathes like:
<script type="text/jscript" src="/lib/jquery/menus.js"></script>
<script type="text/jscript" src="/lib/jquery/dialogs.js"></script>
As a result, the "SiteName" portion is deleted from the path! but really it is available!
Yet the browser must be able to load these scripts.
I think this must be done by routes.MapRoute or like these!
You can use BundleConfig to achieve this. You can create styles and script bundles that have a virtual path with the added benefit of minification. If you add multiple scripts into one bundle, it'll join and minify both into one virtual script. e.g.:
bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/lib/jquery").Include(
"~/SiteName/lib/jquery/menus.js",
"~/SiteName/lib/jquery/dialogs.js"));
On page render, it'll show up as:
<script type="text/javascript" src="~/lib/jquery"></script>
From memory this wasn't there by default in MVC3, but it looks pretty easy to implement if you refer to this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/12754108/769083
I have developed an Asp.Net MVC application in Visual Studio 2010. So far so good. In terms of path resolution for images and script execution, everything runs perfect within Visual Studio. As I am using the default template of MVC I am using "../../Script/*.js" kind of path. After I build the package for deployment and deploy in IIS, the images and the script references stop working. I think it might be a path resolution issue. I tried with "~/Script/.js" but it does not work either. Could somebody suggest why this is happening?
Consider using two things in any of your asp.net MVC projects.
1) Using a Layout for common site elements using _Layout.cshtml and include all your javascript and css files inside that and do not put it on the any other .cshtml pages unless necessary required. see here how to use _Layout.cshtml
2) Second thing always use #Url.Content() directive to define your paths e.g
<link href="#Url.Content("~/Content/Site.css")" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery-1.5.1.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/modernizr-1.7.min.js")" type="text/javascript"></script>
This two way always helps you and never have problem even if you deploy package.
Hope above helps.
This type of problem we get in asp.net when we use URL Rewriting and asp.net mvc have a URL Rewriting by default.
so when you use script or urls and js then you set your path like this .
#Url.Content("~/Your Url or Your script or Your js File ") ;
i think this will help you.
MVC has built in functions that generates url's, so use those instead of hard code url
#Url.Content("~/yourpath")
When you deploy your webapp onto IIS, your site is set to run as Virtual Directory so the website root is no longer the same as the application root, MVC has
ActionLinks,Url.Contents to resolve Url's.
MSDN help
I've setup an Admin area within MVC 3 application and while everything is working when I reference files from the root Scripts, Styles and Images folder, it doesn't work when I created those folders under /Areas/admin/ and referenced them like this:
#Script.Include("~/admin/Scripts/superfish-1.4.8/js/superfish.js")
Please note that this Script.Include helper is something that I have that essentially spits out this:
<script type="text/javascript" src="/admin/Scripts/superfish-1.4.8/js/superfish.js"></script>
So the helper is working and everything is fine when I reference like this
#Script.Include("~/Scripts/superfish-1.4.8/js/superfish.js")
but not when I introduce the area name in there. It results in a 404 Error.
That's because the actual path to your script is the following:
#Script.Include("~/areas/admin/Scripts/superfish-1.4.8/js/superfish.js")
which should render:
<script type="text/javascript" src="/areas/admin/Scripts/superfish-1.4.8/js/superfish.js"></script>
Notice the Areas prefix that I added.