I am trying to load an entity based on a Query and allow the user to edit it. The entity loads without issues from the query, however it does not load its related entities, leaving detail pickers unfilled when loading the edit screen.
This is the code that I have:
myapp.BrowseCOAMissingHoldingCompanies.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies_ItemTap_execute = function (screen) {
var accountName = screen.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies.selectedItem.AccountFullName;
return myapp.activeDataWorkspace.Accounting360Data.FindChartOfAccountsMappingByAccountName(accountName)
.execute().then(function (query) {
var coa = query.results[0];
return myapp.showAddEditChartOfAccountsMapping(coa, {
beforeShown: function (addEditScreen) {
addEditScreen.ChartOfAccountsMapping = coa;
},
afterClosed: function () {
screen.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies.refresh();
}
});
});
};
Interestingly if I open the browse screen (and nothing else) of that entity type first (which does retrieve the entity), then the related entities load correctly and everything works, but I can't figure out how to make that level of load happen in this code.
One method of tackling this (and to avoid the extra query execution of a follow on refresh) is to use the expand method to include any additional navigation properties as follows:
myapp.BrowseCOAMissingHoldingCompanies.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies_ItemTap_execute = function (screen) {
var accountName = screen.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies.selectedItem.AccountFullName;
return myapp.activeDataWorkspace.Accounting360Data.FindChartOfAccountsMappingByAccountName(
accountName
).expand(
"RelatedEntity," +
"AnotherRelatedEntity," +
"AnotherRelatedEntity/SubEntity"
).execute().then(function (query) {
var coa = query.results[0];
return myapp.showAddEditChartOfAccountsMapping(coa, {
beforeShown: function (addEditScreen) {
addEditScreen.ChartOfAccountsMapping = coa;
},
afterClosed: function () {
screen.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies.refresh();
}
});
});
}
As you've not mentioned the name of your entity's navigational properties, I've used coa.RelatedEntity, coa.AnotherRelatedEntity and coa.AnotherRelatedEntity.SubEntity in the above example.
As covered by LightSwitch's intellisense (in msls-?.?.?-vsdoc.js) this method 'Expands results by including additional navigation properties using an expression defined by the OData $expand system query option' and it accepts a single parameter of 'An OData expand expression (a comma-separated list of names of navigation properties)'.
The reason your forced refresh of coa also populates the navigational properties is that LightSwitch's refresh method implicitly expands all navigation properties (provided you don't specify the navigationPropertyNames parameter when calling the refresh). The following shows the internal implementation of the LightSwitch refresh method (with the implicit expand behaviour executing if the navigationPropertyNames parameter is null):
function refresh(navigationPropertyNames) {
var details = this,
properties = details.properties.all(),
i, l = properties.length,
property,
propertyEntry,
query;
if (details.entityState !== _EntityState.unchanged) {
return WinJS.Promise.as();
}
if (!navigationPropertyNames) {
navigationPropertyNames = [];
for (i = 0; i < l; i++) {
property = properties[i];
propertyEntry = property._entry;
if (isReferenceNavigationProperty(propertyEntry) &&
!isVirtualNavigationProperty(propertyEntry)) {
navigationPropertyNames.push(propertyEntry.serviceName);
}
}
}
query = new _DataServiceQuery(
{
_entitySet: details.entitySet
},
details._.__metadata.uri);
if (navigationPropertyNames.length > 0) {
query = query.expand(navigationPropertyNames.join(","));
}
return query.merge(msls.MergeOption.unchangedOnly).execute();
}
However, if you take the refresh approach, you'll be performing an additional unnecessary query operation.
Entity Framework uses lazy loading by default, so related data will be loaded on demand, but in your case that's too late because the entity is already client-side a that point.
Try using the Include method in your query if you want eager loading.
Calling refresh on the details of the entity seems to do it:
return coa.details.refresh().then(function() {
return myapp.showAddEditChartOfAccountsMapping(coa, {
beforeShown: function (addEditScreen) {
addEditScreen.ChartOfAccountsMapping = coa;
},
afterClosed: function () {
screen.VW_ChartOfAccountsWithMissingHoldingCompanies.refresh();
}
});
});
You should use load method to fetch related data from Server. At this time we don't have any ways to force msls load related data.
Related
Is there a way to hide some Functions/Operators in the Row Filter of APEX 19.1's Interactive Report? Some end-users get confused with as many functions/operators that they do not used.
Thanks for any considerations.
While APEX doesn't support this out of the box, it is doable with JavaScript. Every time the filter dialog is displayed, content is brought from the server to the client and injected into the DOM. You just need to modify the content before the user can see it. One way to achieve this is by using the MutationObserver interface: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MutationObserver
Here are some steps you could follow to do it (tested in APEX 19.2):
Go to the Interactive Report and set the Static ID to my-irr.
Go to the page level attributes and add the following code to the Function and Global Variable Declaration field:
function removeIRFilterOperators() {
var irRegId = 'my-irr';
var filterOperatorsToRemove = ['!=', 'ABS'];
var observer;
function detectFilterDialog(mutationsList) {
for (var mIdx = 0; mIdx < mutationsList.length; mIdx++) {
if (mutationsList[mIdx].addedNodes.length &&
mutationsList[mIdx].addedNodes[0].classList &&
mutationsList[mIdx].addedNodes[0].classList.contains('a-IRR-dialog--filter')) {
removeOperators();
}
}
}
function removeOperators() {
var anchors = document.querySelectorAll('#' + irRegId + '_row_filter_operators a');
for (var aIdx = 0; aIdx < anchors.length; aIdx++) {
if (filterOperatorsToRemove.includes(anchors[aIdx].textContent)) {
anchors[aIdx].parentElement.parentElement.removeChild(anchors[aIdx].parentElement);
}
}
}
observer = new MutationObserver(detectFilterDialog);
observer.observe(
document,
{
attributes: false,
childList: true,
subtree: true
}
);
}
removeIRFilterOperators();
The MutationObverver uses the detectFilterDialog function to detect when the filter dialog is added to the DOM. When that happens, the removeOperators function removes the specified options from the operator's list. All you need to do is update the filterOperatorsToRemove array to include the list of operators you want to remove.
If you're talking about the "Actions" menu, then yes - go to IR's attributes and enable/disable any option you want:
I am working with Angular Meteor and am having an issue with my objects/arrays. I have this code:
angular.module("learn").controller("CurriculumDetailController", ['$scope', '$stateParams', '$meteor',
function($scope, $stateParams, $meteor){
$scope.curriculum = $meteor.object(CurriculumList, $stateParams.curriculumId);
$scope.resources = _.map($scope.curriculum.resources, function(obj) {
return ResourceList.findOne({_id:obj._id})
});
console.log($scope.resources)
}]);
I am attempting to iterate over 'resources', which is a nested array in the curriculum object, look up each value in the 'ResourceList' collection, and return the new array in the scope.
Problem is, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt. When I load up the page and access it through a UI-router link. I get the array as expected. But if the page is refreshed, $scope.resources is an empty array.
My thought is there is something going on with asynchronous calls but have not been able for find a solution. I still have the autopublish package installed. Any help would be appreciated.
What you're going to do is return a cursor containing all the information you want, then you can work with $meteor.object on the client side if you like. Normally, publishComposite would look something like this: (I don't know what your curriculum.resources looks like)
Use this method if the curriculum.resources has only ONE id:
// this takes the place of the publish method
Meteor.publishComposite('curriculum', function(id) {
return {
find: function() {
// Here you are getting the CurriculumList based on the id, or whatever you want
return CurriculumList.find({_id: id});
},
children: [
{
find: function(curr) {
// (curr) will be each of the CurriculumList's found from the parent query
// Normally you would do something like this:
return ResourceList.find(_id: curr.resources[0]._id);
}
}
]
}
})
This method if you have multiple resources:
However, since it looks like your curriculum is going to have a resources list with one or many objects with id's then we need to build the query before returning anything. Try something like:
// well use a function so we can send in an _id
Meteor.publishComposite('curriculum', function(id){
// we'll build our query before returning it.
var query = {
find: function() {
return CurriculumList.find({_id: id});
}
};
// now we'll fetch the curriculum so we can access the resources list
var curr = CurriculumList.find({_id: id}).fetch();
// this will pluck the ids from the resources and place them into an array
var rList = _.pluck(curr.resources, '_id');
// here we'll iterate over the resource ids and place a "find" object into the query.children array.
query.children = [];
_.each(rList, function(id) {
var childObj = {
find: function() {
return ResourceList.find({_id: id});
}
};
query.children.push(childObj)
})
return query;
});
So what should happen here (I didn't test) is with one publish function you will be getting the Curriculum you want, plus all of it's resourceslist children.
Now you will have access to these on the client side.
$scope.curriculum = $meteor.object(CurriculumList, $stateParams.curriculumId);
// collection if more than one, object if only one.
$scope.resources = $meteor.collection(ResoursesList, false);
This was thrown together somewhat quickly so I apologize if it doesn't work straight off, any trouble I'll help you fix.
I'm at a bit of an impasse. I am working in Domino with xPages and I am trying to allow full text searching through a view including response documents but including the parent document for any responses that match the query in the view or data table. Currently I'm just using the search term in a view datasource, and then using that datasource in a view control, but any workable solution would be welcome. There may be additional search criteria on the parent document.
Any ideas?
Richard,
you can't directly use the view as data source, so you won't use the view control. You can use the data table or (probably better, since it gives you full layout control) the repeat control.
Run the search against the view in code:
var v = database.getView("yourView")
//var result = database.FTSearch(...)
var result = v.FTSearchSorted(...) // or FTSearch
var datasource = [];
var parent;
for (var doc in result) {
addResult(doc, datasource);
if (doc.isResponseDoc()) {
parent = doc.getParentDocument();
addResult(parent, datasource);
// Careful here - if the parent is part of the resultset on its own
parent.recycle();
}
doc.recycle();
}
try {
result.recycle();
v.recycle();
} catch (e) {
// We suffer silently
}
return datasource;
function addResult(doc, datasource) {
var oneResult = {};
//Adjust that to your needs
oneResult.subject = doc.getItemValueString("Subject");
oneResult.unid = doc.getUniversalId();
datasource.push(oneResult);
}
See the FTSearchSorted documentation. I typed the code off my head, so there might be little syntax snafus, ut you get the idea Don't return documents or Notes objects to the XPage and use recycle() wisely.
I'm working on an ASP.Net MVC application. My action is returning a view with a model that is an array of objects (a class with properties like Name, ID, IsViewable).
var model = #Model.ToJson(); // done via extension call
I want to observe this array, so whenever it changes I can update a table that has been bound to a template.
var viewModel = {
accounts = ko.observableArray(model)
}
This works just fine for adding and deleting elements from the array. However, I also want the template to update when a property in one of the accounts changes (ie, Name or ID).
On the KnockoutJS website, it says: Of course, you can make those properties observable if you wish, but that’s an independent choice. This is what I cannot figure out how to do.
I tried something like this with no avail:
var viewModel = {
accounts = ko.oservableArray([])
}
for(var i = 0; i < model.length; i++) {
ko.observableArray(model[i]);
viewModel.accounts.push(model[i]);
}
I can post the template and the table if it's needed.
You should look into the knockout.mapping plugin. I think it does everything you are looking to do.
I ended up getting this to work, so I thought I would share with anyone that might have having the same problem.
You need to wrap your array items in a JavaScript class. Then in the constructor, set each property to obserable:
var model = #Model.ToJson();
var viewModel = {
accounts = ko.observableArray(ko.utils.arrayMap(model, function(account) {
return new AccountWrapper(account);
}))
};
function AccountWrapper(account) {
this.Property1 = ko.observable(account.Propery1);
this.Property2 = ko.observable(account.Propery2);
this.Property3 = ko.observable(account.Propery3);
}
ko.applyBindings(viewModel);
And if you want to modify one of the items directly to see the change, you could do something like:
viewModel.accounts()[3].Name('My Name Changed');
And you can still get notified when items are added or remove:
viewModel.accounts.remove(viewModel.accounts()[4]);
Here's another approach that works and doesn't require the mapping plugin:
var model = #Model.ToJson();
var viewModel = {
accounts: ko.observableArray([]),
fromJS: function(js) {
for (var i = 0; i < js.length; i++) {
this.accounts.push({
Property1: ko.observable(js[i].Property1),
Property2: ko.observable(js[i].Property2),
Property3: ko.observable(js[i].Property3)
});
}
}
};
viewModel.fromJS(model);
ko.applyBindings(viewModel);
I have a couple of tables with similar relationship structure to the standard Order, OrderLine tables.
When creating a data context, it gives the Order class an OrderLines property that should be populated with OrderLine objects for that particular Order object.
Sure, by default it will delay load the stuff in the OrderLine property but that should be fairly transparent right?
Ok, here is the problem I have: I'm getting an empty list when I go MyOrder.OrderLines but when I go myDataContext.OrderLines.Where(line => line.OrderId == 1) I get the right list.
public void B()
{
var dbContext = new Adis.CA.Repository.Database.CaDataContext(
"<connectionString>");
dbContext.Connection.Open();
dbContext.Transaction = dbContext.Connection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
//!!!Edit: Imortant to note that the order with orderID=1 already exists
//!!!in the database
//just add some new order lines to make sure there are some
var NewOrderLines = new List<OrderLines>()
{
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=300 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=301 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=302 },
new OrderLine() { OrderID=1, LineID=303 }
};
dbContext.OrderLines.InsertAllOnSubmit(NewOrderLines);
dbContext.SubmitChanges();
//this will give me the 4 rows I just inserted
var orderLinesDirect = dbContext.OrderLines
.Where(orderLine => orderLine.OrderID == 1);
var order = dbContext.Orders.Where(order => order.OrderID == 1);
//this will be an empty list
var orderLinesThroughOrder = order.OrderLines;
}
catch (System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException e)
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
throw;
}
finally
{
dbContext.Transaction.Rollback();
dbContext.Dispose();
dbContext = null;
}
}
So as far as I can see, I'm not doing anything particularly strange but I would think that orderLinesDirect and orderLinesThroughOrder would give me the same result set.
Can anyone tell me why it doesn't?
You're just adding OrderLines; not any actual Orders. So the Where on dbContext.Orders returns an empty list.
How you can still find the property OrderLines on order I don't understand, so I may be goofing up here.
[Edit]
Could you update the example to show actual types, especially of the order variable? Imo, it shoud be an IQueryable<Order>, but it's strange that you can .OrderLines into that. Try adding a First() or FirstOrDefault() after the Where.