I have a Parse application that will soon be used in production, and I need to be able to continue developing things locally without breaking things for live users when I make changes to cloud code.
I have cloned the app, and can now deploy to either the production or staging app using the parse deploy staging and parse deploy production commands, however these commands only work if I am on the master branch.
What I would like to have are two branches in git, one that can be pushed to my staging app, and the other that can be pushed to the production app.
At the moment all I can think of doing is to just tag commits in master as being pushed to production, then continue ontop of that for development, but that is going to be a nightmare if I need to patch the released app when I have all my development changes on master.
Pushing directly to the heroku git repos doesn't seem to work either, parse deploy must be doing something extra (plus it tries to build the app so I can see when things go wrong).
Another issue is that when other developers start working on this as well, we won't be able to all deploy to the development server, and as far as I know there isn't an easy way to run parse cloud code locally on windows.
What is the best way to manage all this?
You have to setup parse-server (use parse-server-example), parse-dashboard and mongoDB on a local or remote development server. You and your team can now develop everything locally, test and then deploy to production.
Related
I'm beginning to understand how Heroku works, but haven't yet used a pipeline. I have an app I'm working on that is near its first production version. I'd like to begin using pipelines.
But I don't understand how to begin. What do I need to do to make a copy of the current app and have that copy be in the development stage and make another copy for the staging stage? Do I fork my git repository twice and add each one?
I'm trying to take this one step at a time. I don't need GitHub integration yet. This is a small project and will not have any pull requests for quite some time, if ever. I'm only interested in the ability to develop, stage and release in the three stages offered by Heroku.
While pipelines do use multiple apps, they should use the same git repository with different remotes. Heroku's help page helped me understand that the process is to link the repository to each app different remote names and then push to the remote that I'm currently working on.
I'm somewhat new to maintaining separate production vs development builds of an app.
I want to have my current build deployed to heroku so i can easily get it in front of people for critique but I'd also like to run a local version as well so i can make changes and see them quickly on the fly.
With my app on heroku, everytime i make a change, I have to push to github then hit the deploy button. This takes a relatively long amount of time compared to just launching the app on localhost and just refreshing the browser page to see how the changes came out. This is fine if you have made a ton of changes and you know they all work as expected, but its horrible for trying incremental changes, as you can imagine.
I know this is sort of a newbie question, but how can I have the best of both worlds?
The only way to achieve something like this is with review apps.
Instead of doing a git push, you will need to enable GitHub Sync. You will be able to deploy either through the heroku dashboard, or automatically when a push is made to master.
Review apps will automatically create a test app and configure it, for each pull request.
Then, when you wish to do QA with other people, you just have to give them the address to that review app where the new code is deployed instead of the main one.
Is there any CI/CD tool for Netezza that can manage versions and can be used for migrating code across environments? We have used flywaydb for other databases and are happy with it, but that does not support Netezza. I have already googled and did not find a single tool, so any responses are good for me to begin analyzing further
To my knowledge, there's nothing specifically geared for Netezza. That said, with a bit of understanding of your target environment, it's certainly possible.
We use git and GitHub Enterprise (GHE). The reason for GHE is not particular to this solution, but rather because I work at a hospital. Here's what we do.
Setup
Build a repository at /home/nz on your production server. Depending on how you work nzlogs, nzbads, and other temporary files, you may need to fiddle quite a bit with the .gitignore file. We have dedicated log directories where temporary files should reside.
Push that repo into GHE.
If you have a development server, clone the repo in the /home/nz directory on that server. Clearly you'll lose all development work up until that point and will want to make sure that things like .bashrc are not versioned. Alternatively, you could set up a different branch and repo and try merging the prod and dev versions. We did this, but I'd recommend just wiping your development box with production code one slow day.
Assign your production box a dedicated branch in git. For this discussion, I'll call them prod and dev. Do the same for development, if you have it. This is mainly a mental thing, not a tech thing, but it's crucial, like setting up a remote for Heroku or Azure.
Find or develop a tiny web server that can listen for GitHub webhooks. I built a Sinatra server with a simple configuration file. Anything will do. Deploy the web server to each of the environments and tune them to perform the following activities on an update to the prod or dev branches, respective to the server.
git reset --hard
git clean -f
git pull
Set up webhooks in your GHE repository to send the push event to the web servers.
Of course, you can always have the web server do other things on a branch update if you want to get fancy (maybe update cron from a versioned file or update schemas from all new files).
Process
Fairly simply, follow the GitHub Flow workflow. You can pretty much follow whatever process you want with the understanding that your prod and dev branches should be protected and only removed or futzed with as an admin task. Create a feature branch, test it by pushing to dev, and then make a pull request for the prod branch.
Why GHE? Mainly because it keeps an open area where our code is available. You could absolutely do this by pushing directly to Netezza's git repo, but your workflow will suffer--it just isn't as clean as having all code in one clear place with discussion around pull requests.
In starting a new project, I put together the skeleton for a Node app that has tests and generates some build artifacts, like asset compilation and compression. I have the tests running in Codeship so successful builds initiate a deploy to Heroku. They've made it all super easy, except I can't find any way to deploy built files, just a copy of what's in the repo.
Has anyone done this successfully? I feel like writing a custom deploy script to rebuild the assets after the tests and manually deploy them would be working against the existing toolset, and I know can't possibly be the first person to want to do this...
Turns out that Codeship doesn't keep anything, in fact, different servers do the deployment than the testing. It seems that the best-practice here is to recreate the assets on the Heroku side with a custom buildpack, which, directly after the git pull, does the dependency installation and compiles the app slug.
I am creating a very small and clean meteor app and have recently updated to v0.9 of meteor to be able to get rid of meteorite as "package manager".
For me it is really important in a way not to have any deployment specific stuff wired up into the sourcecode if it is possible.
What I am trying to do in a way is to have a good and clean Continuous Integration running. Right now I am using Codeship to run the tests and then push to heroku. But since I updated top meteor v0.9 there not seems to be a working buildpack.
Is it a reasonable way to create a buildpack on my own? That one would not have to do more than just install node, npm and meteor. Or is there another way to have the app bundled on a "build server" (can codeship do that?) and then have it somehow pushed to heroku as normal node.js app with all the necessities and dependencies?
Concerning the buildpack way:
I have been trying to install meteor via
curl https://install.meteor.com | /bin/sh
But when I run
meteor deploy --directory deploy
I get
bundle: You're not in a Meteor project directory.
This buildpack (which I authored) works for meteor >0.9 using meteor's native packager; no meteorite:
https://github.com/AdmitHub/meteor-buildpack-horse
You could start off with the existing buildpack (or one of the many forks of it).
It should be relatively easy without meteorite since you would no longer have to worry about it, its just getting rid of meteorite and updating the version of node. https://github.com/oortcloud/heroku-buildpack-meteorite
Regarding deploying to heroku. meteor deploy is meant to deploy to *.meteor.com or via Meteor's upcoming commercial product. Deploying to heroku is also relatively easy.
Deploying to heroku is setting up the buildpack, adding the git remote and git pushing to it. Also easy, perhaps easier, than meteor deploy.
During the git push process heroku will take your meteor app, bundle it, download node and run it (as in the buildpack). It's quite easy that way. One nice thing without meteorite is I imagine the build process is much faster.