I am thinking about creating a multi-module project in maven, with one plugin module (i.e. this module is used as a plugin in other projects, not a dependency).
Question: Is it feasible to have a plugin as a module in a multi module maven project?
It is feasible and it is also documented on the official maven multi-module/reactor page concerning how having a plugin as module is handled by the build (bold is mine):
Because modules within a multi-module build can depend on each other, it is important that The reactor sorts all the projects in a way that guarantees any project is built before it is required.
The following relationships are honoured when sorting projects:
a project dependency on another module in the build
a plugin declaration where the plugin is another modules in the build
a plugin dependency on another module in the build
[..]
Once the plugin is installed and deployed, it will then not bring with it any knowledge of its module nature, that is, it will be seen as a normal plugin by the projects that will use it via its unique maven coordinates (GAV).
The same is applied to archetypes, which can be modules of a multi module project and then be used individually.
Also note that you can have - as an example - an aggregator project of projects (then modules) completely unrelated between each other, and, say, just aggregate then because you want to build them all together (often not really meaningful, but useful in some cases).
Related
I want to publish a common build script which i will include across various projects in my application.
This will contain only the common set of dependencies, i.e dependencies with particular versions that will be common across all the artifacts in my enterprise application..
My applications will refer to this file from the url.
How can i achieve this?
EDIT1: my exploration in this direction is based on this answer on SO:
How to share a common build.gradle via a repository?
There are a few different options for this.
One is to publish a project with the dependencies you want to share defined as API dependencies. Projects that depend on this will inherit the dependencies.
Or you could write and publish a Gradle plugin that will configure your projects with the common dependencies. Projects can apply the plugin, and will automatically be configured in a certain way. (You don't need to publish a plugin to do this - first try creating a project-local buildSrc convention plugin.)
I would actually recommend neither of these approaches.
It's easy to get into a tangled web of dependency hell when transitive dependencies are inherited. It's likely that at some point some dependency will clash, and excluding dependencies can be a big headache, and will easily cancel out any benefit in trying to reduce a little duplication.
Additionally, it's nice when a project is explicit about its dependencies. Being able to look at a build.gradle.kts and understand exactly what dependencies are set is very convenient.
Instead, what I would recommend is controlling the versions of common dependencies in a central location. This can be achieved with the Java Platform plugin. This plugin can be applied to a single build.gradle.kts file, and it lists all versions of all possible dependencies. (It can also import existing Maven BOMs, like the Spring Boot BOM).
Now, all subprojects can add a platform dependency on the 'Java Platform' project.
dependencies {
// import the platform from a Maven repo
implementation(platform("my.company:my-shared-platform:1.2.3"))
// or import a platform from a local project
implementation(platform(":my-project:version-platform"))
// no need to define a version, if it's defined in the platform
implementation("com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind")
}
This is the best of both worlds. Projects can be explicit about their dependencies, retain autonomy, while the versions can be aligned across independent projects.
I have three Java projects. The first is an application, com.foo:foo-application:1.0.0, and the second is a module used as a dependency to that application, com.foo:foo-framework:1.0.0. The third is a Maven plugin authored by our team, com.foo:foo-plugin:1.0.0.
My intention is that any project, e.g. foo-application, which uses classes available in foo-framework must also validate that it has used those classes correctly, where said validation is enforced by foo-plugin.
Is there a way to enforce this behaviour within foo-framework's POM.xml, whereby any Maven module which declares it as a dependency in its own POM will have foo-plugin executed as part of its build lifecycle?
No (at least no way that I'm aware of).
when you declare a dependency on something, youre declaring a dependency on its output artifacts (and transitively their dependencies as optionally described in that artifact's pom.xml file). There's no place in a pom file to force anything on the build importing it - the build importing it may not even be a maven build.
it appears you may be able to do something similar via other tools though - for example checkstyle supports discovering rules from dependencies on the classpath (not exactly what you want and depends on users of your library running checkstyle configured just right)
I have the following Java projects structure:
Util
|
-- Core
|
-- Services
|
-- Tools
The projects: Tools and Services references to Core and Util projects, the thing is that I ended up writing the same dependency over each project, there must be a better way to inherit the dependencies of the referenced projects and add new ones if needed.
I know about multi projects in Gradle, but this is not like a multi project, since I can basically take the Core library, compile it (which will then contain Core + Util libs) and use it in another project.
I wonder what would be the best way to approach this?
Repeating the same dependencies in every project is usually reasonable because in a bigger project you'll never know when they become different, and you don't want to deal with compilation/runtime problems when someone changes common dependencies list.
I believe that it is more pragmatic to add dependency analyser plugin to your build. It will help you to remove unnecessary dependencies and explicitly add transitive dependencies. And if you add this plugin to your build chain, it will help you to keep your dependencies healthy in the future. Pick this plugin here gradle-dependency-analyze, or maybe there is a better fork or equivalent somewhere.
You are actually out of options in your case because there are only two kinds of dependencies: (1) external (some other jar artefact) or (2) internal (another module in a multimodule build).
2.1 When you use an external maven-like dependency it will come to you with own dependencies (they are named "transitive dependencies"). It means that if you do compile 'yourgroup:Core:1.0' then you will get Util as a transitive dependency. But as I mentioned above, it is better to list transitive dependencies explicitly if they are used during compilation or to prevent them from being accidentally removed and crash your application in runtime.
2.2. If your projects live in the same version control repository and usually change and build together, then the multimodule layout is your best choice. In this case, you will refer to Core dependency like compile project(':Util:Core') and it will grab Util as a transitive dependency as well. And you will be able to do what you asked for and define dependencies for Services and Tools once - inside subprojects {} closure in the Core/build.gradle.
Having multimodule built doesn't limit you from using Core library elsewhere. No matter if it is a multimodule build or not, you can always add maven-publish plugin to Core/build.gradle, execute publishToMavenLocal task and reference to Core.jar from another project the same way you do for external dependencies.
You can always put your common code (like the one which will add common dependencies) in the external gradle file or custom plugin and apply it in Services and Tools.
I have a situation at the moment where I have:
Project A which is built into a fat jar using Maven assembly plugin.
Project B which uses the jar built in Project A. It is added to the project as a resource and launched in a separate process using a process builder.
I wonder if it's possible to achieve similar behaviour using just one Maven project. I.e build the jar containing only the classes and dependencies required for project A, and then build the rest of the project with the prebuilt jar.
Sorry if I'm not being very clear here.
This is against a few of Maven's core concepts:
One project, one model (POM). Two projects (A, B), two models (POMs).
There's one artifactId in a POM. What is a second artifact (jar) supposed to be named?
One project leads to one artifact. There is no additional "prebuilt jar" built within the very same project.
Dependencies are for the whole project (and possible sub-module projects). I'm not aware of how to "containing only the classes and dependencies required for project A".
Artifacts are stored:
in <project>/target temporarily
in the local Maven repository (default: ~/.m2/repository)
possibly in a remote Maven repository
... while resources are taken from <project>/src/main/resources during the build.
There might be some tricky solutions (which have possibly pitfalls, too) to achieve this if one thinks about it thoroughly. But I'd never ever recommend such.
Very new to Maven, can someone please explain to me the difference between using maven modules vs just adding a dependency to your maven project to another maven project in your workspace? When would you use one over the other?
A dependency is a pre-built entity. You get the artifact for that dependency from Maven Central (or Nexus or the like.) It is common to use dependencies for code that belongs to other teams or projects. For example, suppose you need a CSV library in Android. You'd pull it as a dependency.
A Maven module gets built just like your project does. It is common to use Maven modules for components that the project owns. For example, maybe your project creates three jar files.
A dependency can be thought of as a lib/jar (aka Artifact in Maven parlance) that you need to use for building and/or running your code.
This artifact can either be built by your one of the modules of your multi module project or a third party pre-build library (for example log4j).
One of the concepts of maven is that each module is going to output a single artifact (say a jar). So in case of a complex project it is good idea to split your project to multiple modules. And these modules can be dependent on each other via declared dependencies.
See http://books.sonatype.com/mvnex-book/reference/multimodule-sect-intro.html for example of how a web app is split to parent and child modules and how they are linked.
One of the most confusing aspects of Maven is the fact that the parent pom can act as both a parent and as an aggregator.
99% of the functionality you think about in Maven is the parent pom aspect, where you inherit things like repositories, plugins, and most importantly, dependencies.
Dependencies are hard, tangible relationships between your libs that are evaluated during each build. If you think of your software as a meal, it's basically saying A requires ingredient B.
So let's say you're preparing lasagne. Then your dependency chain would look something like this:
lasagne
<- meatSauce
<- groundBeef
<- tomatoPaste
<- cheese
<- noodles
The key thing is, each of the above items (meatSause, groundBeef, cheese, etc) are individual builds that have their individual set of dependencies.
By contrast, the only section of your pom that pertains to aggregation is the modules section:
<modules>
<module>meatSauce</module>
<module>groundBeef</module>
<module>tomatoPaste</module>
<module>cheese</module>
<module>noodles</module>
</modules>
Aggregation simply tells your build engine that it should run these 5 builds in rapid succession:
groundBeef -> tomatoPaste -> cheese -> noodles -> meatSauce
The main benefit of aggregation is the convenience (just click build once) and ensuring the builds are in the correct order (e.g. you wouldn't want to build meatSauce before tomatoPaste).
Here's the thing though: even if you organize the libs as standalone projects without module aggregation, your build will still come out the same provided you build in the correct order.
Moreover, both Jenkins and Eclipse have mechanisms for triggering builds if a dependent project has changed (e.g. changing groundBeef will automatically trigger meatSauce).
Therefore if you're building out of Jenkins or Eclipse, there is no need for aggregation