Situation
using Cake 3.2.6
in my CostItemsTable,
I have a buildRules function
/**
* Returns a rules checker object that will be used for validating
* application integrity.
*
* #param \Cake\ORM\RulesChecker $rules The rules object to be modified.
* #return \Cake\ORM\RulesChecker
*/
public function buildRules(RulesChecker $rules)
{
$rules->add($rules->existsIn(['foreign_model_id'], 'ForeignModels'));
return $rules;
}
What I want
My CostItems Entity has 2 fields called foreign_model and foreign_model_id.
foreign_model_id acts as the foreign key. foreign_model acts as the Table that will be Parent to the CostItems table.
so a typical record can have foreign_model as GeneralCostCategories and foreign_model_id as 1.
What I tried
I tried to log the $this inside the buildRules function but I find nothing useful that allows me to dynamically change this rule.
$rules->add($rules->existsIn(['foreign_model_id'], 'ForeignModels'));
to
$rules->add($rules->existsIn(['foreign_model_id'], $entity->foreign_model));
There are various ways to solve this, here's two of them.
* It should be noted that the following is all untested example code!
Custom rules
You could implement a custom rule, either as a callback, or as a rule class, where the entity is going to be passed to, and then run the exists check accordingly with the data from the entity.
callback
use Cake\Datasource\EntityInterface;
use Cake\ORM\Rule\ExistsIn;
// ...
$rules->add(
function (EntityInterface $entity, array $options) {
$check = new ExistsIn(['foreign_model_id'], $entity->get('foreign_model'));
return $check($entity, $options);
},
'_existsIn',
[
'errorField' => 'foreign_model_id',
'message' => __d('cake', 'This value does not exist')
]
);
custom rule class, src/Model/Rule/MyExitsIn.php
namespace App\Model\Rule;
use Cake\Datasource\EntityInterface;
use Cake\ORM\Rule\ExistsIn;
class MyExistsIn extends ExistsIn
{
public function __construct($fields)
{
parent::__construct($fields, null);
}
public function __invoke(EntityInterface $entity, array $options)
{
$this->_repository = $entity->get('foreign_model');
return parent::__invoke($entity, $options);
}
}
use App\Model\Rule\MyExistsIn;
// ...
$rules->add(
new MyExistsIn(['foreign_model_id']),
'_existsIn',
[
'errorField' => 'foreign_model_id',
'message' => __d('cake', 'This value does not exist')
]
);
Build rules on the fly
Or use the Model.beforeRules event, which receives the entity too, and modify the rules checker object on the fly.
in your table class
use Cake\Datasource\EntityInterface;
use Cake\Event\Event;
// ...
public function beforeRules(Event $event, EntityInterface $entity, \ArrayObject $options, $operation)
{
/* #var $rulesChecker \Cake\ORM\RulesChecker */
$rulesChecker = $this->rulesChecker();
$rulesChecker->add(
$rulesChecker->existsIn(['foreign_model_id'], $entity->get('foreign_model'))
);
}
See also
Cookbook > Database Access & ORM > Validation > Creating a Rules Checker
Cookbook > Database Access & ORM > Validation > Creating Custom Rule objects
Cookbook > Database Access & ORM > Table Objects > Lifecycle Callbacks > beforeRules
Related
In laravel 9 app I want to add additive paramerer into Resource and looking at this
Laravel 5.6 - Pass additional parameters to API Resource?
branch I remade in app/Http/Resources/CurrencyResource.php :
<?php
namespace App\Http\Resources;
use App\Library\Services\DateFunctionalityServiceInterface;
use Illuminate\Http\Resources\Json\JsonResource;
use App;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\File;
use Spatie\Image\Image;
use App\Http\Resources\MediaImageResource;
class CurrencyResource extends JsonResource
{
protected $show_default_image = false;
public function showDefaultImage($value){
$this->show_default_image = $value;
return $this;
}
/**
* Transform the resource into an array.
*
* #param \Illuminate\Http\Request $request
*
* #return array
*/
public function toArray($request)
{
$dateFunctionality = App::make(DateFunctionalityServiceInterface::class);
$currencyImage = [];
$currencyMedia = $this->getFirstMedia(config('app.media_app_name'));
if ( ! empty($currencyMedia) and File::exists($currencyMedia->getPath())) {
$currencyImage['url'] = $currencyMedia->getUrl();
$imageInstance = Image::load($currencyMedia->getUrl());
$currencyImage['width'] = $imageInstance->getWidth();
$currencyImage['height'] = $imageInstance->getHeight();
$currencyImage['size'] = $currencyMedia->size;
$currencyImage['file_title'] = $currencyMedia->file_name;
}
else {
\Log::info( varDump($this->show_default_image, ' -1 $this->show_default_image::') );
$currencyImage['url'] = $this->show_default_image ? '/images/default-currency.jpg' : '';
}
// $currencyMedia = $currency->getFirstMedia(config('app.media_app_name'));
return [
'id' => $this->id,
'name' => $this->name,
...
and with code in control :
'currency' => (new CurrencyResource($currency))->showDefaultImage(false),
its work ok, but I got an error :
Method Illuminate\Support\Collection::showDefaultImage does not exist.
when I applyed this method for collection:
return (CurrencyResource::collection($currencies))->showDefaultImage(true);
But in link above there is a similar way :
UserResource::collection($users)->foo('bar');
What is wrong in my code and how that can be fixed ?
Thanks!
I wonder if there is a reason you can't use this approach: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51689732/8485567
Then you can simply use the request parameters to modify your response.
If you really want to get that example working in that way, it seems you are not following the example correctly.
You need to override the static collection method inside your CurrencyResource class:
public static function collection($resource){
return new CurrencyResourceCollection($resource);
}
You also need to create the CurrencyResourceCollection class and define the showDefaultImage method and $show_default_image property on that class as in the example you referred to.
Then you should be able to do:
CurrencyResource::collection($currencies)->showDefaultImage(true);
The reason the way you are doing it doesn't work is because you haven't defined the static collection method on your resource hence it's defaulting to the normal behavior of returning a default collection object as you can see in your error message.
I have a Printer model which has a page_count field..
the user will be able to input the current page_count...
the new page_count must be greater than the existing data in the database... How can I do that?
I had the same issue solved like this, though someone already gave the solution in the comments section.
/**
* #param array $data
* validates and Stores the application data
*
*/
public function sendMoney(Request $request)
{
//get the value to be validated against
$balance = Auth::user()->balance;
$validator = Validator::make($request->all(), [
'send_to_address' => 'required',
'amount_to_send' => 'required|max:'.$balance.'|min:0.01|numeric',
]);
//some logic goes here
}
Depending on your use case you could modify...
Happy Coding
Assuming you have Printer model which contains the page_count column.
You can define a custom validation rule in your AppServiceProvider's boot() method.
public function boot()
{
//your other code
Validator::extend('page_count', function($attribute, $value, $parameters, $validator) {
$page_count = Printer::find(1)->first()->value('page_count'); //replace this with your method of getting page count.
//If it depends on any extra parameter you can pass it as a parameter in the validation rule and extract it here using $parameter variable.
return $value >= $page_count;
});
//your other code
}
Then, you can use it in your validation rule like below
'page_count' => 'required|page_count'
Reference: Laravel Custom Validation
I find soft delete in cakephp 3 that implemented via traits. And I try to implement it via behaviors. But unlike the trait version, SoftDeleteBehavior do not work.
I have this line in my model initialize method:
$this->addBehavior('SoftDelete');
And this is my SoftDeleteBehavior
namespace App\Model\Behavior;
use Cake\ORM\Behavior;
use Cake\ORM\RulesChecker;
use Cake\Datasource\EntityInterface;
use App\Model\Behavior\MyQuery;
class SoftDeleteBehavior extends Behavior {
public $user_id = 1;
public function getDeleteDate() {
return isset($this->deleteDate) ? $this->deleteDate : 'deleted';
}
public function getDeleter() {
return isset($this->deleter) ? $this->deleter : 'deleter_id';
}
public function query() {
return new MyQuery($this->connection(), $this);
}
/**
* Perform the delete operation.
*
* Will soft delete the entity provided. Will remove rows from any
* dependent associations, and clear out join tables for BelongsToMany associations.
*
* #param \Cake\DataSource\EntityInterface $entity The entity to soft delete.
* #param \ArrayObject $options The options for the delete.
* #throws \InvalidArgumentException if there are no primary key values of the
* passed entity
* #return bool success
*/
protected function _processDelete($entity, $options) {
if ($entity->isNew()) {
return false;
}
$primaryKey = (array)$this->primaryKey();
if (!$entity->has($primaryKey)) {
$msg = 'Deleting requires all primary key values.';
throw new \InvalidArgumentException($msg);
}
if (isset($options['checkRules']) && !$this->checkRules($entity, RulesChecker::DELETE, $options)) {
return false;
}
$event = $this->dispatchEvent('Model.beforeDelete', [
'entity' => $entity,
'options' => $options
]);
if ($event->isStopped()) {
return $event->result;
}
$this->_associations->cascadeDelete(
$entity,
['_primary' => false] + $options->getArrayCopy()
);
$query = $this->query();
$conditions = (array)$entity->extract($primaryKey);
$statement = $query->update()
->set([$this->getDeleteDate() => date('Y-m-d H:i:s') , $this->getDeleter() => $this->user_id])
->where($conditions)
->execute();
$success = $statement->rowCount() > 0;
if (!$success) {
return $success;
}
$this->dispatchEvent('Model.afterDelete', [
'entity' => $entity,
'options' => $options
]);
return $success;
}
If I use trait, SoftDeleteTrait works in true manner. But SoftDeleteBehavior do not work properly!
One is a PHP language construct, the other is a programmatic concept. You may want to read upon what traits are, so that you understand that this question, as it stands, doesn't make too much sense. Also stuff like "doesn't work" doesn't serve as a proper problem description, please be more specific in the future.
That being said, CakePHP behaviors do serve the purpose of horizontal code reuse, similar to traits, as opposed to vertical reuse by inheritance.
However, even if they have conceptual similarities, you cannot simply exchange them as you seem to do in your code, a trait will be composited into the class on which it is used, so that it becomes part of it as if it were written directly in the class definition, and therefore has the ability to overwrite inherited code like the Table::_processDelete() method, a behavior on the other hand is a totally independent class, which is being instantiated and injected as a dependency into a table class at runtime, and calls to its methods are being delegated via the table class (see Table::__call()), unless a method with the same name already exists on the table class, which in your case means that _processDelete() will never be invoked.
I'd suggest that you study a little more on PHP/OOP basics, as this is rather basic stuff that can be untangled easily by just having a look at the source. Being able to understand how the CakePHP code base and the used concepts do work will make your life much easier.
How can we validate form fields that are arrays? Take a look at the following code
UserPhone Model:
public static $rules= array(
'phonenumber'=>'required|numeric',
'isPrimary'=>'in:0,1'
)
...........
UserController:
$validation = UserPhone::validate(Input::only('phonenumber')));
if($validation->passes())
{
$allInputs = Input::only('phonenumber','tid');
$loopSize = sizeOf($allInputs);
for($i=0;$i<$loopSize;$i++)
{
$phone = UserPhone::find($allInputs['tid'][$i]);
$phone->phonenumber = $allInputs['phonenumber'][$i];
$phone->save();
}
return Redirect::to('myprofile')->with('message','Update OK');
}
else
{
return Redirect::to('editPhone')->withErrors($validation);
}
}
the $validation comes from a BaseModel which extends Eloquent.
In my view:
<?php $counter=1; ?>
#foreach($phones as $thephone)
<section class="col col-12">
<label class="label">Phone Number {{$counter++}}</label>
<label class="input">
<i class="icon-append icon-phone"></i>
{{Form::text('phonenumber[]',$thephone->phonenumber)}}
{{Form::hidden('tid[]',$thephone->id)}}
</label>
</section>
#endforeach
Everything is working fine and I get all the phone numbers I want in the Update Form, but I cannot update the model because the validation fails with the message "Phonenumber must be a number".
I know that there is not a simple solution for validating array form fields and I tried to extend the validator class but with no success.
How can I validate this kind of fields?
Here's the solution I use:
Usage
Simply transform your usual rules by prefixing each. For example:
'names' => 'required|array|each:exists,users,name'
Note that the each rule assumes your field is an array, so don't forget to use the array rule before as shown here.
Error Messages
Error messages will be automatically calculated by the singular form (using Laravel's str_singular() helper) of your field. In the previous example, the attribute is name.
Nested Arrays
This method works out of the box with nested arrays of any depth in dot notation. For example, this works:
'members.names' => 'required|array|each:exists,users,name'
Again, the attribute used for error messages here will be name.
Custom Rules
This method supports any of your custom rules out of the box.
Implementation
1. Extend the validator class
class ExtendedValidator extends Illuminate\Validation\Validator {
public function validateEach($attribute, $value, $parameters)
{
// Transform the each rule
// For example, `each:exists,users,name` becomes `exists:users,name`
$ruleName = array_shift($parameters);
$rule = $ruleName.(count($parameters) > 0 ? ':'.implode(',', $parameters) : '');
foreach ($value as $arrayKey => $arrayValue)
{
$this->validate($attribute.'.'.$arrayKey, $rule);
}
// Always return true, since the errors occur for individual elements.
return true;
}
protected function getAttribute($attribute)
{
// Get the second to last segment in singular form for arrays.
// For example, `group.names.0` becomes `name`.
if (str_contains($attribute, '.'))
{
$segments = explode('.', $attribute);
$attribute = str_singular($segments[count($segments) - 2]);
}
return parent::getAttribute($attribute);
}
}
2. Register your validator extension
Anywhere in your usual bootstrap locations, add the following code:
Validator::resolver(function($translator, $data, $rules, $messages)
{
return new ExtendedValidator($translator, $data, $rules, $messages);
});
And that's it! Enjoy!
Bonus: Size rules with arrays
As a comment pointed out, there's seems to be no easy way to validate array sizes. However, the Laravel documentation is lacking for size rules: it doesn't mention that it can count array elements. This means you're actually allowed to use size, min, max and between rules to count array elements.
It works best to extend the Validator class and re-use the existing Validator functions:
Validator::resolver(function($translator, $data, $rules, $messages)
{
return new Validation($translator, $data, $rules, $messages);
});
class Validation extends Illuminate\Validation\Validator {
/**
* Magically adds validation methods. Normally the Laravel Validation methods
* only support single values to be validated like 'numeric', 'alpha', etc.
* Here we copy those methods to work also for arrays, so we can validate
* if a value is OR an array contains only 'numeric', 'alpha', etc. values.
*
* $rules = array(
* 'row_id' => 'required|integerOrArray', // "row_id" must be an integer OR an array containing only integer values
* 'type' => 'inOrArray:foo,bar' // "type" must be 'foo' or 'bar' OR an array containing nothing but those values
* );
*
* #param string $method Name of the validation to perform e.g. 'numeric', 'alpha', etc.
* #param array $parameters Contains the value to be validated, as well as additional validation information e.g. min:?, max:?, etc.
*/
public function __call($method, $parameters)
{
// Convert method name to its non-array counterpart (e.g. validateNumericArray converts to validateNumeric)
if (substr($method, -7) === 'OrArray')
$method = substr($method, 0, -7);
// Call original method when we are dealing with a single value only, instead of an array
if (! is_array($parameters[1]))
return call_user_func_array(array($this, $method), $parameters);
$success = true;
foreach ($parameters[1] as $value) {
$parameters[1] = $value;
$success &= call_user_func_array(array($this, $method), $parameters);
}
return $success;
}
/**
* All ...OrArray validation functions can use their non-array error message counterparts
*
* #param mixed $attribute The value under validation
* #param string $rule Validation rule
*/
protected function getMessage($attribute, $rule)
{
if (substr($rule, -7) === 'OrArray')
$rule = substr($rule, 0, -7);
return parent::getMessage($attribute, $rule);
}
}
each()
It's not in the docs, but the 4.2 branch may have a simple solution around line 220.
Just like the sometimes($attribute, $rules, callable $callback) function, there is now an each($attribute, $rules) function.
To use it, the code would be something simpler than a sometimes() call:
$v->each('array_attribute',array('rule','anotherRule')); //$v is your validator
Caveats
sometimes() and each() don't seem to be easily chainable with each other so if you want to do specifically conditioned rules on array values, you're better off with the magic solutions in other answers for now.
each() only goes one level deep which isn't that different from other solutions. The nice thing about the magic solutions is that they will go 0 or 1 level deep as needed by calling the base rules as appropriate so I suppose if you wanted to go 1 to 2 levels deep, you could simply merge the two approaches by calling each() and passing it a magic rule from the other answers.
each() only takes one attribute, not an array of attributes as sometimes() does, but adding this feature to each() wouldn't be a massive change to the each() function - just loop through the $attribute and array_merge() $data and the array_get() result. Someone can make it a pull request on master if they see it as desirable and it hasn't already been done and we can see if it makes it into a future build.
Here's an update to the code of Ronald, because my custom rules wouldn't work with the array extension. Tested with Laravel 4.1, default rules, extended rules, …
public function __call($method, $parameters) {
$isArrayRule = FALSE;
if(substr($method, -5) === 'Array') {
$method = substr($method, 0, -5);
$isArrayRule = TRUE;
}
//
$rule = snake_case(substr($method, 8));
// Default or custom rule
if(!$isArrayRule) {
// And we have a default value (not an array)
if(!is_array($parameters[1])) {
// Try getting the custom validation rule
if(isset($this->extensions[$rule])) {
return $this->callExtension($rule, $parameters);
}
// None found
throw new \BadMethodCallException("Method [$method] does not exist.");
} // Array given for default rule; cannot be!
else return FALSE;
}
// Array rules
$success = TRUE;
foreach($parameters[1] as $value) {
$parameters[1] = $value;
// Default rule exists, use it
if(is_callable("parent::$method")) {
$success &= call_user_func_array(array($this, $method), $parameters);
} else {
// Try a custom rule
if(isset($this->extensions[$rule])) {
$success &= $this->callExtension($rule, $parameters);
}
// No custom rule found
throw new \BadMethodCallException("Method [$method] does not exist.");
}
}
// Did any of them (array rules) fail?
return $success;
}
There are now array validation rules in case this helps anybody. It doesn't appear that these have been written up in the docs yet.
https://github.com/laravel/laravel/commit/6a2ad475cfb21d12936cbbb544d8a136fc73be97
do anyone know how can I apply rule in Yii model for input must be greater than 0 value, without any custom approach ..
like :
public function rules()
{
return array(
....
....
array('SalePrice', 'required', "on"=>"sale"),
....
....
);
}
many thanks ..
Simpler way
array('SalePrice', 'numerical', 'min'=>1)
with a custom validator method
array('SalePrice', 'greaterThanZero')
public function greaterThanZero($attribute,$params)
{
if ($this->$attribute<=0)
$this->addError($attribute, 'Saleprice has to be greater than 0');
}
I see it is a price so you could use 0.01 (a penny) as a minimum value like so:
array('SalesPrice', 'numerical', 'min'=>0.01),
Note that this solution does not validate that the number entered is a price, just that it is > 0.01
I know I am too late for this . But just for future reference you can use this class also
<?php
class greaterThanZero extends CValidator
{
/**
* Validates the attribute of the object.
* If there is any error, the error message is added to the object.
* #param CModel $object the object being validated
* #param string $attribute the attribute being validated
*/
protected function validateAttribute($object,$attribute)
{
$value=$object->$attribute;
if($value <= 0)
{
$this->addError($object,$attribute,'your password is too weak!');
}
}
/**
* Returns the JavaScript needed for performing client-side validation.
* #param CModel $object the data object being validated
* #param string $attribute the name of the attribute to be validated.
* #return string the client-side validation script.
* #see CActiveForm::enableClientValidation
*/
public function clientValidateAttribute($object,$attribute)
{
$condition="value<=0";
return "
if(".$condition.") { messages.push(".CJSON::encode($object->getAttributeLabel($attribute).' should be greater than 0').");
}";
}
}
?>
Just make sure this class is imported before use.
Did nobody check the docs?
There is a built-in validator CCompareValidator:
['SalePrice', 'compare', 'operator'=>'>', 'compareValue'=>0]
you can use this one too:
array('SalePrice', 'in','range'=>range(0,90))
I handled this by regular expression, may be it will help too ..
array('SalePrice', 'match', 'not' => false, 'pattern' => '/[^a-zA-Z0]/', 'message' => 'Please enter a Leader Name', "on"=>"sale"),
many thanks #sdjuan & #Ors for your help and time ..