I've read in linux Makefile:
$(filter-out _all sub-make $(CURDIR)/Makefile, $(MAKECMDGOALS)) _all: sub-make
$(Q)#:
What is the meaning of $(Q)#:?
I'm trying to google it, but google always crappy if the search using some weird character. So in the end i can't found any Manual about it.
After looking in the code. Q is defined somewhere after those line. Since makefile have peculiar concept of variable (which is expandable), it can be implement in anywhere. Q is used to whether show message or not (Q maybe for Quiet).
ifeq ($(KBUILD_VERBOSE),1)
quiet =
Q =
else
quiet=quiet_
Q = #
endif
And for the last #: this means do-nothing-output-nothing.
So the conclusion $(Q)#: simply do-nothing-output-nothing.
To reinforce and expand on what nafsaka found:
Sometimes Makefiles are written like this:
target:
rm -rf $(DIRECTORY)
$(Q)$(MAKE) all
And Q will be defined as # or nothing for example:
V ?= 0
ifeq ($(V), 0)
Q = #
else
Q =
endif
If a target action is preceded by # then make won't display it when run. Here's the GNU make documentation on that subject: Recipe Echoing
In this case you need to define V=1 before running make to see commands as they're run (This is very common).
Another wrinkle: Look for "include file.mk" statements in your Makefile, which is where V and Q were defined in my case. Here's the GNU make documentation on include: Including Other Makefiles
From the Make manual:
5.2 Recipe Echoing
Normally make prints each line of the recipe before it is executed. We call this echoing because it gives the appearance that you are typing the lines yourself.
When a line starts with ‘#’, the echoing of that line is suppressed. The ‘#’ is discarded before the line is passed to the shell. Typically you would use this for a command whose only effect is to print something, such as an echo command to indicate progress through the makefile:
#echo About to make distribution files
When make is given the flag ‘-n’ or ‘--just-print’ it only echoes most recipes, without executing them. See Summary of Options. In this case even the recipe lines starting with ‘#’ are printed. This flag is useful for finding out which recipes make thinks are necessary without actually doing them.
The ‘-s’ or ‘--silent’ flag to make prevents all echoing, as if all recipes started with ‘#’. A rule in the makefile for the special target .SILENT without prerequisites has the same effect (see Special Built-in Target Names).
Related
I have a complicated set of rules I need to write to generate a rather large number of "parameterised" output files and thought that, rather than expand them all out by hand, I could repeatedly "include" a template file with sets of rules and use (GNU)make's facility for allowing "simply expanded" variables to avoid the pain.
(In the past I've always been using the "recursively expanded" variable approach, so this is new to me)
As a trivial example of what I thought would work, I tried putting the following in a Makefile
Targ:=A
Param1:=Pa
Param2:=Qa
$(Targ):
#echo expect A, get $(Targ), Target is $#. Params are $(Param1) and $(Param2)
Targ:=B
Param1:=Pb
Param2:=Qb
$(Targ):
#echo expect B, get $(Targ), Target is $#. Params are $(Param1) and $(Param2)
Targ:=C
Param1:=Pc
Param2:=Qc
$(Targ):
#echo expect C, get $(Targ), Target is $#. Params are $(Param1) and $(Param2)
The eventual plan was to replace the rules with an include file containing dozens of different rules, each referencing the various "parameter" variables.
However, what I get is...
prompt> make A
expect A, get C, Target is A. Params are Pc and Qc
prompt> make B
expect B, get C, Target is B. Params are Pc and Qc
Essentially, unlike each rule's target, which is picking up the intended definition, the $(Targ), $(Param1), and $(Param2) in each rule's command is instead being run with the final definition.
Does anyone know how to prevent this, i.e. how do you force the command to use the definition at the time it is encountered in the Makefile?
Simple vs recursive expansion makes no difference here; regardless of which you use you'll see the same behavior. A GNU make variable is global and obviously can have only one value.
You have to understand when variables are expanded. The documentation provides a detailed description of this. Targets and prerequisites are expanded when the makefile is read in, so the value of Targ as the makefile is being parsed is used.
Recipes are expanded when the recipe is to be invoked, which is not until after all makefiles are parsed and make starts to build targets. At that time of course the variable Targ has its last set value.
Without knowing what your makefile really does it's hard to suggest an alternative. One option is to use target-specific variables:
Targ := A
$(Targ): LocalTarg := $(Targ)
$(Targ):
#echo expect A, get $(LocalTarg), Target is $#
Another option is to use constructed variable names:
Targ := A
Targ_$(Targ) := $(Targ)
$(Targ):
#echo expect A, get $(Targ_$#), Target is $#
Apologies for answering my own question, but I now realised it is possible to solve the issue I was having by running make recursively.
E.g. if the parameter variables for the rules are Targ, Param1 and Param2 then
#Set up "default" values for the parameters (As #madscientist points out,
#these will safely be overridden by the defs on the #(make) commands below
Targ=XXXXXXXXXX
Param=XXXXXXXXXX
Param2=XXXXXXXXXX
Recursing=
#
# define N (==3) templated rule(s)
#
$(Targ)%a:
#echo Run Combo_a $(Targ) $(Param1) $(Param2) $#
$(Targ)%b:
#echo Run Combo_b $(Targ) $(Param2) $(Param1) reversed $#
$(Targ)%c:
#echo Run Combo_c $(Param1) $(Targ) $(Param2) mixed again $#
#
#Enumerate "M" (==2) sets of parameters,
# (Except if we are already recursing because unrecognised targets may cause
# it to descend forever)
#
ifneq ($(Recursing), Yes)
Set1%:
#$(MAKE) Targ=Set1 Param1=foo Param2=bar Recursing=Yes $#
Set2%:
#$(MAKE) Targ=Set2 Param1=ray Param2=tracing Recursing=Yes $#
endif
This then allows N*M different combos for N+M typing cost.
eg. (removing messages from make re recursion)
>make Set1.a
Run Combo_a Set1 foo bar Set1.a
>make Set2.c
Run Combo_c ray Set2 tracing mixed again Set2.c
In my makefile, the user supplies an argument called EXEC (make target EXEC=something). I want this to happen:
if EXEC equals "server"
make the variable NOT equal to "client"
if EXEC equals "client"
make the variable NOT equal to "server"
I tried doing this:
ifeq ($(EXEC),server)
NOT := client
endif
ifeq ($(EXEC),client)
NOT := server
endif
I run this by saying make -f build.mk EXEC=server
the output is:
NOT := client
make[2]: NOT: No such file or directory
Why is this error happening?
It seems you've indented the variable assignment with a TAB character. That means that line is considered part of the recipe for the previous target.
Since you haven't provided the entire makefile, or at least the section of the makefile before/after this, we can't say more than that.
However, in general in a makefile you should never indent any lines with TAB characters unless they are intended to be a part of a recipe.
I want to comment one or more line(s) within a define directive in a Makefile so as the line is ignored when the directive is expanded. The goal is to place the commented line as a hint for the users of my Makefile to show an example of what could be into the define directive. The directive is expanded into a target.
In other words, I want that Makefile
define ECHO_FOO =
# #echo foo
endef
all:
#echo Before call
$(ECHO_FOO)
#echo After call
.PHONY: all
to have the same behavior than this one :
define ECHO_FOO =
endef
all:
#echo Before call
$(ECHO_FOO)
#echo After call
.PHONY: all
The issue is that the first Makefile gives me the following error :
process_begin: CreateProcess(NULL, ##echo foo, ...) failed.
make (e=2): The system cannot find the file specified.
Makefile:6: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
The GNU make:Makefile contents page states that :
Within a define directive, comments are not ignored during the definition of the variable, but rather kept intact in the value of the variable. When the variable is expanded they will either be treated as make comments or as recipe text, depending on the context in which the variable is evaluated.
But this doesn't explain in which specific case the # symbol is treated as a make comment or as a recipe text (which seems to be the problem I meet).
Can someone tell me how to have the # symbol treated as a comment mark in a define function ?
I have already tried all of the following lines with the idea of escaping the # symbol or changing the indentation but none of them gave me a correct output :
##echo foo
##echo foo
###echo foo
###echo foo
\##echo foo
\##echo foo
/##echo foo
/##echo foo
I'm running MinGW make 3.82 on Windows but I have already tried other implementations of make v3.82.90 and 4.1.
There's no way to do what you're asking for directly. The contents of the variable are expanded in a recipe context, so no matter what the variable expands to it will be considered part of the recipe and whatever characters are there will be passed to the shell.
Note you can use : in UNIX shells as well as Windows command.com, because : is the shell no-op operator. You have to add a space after it though otherwise it will try to run the command :echo which is not a valid command. However, further note that the shell will still expand the line! This means that if you use backquotes etc. then those still are expanded. Also note that since it's a statement, semicolon will stop it. So for example:
define ECHO_FOO
: echo hi `echo there 1>&2` ; echo bye
endef
all: ; #$(ECHO_FOO)
Here, the hi won't be printed because the echo command is not run, but the backticks are still expanded so there will be printed (to stderr) and the semicolon ends the "no-op" command so bye will also be printed.
If your commands are simple enough then : will work, but if they're that simple one wonders why you're using define...
Another option is just to override the variable, rather than comment it out:
define ECHO_FOO =
#echo foo
endef
ECHO_FOO =
ETA:
In the comments you affirm that the command is simple. I don't quite know what you mean by could be expanded by the final user or why that makes a difference.
But what I was alluding to is that if you have a simple command you can just write:
ECHO_FOO = echo hi
and not use define. define is only needed for complicated commands: really it's only required for commands that contain un-escaped newlines.
And, if you write:
ECHO_FOO =# echo hi
then you ARE commenting out the content of the variable using make comments, not shell comments, so it will work everywhere.
On Windows, you can use : as a comment character. The traditional comment keyword in MS-DOS is REM (as in "remark").
From the docs:
...You can modify .SHELLFLAGS to add the -e option to the shell which will
cause any failure anywhere in the command line to cause the shell to
fail...
So, given the following makefile:
.SHELLFLAGS = -e -c
define cmd
echo true
true
endef
all::
$(shell $(cmd))
Running, I get:
truetrue
/bin/sh: 1: truetrue: not found
makefile:10: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 127
Did you see that (in the 1st line of output)? truetrue? Where did it come from?
Let's compare it with the following identical makefile, where -e was not added to .SHELLFLAGS.
The makefile, would be:
# Do you see the difference, from the previous Makefile?
# Here, the value is '-c' alone. No '-e' flag is present here!
.SHELLFLAGS = -c
define cmd
echo true
true
endef
all::
$(shell $(cmd))
Running, I get:
true true
Much better!
So, we have here 2 versions of makefile, both run identical commands, where the first version also added the -e flag to .SHELLFLAGS.
The results however - for the respective runs - were not consistent! We had:
Expands to the trivial command true true, which is analogous to the trivial command : true (i.e "ignore arguments..."), and therefore an exit-status: 0.
This was for the "simple" run, without the change in .SHELLFLAGS. (version 2).
As for the first run, Make went ahead, and condensed the command to truetrue (really?), hence: a meaningless command and a fatal error from the shell.
In summary: It seems that adding -e to .SHELLFLAGS is not that innocent as the documentation suggested above.
In fact, Make, then (when .SHELLFLAGS is modified to include -e), and only then - Make takes the liberty to do some more (unexpected?) modification to the command, resulting - for example - here with the command truetrue for a true true command.
Really?
(Versions-note: All versions supporting .SHELLFLAGS, which is 3.82 and up).
I’ve never understood using $(shell ...) in a recipe. There may be one or two
situations where it’s useful, but I see it constantly and I’ve yet to see one.
However, you’ll note that the documentation says that the value for
.SHELLFLAGS when you want to use the -e flag should be -ec, not -e -c.
Some versions of the Bourne shell do not accept multiple flags on the command
line: they must be a single set of flags. If you use -ec then your example
works.
The difference in behavior you’re seeing is in the treatment of newlines in
recipes: in some situations they’re removed along with the initial TAB, in other
situations they’re converted to a single space. I don’t know why adding a second
option to .SHELLFLAGS causes this but I agree with tripleee: you should
file a bug.
In my makefile, I have a variable 'NDK_PROJECT_PATH', my question is how can I print it out when it compiles?
I read Make file echo displaying "$PATH" string and I tried:
#echo $(NDK_PROJECT_PATH)
#echo $(value NDK_PROJECT_PATH)
Both gives me
"build-local.mk:102: *** missing separator. Stop."
Any one knows why it is not working for me?
You can print out variables as the makefile is read (assuming GNU make as you have tagged this question appropriately) using this method (with a variable named "var"):
$(info $$var is [${var}])
You can add this construct to any recipe to see what make will pass to the shell:
.PHONY: all
all: ; $(info $$var is [${var}])echo Hello world
Now, what happens here is that make stores the entire recipe ($(info $$var is [${var}])echo Hello world) as a single recursively expanded variable. When make decides to run the recipe (for instance when you tell it to build all), it expands the variable, and then passes each resulting line separately to the shell.
So, in painful detail:
It expands $(info $$var is [${var}])echo Hello world
To do this it first expands $(info $$var is [${var}])
$$ becomes literal $
${var} becomes :-) (say)
The side effect is that $var is [:-)] appears on standard out
The expansion of the $(info...) though is empty
Make is left with echo Hello world
Make prints echo Hello world on stdout first to let you know what it's going to ask the shell to do
The shell prints Hello world on stdout.
As per the GNU Make manual and also pointed by 'bobbogo' in the below answer,
you can use info / warning / error to display text.
$(error text…)
$(warning text…)
$(info text…)
To print variables,
$(error VAR is $(VAR))
$(warning VAR is $(VAR))
$(info VAR is $(VAR))
'error' would stop the make execution, after showing the error string
from a "Mr. Make post"
https://www.cmcrossroads.com/article/printing-value-makefile-variable
Add the following rule to your Makefile:
print-% : ; #echo $* = $($*)
Then, if you want to find out the value of a makefile variable, just:
make print-VARIABLE
and it will return:
VARIABLE = the_value_of_the_variable
If you simply want some output, you want to use $(info) by itself. You can do that anywhere in a Makefile, and it will show when that line is evaluated:
$(info VAR="$(VAR)")
Will output VAR="<value of VAR>" whenever make processes that line. This behavior is very position dependent, so you must make sure that the $(info) expansion happens AFTER everything that could modify $(VAR) has already happened!
A more generic option is to create a special rule for printing the value of a variable. Generally speaking, rules are executed after variables are assigned, so this will show you the value that is actually being used. (Though, it is possible for a rule to change a variable.) Good formatting will help clarify what a variable is set to, and the $(flavor) function will tell you what kind of a variable something is. So in this rule:
print-% : ; $(info $* is a $(flavor $*) variable set to [$($*)]) #true
$* expands to the stem that the % pattern matched in the rule.
$($*) expands to the value of the variable whose name is given by by $*.
The [ and ] clearly delineate the variable expansion.
You could also use " and " or similar.
$(flavor $*) tells you what kind of variable it is. NOTE: $(flavor)
takes a variable name, and not its expansion.
So if you say make print-LDFLAGS, you get $(flavor LDFLAGS),
which is what you want.
$(info text) provides output.
Make prints text on its stdout as a side-effect of the expansion.
The expansion of $(info) though is empty.
You can think of it like #echo,
but importantly it doesn't use the shell,
so you don't have to worry about shell quoting rules.
#true is there just to provide a command for the rule.
Without that,
make will also output print-blah is up to date. I feel #true makes it more clear that it's meant to be a no-op.
Running it, you get
$ make print-LDFLAGS
LDFLAGS is a recursive variable set to [-L/Users/...]
All versions of make require that command lines be indented with a TAB (not space) as the first character in the line. If you showed us the entire rule instead of just the two lines in question we could give a clearer answer, but it should be something like:
myTarget: myDependencies
#echo hi
where the first character in the second line must be TAB.
#echo $(NDK_PROJECT_PATH) is the good way to do it.
I don't think the error comes from there.
Generally this error appears when you mistyped the intendation : I think you have spaces where you should have a tab.
No need to modify the Makefile.
$ cat printvars.mak
print-%:
#echo '$*=$($*)'
$ cd /to/Makefile/dir
$ make -f ~/printvars.mak -f Makefile print-VARIABLE
Run make -n; it shows you the value of the variable..
Makefile...
all:
#echo $(NDK_PROJECT_PATH)
Command:
export NDK_PROJECT_PATH=/opt/ndk/project
make -n
Output:
echo /opt/ndk/project
This makefile will generate the 'missing separator' error message:
all
#echo NDK_PROJECT_PATH=$(NDK_PROJECT_PATH)
done:
#echo "All done"
There's a tab before the #echo "All done" (though the done: rule and action are largely superfluous), but not before the #echo PATH=$(PATH).
The trouble is that the line starting all should either have a colon : or an equals = to indicate that it is a target line or a macro line, and it has neither, so the separator is missing.
The action that echoes the value of a variable must be associated with a target, possibly a dummy or PHONEY target. And that target line must have a colon on it. If you add a : after all in the example makefile and replace the leading blanks on the next line by a tab, it will work sanely.
You probably have an analogous problem near line 102 in the original makefile. If you showed 5 non-blank, non-comment lines before the echo operations that are failing, it would probably be possible to finish the diagnosis. However, since the question was asked in May 2013, it is unlikely that the broken makefile is still available now (August 2014), so this answer can't be validated formally. It can only be used to illustrate a plausible way in which the problem occurred.
The problem is that echo works only under an execution block. i.e. anything after "xx:"
So anything above the first execution block is just initialization so no execution command can used.
So create a execution blocl
If you don't want to modify the Makefile itself, you can use --eval to add a new target, and then execute the new target, e.g.
make --eval='print-tests:
#echo TESTS $(TESTS)
' print-tests
You can insert the required TAB character in the command line using CTRL-V, TAB
example Makefile from above:
all: do-something
TESTS=
TESTS+='a'
TESTS+='b'
TESTS+='c'
do-something:
#echo "doing something"
#echo "running tests $(TESTS)"
#exit 1
This can be done in a generic way and can be very useful when debugging a complex makefile. Following the same technique as described in another answer, you can insert the following into any makefile:
# if the first command line argument is "print"
ifeq ($(firstword $(MAKECMDGOALS)),print)
# take the rest of the arguments as variable names
VAR_NAMES := $(wordlist 2,$(words $(MAKECMDGOALS)),$(MAKECMDGOALS))
# turn them into do-nothing targets
$(eval $(VAR_NAMES):;#:))
# then print them
.PHONY: print
print:
#$(foreach var,$(VAR_NAMES),\
echo '$(var) = $($(var))';)
endif
Then you can just do "make print" to dump the value of any variable:
$ make print CXXFLAGS
CXXFLAGS = -g -Wall
You could create a vars rule in your make file, like this:
dispvar = echo $(1)=$($(1)) ; echo
.PHONY: vars
vars:
#$(call dispvar,SOMEVAR1)
#$(call dispvar,SOMEVAR2)
There are some more robust ways to dump all variables here: gnu make: list the values of all variables (or "macros") in a particular run.
if you use android make (mka) #echo $(NDK_PROJECT_PATH) will not work and gives you error *** missing separator. Stop."
use this answer if you are trying to print variables in android make
NDK_PROJECT_PATH := some_value
$(warning $(NDK_PROJECT_PATH))
that worked for me
I usually echo with an error if I wanted to see the variable value.(Only if you wanted to see the value. It will stop execution.)
#echo $(error NDK_PROJECT_PATH= $(NDK_PROJECT_PATH))
The following command does it for me on Windows:
Path | tr ; "\n"