So, I've created a GitHub to manage my latest Ruby project, and I want for it to utilize a couple of gems. On my PC, all I have to go is type
gem install "gemName"
and it loads it to my computer, and then all I have to do in my Ruby script is have
require "rubygems"
require "gemName"
How can I do this with GitHub? What I tried to do is create a subfolder from the main repository (called "RubyGems") and then in my main ruby script
require "/RubyGems/colorize"
require "/Rubygems/psych"
With the two gems (colorize and psych) in the "RubyGems" folder.
Is this the proper way to do this? Will this even work? What is the right way to do this? (Sorry, I'm kinda new to GitHub.)
A couple of things, unless you're using a really old version of Ruby (like 1.9) you don't need to require 'rubygems' because is already required by default, next I highly recommend you to get familiar with bundler.
Bundler is used for "bundling" the required gems you use, to so do you have to install the gem (gem install bundler) and then you create a Gemfile, like this:
source 'https://rubygems.org'
ruby '2.2.0'
gem 'colorize', git: 'https://github.com/fazibear/colorize.git'
gem 'psych'
Execute bundle install after, that will create Gemfile.lock file, make sure you push both files to your repository.
With that you would be able to bundle exec ./your-script.rb, assuming your script is something like this:
require 'psych'
require 'colorize'
# Here I do stuff with psych and colorize
Related
I noticed for some gems you must include it in the file where you want to use it like this require 'a_gem', but this is not always the case.
I am going to compose a gem by myself. What should I do if I do not want to add the require 'my_gem' to the .rb file when using it?
Usually, an application that is using a gem needs to require the gem:
require "my_awesome_gem"
MyAwesomeGem.do_something_great
However, if an application is using bundler, which defines the application's gem in a file called "Gemfile":
source 'http://rubygems.org'
gem 'my_awesome_gem'
then the application may invoke bundler in a way that automatically requires all of the gems specified in the Gemfile:
require "bundler"
Bundler.require
MyAwesomeGem.do_something_great
Rails projects use Bundler.require, so a Rails application will not need to explicitly require a gem in order to use it: Just add the gem to the Gemfile and go.
For more about Bundler.require, see the bundler documentation
For more about how Rails uses Bundler, see How Does Rails Handle Gems? by Justin Weiss.
This doesn't make sense. If you want to write a Gem and use it, it needs to be required somewhere.
This "somewhere" could be explicit in one of your scripts, it could be written in a Gemfile or it could be required by another script/gem that is required by your script.
If you write a gem, Ruby will not include it automatically in all your scripts.
Finally, if you publish it, should every single Ruby script on earth magically require it and execute your code?
I suppose that the project you have seen which didn't use require 'a_gem' was using a Gemfile.
I'm writing a batch script as a setup for a ruby program I'm writing. It needs to be able to
a. Make sure Ruby is installed on the user's computer (and if not point them to the ruby download page)
b. make sure the ruby "yaml" gem is installed, which is a prerequisite for it. I've tried
gem install yaml
in the batch script to no avail. How can I write a batch script that will do these two things?
As far as I know, there is no yaml gem. Although it must be required in code that uses it, it is distributed as part of a Ruby installation. Try this:
ruby -ryaml -e"puts 'YAML found'"
It should work; and if you change the -r token to some nonexistent gem, you'll see an exception raised.
Instead of writing your own script, you could use bundler and create a gemfile. This way people can install all the gems on any operating system.
Example:
require 'rubygems'
require 'bundler/setup'
require 'nokogiri'
require 'rest-client'
#require all your gems like normal
def parse(site)
Nokogiri::HTML(RestClient.get(site))
end
And for the gem file:
source: "https://rubygems.org"
gem 'nokogiri', '~> 1.6.7.2' #<= you can specify which version
gem 'rest-client' #<= you don't have to specify a version though
After you've got everything set up, cd to the directory that has the gemfile and run bundle install this will install all the gems
I have just started learning ruby . There are few things I am quite confuse with in ruby as I used to work with Perl and C.
1) How to add external library like "Mechanize" to use with your script?
Ruby has virtually standardized on using bundler to manage dependencies. For any project you create a Gemfile that looks roughly like:
source 'https://rubygems.org/'
gem 'mechanize'
Then you would run bundle install to be sure your gems are loaded correctly.
Inside your application you'd have:
require 'rubygems'
require 'bundler/setup'
require 'mechanize'
# ...
If you want to build your own gem, the best thing to do is read the documentation and look at the source of other gems to see how they do it. Every gem has to follow certain conventions to work correctly, but these are pretty obvious if you look at more than a few of them.
You can even use bundler to help build a new gem which can simplify the process considerably.
I'm trying to use rake in my ruby script...(Ruby 1.8.6, JRuby 1.6.5)
Downloaded rake using gem install --remote rake, looks ok on install...
Fetching: rake-0.9.2.2.gem (100%)
Successfully installed rake-0.9.2.2
1 gem installed
I've got a simple ruby script which works fine, but when I import rake to using any of the following requires, it starts complaining....
require 'rake'
LoadError: no such file to load -- rake
or
require '/lib/rake'
LoadError: no such file to load -- lib/rake
After some searching, I found that adding require 'rubygems' just before rakefixes the issue....
require 'rubygems'
require 'rake'
Even though it's working, I've got some questions...
The gem spec on rake shows the require_path as lib, so why
doesn't require '/lib/rake' work? Am I misunderstanding the significance of require_path?
Why is it necessary to place require 'rubygems' before require
'rake'
Yes, you are misunderstanding the significance. The require_paths in the specification is an array of subdirectories of that gem's installation directory that should be searched for files belonging to the gem.
To find out where rake really is, try this:
$ gem which rake
You'll see that it is actually installed somewhere completely unrelated to /lib; on my system, it's under /var/lib/gems. Ruby gems, in general, live in their own directory structure; the only file in the standard Ruby include path ($:) is rubygems itself, which you used to have to explicitly require in order to make any actual gems visible. (Since Ruby 1.9, that has not been necessary.)
Gems are more complex than just libraries to load; you can have multiple versions of the same gem installed, and specify which one you want at a time, and do other things that wouldn't work if the gems were just dumped into the standard Ruby include path.
The require_path in the gemspec tells ruby where the files of this gem are located within the gem. It makes you able to type require 'rake', and ruby then knows it needs to look for /lib/rake within the gem installation folder.
In Ruby 1.8, rubygems (the mechanism responsible for making gems available to your app) is not loaded by default, and the default ruby isn't aware of any gem on your system. You need to load rubygems before being able to require any other gem. This is not the case anymore with Ruby 1.9.
I'm developing a gem with Jeweler in a custom directory.
I want to be able to require the gem within any app (and also the executables files from $PATH), and without needing to build and install the gem each time I modify it.
I thought about 2 ways:
I make a symlink to $GEM_HOME/gems and $GEM_HOME/bin
I add the bin directory to $PATH and the lib directory to rubygems to be loaded.
But I bet there is a proper way to do this.
You can specify a local path in the gem command:
gem 'your-gem', '1.2.3', :path => 'path/to/your-gem'
Update: As #Nick points out in the comments,
This is specific to using bundler. In general, it's just require '/path/to/your-gem.
I'd like to add, however, that if you're using a custom-developed gem, bundle will probably make your life easier if you're not already using it. This is because with bundler, when you're done developing the gem (or at a stable/release point) you can load a gem directly from a github repository like this:
gem 'your-gem', :git => 'git#github.com:you/your-gem.git'
No need to mess around with your Gemfile
require 'bundler/setup' will put the right gem into your $LOAD_PATH and allow you to require it on the next line.
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'bundler/setup'
require '<gem-name>'