I'm developing a school management system in laravel. I have many controllers like
controller staff in method index
class controllerstaff extends controller {
public function index{
//here process of staff data
}
}
//this controller have `Route::get('/', 'controllerstaff#index');
and other controller
class controllerstudent extends controller {
public function index{
//here process of student data
}
}
//this controller have Route::get('/', 'controllerstudent#index');
As above does not work properly.
Any one can tell me how to create route for every controller of index method. If we crate many route file then how operate it and how access in controller and form action
You cannot create same urls for each route. For each route you need to have different url, for example:
Route::get('/staff', 'controllerstaff#index');
Route::get('/students', 'controllerstudent#index');
You should also name your controllers rather StudentController and not controllerstudent. You might also consider looking at Routing documentation before creating code - I believe it might be the right way ;)
Related
As we know in Laravel 5.2 Route::controller() and Route::controllers() method was deprecated but it was very handy for reducing the number of routes. I was able to write simple route like this Route::controller('admin/invoice','InvoiceController'). With this simple one route, I can manage all things related to making invoice related work by a controller.
class InvoiceController extends Controller{
public function getInvoices(){ }
public function getInvoiceDetails(){ }
public function postStoreInvoice(){ }
public function postUpdateInvoice(){ }
public function postStoreInvoiceDetails(){ }
public function postupdateInvoiceDetails(){ }
public function postDeleteInvoice(){ }
public function postDeleteInvoiceDetails(){ }
....
}
but unfortunately this Route::controller() and Route::controllers() no longer available laravel version > 5.1. An option available Route::resource() but it has a limited number of the route. The laravel route is Macroable, there is an option to extend the route features like
Illuminate\Routing\Router::macro('controller', function ($routes) {
// implementation
});
Is there anyone who implements Route::controller() and Route::controllers() method for Laravel 5.8, 6 ? or suggest any way.
You can use Route::resource() or Route::resources().
Example:
Route::resource('books', 'BookController');
this will assumes you have
class BookController extends Controller {
// to list resources.
public function index();
// to show create form.
public function create();
// to store resource in database.
public function store();
// to show single resource.
public function show();
// to show edit form.
public function edit();
// to edit and then store the modified resource in database.
public function update();
// to delete a resource from database.
public function destroy();
}
You should read https://laravel.com/docs/master/controllers#resource-controllers for more information.
Edit
Implicit controllers was removed in version 5.2 for some reason.
If you come from the CodeIgniter world, then you may have warm and fuzzy
feelings for implicit routing. You know, where the URI matches up to
the controller method that will be called. You might even want this
for your Laravel development (which Laravel can do).
Though it might seem useful at first to simply call
Route::controller('admin', 'AdminController') and then declare all of
your desired routes from the controller, there are a number of
setbacks to this. Think about how you would, when using implicit routing,
leverage named routes, or create nested resources, or even do
something as simple as rename your controller class without affecting
your URI design.
No, when it comes to implicit routing, just say no.
source: https://laracasts.com/lessons/say-no-to-implicit-routing
However if you want this functionality you can use this package:
Laravel Routes Publisher or Laravel Advanced Route
I'm a newbie with this and I need some help.
I'm developing some kind of music library and let's say I don't want to make a route for each artist so I have made this one:
Route::get('/{artist_name}', 'Artist_controller#{artist_name}');
I get the value of {artist_name} from my view and the route works, for instance, the artist_name may be John and the url generated is localhost:8000/John. But when it comes to look for the class in the controller it doesn't work. I have a class named John in my controller, but I keep getting this error when I try to access:
BadMethodCallException
Method [{artist_name}] does not exist.
So I guess the route isn't taking the value of {artist_name}. What I intend is the route to be processed like:
Route::get('/John', 'Artist_controller#John');
But as I said, I don't want to create a specific route for an artist.
I'd appreciate any kind of help. Thank You
There is no need to create a dynamic method for each artist. You could have one generic method in your controller that handles retrieving the proper artist information from the database and pass it to the view.
routes file:
Route::get('artists/{artist_id}', 'ArtistsController#show');
ArtistsController.php
class ArtistsController extends Controller
{
public function show($artist_id)
{
$artist = Artists::find($artist_id);
return view('artists.show', ['artist' => $artist]);
}
}
So if the user hits the following URL http://localhost/artists/4 the artist id of 4 will be passed to the show method and it will dynamically looks for an artist with that ID and pass an object of artist to your view.
Of course you are not limited to IDs in your URLs. You can use the name if it was unique and your code will be as the following.
routes file:
Route::get('artists/{artist_name}', 'ArtistsController#show');
ArtistsController.php
class ArtistsController extends Controller
{
public function show($artist_name)
{
$artist = Artist::where('name', $artist_name);
return view('artists.show', ['artist' => $artist]);
}
}
I suggest you read this documentation for more information about routing.
You can not have dynamic method (controller action) in a controller class. Instead you should define a method and pass the route parameter to that action.
In your route (web.php) file:
Route::get('/{artist_name}', 'ArtistController#artist');
then in ArtistController.php:
public function artist ($artist_name) {
// do stuff based on $artist_name
}
To get more info read these 2 documentation pages. Controller and Routing.
I have two entities: users, announcements
Eaach user can publish the announcements.
I creted controller AnnouncemetController, where there is method class: my(), that returns notes for current user.
Also I have controller ProfileController that represent current profile user, where I need to show all announcements of user.
For this I tried to reuse controller AnnouncemetController inside ProfileController and call public method my().
use App\Http\Controllers\AnnouncementController;
class ProfileController extends Controller
{
$my = new AnnouncementController();
$my->my();
}
Is it well to use such?
A Laravel controller maps a uri to an action. In your example, you are using a controller to access data, so this is not the "right thing to do".
Instead use model methods to access the data.
im using laravel 5.
I need to call a controller function but this should be done in another controller.
I dont know how to do this
public function examplefunction(){
//stuff
}
And i have a Route for this function, so at
public function otherfunctioninothercontroller(){
// I need examplefunction here
}
how Can i do this?
1) First way
use App\Http\Controllers\OtherController;
class TestController extends Controller
{
public function index()
{
//Calling a method that is from the OtherController
$result = (new OtherController)->method();
}
}
2) Second way
app('App\Http\Controllers\OtherController')->method();
Both way you can get another controller function.
If they are not in the same folder, place use namespace\to\ExampleClass; on top of your file, then you are able to instantiate your controller.
You can simply instantiate the controller and call the desired method as follows
FirstController.php:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
class FirstController extends Controller {
public function examplefunction() {
// TODO: implement functionality
}
}
SecondController.php:
namespace App\Http\Controllers;
class SecondController extends Controller {
public function test() {
$object = new FirstController();
$object->examplefunction();
}
}
Now, after i've answered the question, i would like to add the following comment:
Controllers are classes, all rules that applies to normal classes can be applied to them
However, instantiating a controller directly inside another controller to call a desired method signifies a problem in your design for the following 2 reasons:
A controller cannot obtain an instance of another controller directly
Controller should contain as little business logic as possible, and if possible none
The closest possible solution to what you want (WITHOUT BREAKING MVC) is to make an HTTP request to the route that points to the desired method (using cURL, for example) and read the response as the returned data
But this still doesn't make much sense in this scenario because after all you're making an HTTP request from a method in a controller in your project on your server to a method in a controller in your project on your server, seems like unnecessary overhead, right ?
As i said earlier, a controller should contain as little business logic as possible because the logic should stay inside specialized classes (commonly known as Service Classes), and when a processing is requested the controller simply delegates the job of processing to the appropriate service class which does the processing and returns the results to the controller which in turn sends it back as a response
Now imagine if you've the following scenario:
We've got an application that consists of 3 functionalities:
A user can register an account from web application
There's a mobile application that talks to an API to register a user
There's an admin panel, which he can use to add new user
Obviously you need to create 3 controllers, but those controllers contains repeated logic, would you copy/paste the code everywhere ?
Why not encapsulate this logic inside a service class and call it from the controller when needed ?
Let's say I have Controller1 and Controller2. I want to call a function of Controller1 from inside a function placed in Controller2.
// Controller1.php
class Controller1 {
public static function f1()
{
}
}
And on the other controller:
// Controller2.php
use App\Http\Controllers\Controller1;
class Controller2 {
public function f2()
{
return Controller1::f1();
}
}
Points to be noted:
f1() is declared static
A call to a controller from inside another controller is a bad idea. There is no sense of meaning of controllers then. You should just redirect to web.php to save safe whole architecture like this:
class MyController {
public function aSwitchCaseFunction(Request $requestPrm){
...
//getting path string from request here
...
switch($myCase){
case CASE_1:
return redirect()->route('/a/route/path');
....
}
}
}
I am attempting to create a route in Laravel for a dynamic URL to load a particular controller action. I am able to get it to route to a controller using the following code:
Route::get('/something.html', array('uses' => 'MyController#getView'));
What I am having trouble figuring out is how I can pass a variable from this route to the controller. In this case I would like to pass along an id value to the controller action.
Is this possible in Laravel? Is there another way to do this?
You are not giving us enough information, so you need to ask yourself two basic questions: where this information coming from? Can you have access to this information inside your controller without passing it via the routes.php file?
If you are about to produce this information somehow in your ´routes.php´ file:
$information = WhateverService::getInformation();
You cannot pass it here to your controller, because your controller is not really being fired in this file, this is just a list of available routes, wich may or may not be hit at some point. When a route is hit, Laravel will fire the route via another internal service.
But you probably will be able to use the very same line of code in your controller:
class MyController extends BaseController {
function getView()
{
$information = WhateverService::getInformation();
return View::make('myview')->with(compact('information'));
}
}
In MVC, Controllers are meant to receive HTTP requests and produce information via Models (or services or repositores) to pass to your Views, which can produce new web pages.
If this information is something you have in your page and you want to sneak it to your something.html route, use a POST method instead of GET:
Route::post('/something.html', array('uses' => 'MyController#getView'));
And inside your controller receive that information via:
class MyController extends BaseController {
function getView()
{
$information = Input::get('information');
return View::make('myview')->with(compact('information'));
}
}