I want to do the static compilation of my code with glibc using codeblocks.For that , I have done the following ,
Project->Build Options->Linker settings->Other-linker-options , and then added -static-libgcc. And then build and the ran the code. The code was working fine in that Ubuntu-14.04 machine having glib version 2.19. Then I copied the code to another machine having 2.12. The sole purpose of doing static linking was to make the code running in 2.12 as well. But it is giving the same error like that no static linking,as follows,
/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found
/lib64/libc.so.6: versionGLIBC_2.14' not found
Can anybody please help me on this ? Am I doing the static linking of glibc correctly?
glibc is not libgcc (the GCC compiler support library). glibc is libc (the GNU C Library). -static-libgcc statically
links libgcc. You can't statically link libc except by statically
linking the entire executable, with -static.
Related
My os is Kali, running GLIBC_2.32. I need to build an CGO application for a debian 10 system, which is running GLIBC_2.28.
If I go build with dynamic linking, it can't be run on the debian system, it shows GLIBC mismatch:
version `GLIBC_2.29` not found
version `GLIBCXX_3.4.29` not found
version `GLIBC_2.32` not found
So I tried static linking: CGO_LDFLAGS='-static' go build. A gui library uses OpenGL and it shows error:
# github.com/go-gl/gl/v3.2-core/gl
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
After searching a while I found the libGL is related to the gpu driver and can't be statically linked.
Then I tried linking libGL.so dynamically and statically linking other libraries by:
CGO_LDFLAGS='-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -Bdynamic -lGL -static' go build
But same error: "cannot find -lGL"
I don't want to use docker, it's too heavy. And I don't think upgrading from debian 10 to 11 solves the problem, there maybe some other clients running different os in the future. What's the best solution?
Then I tried linking libGL.so dynamically and statically linking other libraries by:
CGO_LDFLAGS='-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -Bdynamic -lGL -static' go build
The -static flag tells the linker: perform a completely static link. It doesn't matter whether you put it before or after -lGL, the meaning is the same.
To link some libraries statically and link others dynamically, see this answer.
That said, what you are trying to do is impossible: if you have any dynamic libraries in your link, then libc.so.6 must also be dynamically linked.
I don't want to use docker, it's too heavy.
Too bad. You'll have to use docker, or set up a chroot environment, or build yourself a "Linux to older Linux" crosscompiler. The docker is likely easiest to implement.
**Edit: Found my problem. As explained by the following answer, I was not actually doing any linking when making the static library. Instead, I made a shared library and linked libstdc++ statically.
Compile a static library link with standard library (static)**
I am trying to create a method to use c++11 on an ancient arm platform running kernel (2.6.37). Unfortunately the latest cross compile our BSP contains is GCC 4.5.3, which does not support all the c++11 utilites we need.
Initially I tried to use old versions of crosstool-ng to build a cross compiler, but the older versions were too broken. The newer versions did not support the 2.6.37 kernel. I was able to complete one build, however the g++ binary was not built, making the whole endeavor useless (I did check that c++ was enabled in the menuconfig).
Thus my last option was to build gcc natively at version 4.9.4 and create a statically linked library to have my gcc 4.5.3 cross compiler link against. This seems to work for the most part. I create my library on the target with the following:
g++ -std=c++11 --static -c main2.cpp
ar -cvq libmain2.a main2.o
I then copy over the files and try build on the host machine with gcc 4.5.3 and get the following:
arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-g++ simple.cpp -lmain2 -L.
(I cleaned up some of the output)
undefined reference to `std::_Hash_bytes(void const*, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
undefined reference to
std::__throw_regex_error(std::regex_constants::error_type)'
However, when I use nm, I get the following:
$ arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-nm libmain2.a | grep Hash_bytes
U _ZSt11_Hash_bytesPKvjj
U _ZSt11_Hash_bytesPKvjj
$ arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-nm libmain2.a | grep throw_regex
U _ZSt19__throw_regex_errorNSt15regex_constants10error_typeE
U _ZSt19__throw_regex_errorNSt15regex_constants10error_typeE
Does anyone know what the heck is going on? Unfortunately we need to be able to use our cross compiler on the host system for most work, but we are also needing to integrate this specific library which uses c++11.
Also note that if I take out the regex and hash functionality from my code but leave other c++11 concepts like nullptr, type inference, delegation etc, the code compiles and runs on the target fine.
Edit: Okay, so after a little more investigation, it looks like the functions _Hash_bytes and __throw_regex_error are not being statically linked into the static library. I guess I need to know why this is the case in order to fix the issue.
Using the How To Build GCC 4.8.2 ARM Cross-Compiler, I have installed and setup everything and it works just fine as mentioned in the post i.e., I was able to cross compile a simple C code. But, when I try to compile a simple GMP code, I get this error.
fatal error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
Compilation terminated
How should I fix this? My goal is to compile a gmp program. If possible, refer me to good tutorials.
Thanks!
If you want GMP compiled for the target system (ARM), you must compile it by itself using the newly built cross-compiler, not as a part of building GCC. GMP (along with MPFR, MPC, ISL, CLooG, etc.) being placed in the GCC toplevel source directory simply means that it gets compiled and linked for the cross-compiler you're building.
Since the cross-compiler will run on the host system, GMP will also be compiled for the host system, else linking the library would fail, and you wouldn't get a cross-compiler. It may sound silly, but there are reasons for doing it this way, such as buggy prebuilt packages provided by the package manager on the host system or merely to avoid installing those libraries on the host system when all you want is the cross-compilation toolchain.
I am trying to link my program statically with glibc, because version of the glibc on the target machine is pretty much unpredictable. I used linker flags -static-libgcc and -static-libstdc++ and it worked fine. The executable is big, but I can live with it. Unfortunately, when I run my executable on the target machine (it is named 'mytest' in the example below) I get the following error:
./mytest: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.11' not found (required by libboost_log.so.1.53.0)
./mytest: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by libboost_log.so.1.53.0)
./mytest: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by libboost_log.so.1.53.0)
./mytest: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by libboost_date_time.so.1.53.0)
./mytest: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by libboost_thread.so.1.53.0)
If I do 'strings' on mytest, it gives me
$ strings mytest | grep GLIBC
GLIBC_2.9
GLIBC_2.7
GLIBC_2.8
GLIBC_2.3.2
GLIBC_2.2.5
GLIBCXX_3.4.15
GLIBCXX_3.4.11
GLIBCXX_3.4.14
GLIBCXX_3.4.9
GLIBCXX_3.4
What means, I think, that the static linking was working ok. Why does the loader still tries to look for my functions in shared glibc and libstdc++? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
I am trying to link my program statically with glibc, because version of the glibc on the target machine is pretty much unpredictable. I used linker flags -static-libgcc and -static-libstdc++ and it worked fine.
That didn't affect the version of glibc (libc), which is different from libgcc and libstdc++. With these flags, you still have produced a dynamically-linked executable, which is expected to not work on an older distribution.
You can link your executable with -static flag, and that should give you a completely static executable.
Update:
After re-reading your question; your problem is not with glibc. Your problem is that you are linking with libboost_log.so, which itself depends on libstdc++.so.6.
The answer then is to link with libboost*.a instead of libboost*.so. You can try to achieve it this way:
g++ $(OBJS) -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -Wl,-Bstatic -lboost_log ... \
-Wl,-Bdynamic
(It is very important to have the trailing -Wl,-Bdynamic.)
Linking with -static-libgcc and -static-libstdc++ will only work for those libraries. It looks like you are also linking against the boost libraries (likely dynamically) which then link against libgcc and libstdc++.
Try running the following:
ldd mytest
It should show "not a dynamic executable". If it shows anything else, it means it is dynamically linked against other libraries. It doesn't always work so easily, but try adding -static to the compilation line as well to take care of remaining libraries.
I am using buildroot to build a fresh gcc cross-compiler on a dedicated machine.
It worked fine, but I now need to run this gcc from another machine, on which I have not the same libc version :-(. Of course gcc then crashed.
Is it possible to build gcc statically using buildroot ?
You could try passing -static to the linker (via LDFLAGS), but be aware that full static linking is not supported by glibc anymore (resp. it needs a glibc build which supports static linking).
This is due to the fact that nss libraries (name server switch) will be loaded dynamically (unless you compile your own glibc - but that defeats the purpose of nss). This might be enough for you however to reduce dependencies against system libraries.
But I could assume that a statically linked gcc is fairly huge - this might result in long startup times.
If your objective is only to make a relocatable toolchain, statically link with expat, gmp, mpfr and mpc should enough. You can simply apply https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/359841/