I want to make a "communication" between two Karaf instances and I decided to use Karaf Cellar in order to do that.
I, now, have two bundles each one is installed on a Karaf container. They are identified by an address and port provided in hazelcast.xml.
My problem is when I restart both Karaf containers I have bundles which are installed on Karaf (A) that got installed on Karaf (B) and vice versa.
Now I have the same bundles installed on both Karaf containers.
Is there anyway to stop this behaviour?
The answer was in the org.apache.karaf.cellar.groups.cfg file.
Had to set default.bundle.sync value to disabled and not cluster.
Related
I have two bundles:
bundleName.2.0.0.324999.jar
bundleName.2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
When I am trying to install them in Apache Felix console, the one which I am trying to install gets the priority.
So my question is, how does it decides the priority then?
You can install both of these bundles at the same time if you like. OSGi does not have a concept of "priority" between bundles.
I am able to get OSGi blueprint to work in Karaf, but I don't understand how to do it in Apache Felix, or my question can be also defined as how can I use OSGi blueprint in plain OSGi?
I made an example here https://github.com/PhilAndrew/sbt-osgi-felix-akka-blueprint-camel using https://github.com/doolse/sbt-osgi-felix in which Akka is working but Blueprint and Camel not yet working.
This question may help Is Apache Aries running in Felix?
It's not starting Blueprint because your bundle's code doesn't actually rely on any of the classes in blueprint, so you either need to add "Require-Bundle" header to your manifest:
requireBundle := Seq("org.apache.aries.blueprint")
or add the bundles that needed to be started to the osgiDependencies of run:
osgiDependencies in run := bundleReqs("org.apache.aries.blueprint.core",
"org.apache.aries.proxy")
Apache Karaf also runs on felix. So for the most part you just need to install the correct bundles and maybe do the necessary system package exports if you hit package use constraint violations.
Check what karaf installs and try to do the same.
I try to use the "Apache Felix" implementation of OSGi for my project, I launch the framework from the distributable jar (/bin /felix.jar). I have created simple example bundles to register or consume services in the registry.
I want to use a configuration management service so I installed the bundle "org.apache.felix.configadmin" felix in the framework, and then I do not know how and where to put the configuration file of another bundle, for example I want to install the bundle "org.apache.felix.http.jetty" and then I want to configure this bundle through the configAdmin, so how I rename my config file, and where to put it?
Another question, what is the difference between setting, for example, the property "org.osgi.service.http.port" of the jetty bundle using the framework properties(conf/config.properties) or configure it through the bundle of configuration admin service.
Best regards,
You probably also need the file-installer from felix for it to pick up the config files.
If you want to see a working example of this take a look at Apache Karaf. It's a OSGi Container with lots of nice preconfigured features. The config admin service works out of the box.
Normally you use the felix config admin service together with the felix fileinstall. So fileinstall takes care of the directory to be monitored for config files and hands over to config admin to make it available as configs in OSGi.
For a fully working example take a look at Apache Karaf. There you can see the configs you need for it to work together. You might also consider to simply install your own bundles into karaf as it makes managing the felix framework a lot easier.
Is anyone using Karaf instead of Servicemix? If so, how did you come to this decision? I'm aware that Servicemix adds a layer of functionality around Karaf, just curious if Karaf is being used on its own and why...
We're using Karaf for a number of our applications. We were already using Camel (JMS and Esper) for integration between several different platforms (a JBoss 4.2 instance, a Tomcat and several Felix instances) and as this was working well there was little justification in migrating this too (which would have been cause to consider ServiceMix).
The only reason we have some Felix nodes, is that they're limited in use (on client desktops), rarely need/get updated and I wanted the smallest footprint for these nodes. For anything OSGi on the serverside we're using Karaf.
Karaf provides all of the features you'd expect and need for a production environment (see the apache-karaf tag's info). We do our development and testing against standard minimal framework (using pax-exam) but deploy to Karaf.
If you don't need an ESB, JCA, BPEL, etc but want a solid, tunable OSGi container, then Karaf on it's own is more than adequate. (And if you found yourself needing a limited subset of ServiceMix's functionality you can always install these in a Karaf instance).
You can also customise the Karaf distribution as part of a maven build - personally I like have the container as part of the application's build, as I can checkout, build and run the entire setup from the command line in minimal time.
Recently there's a clustering subproject of Karaf called Cellar using HazelCast, I not sure if this applies to ServiceMix too.
Karaf's life started as the ServiceMix core. Currently, ServiceMix is really a set of bundles that are deployed into a Karaf container. ServiceMix has a number of very handy bundles which do a lot of cool stuff that karaf doesn't. That said, the two primary reason for using ServiceMix is if you want:
1) an ESB,
2) NMR (a feature that allows you to community between bundles AND instances of Karaf).
This all said, the ServiceMix group is currently planning version 5, which will remove the ESB and NMR features and will be focused on being a management container for Camel. In ESB's a great deal of effort when into creating components that could be described using BPL (Business Process Language). However, the folks that wrote ServiceMix began to focus on the implementation of EIP's (Enterprise Integration Patterns) which largely does the same stuff as BPL, but does it in a more standardized and accepted manner. This work was done under the Camel project.
So, in short. If you are using ServiceMix 4+, you're also using Karaf. If you want a more robust integration environment, the environment of choice today (in the Apache/Felix world at least) is Karaf, Camel, and a few bundles from Servicemix.
Here's a little comparative illustration I made. Going from the simplest case (JVM with OSGi functions provided by Apache Felix at the bottom), to more complete/manageable OSGi functions (Apache Karaf in the middle), to enough functions to implement complete ESB instances (Apache ServiceMix at the top) (note that "an ESB" is not a product but a set of endpoints, routers, databases, ETL functions and whatnot configured together in a particular task-specific way).
Karaf does NOT come with CXF.
Its pure extracted kernel of ServiceMix. However, you can install CXF on Karaf as below.
karaf:root()> feature:repo:add cxf
Once the feature URL is added we can see the "provided" features by using the following command.
karaf:root()> feature:repo:feature:list | grep cxf
To install cxf fire the command below
karaf:root()> feature:install cxf
This is cross posted from the fusesource forum and the servicemmix forum.
I can't get DOSGi working in FUSE. I'm trying to get CXF's DOSGi 1.1-SNAPSHOT with Zookeeper discovery onto FUSE 4.1.0.2. I'm also using Zookeepr 3.2.1.
Everything works perfectly on Felix 2.0.0. I just follow the instructions on the DOSGi Discovery page and then install the Discovery Demo bundles. For DOSGi, I just use the cxf-dosgi-ri-singlebundle-distribution-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar for DSW and cxf-dosgi-ri-discovery-singlebundle-distribution-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar for zookeepr discovery. Then when I start the sample bundles with the sample service impl on one machine, I see the node creation in zookeeper. Then I start the sample client on another machine and I see the output on the service machine. Works great. I do have an warning about an xml error being ignored because some XSD coudln't be found, but it doesn't seem to affect anything. Oh, I also have to install the OSGi compendium bundle first.
When I move to Fuse, I have no such luck. The OSGi compendium bundle comes with fuse, so no need to install that. I should just be able to install the dosgi-ri singlebundle, and the dosgi-ri-discovery single bundle, but that doesn't work. The dosgi-ri singlebundle has all kinds of overlapping bundles with servicemix. I get an error about port 8081? or whatever the osgi.http.service parameter is, being already in use. Apparently the dosgi-ri singlebundle comes with pax webservice, which reads the same property as the servicemix http service bundle that comes with servicemix. Thats when I switch to the cxf-dosgi-ri-multibundle-distribution-1.1-SNAPSHOT.zip and unzip it to take the parts I want. I take the dsw bundle out of the dosgi-ri multibundle and install that. No luck because of the jdom dependency. Then I install the jdom that comes in the ri multibundle, which works fine. Then go back to dsw, and that installs, so I think i'm getting somewhere. Time to go back and install the ri-discovery singlebundle. When I start that I get a pax logging service classcastexception saying it can't be cast to a osgi logservice or something. But thats just a logging error, and at the bottom it says it can't find the transport class for http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http. Ok, so logging is screwed up and I'm missing some transport class. Well, clearly this comes from not installing enough from the ri multibundle because it worked on felix. So what else in there is necessary. The cxf-minimal-bundle upon inspection has the missing class causing that last error. So I install that. Try to start the discovery bundle, but I end up with some kind of corbabroker exception. Wtf. Whose using corba in all of this? Then I go back and undo all of that and try to stick with the singlebundle distros of ri and ri-discovery, but just turn off the servicemix http service. That crashes servicemix and I can't restart it becauuse the cxf jbi components end up with an unsatisfied dependency. Odd. I'll just ignore that because I don't use those anyway, and try to start my samples. Can't start the samples because it says jetty can't start because the ports already in use. Doesn't make sense because I shutdown the servicemix http service already. Then I restart jetty. Works? Maybe. My service gets registered and I can browse to the wsdl using firefox, but no registration in zookeeper. Try to shutdown the ri-discovery bundle and restart it, but I get a nullpointerexception. Appparently the ri-discovery never actually started up due to one of the aforementioned errors. Then I started trying to take apart the ri-discovery singlebundle and pull out the internals. That didn't work because its all apparently necessary, even though theres some libs inside we could do without.
End of the story. Can't get it to work. Can anybody else get it to work? I just want to run the discovery samples in SMX4. I'm pretty sure its just a bundle conflict problem. Isn't this what OSGi is supposed to fix??? This is worse than just telling me what jars you depend on and making me setup my classpath. At least then I'd eventually get the thing running.
My next steps, I think, will be to try again with the ri-multibundle, just the dsw and jdom, plus the ri-discovery singlebundle. Then I'll try some of the cxf-fuse bundles or some of the cxf-rt bundles to get around the soap transport issue.
Edit notes: I need more than just showing the DOSGi bundles in an Active state. They don't actually do much until you try to expose a service through them. I do need to see multiple machines registering services with a zookeeper instance and other machines consuming those services -- just like the running DOSGi Discovery Sample.
I've been able to get cxf to expose the distributed service sample as a soap webservice by using the minimal cxf bundle mentioned by either removing parts of the original cxf bundles and restarting the jetty service, and then starting the sample service... or by installing the cxf minimal buundle, then starting my service, then immediately uninstalling the cxf minimal bundle, then restarting jetty... I think that was the order. Neither of these will work from a clean startup, and having to restart services as a procedure to get DOSGi working is just bad. I don't even know why installing then uninstalling would do anything -- it shouldn't be leaving any artifacts around.
First point, looking at the CXF DOSGi mega-bundle I think this is only for quick-n-dirty hacking in a bare OSGi runtime, basically the minimal environment provided by Equinox and Felix. It will not be intended for richer environments like FUSE or Servicemix as you will likely clash on services from the bundle and the platform, as you appear to have seen.
I was able to get Servicemix 4.0 to start cleanly (this is on Windows) and then I hot-deployed:
com.springsource.org.jdom-1.0.0.jar
cxf-bundle-minimal-2.2.1.jar
cxf-dosgi-ri-discovery-local-1.0.jar
cxf.dosgi-ri-dws.cxf-1.0.jar
Using the Servicemix console I listed all bundles and saw that all of the above were in the Active state (as expected). I listed the services and the 2 CXF DOSGi bundles were exporting services, so that appeared to have worked correctly. No errors were reported in the log.
How familiar are you with OSGi? Servicemix looks quite large and learning OSGi, Servicemix and CXF/DOSGi together isn't going to be easy (in my opinion).
The supplied console isn't great for the OSGi stuff and I'd suggest installing the Apache Felix console bundles for a web interface.