Coudn't run code used std::async on GCC 5.3.0 - c++11

I was practicing std::asyn function that introduced in c++11, I wrote a simple example
#include<future>
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
void check()
{
cout<<"some"<<endl;
}
int main()
{
auto p=std::async(std::launch::async,check);
p.get();
}
Yes very simple to start off with and i am compiling it using GCC 5.3.0
g++ -std=c++11 practise.cpp -lpthread
and the error
practise.cpp: In function 'int main()':
practise.cpp:13:47: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'class std::future<int>'
auto p=std::async(std::launch::async,chech);
^
In file included from practise.cpp:1:0:
C:/Program Files/mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/include/c++/future:115:11: note: declaration of 'class std::future<int>'
class future;
^
Am i missing anything? is the way i linked lpthread is ok? i am on windows 7.

Your problem looks very similar to the one from this SO:
c++11 std::async doesn't work in mingw
You should check what gcc -v returns for 'Thread model:'. In above SO it returns win32 - and quite possibly mingw still does not support async/future in this mode.
In my mingw installation - also 5.3.0, I have Thread model: posix. I checked the exact same compile flags as yours and your example always compiles fine.
So my suggestion is for you to first check thread model with gcc -v, if its non posix, then reinstall mingw with posix threads. You choose threads model when running mingw-w64-install.exe installer/

Related

gcc undefined reference to with pthread [duplicate]

I picked up the following demo off the web from https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/pthreads/
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define NUM_THREADS 5
void *PrintHello(void *threadid)
{
long tid;
tid = (long)threadid;
printf("Hello World! It's me, thread #%ld!\n", tid);
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
pthread_t threads[NUM_THREADS];
int rc;
long t;
for(t=0; t<NUM_THREADS; t++){
printf("In main: creating thread %ld\n", t);
rc = pthread_create(&threads[t], NULL, PrintHello, (void *)t);
if (rc){
printf("ERROR; return code from pthread_create() is %d\n", rc);
exit(-1);
}
}
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
But when I compile it on my machine (running Ubuntu Linux 9.04) I get the following error:
corey#ubuntu:~/demo$ gcc -o term term.c
term.c: In function ‘main’:
term.c:23: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘exit’
/tmp/cc8BMzwx.o: In function `main':
term.c:(.text+0x82): undefined reference to `pthread_create'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
This doesn't make any sense to me, because the header includes pthread.h, which should have the pthread_create function. Any ideas what's going wrong?
For Linux the correct command is:
gcc -pthread -o term term.c
In general, libraries should follow sources and objects on command line, and -lpthread is not an "option", it's a library specification. On a system with only libpthread.a installed,
gcc -lpthread ...
will fail to link.
Read this or this detailed explanation.
For Linux the correct command is:
gcc -o term term.c -lpthread
you have to put -lpthread just after the compile command,this command will tell to the compiler to execute program with pthread.h library.
gcc -l links with a library file.Link -l with library name without the lib prefix.
in eclipse
properties->c/c++Build->setting->GCC C++ linker->libraries in top part add "pthread"
Running from the Linux terminal, what worked for me was compiling using the following command (suppose the c file I want to compile is called test.c):
gcc -o test test.c -pthread
Hope it helps somebody!
If you are using cmake, you can use:
add_compile_options(-pthread)
Or
SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -pthread")
I believe the proper way of adding pthread in CMake is with the following
find_package (Threads REQUIRED)
target_link_libraries(helloworld
${CMAKE_THREAD_LIBS_INIT}
)
Acutally, it gives several examples of compile commands used for pthreads codes are listed in the table below, if you continue reading the following tutorial:
https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/pthreads/#Compiling
Compile it like this : gcc demo.c -o demo -pthread
In Visual Studio 2019 specify -pthread in the property pages for the project under:
Linker -> Command Line -> Additional Options
Type in -pthread in the textbox.
You need to use the option -lpthread with gcc.
you need only Add "pthread" in proprieties=>C/C++ build=>GCC C++ Linker=>Libraries=> top part "Libraries(-l)".
thats it
check man page and you will get.
Compile and link with -pthread.
SYNOPSIS
#include <pthread.h>
int pthread_create(pthread_t *thread, const pthread_attr_t *attr,
void *(*start_routine) (void *), void *arg);
Compile and link with -pthread.
....
Since none of the answers exactly covered my need (using MSVS Code), I add here my experience with this IDE and CMAKE build tools too.
Step 1: Make sure in your .cpp, (or .hpp if needed) you have included:
#include <functional>
Step 2 For MSVSCode IDE users:
Add this line to your c_cpp_properties.json file:
"compilerArgs": ["-pthread"],
Step 2 For CMAKE build tools users:
Add this line to your CMakeLists.txt
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-pthread")
Note: Adding flag -lpthread (instead of -pthread) results in failed linking.
From man gcc,
-pthread
Define additional macros required for using the POSIX threads library.
You should use this option consistently for both compilation and linking.
This option is supported on GNU/Linux targets,
most other Unix derivatives,
and also on x86 Cygwin and MinGW targets.
It is correct that -pthread is an option and the best way to handle this.
There are statements in some answers that it generates different compiled code. This is misleading.
If you wish to duplicate -pthread, you could use -lpthread -D_REENTRANT=1. So there are two things going on with the -pthread option.
Indeed it links with the pthread library as many answers express. Also, the order of the pthread library is important because it may override some weak symbols. So a correct version using -lpthread may need to have it multiple times on the command line.
The other important part is the _REENTRANT define. Note, that this is in the implementation namespace. Some people may care for portability and other not. However, it is very important that it is defined as the first thing in the compilation unit. This symbol will alter the way that many system headers files are parsed.
You can include #define _REENTRANT 1 at the top of every source file, but it is much easier to have it on the command line. Again, the -pthread is the best way to achieve this. Also, gcc may change the way this is implemented in the future. However, I think it is important for programmers to understand what is going on.
term.c: In function ‘main’: term.c:23: warning: incompatible implicit
declaration of built-in function ‘exit’
You never included <stdlib.h>, where exit() is declared. Also, I think newer versions of gcc have removed the need for _REENTRANT.
Why features.h?
Example on godbolt, without -pthread.
So, it is NOT generating different code. Ie, the backend of the compiler is NOT different. It is only conditional compilation and linking to different libraries. It does not generate 'lock free' code or add appropriate machine barriers because you have used this option.
In Anjuta, go to the Build menu, then Configure Project.
In the Configure Options box, add:
LDFLAGS='-lpthread'
Hope it'll help somebody too...
Sometimes, if you use multiple library, check the library dependency.
(e.g. -lpthread -lSDL... <==> ... -lSDL -lpthread)

gcc 5.40 doesn't include standard include files?

gcc 5.4.0
cygwin 2.8.0
Win10
I've been been knocking my head around this problem.When I compile a simple program, see below, I get an error in one of the gcc include files. I checked the cygwin mailing list and no one has reported an error in the gcc download so I think it's a misunderstanding on my part but I can't figure what I did wrong. Prior to this point all the gcc include fileswere included automatically. Oh, and the compile is correct for other libraries.
The code is:
gcc -std=c++11 test.cpp or gcc test.cpp
include iostream
using namespace std;
int main(int argc, char** argv) { }
and the error message is:
/tmp/ccfBvaqg.o:test.cpp:(.text+0x44): undefined reference to std::ios_base::Init::Init()'
/tmp/ccfBvaqg.o:test.cpp:(.text+0x44): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbolstd::ios_base::Init::Init()'
/tmp/ccfBvaqg.o:test.cpp:(.rdata$.refptr._ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev[.refptr._ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev]+0x0): undefined reference to `std::ios_base::Init::~Init()'
gcc is the C compiler driver. The compiler automatically detects the language based on the file name; that is why the compilation succeeded. However, the linker is not affected by the names of the source files. By default, the C compiler driver does not link with the C++ standard library.
Since you used the standard library (<iostream> is a bit atypical header file in such a way that merely including it causes a standard library function to be called at the start of the program), but did not link it, the linker fails. The solution is to link with the C++ standard library. The simplest way to do that is to use the C++ compiler driver (g++) which links the standard library by default.

MinGW g++: Multiple definition of vsnprintf when using to_string

I just started using MinGW for Windows. When trying to create executable using
g++ a.cpp -o a.exe -std=c++14
for the code below:
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
string x = to_string(123);
return 0;
}
I'm getting following error:
C:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/5.3.0/../../../libmingwex.a(vsnprintf.o):(.text+0x0): multiple definition of vsnprintf
C:\Users\..\Local\Temp\cc4sJDvK.o:c:/mingw/include/stdio.h:426: first defined here
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
What is the root cause for this error and how can I make it go away? While I can easily find a replacement for to_string() function I'm not sure what is causing this error to occur in the first place.
Installing MinGW packages mingw32-libmingwex-* will link an appropriate version of vsnprintf and avoid the linker error.
This issue, i.e. multiple definition of vsnprintf, still exists in MinGW as December 2019.
After investigating a lot, I found the solution in the official mailing list.
It's a bug in mingwrt-5.2.2. Downgrading to the mingwrt-5.2.1 version solves that issue.
To do that, just input the following command:
mingw-get upgrade mingwrt=5.2.1
Then restart the MinGW shell.
Read the full story here.
Note: MinGW-w64 and MinGW are separate projects, so the accepted solution is not so helpful to me, as I want to keep MinGW and not to move to MinGW-w64.
I solved this issue using MinGW w64 compiler
download mingw-w64-install.exe
setup to Version: 6.3.0, Architecture: i686, Threads: posix, Exception: dwarf and Build revision: 2.
I hope this will be of some help.
There are multiple definitions of vsnprintf in both stdio.h and libmingwex.a. I am able to work this around by adding #define __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO 0 to the start of the code, before any includes, which disables the definition of vsnprintf in stdio.h.

Can I use C++11 in the .cu-files (CUDA5.5) in Windows7x64 (MSVC) and Linux64 (GCC4.8.2)?

When I compile the following code containing the design C++11, in Windows7x64 (MSVS2012 + Nsight 2.0 + CUDA5.5), then I do not get errors, and everything compiles and works well:
#include <thrust/device_vector.h>
int main() {
thrust::device_vector<int> dv(10);
auto iter = dv.begin();
return 0;
}
But when I try to compile it under the Linux64 (Debian 7 Wheezey + Nsight Eclipse from CUDA5.5), I get errors:
../src/CudaCpp11.cu(5): error: explicit type is missing ("int"
assumed)
../src/CudaCpp11.cu(5): error: no suitable conversion function from
"thrust::detail::normal_iterator>" to "int"
exists
2 errors detected in the compilation of
"/tmp/tmpxft_00001520_00000000-6_CudaCpp11.cpp1.ii". make: *
[src/CudaCpp11.o] Error 2
When I added line:-stdc++11
in Properties-> Build-> Settings-> Tool Settings-> Build Stages-> Preprocessor options (-Xcompiler)
I get more errors:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/include/stddef.h(432): error:
identifier "nullptr" is undefined
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/include/stddef.h(432): error:
expected a ";"
...
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(314): error: namespace
"std::__gnu_cxx" has no member
"__normal_iterator"
/usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/cpp_type_traits.h(314): error: expected a
">"
nvcc error : 'cudafe' died due to signal 11 (Invalid memory
reference) make: * [src/CudaCpp11.o] Error 11
Only when I use thrust::device_vector<int>::iterator iter = dv.begin(); in Linux-GCC then I do not get an error. But in Windows MSVS2012 all c++11 features works fine!
Can I use C++11 in the .cu-files (CUDA5.5) in Windows7x64 (MSVC) and Linux64 (GCC4.8.2)?
You will probably have to split the main.cpp from your others.cu like this:
others.hpp:
void others();
others.cu:
#include "others.hpp"
#include <boost/typeof/std/utility.hpp>
#include <thrust/device_vector.h>
void others() {
thrust::device_vector<int> dv(10);
BOOST_AUTO(iter, dv.begin()); // regular C++
}
main.cpp:
#include "others.hpp"
int main() {
others();
return 0;
}
This particular answer shows that compiling with an officially supported gcc version (as Robert Crovella stated correctly) should work out at least for c++11 code in the main.cpp file:
g++ -std=c++0x -c main.cpp
nvcc -arch=sm_20 -c others.cu
nvcc -lcudart -o test main.o others.o
(tested on Debian 8 with nvcc 5.5 and gcc 4.7.3).
To answer your underlying question: I am not aware that one can use C++11 in .cu files with CUDA 5.5 in Linux (and I was not aware the shown example with host-side C++11 gets properly de-cluttered under MSVC). I even filed a feature request for constexpr support which is still open.
The CUDA programming guide for CUDA 5.5 states:
For the host code, nvcc supports whatever part of the C++ ISO/IEC
14882:2003 specification the host c++ compiler supports.
For the device code, nvcc supports the features illustrated in Code
Samples with some restrictions described in Restrictions; it does not
support run time type information (RTTI), exception handling, and the
C++ Standard Library.
Anyway, it is possible to use some of the C++11 features like auto in kernels, e.g. with boost::auto.
As an outlook, other C++11 features like threads may be quite unlikely to end up in CUDA and I heard no official plans about them yet (as of supercomputing 2013).
Shameless plug: If you are interested in more of these tweeks, feel free to have a look in our library libPMacc which provides multi-GPU grid and particle abstractions for simulations. We implemented lambda, a STL-like access concept for 1-3D matrices and other useful stuff there.
All the best,
Axel
Update: Since CUDA 7.0 C++11 support in kernels has been added officially. As BenC pointed our correctly, parts of this feature were already silently added in CUDA 6.5.
According to Jared Hoberock (Thrust developer), it seems that C++11 support has been added to CUDA 6.5 (although it is still experimental and undocumented). This may make things easier when starting to use C++11 in very large C++/CUDA projects, since splitting everything can be quite cumbersome for large projects when you use CMake for instance.

cygwin g++ std::stoi "error: ‘stoi’ is not a member of ‘std

I have:
-cygwin 1.7.25 on windows 7/32bit
-g++ --version --> g++ (GCC) 4.8.2
-libstdc++.a --> gcc-g++-4.8.2-1
Tried to make a c++
Hello World:
#include <string>
int main()
{
std::string s = "123";
int i = std::stoi(s);
}
compiling gives:
$ g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp
main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:6:10: error: ‘stoi’ is not a member of ‘std’
int i = std::stoi(s);
I searched for hours but I still could not find a solution. What's the issue here?
That's a bug, possibly an incomplete port of some library code to cygwin (it's a cplusplus11 feature) - some stuff has to be changed after all. Make sure to report it.
The solution is easy of course: #include <cstdlib> strtol(s.c_str(),0,10);
www.cplusplus.com/.../strtol
A similar mingw bug is mentioned also here
std::stoi doesn't exist in g++ 4.6.1 on MinGW
I have the same problem yesterday. "error: 'stoi' is not a member of 'std'."
First, I made sure c++11 was enabled. Then, I updated the g++ compiler to the newest version. After that, this error disappeared.
The compiler is not being taken seriously. On windows your best bet is to probably use visual studio, as it is always kept up to date . The bug here is that the macro defs are wrong to begin with. The problem starts from iomanip.h and iosbase . So they would have to changed all of there code. There are user made patches for this but I would not trust them at all, as they may contain even more bugs then the original copies. But it's up to you , I just stick with visual studio express edition.
stoi works correct only on mingw64 for me.
If you use Codeblocks, don't forget to check if your projects compiler is set to mingw64.
Well, I am working with -std=c++98, not -std=c++11 but I solved it with the following:
int i = std::atoi(input.c_str());
atoi() is waiting for c type null-terminated string, c_str() makes it null-terminated char*. To use atoi I also() added the following library:
#include <cstdlib>
my system is:
Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS

Resources