Same problem as this OP, but must be a seperate cause.
The following script:
#!/bin/sh
arr=("cat" "dog" "bird")
Works interactively (debian) but fails when called by crontab with:
/bin/sh: 2: /path/zero_check.sh: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
I've tried with #!/bin/bash shebang, and declaring array with declare -a arr=("cat" "dog" "bird"), to no effect.
Any idea why?
The problem here is that you are using this shebang:
#!/bin/sh
Whereas arrays are something Bash specific that shell does not allow.
So to make it work, change the shebang of your script to Bash:
#!/bin/bash
Specify your interpreter explicitly in the crontab entry. Use
bash /path/zero_check.sh
rather than
/path/zero_check.sh
Just for the documentation,
i had an old script to run which had an Syntax Error in the Shebang:
#/bin/bash
instead of
#!/bin/bash
Also check the Script is executable of course.
Very similar problem with incorrect bash function declarations. This works OK from the command line, but it causes cron to fail...
function test () { ... }
Cron should save the errors in /var/mail
I also recommend linting with "shellcheck" because it found another error I didn't notice.
Related
I want to run this script:
#!/bin/bash
echo <(true)
I run it as:
sh file.sh
And I get "Syntax error: "(" unexpected" . I found some similar situations but still can't solve this.
I'm a beginner at shell scripting , but as I understand:
the shebang I use is correct and chooses the bash shell , so the process substitution syntax should work
I try the same from the command line and it works. I checked with echo $0 and it gives me "bash" , so what's the difference from running the command in the command line and from a script that invokes the same shell?
Maybe it's something simple, but I couldn't find an explanation or solution.
You should run your script with bash, i.e. either bash ./script.sh or making use of the shebang by ./script.sh after setting it to executable. Only running it with sh ./script.sh do I get your error, as commented by Cyrus.
See also: role of shebang at unix.SE
Remove export POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 from your ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile (etc.) files.
The issue is that process substitution is an added bash feature that is not part of the posix standards.
sh file.sh
errorsh: 3: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
solution:
bash file.sh
I want to run this script:
#!/bin/bash
echo <(true)
I run it as:
sh file.sh
And I get "Syntax error: "(" unexpected" . I found some similar situations but still can't solve this.
I'm a beginner at shell scripting , but as I understand:
the shebang I use is correct and chooses the bash shell , so the process substitution syntax should work
I try the same from the command line and it works. I checked with echo $0 and it gives me "bash" , so what's the difference from running the command in the command line and from a script that invokes the same shell?
Maybe it's something simple, but I couldn't find an explanation or solution.
You should run your script with bash, i.e. either bash ./script.sh or making use of the shebang by ./script.sh after setting it to executable. Only running it with sh ./script.sh do I get your error, as commented by Cyrus.
See also: role of shebang at unix.SE
Remove export POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 from your ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile (etc.) files.
The issue is that process substitution is an added bash feature that is not part of the posix standards.
sh file.sh
errorsh: 3: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
solution:
bash file.sh
I want to run this script:
#!/bin/bash
echo <(true)
I run it as:
sh file.sh
And I get "Syntax error: "(" unexpected" . I found some similar situations but still can't solve this.
I'm a beginner at shell scripting , but as I understand:
the shebang I use is correct and chooses the bash shell , so the process substitution syntax should work
I try the same from the command line and it works. I checked with echo $0 and it gives me "bash" , so what's the difference from running the command in the command line and from a script that invokes the same shell?
Maybe it's something simple, but I couldn't find an explanation or solution.
You should run your script with bash, i.e. either bash ./script.sh or making use of the shebang by ./script.sh after setting it to executable. Only running it with sh ./script.sh do I get your error, as commented by Cyrus.
See also: role of shebang at unix.SE
Remove export POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 from your ~/.bashrc or ~/.profile (etc.) files.
The issue is that process substitution is an added bash feature that is not part of the posix standards.
sh file.sh
errorsh: 3: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
solution:
bash file.sh
when I run the following script
#!/bin/sh
[ `whoami` == root ] || echo "must be run as root"
I get the following error
./test.sh: 2: [: root: unexpected operator
How can I avoid that error?
While it might seem like the problem is not quoting the word root, your script does run without error on my machine, even without quoting it. So it seems your error depends on the shell implementation.
The problem is that sh is implemented by different shells in different environments. The posix sh command doesn't support == (only =), and I think that's the error you're experiencing. See e.g. this answer.
Try changing the first line to #!/bin/bash to see if this is the case on your machine.
I have two commands:
#!/bin/bash
python /srv/django/manage.py shell; execfile('/home/usr/myscript.py')
I want to use them in one script scr.sh. However as it is, I get errors.
CommandError: Command doesn't accept any arguments
/home/usr/project.sh: line 7: syntax error near unexpected token
`'/home/usr/myscript.py''
where myscript.py is what the code I want running when the python shell appears. How could I go about achieving this?
Thanks!
What was happening here is that ';' symbol will wait until something is performed/run in the shell. The correct syntax would be
#!/bin/bash
python /srv/django/manage.py shell <<EOF\ execfile('myscript.py') EOF