Does Spring closes the DataSource when context get destroyed - spring

I am using an embedded DBCP1.3 DataSource in Spring Batch. The batch is packaged inside an EAR and deployed in WAS7 server (But it is not an AppClient). The job is scheduled using a Unix script.
DataSource Configurations:
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource" destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="com.ibm.db2.jcc.DB2Driver"/>
<property name="url" value="****"/>
<property name="username" value="***"/>
<property name="password" value="****"/>
<property name="initialSize" value="5"/>
<property name="maxActive" value="10"/>
<property name="maxIdle" value="10"/>
<property name="maxWait" value="10000"/>
<property name="minEvictableIdleTimeMillis" value="30000"/>
<property name="timeBetweenEvictionRunsMillis" value="5000"/>
<property name="validationQuery" value="select 1 from sysibm.sysdummy1"/>
<property name="testOnBorrow" value="true"/>
<property name="testOnReturn" value="true"/>
<property name="testWhileIdle" value="true"/>
</bean>
Once the job is completed I am closing the the ClassPathXmlApplicationContext spring context explicitly inside a finally block by calling context.close()
Now my question is once the job is completed the DataSource get close automatically and releases all the connection created for the database?
[EDIT]:
After running the application debug mode I can see it does close the DataSource
2016-05-31 11:00:56 DEBUG DisposableBeanAdapter:302 - Invoking destroy method 'close' on bean with name 'dataSource'

Related

JPA hibernate insertion not locking

We are using SpringFramework 3.2.12.RELEASE, Hibernate 4.1.6.FINAL against Oracle 11g.
We have a service managed by JPATransactionManager. The service accepts an id as primary key and creates a new entity with the id, saves it, makes an external call, then updates the entity. Under multi-thread testing with the same id, I am expecting all other threads are blocking after the first thread has done the insertion and making external call, however it is not the case. The service is annotated with #Transactional(propagation=Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW, readOnly=false), and the two save calls are made via JpaRepository. Below is my spring configuration.
<bean id="jpaVendorAdapter"
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter">
<property name="showSql" value="true"></property>
<property name="generateDdl" value="false"></property>
<property name="database" value="ORACLE"></property>
</bean>
<bean id="abstractEntityManagerFactory"
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean"
abstract="true">
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter" ref="jpaVendorAdapter" />
</bean>
<bean id="myEntityManagerFactory" parent="abstractEntityManagerFactory">
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="my" />
<property name="dataSource" ref="myDataSource" />
<property name="PackagesToScan" value="test.schema" />
</bean>
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager">
<property name="entityManagerFactory" ref="myEntityManagerFactory" />
</bean>
<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager" />
<jpa:repositories base-package="test.dao"
entity-manager-factory-ref="myEntityManagerFactory"></jpa:repositories>
Appreciate comments and help!

Build Maven project without include Spring bean profile

I use Spring bean profile to separate each datasource environments:
<bean id="fooJDBCTemplate" class="com.rakuya.r_erp.task.dao.FooJDBCTemplate">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
</bean>
<beans profile="dev">
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
<property name="driverClassName" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" />
<property name="url" value="jdbc:mysql://somewhere:3306/erp?characterEncoding=UTF-8" />
<property name="username" value="" />
<property name="password" value="" />
</bean>
</beans>
<beans profile="qa">
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
<property name="driverClassName" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"/>
<property name="url" value="jdbc:mysql://somewhere:3306/erp?characterEncoding=UTF-8"/>
<property name="username" value=""/>
<property name="password" value=""/>
</bean>
</beans>
<beans profile="prod">
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
<property name="driverClassName" value="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"/>
<property name="url" value="jdbc:mysql://somewhere:3306/erp?characterEncoding=UTF-8"/>
<property name="username" value=""/>
<property name="password" value=""/>
</bean>
</beans>
And i use following command to build jar file and specify profile
mvn clean package -Dspring.profiles.active=prod
But i got the error about no definition of dataSource when executing the jar file.
It seems like Maven does not use the Spring profile to build jar.
How can I configure the Maven or Spring peofile to use the dataSource ?
Thx
You need to pass the profile -D switch when you run your app.
Since your bears are all the same type (DriverManagerDataSource) and the only thing that differs between environments are some of the properties, I think it would be best to get rid of the spring profiles and use properties to set these values. PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer should be able to handle this scenario where you set a vm param specifying what environment you want. Something like -Denv=dev.
<bean id="propertyConfigurer"
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
<property name="locations">
<list>
<value>classpath:${env}.properties</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
Then you would only need one datasource bean like the following:
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
<property name="driverClassName" value="${db.driver}" />
<property name="url" value="${db.url}" />
<property name="username" value="${db.username}" />
<property name="password" value="${db.password}" />
</bean>
And a property file for each environment named dev.properties, qa.properties, and prod.properties with values in each for db.driver, db.url, etc.
When spring starts up it will select the appropriate properties file based on the value passed in with -Denv and load the corresponding property values into your datasource bean.

Hibernate (JPA,JSF 2.0, Spring) switch from HyperSQL to Oracle - Configuration is being ignored

i'm currently in the process of working on a midsized Webproject, using JSF 2.0 with Spring.As IDE i use Eclipse with JBoss Tools. The Webapp is deployed to a Tomcat v7.0 Server.
I use Hibernate/JPA/C3P0/ to connect to the Database (previously HyperSQL) I now tried to switch to an Oracle DB, which i did a number of times before and it never was a problem, however now it seems, that the changed configuartion is just being ignored. When i fire up the Server, it still uses the HyperSQl Driver and the old DB, although i cleaned the workdirectory of Tomcat, removed and redeployed the Webapp (which i built from scratch of course).
The project is split in two, one webapp and one service part. The project are dependent in Eclipse. However, although all of the businesslogic is implemented in the service layer, i can just remove it and the webapp doesn't throw an error and i can start it as if nothing has changed. This tells me that it must be cached somewhere and it is not refreshed on the server...I also deleted the server, added a freshly downloaded instance - still the same thing...Does anyone have an Idea what this could be about?
Here is my service.spring.xml:
<!-- Enable processing of #PersistenceContext and #PersistenceUnit -->
<context:annotation-config/>
<!-- Enable transaction configuration with #Transactional -->
<tx:annotation-driven transaction-manager="transactionManager"/>
<!-- Configure a c3p0 pooled data source -->
<bean id="dataSource" class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource">
<property name="user" value="user"/>
<property name="password" value="password"/>
<property name="driverClass" value="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"/>
<property name="jdbcUrl" value="jdbc:oracle:thin:#dburl"/>
<property name="initialPoolSize" value="1"/>
<property name="minPoolSize" value="1"/>
<property name="maxPoolSize" value="10"/>
</bean>
<!-- Configure the JPA entity manager factory with Hibernate -->
<bean id="entityManagerFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter">
<bean class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter">
<property name="showSql" value="false"/>
<property name="database" value="ORACLE"/>
<property name="generateDdl" value="true"/>
</bean>
</property>
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="mygourmet"/>
</bean>
<!-- Configure transaction manager for JPA -->
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager">
<property name="entityManagerFactory" ref="entityManagerFactory"/>
</bean>
And my persistence.xml:
<persistence-unit name="mygourmet" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<properties>
<property name="hibernate.dialect" value="org.hibernate.dialect.OracleDialect" />
<property name="hibernate.show_sql" value="false" />
<property name="hibernate.format_sql" value="false" />
<property name="hibernate.use_sql_comments" value="false" />
<property name="hibernate.connection.autocommit" value="false" />
<property name="hibernate.cache.use_query_cache" value="false" />
<property name="hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache" value="false" />
<property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto" value="create" />
</properties>
I used the exact same configuration on another project and it works like a charm...Any hints are highly appreciated, thank you guys in advance!
Problem solved - i did a mvn clean install, generated new eclipse projects and imported them back into eclipse. It seems the changes in my service module were not recognized by eclipse.

Setup Connection Pooling in Spring MVC

How can I setup connection pooling in Spring MVC? I am working on an intranet website powered by Spring MVC 2.5 and jQuery. This is my first attempt at web development.
I am not sure but, I am only using this in my spring configuration file and I saw this in the Spring MVC step By Step tutorial
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource"
destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}" />
<property name="url" value="${jdbc.url}" />
<property name="username" value="${jdbc.username}" />
<property name="password" value="${jdbc.password}" />
</bean>
<bean id="propertyConfigurer"
class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer">
<property name="locations">
<list>
<value>classpath:jdbc.properties</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
This looks good during development and connection speed is fast but I am not sure if this will still holds true if many users are concurrently connected.
How can I achieve this? I have read that this is not an optimal connection datasource.
You might want to look at c3p0, which has some powerful configuration and optimization available.
<bean id="dataSource" class="com.mchange.v2.c3p0.ComboPooledDataSource">
<property name="driverClass" value="..." />
<property name="jdbcUrl" value="..." />
<property name="user" value="..." />
<property name="password" value="..." />
</bean>
Your current setup is correct, all you need to do in order to use basic connection pooling is use a DataSource implementation provided by a connection pooling library, in your case Apache DBCP. See this post for a few links to other alternatives, C3P0 being one of them.
Note that when you actually use the DataSource bean you're injecting wrap it in a SimpleJdbcTemplate or use DataSourceUtils to obtain a Connection - see Spring JDBC Documentation
For connection Pooling
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource"
destroy-method="close">
<property name="driverClassName" value="${jdbc.driverClassName}" />
<property name="url" value="${jdbc.url}" />
<property name="username" value="${jdbc.username}" />
<property name="password" value="${jdbc.password}" />
//Add this two more parameters
<property name="**initialSize**" value="20" />
<property name="**maxActive**" value="30" />
</bean>
connection pool will create 20 database connection as initialSize is 20 and goes up to 30 Database connection if required as maxActive is 30.

Spring/JTA/JPA DAO integration test doesn't rollback?

My DAO integration tests are failing because entities created during the tests are still in the database at the start of the next test. The exact same behavior is seen from both MySQL 5 and H2.
The test classes are annotated with:
#Transactional
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration( { "/testPersist-applicationContext.xml" })
The transaction bean configuration in the test application context is as follows:
<tx:annotation-driven />
<bean id="transactionManager"
class="org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager">
<property name="transactionManager" ref="atomikosTransactionManager" />
<property name="userTransaction" ref="atomikosUserTransaction" />
</bean>
<bean id="atomikosTransactionManager" class="com.atomikos.icatch.jta.UserTransactionManager"
init-method="init" destroy-method="close">
<property name="forceShutdown" value="false" />
</bean>
<bean id="atomikosUserTransaction" class="com.atomikos.icatch.jta.UserTransactionImp">
<property name="transactionTimeout" value="300" />
</bean>
The entity manager is configured as follows:
<bean id="myappTestLocalEmf"
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="myapp" />
<property name="persistenceUnitPostProcessors">
<bean class="com.myapp.core.persist.util.JtaPersistenceUnitPostProcessor">
<property name="jtaDataSource" ref="myappPersistTestJdbcDataSource" />
</bean>
</property>
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter">
<bean class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter">
<property name="showSql" value="false" />
<property name="database" value="$DS{hibernate.database}" />
<property name="databasePlatform" value="$DS{hibernate.dialect}" />
</bean>
</property>
<property name="jpaProperties">
<props>
<prop key="hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class">com.atomikos.icatch.jta.hibernate3.TransactionManagerLookup
</prop>
<prop key="hibernate.format_sql">true"</prop>
<prop key="hibernate.use_sql_comments">true</prop>
</props>
</property>
</bean>
<context:annotation-config />
Everything in the log files seem to be fine...I can see messages from Spring about rollback and from Atomikos about rollback as well. But frankly, the logs are so huge and so complex, I could easily be missing something...
Yet the inserted test data remains! Any clues?
It turned out that my C3P0 JDBC data source was not XA aware and was therefore not participating in the transaction. Why I did not get an error, nor a warning in the log file, I do not know. Nonetheless, the reason you cannot use an XA aware data source is explained very nicely here. Note that the data source does not need to be XA capable...just XA aware.
Replacing the C3P0 data source with the following one solved the problem.
<bean id="myappJTANonXADataSource" class="com.atomikos.jdbc.nonxa.AtomikosNonXADataSourceBean">
<property name="uniqueResourceName" value="myappDatabase" />
<property name="driverClassName" value="$DS{hibernate.connection.driver_class}" />
<property name="url" value="$DS{hibernate.connection.url}" />
<property name="user" value="$DS{hibernate.connection.username}" />
<property name="password" value="$DS{hibernate.connection.password}" />
<property name="maxPoolSize" value="20" />
<property name="reapTimeout" value="300" />
</bean>
I think you will need to go through the logs in details. It could be that the rollbacks you are seeing are working, except that something else has executed a commit first. I also cannot see anything in your code which indicates automated rollback. And that it should occur at the end of each test. If you are depending on a timeout based rollback it could be that the second test is running before the timeout occurs, therefore it sees the data before it is rolled back.
Many options here there is :-)

Resources