i'm not sure if GRINDER is still best tool so far JAVA API performance testing tool. If anyone is using it, could you share your feedback? tx
I have used JMeter and Grinder and can tell you that grinder is awesome . JMeter is also great . Not sure why you will be testing a JAVA API.
Grinder is more like a programmers performance tester tool. Once you get a hang of it you will not lean away from it . The only complex part could be the recorded scripts that grinder generates .The initial recorded script can get you overwhelmed and you might think what have i picked up .
But actually it just a step by step script and easy to modify as per your needs.
Any performance testing will have only these steps .
Record - Generates the Initial Script of what you want to test.
Modify - Modify it as per you needs.For grinder you may require a basic knowledge of some scripting language. Many times this may not be required.
Test - Put the load you want to .Here you need to decide the number of threads plus agents .
My vote is for grinder specially for complicated scenarios.
Related
Please could someone suggest:
I need to performance test a few APIs. Which of the below methods will be better way of conducting the tests (trying to understand the pros and cons of various ways to run JMeter tests):
Create Ultimate Concurrency Thread groups using only Jmeter.
Buy Blazemeter, add the Jmeter scripts, create scenario and run the tests
Run the JMeter tests using Maven plugin as part of the build.
Thanks,
N
Testing the performance of an API can be achieved by the above mentioned 3 ways.
Open Source: (Standalone JMeter/Taurus)
Cloud based solutions (Octoperf/Blazemeter)
If you are looking for an open source tool + you have your LG machine allocated + not gonna test with massive number of users - I would suggest to go with standalone JMeter/ taurus for your load testing solution.
If you are looking for an hassle free environment to manage all your test, LGs, reports, monitoring, etc then cloud based solutions like Blazemeter/Octoperf seems promising. This is going to cost you money and requires a port needs to be open for the solution to communicate with AUT.
For Scripting: You can use the same JMeter scripting in all 3 cases. Choosing a thread group requires what kinda test you wanna perform on your microsevrices.
In any case you will be using JMeter so points 2 and 3 don't really differ. The pro is that you don't have to pay. The con is that you need to manage your infrastructure yourself.
BlazeMeter provides easy way of launching a JMeter test so you don't have to worry about creating and configuring machines, installing JMeter, setting up distributed testing, real time monitoring and results comparison.
JMeter Maven Plugin makes the following processes easier:
installing JMeter
generating reporting dashboard
returning non-zero exit status code when acceptance criteria are not met
I need some input from loadrunner/jmeter experts.
I'm having automation scripts which is written in selenium+ java .
Can i use same scripts to do performance testing using loadrunner/jemeter.?
why i want do like this : to maintain single code base. if any changes happen so i will able to correct at one place and use it for UI Automation and performance testing.
Any help appreciate.
Selenium automates browsers that it!
Jmeter is specifically to use for Performance test. to be more specific either stress testing or load testing.
JMeter and Selenium can be used together for load testing of a website. Selenium is used to perform load testing and JMeter is used to measure the performance of the same. One can measure how fast HTML pages take to load, and also check javascript and CSS performances. This is done using a combination of the graphical JMeter interface and some scripting to invoke Selenium code.
Please read more about it here
JMeter and Selenium are both used for web application testing. But the main difference is that JMeter is mostly used to test the performance of web applications under load and stress. On the other hand, Selenium is best suited for automation and cross browser testing of a website. Based on what type of testing is necessary for the project, one can choose JMeter or Selenium or integrate both if that serves their purpose.
Theoretically yes, it is possible, but it is not recommended even by Selenium developers, be informed of the following additional constraints:
Browsers are quite resource intensive, for example Firefox 94 needs 1 CPU core and 2 GB of RAM per instance so you can calculate how much RAM you will need to simulate, say, 100 users.
You won't get metrics and KPIs normally available as the result of a performance test run
I have to test my rest API such that 100k API calls are made simultaneously(within 500ms).Any Idea how to simulate it?Utility to use?
I would suggest to use JMeter too, it enable your test to create multiple concurrent jmeter server. Just to be clear you can control multiple remote JMeter engines from a single JMeter client and replicate a test across many computers and thus simulate a larger load on the target server.
To be honest, your target is quite high (100k API calls simultaneously within 500ms), i.e. you'll need a lot of jmeter servers. When you create stress tests, there are not magical recipes, guides or manuals. Trial and error is a fundamental method of solving this kind of problems.
In my experience, I first try with few concurrent users and see how the server react. Then increase the number of concurrent users till to reach an intolerable performance decrease or, worst, a bottleneck .
http://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/remote-test.html
You will obviously need a load testing tool which can be run in a distributed mode, i.e. 1 controller and X load generators executing the same test.
Grinder - scripts are written in some Python dialect
Apache JMeter - this guy doesn't require any specific knowledge, you can create tests using simple GUI
Tsung - is written in Erlang, known for capability to produce high loads even on low-end hardware.
See Open Source Load Testing Tools: Which One Should You Use? article for more information on above tools.
JMeter
The Apache JMeter™ application is open source software, a 100% pure
Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure
performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications
but has since expanded to other test functions.
I've got a PHP site up and running, and the db is mysql. before launching the site, I would like to test the traffic handling. Now am assuming that there are soe softwares that would simulate the traffic and log the processes running on my site. Any recommendation of software I should use? the traffic doesn't have to be real, but nonetheless, I would like to generate a high traffic to investigate the threshold of the site.
Appreciate the help
You can use Gatling https://github.com/excilys/gatling.
It's a stress tool written in Scala which aims at being more efficient and lighter than Jmeter.
Basically you record a scenario on your website and then run it 'n' times in parallel.
Here is the wiki for more infos https://github.com/excilys/gatling/wiki/Basic-Usage
You can use Jmeter:
It's free.
it's easy to Start with lot of documentation on its Website and on internet
it has a proxy feature to easily create test plan from browser navigation
It is easy to start up processes on other machines. It remote testing, can be done from GUI or console.
The scripts can be written in beanshell, java, or any jsr223 language ( groovy, Javascript, scala, jexl ...)
it has a lot of built- in samplers and thanks to its plugin architecture it's very Easy to add new ones or use any scripting engine to do what's missing
it has great user mailing list
it has very reactive support
it's now a top Level Apache
it can run thousands of users
professional solutions exist to run it from cloud
...
See:
Performing a Stress Test on Web Application?
Best way to stress test a website
How do you test the performance of a website?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking at stress testing our website and having trouble picking the right tool.
It looks to me like two of the most popular are JMeter and The Grinder. Can anyone help with reasons in favor of either?
Thanks!
I have worked a bunch with The Grinder and there are three main reasons I like it.
It's free. I assume from your question, you are only looking at free solutions. There are some excellent commercial products as well, but most of the time, I cannot justify the cost
It is easy to start up processes on other machines. When really trying to crank up load on a cluster, I need to easily distribute the load out to remote machines. Grinder is great for that.
The scripts are all Jython. That allows me to easily customize my scripts to programatically tweak my scripts (e.g. randomize certain paths).
I haven't used JMeter in a long time, so I cannot say authoritatively how it compares on points 2 & 3.
As of Jmeter:
It's free.
it's easy to Start with lot of documentation on its Website and on internet
it has a proxy feature to easily create test plan from browser navigation
It is easy to start up processes on other machines. It remote testing, can be done from GUI or console.
The scripts can be written in beanshell, java, or any jsr223 language ( groovy, Javascript, scala, jexl ...)
it has a lot of built- in samplers and thanks to its plugin architecture it's very Easy to add new ones or use any scripting engine to do what's missing
it has great user mailing list
it has very reactive support
it's now a top Level Apache project
...
Use gatling.
http://gatling-tool.org/
Its lovely, great DSL, and you can just edit the .scala files and rerun and it will compile for you on demand. Also emits very nice graphs
http://gatling-tool.org/sample/index.html
If you're not familiar with Jython (like I wasn't) then there is also a great little tool that comes with Grinder (the TCP Proxy or some such name) that allows you to click around in a webapp and save your actions as a ready-made Jython script for Grinder, which you can then analyse/edit/adopt as necessary.
There is an excellent blog post that describes
Load Test Tools:
Grinder 3.11
Gatling 2.0.0.M3a
Tsung 1.51
JMeter 2.11
The Grinder
The Grinder consists of two main parts:
The Grinder Console - This is GUI application which controls various Grinder agents and monitors results in real time. The console can be used as a basic IDE for editing or developing test suites.
Grinder Agents - These are headless load generators; each can have a number of workers to create the load
Key Features of the Grinder:
TCP proxy - records network activity into the Grinder test script
Distributed testing - can scale with the increasing number of agent instances
Power of Python or Closure combined with any Java API for test script creation or modification
Flexible parameterization which includes creating test data on-the-fly and the capability to use external data sources like files, databases, etc.
Post processing and assertion - full access to test results for correlation and content verification
Support of multiple protocols
Apache JMeter
Key Features of the JMeter:
Cross-platform. JMeter can be run on any operating system with Java
Scalable. When you need to create a higher load than a single machine can create, JMeter can be executed in a distributed mode - meaning one master JMeter machine will control a number of remote hosts.
Multi-protocol support. The following protocols are all supported ‘out-of-the-box’: HTTP, SMTP, POP3, LDAP, JDBC, FTP, JMS, SOAP, TCP
Multiple implementations of pre and post processors around sampler. This provides advanced setup, teardown parametrization and correlation capabilities
Various assertions to define criteria
Multiple built-in and external listeners to visualize and analyze performance test results
Integration with major build and continuous integration systems - making JMeter performance tests part of the full software development life cycle
I just went through the process of trying at both and I would totally agree with Rob here. Grinder also seemed faster, and I really like how simple and lightweight it is compared to Jmeter. The grinder.properties file is totally easy to use, especially if you're more of a console guys then a UI guy.