I am trying to schedule a batch in Jenkins (Windows environment) for Windows EXE program (Implemented through .NET).
This program refers to some shared location in the network (viz. \shared network.net\sample path) for the sake of reading from and writing into files.
When I run this program independently out of Jenkins, it works fine, as it considers my login as user who actually has access over shared path.
However, when I run it through Jenkins, there is issue over access. Through my program logs I checked and found that it uses 'NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM' as user.
I need to make Jenkins job run through particular user's authentication, which will have relevant access over shared path.
Please advise.
The Authorize Project Plugin allows you to run a job as a specific user.
Or, if you are executing from a bat script, you should be able to change the user in your script before running your program.
Several options:
Use "net use" to map the network location under the job's session using your credentials.
In your Windows slave you can go to services-> Jenkins slave->properties. there under "Log On" section you can specify the user you want the service to run under.
I would definitely go with the first option as it is much more manageable (tomorrow you'll replace your slave and have to do it all over again, instead of just migrating the job and mapping the session again).
Good Luck!
Related
The scenario is as follows:
I have TeamCity set up to use AWS EC2 hosts running Windows Server 2012 R2 as build agents. In this configuration, the TeamCity agent service is running as SYSTEM. I am trying to implement FastBuild as our new compilation process. In order to use the distributed compilation functionality of FastBuild, the build agent host needs to have access to a shared network folder. Unfortunately, I cannot seem to give this kind of access from one machine to another.
To help further the explanation, I'll use named examples. The networked folder, C:\Shared-Folder, lives on a host named Central-Host. The build agent lives on Builder-Host. Everything is running Windows Server 2012 R2 on EC2 hosts that are fully network permissive to each other via AWS security groups. What I need is to share a directory from Central-Host so that Builder-Host can fully access it via a directory structure like this:
\\Central-Host\Shared-Folder
By RDPing into both hosts using the default Administrator account, I can very easily set up the network sharing and browse (while on Builder-Host) to the \\Central-Host\Shared-Folder location. I can also open up the command line and run:
type NUL > \\Central-Host\Shared-Folder\Empty.txt
with the result of an empty text file being created at that networked location.
The problem arises from the SYSTEM account. When I grab PSTOOLS and use the command:
PSEXEC -i -s cmd.exe
I can test commands that will be given by TeamCity. Again, it is a service being run as SYSTEM which, I need to emphasize, cannot be changed to a normal User due to other issues we have when using TeamCity agents under the User account type.
After much searching I have discovered how to set up Active Directory services so that I can add Users and Computers from the domain but after doing so, I still face access denied errors. I am probably missing something important and I hope someone here can help. I believe this problem will be considered "solved" when I can successfully run the "type NUL" command shown above.
This is not an answer for the permissions issue, but rather a way to avoid it. (Wanted to add this as a comment, but StackOverflow won't let me - weird.)
The shared network drive is used only for the remote worker discovery. If you have a fixed list of workers, instead of using the worker discovery, you can specify them explicitly in your config file as follows:
Settings
{
.Workers =
{
'hostname1' // specify hostname
'hostname2'
'192.168.0.10' // or ip
}
... // the other stuff that goes here
This functionality is not documented, as to-date all users have wanted the automatic worker discovery. It is fine to use however, and if it is indeed useful, it can be elevated to a supported feature with just a documentation update.
I have a script on my domain stored on the Active Directory server. every machine on the domain has a task that when fired, calls this script to run.
Running the task from the AD server works. Running the task from another machine doesn't work. However, running the command that is triggered from cmd manually on the remote computer works?
Could anyone shine some light on this. Basically I call it like this so that the trigger is set up like...
Action: PowerShell.exe
Arguments: -noprofile –ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "\\<>NameOfADServer<>\C$\Tasks\script.ps1" "Argument 1" "Argument 2"
Running as SYSTEM is probably your issue - it wont have any access outside of the PC its running on.
When you run it manually youll have the access.
There's several problems here.
You're running the task as the local SYSTEM accounts. SYSTEM generally does not have access to any network resources.
You're using the administrative share (\\<servername>\C$) to share the script. Only users that have Administrator access to the server can access the administrative shares. Administrative shares are heavily restricted by design and you cannot modify the access on them.
My guess is that the script works when you run it manually is because it's using the current user's credentials for network access when you do that, but don't quote me on that.
The simplest solution with the least amount of change is to do this:
Create a group in Active Directory. Add the Computer accounts, or, preferably, groups with Computer accounts which you want to be able to run the script to this new group. If you really want any SYSTEM account on any computer in the domain to be able to run the script, you can add the "Domain Computers" group to the group.
Create a folder on the server. Put the script in the folder. Don't put anything in this folder you don't want your users to read. Assign the "Read" NTFS permission to the group created above to the folder.
Share the folder out. Grant the group you just created the "Full Control" share access. If you want, you can make it a hidden share by adding a dollar sign to the end of the name.
Update your scheduled tasks to use \\<servername>\<sharename>\script.ps1.
This is almost certainly not the best method to accomplish what you're actually trying to do, but this is probably the best way to use scheduled tasks running scripts on a network share with the SYSTEM account.
I am having trouble when I have one Windows service try to install another Windows service.
Specifically, I have a TeamCity agent running tests for me on a Windows 2008 AWS instance. The tests are written in Java, which shell out to a .bat script to install a service (let's call it Service A), giving it a unique name each time.
The offending line is in the .bat script: sc create "%serviceName%" binPath= %binPath% DisplayName= "%serviceDisplayName:"=%" start= %serviceStartType%. I believe as long as the service name is unique that should work.
And indeed it does work if I run the tests manually on the command line, using an administrator account. Service A is installed, the test completes and Service A is uninstalled at the end.
I have tried running the TeamCity agent as LocalSystem, as Administrator, and as another user that is member of the administrators group. I have also tried disabling UAC completely.
Presumably the problem is access denied type errors, although that is not clear at this point. There are a few avenues to explore still, but it is a simple question really: are processes running as services forbidden from installing other services? Are there special things I have to do to configure the machine/ account to allow it to do this?
The point of the test it to install and use Service A, so workarounds are not relevant - Service A must be operated as a black box.
Thanks!
There are no restrictions on creating services with regards to how the creating process can execute, as long as the process has the appropriate permissions. That is to say, a process could be running as a service and create another service -- the only consideration here is the appropriate permission level.
The problem that often occurs with running batch scripts from within processes (as opposed to directly through user input on the command line) is that the environment expected isn't always the environment that is loaded. In this case, it appears that the env variables referred to in the batch script weren't properly set when running as a service, which of course then caused the service install failure. Correcting the environment loaded when the batch script is shelled out is the correct solution here.
I am running on a Windows Server 2003. This is my problem:
I wrote a Perl script to automate the copy of some files from my Server machine to some network drives. I am using xcopy to copy the files. My problem is the permissions.
If I run the script from the command line, it works, all the copies are successful.
If I try to run the script using a service all the copies fail. This service is a program that I wrote that takes the script and runs it. In the background all it is doing is to call the C function 'system' and it runs the same program that I can run from the command line.
I have tried many variations of this to figure out what is wrong with it but I can't see why the service would not run the same way I run it from the command line.
I set up the service to run as the same user I am using from the command line.
I also tried to map the network drives as the user that has writing permission but the result is the same. Manually the script works, from the service, it doesn't.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks
Tony
The service may be running as the system and not have access to the network drives. In the Service settings, change the service to run under your account (or an account with the relevant permissions/mappings).
When the service runs, it uses whatever credentials you specify in the Services manager of Windows. The default, LOCAL SERVICE, probably does not have permission to access the resources to be copied.
Create a new user account with the minimum set of permissions needed to perform the copy and configure your service to run under that account.
I did figure out the issue (I think), and that matches what I later found in another post:
https://serverfault.com/questions/4623/windows-can-i-map-a-network-drive-for-a-service-account
<...Persistent drive mappings are only restored during an interactive login, which the service does not use. I believe the only way to get a service to use a network drive is for that service to map the drive itself or alternatively for it to us a UNC path instead of a mapped drive.>
What I did was mapping the drive using the service and that seems to work. It turns out, if I map the drive and save credentials, then I can access later the drive without having to map it again. I don't know why this approach seems to work though.
-Thanks everybody for your help.
Tony
I have a program which I would like to run every X min
the problem is that the program is accessing a shared network and using AT command I can't use it (due to the fact that AT is running the program with SYSTEM ACCOUNT)
any ideas how to slove this issue ?
thanks
Does the /interactive switch buy you what you want?
"Use this parameter to allow the task to interact with the desktop of the user who is logged on at the time the task runs."
For more info see: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/313565
With the at command your options are either to run as the System user or the user which is currently logged on.
You might want to try having your program run as a scheduled task instead. That would give you the option to run under any account in which you have credentials (username/password). You can either set this up manually, through the control panel, or programatically from C# using this library