I want to use twilio API in laravel 4 and i have used https://github.com/aloha/laravel-twilio package and read the all the steps but i didn't get this point "And make these objects resolvable from the IoC container".
So please tell me how to make object using IoC container for twilio.
Thanks in advance.
Instructions screenshot
I am adding an answer to this old question because it came up as I was trying to Google the exact same issue OP was having when this question was asked.
I was also confused by the wording in the instructions for that library. The Laravel docs point out:
Almost all of your service container bindings will be registered within service providers...
Assuming this is how the Twilio library is built, if you look a few lines above the on you are quoting, it instructs the developer to "add a new item to the providers array". The two sections beneath that (one starting with "This will..." and the other starting with "And make...") are both explaining the benefits of adding that service provider.
In conclusion, all you should need to do is add that service provider to your app.php file, per the instructions on the GitHub page.
Related
When I am creating a new session (or try to access from an other computer) in Vaadin Flow I get this error:
Can't move a node from one state tree to another
From this link, I read something about UI and getUIId().
However, I don't understand how I should change my application in order to fix the error.
As Denis mentioned in the forum post you linked, wrong scope sounds like the most likely culprit. In other words, you are trying to use the exact same component instance in two different UIs, when both UIs should have their own instance. It's not possible to use the same instance in two places at the same time.
You can find the documentation for Vaadin Spring scopes here: https://vaadin.com/docs/latest/flow/integrations/spring/scopes
One possible cause of errors such as that is that if you're storing a Component in a static variable. You shouldn't do that - a Component instance can only belong to a single UI. A single UI in turn (in practice) means a single browser tab.
In the latest bot samples, we can see that bot is being added to services collection as below
services.AddTransient<IBot, MyBot>();
but in older samples, we saw below approach
services.AddBot<MyBot>(options => { });
Here I am trying to understand the benefits of adding bot using AddTransient() over using AddBot().
What I know is that internally AddBot uses AddTransient only, then why use AddTransient. Referred remarks section from this link.
You can see in the source code that the AddBot methods are used for automatically adding a bot adapter to DI in addition to the bot and for configuring bot-related options like credentials and error handling. The conventions for using the Bot Builder v4 SDK were very different when those samples were made, and the bot's configuration along with its credentials were loaded from something called a bot file. The current convention for using the SDK is much easier because it takes advantage of ASP.NET Core automatically loading the app's configuration from appsettings.json. Since we're not using AddBot anymore you'll notice that the adapter is added to DI explicitly, and you can configure things like error handling and middleware either by accessing the properties and methods of the adapter directly or by deriving your own adapter class, as seen in the samples.
I am implementing a Wagtail powered blog within a larger (primarily DRF) driven app. I'm attempting to use drf-yasg for my documentation.
Since installing wagtail, the docs are now throwing
'Request' object has no attribute 'wagtailapi_router'
It looks to be related to the introspection that drf-yasg does, and all I can find about excluding views from drf-yasg is done at the code level. Being an installed module obviously I want to avoid that.
Has anyone got these 2 (3) components playing nicely together?
It's been a very long time since you asked this question, but as I found this while looking for an answer myself, I thought I might share what worked for me.
Note that I'm not using drf-yasg, but rather DRF's own schema generator. They do however have a lot in common.
The problem in my case was that the schema generator URL was defined like this:
path(
"schema/",
get_schema_view(title="My API Schema"),
name="openapi-schema",
),
What I needed to add was a patterns= argument that referenced my API specifically, leaving out the other non-API urls (like Wagtail):
path(
"v3/schema/",
get_schema_view(title="My API Schema", patterns=router.urls),
name="openapi-schema",
),
I hope that helps... someone :-D
In Angular "Todo App" tutorial on official meteor.com website in constructor there's:
$scope.viewModel(this);
In "Socially" tutorial on angular-meteor.com it looks like the very same thing is achieved by:
$reactive(this).attach($scope)
What's the difference?
Ok, so I did some research on the subject and here is what I found out.
Regarding $reactive(this).attach($scope):
"$reactive is a service that takes care of the reactivity of your
Meteor data, and updates your AngularJS code."
"This service wraps context (can be used with this or $scope) - so you
can use it with any context as you wish."
Read details about it here.
Regarding $scope.viewModel(this):
It looks like it is a package, a library:
"ViewModel is a view layer for Meteor. You can think of it as Angular,
Knockout, Aurelia, Vue, etc. but without the boilerplate code required
to make those work."
More information about it here.
I am trying to add applications into Brooklyn catalog. can anyone explain steps to add a new application to catalog.xml?
I did try the sample catalog provided at https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/v/0.7.0-M1/use/guide/quickstart/policies-and-catalogs.html . The application gets listed in catalog tab but when I try to launch it, it gets stuck at 'configuring'. Is there something else that needs to be done ?
I tried adding existing application to catalog ( https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/v/latest/ops/catalog/index.html ) but it failed. Can anyone help me with this ?
I'd strongly recommend upgrading to 0.7.0-M2-incubating, as the catalog has significantly improved since 0.7.0-M1. The documentation at https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/v/latest/ops/catalog/index.html describes the steps for 0.7.0-M2-incubating; they will not work for 0.7.0-M1.
The link to an explicit version of the docs (rather than latest) is https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/v/0.7.0-M2-incubating/ops/catalog/index.html
There are also more improvements in snapshot (and in existing pull requests), if you fancy trying the bleeding edge!
For the 0.7.0-M1 error "gets stuck at configuring", we'd need more info (e.g. logs, etc). Suggest you e-mail the mailing list or jump on IRC if it's still a problem (https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/community/mailing-lists.html).