I am using Logstash to read some log file.
Here are some data sources records
<2016-07-07 00:31:01> Start
<2016-07-07 00:31:59> Warning - Export_Sysem 6 (1) => No records to be exported
<2016-07-07 00:32:22> Export2CICAP (04) => Export PO : 34 record(s)
<2016-07-07 00:32:22> Export2CICAP (04) => Export CO : 87 record(s)
<2016-07-07 00:32:22> Export2CICAP (04) => Export FC
This is my conf file
grok{
match => {"message" => [
'<%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:Timestamp}> (%{WORD:Level} - )%{NOTSPACE:Job_Code} => %{GREEDYDATA:message}',
'<%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:Timestamp}> %{WORD:Parameter} - %{GREEDYDATA:Message}',
'<%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:Timestamp}> %{WORD:Status}',
]}
}
This is part of my output
{
"message" => "??2016-07-07 00:31:01> Start\r?",
"#version" => "1",
"#timestamp" => "2016-07-08T03:22:01.076Z",
"path" => "C:/CIGNA/Export.log",
"host" => "SIMSPad",
"type" => "txt",
"tags" => [
[0] "_grokparsefailure"
]
}
{
"message" => "<2016-07-07 00:31:59> Warning - Export_Sysem 6 (1) => No records to be exported\r?",
"#version" => "1",
"#timestamp" => "2016-07-06T16:31:59.000Z",
"path" => "C:/CIGNA/Export.log",
"host" => "SIMSPad",
"type" => "txt",
"Timestamp" => "2016-07-07 00:31:59",
"Parameter" => "Warning",
"Message" => "Export_Sysem 6 (1) => No records to be exported\r?"
}
{
"message" => "<2016-07-07 00:32:22> Export2CICAP (04) => Export CO : 87 record(s)\r?",
"#version" => "1",
"#timestamp" => "2016-07-06T16:32:22.000Z",
"path" => "C:/CIGNA/Export.log",
"host" => "SIMSPad",
"type" => "txt",
"Timestamp" => "2016-07-07 00:32:22",
"Status" => "Export2CICAP"
}
As seen from the output, the first output message has a grok parsing error and the other 2 outcomes did not fully parse the message. How should I modify my grok statement so it can fully parse the message?
For the first message, the problem comes from the two ?? that do no appear in the pattern, thus creating the _grokparsefailure.
The second and third message are not fully parsed because the first two pattern do not match the messages and so the message are parsed by the last pattern.
For the second message, if you wish to parse it with the first pattern (<%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:Timestamp}> (%{WORD:Level} - )%{NOTSPACE:Job_Code} => %{GREEDYDATA:message}), your pattern is false:
() around %{WORD:Level} - that do not appear in the log.
There is a space missing between :Timestamp}> and %{WORD:Level}. In the log there is two and only one in the pattern. Note that you can use %{SPACE} to avoid this problem (since %{SPACE} will match any number of space)
The %{NOTSPACE:Job_Code} match a sequence of character without any space, but there is a space in Export_Sysem 6 (1), so the Job_Code will be Export_Sysem and the => in the pattern will prevent successful matching with the first pattern.
Correct pattern :
<%{TIMESTAMP_ISO8601:Timestamp}> %{WORD:Level} - %{DATA:Job_Code} => %{GREEDYDATA:message}
For the third message, I don't see which pattern should be used.
If you add more details, I'll update my answer.
For reference: grok pattern definitions
Related
I'm have an Ubuntu 20.04 VM with Elasticsearch, Logstash and Kibana (all rel.7.7.0) What I'm trying to do is (among other things) to have Logstash to receive Syslog and Netflow traps from Cisco devices, transfer them to Elasticsearch and from there to Kibana for visualization.
I created a Logstash config file (cisco.conf) where input and output sections look like this:
input {
udp {
port => 5003
type => "syslog"
}
udp {
port => 2055
codec => netflow {
include_flowset_id => true
enable_metric => true
versions => [5, 9]
}
}
}
output {
stdout { codec => rubydebug }
if [type] == "syslog" {
elasticsearch {
hosts => ["localhost:9200"]
manage_template => false
index => "ciscosyslog-%{+YYYY.MM.dd}"
}
}
if [type] == "netflow" {
elasticsearch {
hosts => ["localhost:9200"]
manage_template => false
index => "cisconetflow-%{+YYYY.MM.dd}"
}
}
}
The problem is: the index ciscosyslog is created in Elasticsearch with no problem:
$ curl 'localhost:9200/_cat/indices?v'
health status index uuid pri rep docs.count docs.deleted store.size pri.store.size
yellow open ciscosyslog-2020.05.21 BRshOOnoQ5CsdVn3l0Z3kw 1 1 1438 0 338.4kb 338.4kb
green open .async-search dpd-HWYJSyW653u7BAhQVg 1 0 2 0 34.1kb 34.1kb
green open .kibana_1 xA5PIwKsTHCeOFyj9_NIQA 1 0 111 8 231.9kb 231.9kb
yellow open ciscosyslog-2020.05.22 kB4vJAooT3-fbIg0dKKt8w 1 1 566 0 159.2kb 159.2kb
However the index cisconetflow is not created as seen in the above table.
I made a debug on Logstash and I can see netflow messages arriving from Cisco devices:
[WARN ] 2020-05-22 17:57:04.999 [[main]>worker1] Dissector - Dissector mapping, field not found in event {"field"=>"message", "event"=>{"host"=>"10.200.8.57", "#timestamp"=>2020-05-22T21:57:04.000Z, "#version"=>"1", "netflow"=>{"l4_src_port"=>443, "version"=>9, "l4_dst_port"=>41252, "src_tos"=>0, "dst_as"=>0, "protocol"=>6, "in_bytes"=>98, "flowset_id"=>256, "src_as"=>0, "ipv4_dst_addr"=>"10.200.8.57", "input_snmp"=>1, "output_snmp"=>4, "ipv4_src_addr"=>"104.244.42.133", "in_pkts"=>1, "flow_seq_num"=>17176}}}
[WARN ] 2020-05-22 17:57:04.999 [[main]>worker1] Dissector - Dissector mapping, field not found in event {"field"=>"message", "event"=>{"host"=>"10.200.8.57", "#timestamp"=>2020-05-22T21:57:04.000Z, "#version"=>"1", "netflow"=>{"l4_src_port"=>443, "version"=>9, "l4_dst_port"=>39536, "src_tos"=>0, "dst_as"=>0, "protocol"=>6, "in_bytes"=>79, "flowset_id"=>256, "src_as"=>0, "ipv4_dst_addr"=>"10.200.8.57", "input_snmp"=>1, "output_snmp"=>4, "ipv4_src_addr"=>"104.18.252.222", "in_pkts"=>1, "flow_seq_num"=>17176}}}
{
"host" => "10.200.8.57",
"#timestamp" => 2020-05-22T21:57:04.000Z,
"#version" => "1",
"netflow" => {
"l4_src_port" => 57654,
"version" => 9,
"l4_dst_port" => 443,
"src_tos" => 0,
"dst_as" => 0,
"protocol" => 6,
"in_bytes" => 7150,
"flowset_id" => 256,
"src_as" => 0,
"ipv4_dst_addr" => "104.244.39.20",
"input_snmp" => 4,
"output_snmp" => 1,
"ipv4_src_addr" => "172.16.1.21",
"in_pkts" => 24,
"flow_seq_num" => 17176
}
But at this point I can't tell if Logstash is not delivering the information to ES or if ES is failing to create the index, Current facts are:
a) Netflow traffic is present at Logstash input
b) ES is creating only one of the two indexes received from Logstash.
Thanks.
You have conditionals in your output, using the type field, your first input is adding this field with its correct value, but your second input does not have the field, so it will never match your conditional.
Add the line type => "netflow" in your second input as you did with your first one.
I am parsing logs from many daemons of UTM solution.
Grok and kv config looks like:
grok {
match => [ "message", "%{SYSLOGPROG} %{NOTSPACE:syslog_hostname} %{DATA:syslog_program}(?:\[%{POSINT:syslog_pid}\])?: %{GREEDYDATA:syslog_message}" ]
}
kv {
id => "syslogkv"
source => "syslog_message"
trim_key => " "
trim_value => " "
value_split => "="
field_split => " "
}
Usually events looks like
<30>2019:04:23-20:13:38 hostname ulogd[5354]: id="2001" severity="info" sys="SecureNet" sub="packetfilter" name="Packet dropped" action="drop" fwrule="60002" initf="eth3.5" outitf="eth5" srcmac="c8:9c:1d:af:68:7f" dstmac="00:1a:8c:f0:f5:23" srcip="x.x.x.x" dstip="y.y.y.y" proto="17" length="56" tos="0x00" prec="0x00" ttl="63" srcport="5892" dstport="53"
and parsed without any problem
But when some daemons generates events looking like (WAF in example)
<139>2019:04:23-16:21:38 hostname httpd[1475]: [security2:error] [pid 1475:tid 3743300464] [client x.x.x.x] ModSecurity: Warning. Pattern match "([\\\\~\\\\!\\\\#\\\\#\\\\$\\\\%\\\\^\\\\&\\\\*\\\\(\\\\)\\\\-\\\\+\\\\=\\\\{\\\\}\\\\[\\\\]\\\\|\\\\:\\\\;\\"\\\\'\\\\\\xc2\\xb4\\\\\\xe2\\x80\\x99\\\\\\xe2\\x80\\x98\\\\`\\\\<\\\\>].*?){8,}"
my output breaks and logstash stops processing any logs.
How can i exclude kv parsing events by regexp or any pattern?
In simple words - do not use kv if first words in syslog_message begins with "[" or any other regexp.
Wrap your kv filter in a conditional on the field:
if [syslog_message] !~ /^\[/ {
kv { }
}
I've had a look on the other questions surrounding this problem but it doesn't seem to help.
I'm having to change an input of "i phone" or "i Phone" to query "iPhone" in Elasticsearch.
As you can see, I have tried most everything I can think of, including simply "phone => iPhone" and leaving the "i" in there to hang around and possibly add it to the stopwords.
I've tried using "simple", "keyword", "standard" and "whitespace" for my custom analyzer.
Can anyone spot where I've gone wrong, this is the last problem before I can finish my project so it'd be appreciated. Thanks
P.S. Bonus points if you include how I can do auto suggest on inputs, thanks
Below is my code
public static CreateIndexDescriptor GetMasterProductDescriptor(string indexName = "shopmaster")
{
var indexDescriptor = new CreateIndexDescriptor(indexName)
.Settings(s => s
.Analysis(a => a
.TokenFilters(t => t
.Stop("my_stop", st => st
.StopWords("_english_", "new", "cheap")
.RemoveTrailing()
)
.Synonym("my_synonym", st => st
.Synonyms(
"phone => iPhone"
//"i phone => iPhone",
//"i Phone => iPhone"
)
)
.Snowball("my_snowball", st => st
.Language(SnowballLanguage.English)
)
)
.Analyzers(an => an
.Custom("my_analyzer", ca => ca
.Tokenizer("simple")
.Filters(
"lowercase",
"my_stop",
"my_snowball",
"my_synonym"
)
)
)
)
)
.Mappings(
ms => ms.Map<MasterProduct>(
m => m.AutoMap()
.Properties(
ps => ps
.Nested<MasterProductAttributes>(p => p.Name(n => n.MasterAttributes))
.Nested<MasterProductAttributes>(p => p.Name(n => n.ProductAttributes))
.Nested<MasterProductAttributeType>(p => p.Name(n => n.MasterAttributeTypes))
.Nested<Feature>(p => p.Name(n => n.Features))
.Nested<RelatedProduct>(p => p.Name(n => n.RelatedProducts))
.Nested<MasterProductItem>(
p => p.Name(
n => n.Products
)
.Properties(prop => prop.Boolean(
b => b.Name(n => n.InStock)
))
)
.Boolean(b => b.Name(n => n.InStock))
.Number(t => t.Name(n => n.UnitsSold).Type(NumberType.Integer))
.Text(
tx => tx.Name(e => e.ManufacturerName)
.Fields(fs => fs.Keyword(ss => ss.Name("manufacturer"))
.TokenCount(t => t.Name("MasterProductId")
.Analyzer("my_analyzer")
)
)
.Fielddata())
//.Completion(cm=>cm.Analyzer("my_analyser")
)
)
);
return indexDescriptor;
}
The order of your filters matters!
You are applying lowercase, then a stemmer (snowball) then synonyms. You synonyms contain capital letters, but by the time they are applied, lowercasing has already occurred. It's a good idea to apply lowercasing first, to make sure case doesn't affect matching of the synonyms, but your replacements, in the that case, shouldn't have caps.
Stemmers should not be applied before synonyms (unless you know what you are doing, and are comparing post-stemming terms). Snowball, I believe, will transform 'iphone' to 'iphon', so this is another area where you are running into trouble.
"lowercase",
"my_synonym",
"my_stop",
"my_snowball",
(And don't forget to remove the caps from your synonyms)
1st| 2nd|3rd |4th |5th |6th |7th |8th |2012.07.12 05:31:04 |10th |ProductDir: C:\samplefiles\test\storage\4.0 (LF)
C:\samplefiles\test\storage\5.0 (LF)
SampleDir: (LF)
Note: LF -> Line Feed is getting appended
I have tried the following options.. Nothing seems to be working
match => [ "message", "(?m)....
(?<message>(.|\r|\n)*)
Greedydata is also not working as its not considering new line.
mutate {gsub => ["message", "\n", "LINE_BREAK"] }
codec => multiline { pattern => "^\s" negate => true what => previous }
(?m)%{GREEDYDATA} will match any multiline log including yours.
Please test it here
The below one worked for me.
codec => multiline{
pattern => "^\s*\d{1,}\|"
negate => "true"
what => "previous"
}
I want to parse the below mentioned line from log file.
03:34:19,491 INFO [:sm-secondary-17]: DBBackup:106 - The max_allowed_packet value defined in [16M] does not match the value from /etc/mysql/my.cnf [24M]. The value will be used.
After parse, the output must be :
Time : 03:34:19
LogType : INOF
Message : [:sm-secondary-17]: DBBackup:106 - The max_allowed_packet value defined in [16M] does not match the value from /etc/mysql/my.cnf [24M]. The value will be used.
Ignore : ,491 (comma and 3 digit number).
Grok filter config should be like this for parsing the mentioned log.
...
filter {
grok {
match => {"message" => "%{TIME:Time},%{NUMBER:ms} %{WORD:LogType} %{GREEDYDATA:Message}"}
remove_field => [ "ms" ]
}
}
...