Is there a way to exit from gdb connnection without stopping / exiting running program ? I need that running program continues after gdb connection closed.
Is there a way to exit from gdb connnection without stopping / exiting running program ?
(gdb) help detach
Detach a process or file previously attached.
If a process, it is no longer traced, and it continues its execution. If
you were debugging a file, the file is closed and gdb no longer accesses it.
List of detach subcommands:
detach checkpoint -- Detach from a checkpoint (experimental)
detach inferiors -- Detach from inferior ID (or list of IDS)
Type "help detach" followed by detach subcommand name for full documentation.
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word".
Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous.
Since the accepted (only other) answer does not specifically address how to shut down gdb without stopping the program under test, I'm throwing my hat into the ring.
Option 1
Kill the server from the terminal in which it's running by holding Ctrl+c.
Option 2
Kill the gdb server and/or client from another terminal session.
$ ps -u username | grep gdb
667511 pts/6 00:00:00 gdbserver
667587 pts/7 00:00:00 gdbclient
$ kill 667587
$ kill 667511
These options are for a Linux environment. A similar approach (killing the process) would probably also work in Windows.
Related
I have gdb running on cpp application process on remote machine, and accidenttly close terminal. How do i get into this gdb shell again?
$ pidof application
12345
$ pidof gdb
23456
gdb was started like "gdb --pid=12345" which is attached to process.
How do I get back into gdb shell from external shell. Is there any way like
"enter-gdb-shell with pid 23456"
reptyr does what you want: attach a terminal to a running process.
I am trying to debug GDB itself and dealing with a Ctrl+C signal problem that is sent from another terminal.
I run GDB to be debugged in terminal 1 in TUI mode. Right after, I open another terminal 2 and find the PID number of the GDB that runs on Terminal 1. Then attach that process to debug.
In Terminal 1
$ build-gdb/gdb/gdb -tui ./build/output.elf -tty=$TTY
In Terminal 2
$ ps -elf | less
$ sudo gdb -p PID_NUMBER-tty=$TTY -tui
The problem is when I hit Ctrl+C to stop GDB in terminal 1, GDB runs on Terminal 2 stops. GDB in Terminal 1 does not responds to ^C command at all. I tried to use -tty parameter and get the current TTY, but id did not solved the problem. GDB uses readline GNU library, but i should be configure terminal and its input properly.
Any idea?
You can use
handle SIGINT pass
to instruct GDB to pass the signal to the inferior. See Signals in the GDB manual. The nostop argument could be useful in this situation, too.
A legacy program most likely gets into an infinite loop on certain pathological inputs. I have >1000 such instances, however, I suspect that the vast majority of them trigger the same bug. Therefore, I would like to reduce the >1000 instances to the fundamentally different ones. The first step is to pause the application after, say, 10 seconds and collect the backtrace.
If I run:
gdb --batch --command=backtrace.txt --args ./legacy_program
with backtrace.txt
run
bt
and I hit Ctrl + C after 10 seconds in the same terminal I get exactly the backtrace I want.
Now, I would like to do that automatically. I have tried sending SIGINT (the expected equivalent of Ctrl + C) from another terminal but I do not get the backtrace anymore. Here are some of my failed attempts based on
GDB how to stop execution without a breakpoint?
Neither of these have any effect:
pkill -SIGINT gdb
kill -SIGINT 5717
where 5717 is the pid of the only gdb running. Sending SIGINT to the legacy_program the same way does kill it but then I do not get the backtrace:
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
Quit
How can I programmatically pause the execution of the legacy_program after 10 seconds and get a backtrace?
This post was motivated by my frustration not being able to find an answer to this question here at StackOverflow.
Also note that
[it is not merely OK to ask and answer your own question, it is explicitly encouraged.](https://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/07/its-ok-to-ask-and-answer-your-own-questions/)
Apparently, it is a known (bug) feature in gdb, see
GDB is not trapping SIGINT. Ctrl+C terminates program when should break gdb. Try sending SIGSTOP instead from the other terminal:
pkill -STOP legacy_program
It works on my machine.
Note that you do not have to run the legacy_program in the debugger. Enable core dumps
ulimit -c unlimited
and send the program SIGTRAP to make it crash, then get the backtrace from the core dump. So, start the program:
./legacy_program
From another terminal:
pkill -TRAP legacy_program
The backtrace can be obtained like this:
gdb --batch -ex=bt ./legacy_program core
I am trying to debug a concurrent program in LLDB and am getting a seg fault, but not on every execution. I would like to run my process over and over until it hits a seg fault. So far, I have the following:
b exit
breakpoint com add 1
Enter your debugger command(s). Type 'DONE' to end.
> run
> DONE
The part that I find annoying, is that when I get to the exit function and hit my breakpoint, when the run command gets executed, I get the following prompt from LLDB:
There is a running process, kill it and restart?: [Y/n]
I would like to automatically restart the process, without having to manually enter Y each time. Anyone know how to do this?
You could kill the previous instance by hand with kill - which doesn't prompt - then the run command won't prompt either.
Or:
(lldb) settings set auto-confirm 1
will give the default (capitalized) answer to all lldb queries.
Or if you have Xcode 6.x (or current TOT svn lldb) you could use the lldb driver's batch mode:
$ lldb --help
...
-b
--batch
Tells the debugger to running the commands from -s, -S, -o & -O,
and then quit. However if any run command stopped due to a signal
or crash, the debugger will return to the interactive prompt at the
place of the crash.
So for instance, you could script this in the shell, running:
lldb -b -o run
in a loop, and this will stop if the run ends in a crash rather than a normal exit. In some circumstances this might be easier to do.
I am trying to do a profiling on my embedded Linux box. This is running a software.
I want to do a profiling on my software using strace.
The application is the main software that keeps running forever.
How can I run the strace and log the outputs to a file.
In my rcS script.
I run the application like this
./my_app
Now, with strace.
strace ./my_app -> I want to log these outputs on a file, and I should be able to access the file without killing the application. Remember this application never terminates.
Please help!
Instead of a target filename, use the -p option to strace to specify the process ID of an already running process you wish to attach to.
Chris is actually right. Strace takes the -p option, which enables you to attach to a running process just by specifying the processes PID.
Let's say your 'my_app' process runs with PID 2301 (you can see the PID by logging into your device and us 'ps'). Try doing 'strace -p 2301', and you will see all system calls for that PID. You can throw it to a file by redirecting everywhere: 'strace -p 2301 > /tmp/my_app-strace'.
Hope this helps.