During migration from OAS10 to WebLogic 12.1.2, a call to a stored procedure is producing an ORA-03111 around 4 minutes after it is invoked:
java.sql.SQLTimeoutException: ORA-03111: break received on communication channel
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:462)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:405)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.processError(T4C8Oall.java:931)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.receive(T4CTTIfun.java:481)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.doRPC(T4CTTIfun.java:205)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.doOALL(T4C8Oall.java:548)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CCallableStatement.doOall8(T4CCallableStatement.java:213)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CCallableStatement.executeForRows(T4CCallableStatement.java:1111)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1488)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3770)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.execute(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3955)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleCallableStatement.execute(OracleCallableStatement.java:9353)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.execute(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1539)
at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.PreparedStatement.execute(PreparedStatement.java:101)
at mycode.app.impliq.dao.connection.oracle.OracleProcesoDao.callSP(OracleProcesoDao.java:811)
This code is NOT using statement timeout and it is not configured at data source level either.
Any pointer will be appreciated.
Two ways from here.
1. check the connection pool settings in both weblogic and db for your data source.
2. check log running sql.
Related
I've got a Quarkus app which uses hibernate-reactive-panache to run some queries and than process the result and return JSON via a Rest Call.
For each Rest call 5 DB queries are done, the last one will load about 20k rows:
public Uni<GraphProcessor> loadData(GraphProcessor graphProcessor){
return myEntityRepository.findByDateLeaving(graphProcessor.getSearchDate())
.select().where(graphProcessor::filter)
.onItem().invoke(graphProcessor::onNextRow).collect().asList()
.onItem().invoke(g -> log.info("loadData - end"))
.replaceWith(graphProcessor);
}
//In myEntityRepository
public Multi<MyEntity> findByDateLeaving(LocalDate searchDate){
LocalDateTime startDate = searchDate.atStartOfDay();
return MyEntity.find("#MyEntity.findByDate",
Parameters.with("startDate", startDate)
.map()).stream();
}
This all works fine for the first 4 times but on the 5th call I get
11:12:48:070 ERROR [org.hibernate.reactive.util.impl.CompletionStages:121] (147) HR000057: Failed to execute statement [$1select <ONE OF THE QUERIES HERE>]: $2could not load an entity: [com.mycode.SomeEntity#1]: java.util.concurrent.CompletionException: io.vertx.core.impl.NoStackTraceThrowable: Timeout
at <16 internal lines>
io.vertx.sqlclient.impl.pool.SqlConnectionPool$1PoolRequest.lambda$null$0(SqlConnectionPool.java:202) <4 internal lines>
at io.vertx.sqlclient.impl.pool.SqlConnectionPool$1PoolRequest.lambda$onEnqueue$1(SqlConnectionPool.java:199) <15 internal lines>
Caused by: io.vertx.core.impl.NoStackTraceThrowable: Timeout
I've checked https://quarkus.io/guides/reactive-sql-clients#pooled-connection-idle-timeout and configured
quarkus.datasource.reactive.idle-timeout=1000
That itself did not make a difference.
I than added
quarkus.datasource.reactive.max-size=10
I was able to run 10 Rest calls before getting the timeout again. On a pool setting of max-size=20 I was able to run it 20 times. So it does look like each Rest call will use up a SQL connection and not release it again.
Is there something that needs to be done to manually release the connection or is this simply a bug?
The problem was with using #Blocking on a reactive Rest method.
See https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/25138 and https://quarkus.io/blog/resteasy-reactive-smart-dispatch/ for more information.
So if you have a rest method that returns e.g. Uni or Multi, DO NOT use #Blocking on the call. I had to initially add it as I received an Exception telling me that the thread cannot block. This was due to some CPU intensive calculations. Adding #Blocking made that exception go away (in dev-mode but another problem popped up in native mode) but caused this SQL pool issue.
The real solution was to use emitOn to change the thread for the cpu intensive method:
.emitOn(Infrastructure.getDefaultWorkerPool())
.onItem().transform(processor::cpuIntensiveMethod)
I am getting following errors while inserting data in Cassandra.
I am using gocql client for Cassandra.
{"error":"gocql: too many query timeouts on the connection","status":500}
{"error":"gocql: no response received from cassandra within timeout period","status":500}
{"error":"write tcp 172.23.15.226:36954-\u003e172.23.16.15:9042: use of closed network connection","status":500}
Can anybody help me with this?
Try to increase timeouts in Cassandra config file (write_request_timeout_in_ms - for writes) and concurrent writes (concurrent_writes).
Also, try to lower NumConns parameter in your gocql driver.
If you are using goroutines, try to lower their number and verify that you are reusing same session object for all goroutines.
If you are using protocol version prior to 4, you can try to set Timeout paramter of cluster object in gocql to higher value.
A JBoss 5.2 application server log was filled with thousands of the following exception:
Caused by: javax.resource.ResourceException: Unable to get managed connection for jdbc_TestDB
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.getManagedConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:441)
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.TxConnectionManager.getManagedConnection(TxConnectionManager.java:424)
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.allocateConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:496)
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2$ConnectionManagerProxy.allocateConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:941)
at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrapperDataSource.getConnection(WrapperDataSource.java:96)
... 9 more
Caused by: javax.resource.ResourceException: No ManagedConnections available within configured blocking timeout ( 30000 [ms] )
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.getConnection(InternalManagedConnectionPool.java:311)
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.JBossManagedConnectionPool$BasePool.getConnection(JBossManagedConnectionPool.java:689)
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.getManagedConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:404)
... 13 more
I've stripped off the first part of the exception, which is basically our internal JDBC wrapper code which tries to get a DB connection from the pool.
Looking at the Oracle DB side I ran the query:
select resource_name, current_utilization, max_utilization, limit_value
from v$resource_limit
where resource_name in ('sessions', 'processes');
This produced the output:
RESOURCE_NAME CURRENT_UTILIZATION MAX_UTILIZATION LIMIT_VALUE
processes 1387 1500 1500
sessions 1434 1586 2272
Given the fact that that PROCESSES limit of 1500 was reached, would this cause the JBoss exceptions we experienced? I've also been investigating the possibility of connection leaks, but haven't found any evidence of that so far.
What is the recommended course of action here? Is simply increasing the limit a valid solution?
Usually when max_utilization gets the processes value listener will refuse new connections to database. you can see the errors relates to it in alert log. to solve this in database side you should increase the processes parameter.
hmm strange. is it possible, that exception wrapping in JBOSS hides the original error? You should get some sql exception whose text starts with ORA-. Maybe your JDBC wrapper does not handle errors properly.
The recommended actions is to:
check configured size of connection pool against processes sessions Oracle startup paramters.
check Oracles view v$session, especially columns STATUS, LAST_CALL_ET, SQL_ID, PREV_SQL_ID.
translate sql_id(prev_sql_id) into sql_text via v$sql.
if you application has a connection leak, sql_id and pred_sql_id might point you onto a place in your source code, where a connection was used last (i.e. where it was leaked).
Here is our environment:
.Net version: 4.5
Database: Oracle 12.1.0.2 (odp.net)
We are using LLBL "Adapter" but I don't think that has anything to do with the issue
LLBLGen Pro version: 4.1
Llbl Gen Pro Runtime: 4.1.13.1213
When we do an Insert(always into different tables which we are using for the short period and then removing) we use the following code:
int numRecords = strings.Count();
var insertCmd = "insert into " + tableName + " (StringField) values (:StringField)";
var oracleCommand = new OracleCommand();
oracleCommand.CommandText = insertCmd;
oracleCommand.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
oracleCommand.BindByName = true;
oracleCommand.ArrayBindCount = numRecords;
oracleCommand.Parameters.Add(":StringField", OracleDbType.NVarchar2, strings.ToArray(), ParameterDirection.Input);
// this is an LLBL adapter. Like I said, I think the issue is below the LLBL layer.
this.adapter.ExecuteActionQuery(new ActionQuery(oracleCommand));
When the database is getting hit hard with multiple of these inserts in parallel, we get the following error and the insert call never returns from the database.
WG_6.Index_586.TVD: An exception was caught during the execution of an action query: ORA-24381: error(s) in array DML
ORA-12592: TNS:bad packet
ORA-12592: TNS:bad packet
ORA-12592: TNS:bad packet
ORA-12592: TNS:bad packet
ORA-03111: break received on communication channel
ORA-03111: break received on communication channel
ORA-03111: break received on communication channel
On the database, using Toad's session browser, I can see that the "Current Statement" is correct.
insert into schemaX.tableY(StringField) values(:Stringfield)
Under the Waits tab in Toad, there is the following message:
“Waiting for SQL*Net more data from client - waited X hundred seconds, so far” and the X keeps incrementing until we hit our database timeout.
We tried with batches of 1 million and this gave us the best performance for our scenario. However, this hanging issue arose. I then decrease the ArrayBindCount to 500K, 100K, 50K, 10K and then 5K. Only when I used 5K did it stop happening.
A couple of notes:
This happens more frequently when the database is on a different physical machine than the client. When using a local VM, it rarely happens. The network that we are using is generally very reliable with no other noted issues.
From the error message(ORA-12592: TNS:bad packet), it seems that the issue might be on the client and perhaps related to code in the "Oracle.DataAccess.Client"(ODAC) dll.
My next steps for troubleshooting are to use Reflector to debug the call from the ODAC code and also to get more reliable client side tracing while forcing this error to occur.
I had the same situation when trying to insert into an Oracle table using the ArrayBinding.
Using a small number for oracleCommand.ArrayBindCount seemed to improve the frequency of the errors (same like yours) but not completely.
The solution was to use the Managed data access. I suggest you get the latest ODP.NET, add a reference to ManagedDataAccess and change to:
using Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Client;
using Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.Types;
This fixed problem in my case and with no need to change anything in the code.
I get the following error under a certain scenario
When a different thread is populating a lot of users via the bulk upload operation and I was trying to view the list of all users on a different web page. The list query, throws the following timeout error. Is there a way to set this timeout so that I can avoid this timeout error.
Env: h2 (latest), Hibernate 3.3.x
Caused by: org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Timeout trying to lock table "USER"; SQL statement:
[50200-144]
at org.h2.message.DbException.getJdbcSQLException(DbException.java:327)
at org.h2.message.DbException.get(DbException.java:167)
at org.h2.message.DbException.get(DbException.java:144)
at org.h2.table.RegularTable.doLock(RegularTable.java:482)
at org.h2.table.RegularTable.lock(RegularTable.java:416)
at org.h2.table.TableFilter.lock(TableFilter.java:139)
at org.h2.command.dml.Select.queryWithoutCache(Select.java:571)
at org.h2.command.dml.Query.query(Query.java:257)
at org.h2.command.dml.Query.query(Query.java:227)
at org.h2.command.CommandContainer.query(CommandContainer.java:78)
at org.h2.command.Command.executeQuery(Command.java:132)
at org.h2.server.TcpServerThread.process(TcpServerThread.java:278)
at org.h2.server.TcpServerThread.run(TcpServerThread.java:137)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
at org.h2.engine.SessionRemote.done(SessionRemote.java:543)
at org.h2.command.CommandRemote.executeQuery(CommandRemote.java:152)
at org.h2.jdbc.JdbcPreparedStatement.executeQuery(JdbcPreparedStatement.java:96)
at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedPreparedStatement.executeQuery(WrappedPreparedStatement.java:342)
at org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher.getResultSet(AbstractBatcher.java:208)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.getResultSet(Loader.java:1808)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQuery(Loader.java:697)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQueryAndInitializeNonLazyCollections(Loader.java:259)
at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doList(Loader.java:2228)
... 125 more
Yes, you can change the lock timeout. The default is relatively low: 1 second (1000 ms).
In many cases the problem is that another connection has locked the table, and using multi-version concurrency also solves the problem (append ;MVCC=true to the database URL).
EDIT: MVCC=true param is no longer supported, because since h2 1.4.200 it's always true for a MVStore engine, which is a default engine.
I faced quite the same problem and using the parameter "MVCC=true", it solved it. You can find more explanations about this parameter in the H2 documentation here : http://www.h2database.com/html/advanced.html#mvcc
I'd like to suggest that if you are getting this error, then perhaps you should not be using a transaction on your bulk database operation. Consider instead doing a transaction on each individual update: does it make sense to think of an entire bulk import as a transaction? Probably not. If it does, then yes, MVCC=true or a bigger lock timeout is a reasonable solution.
However, I think for most cases, you are seeing this error because you are trying to perform a very long transaction - in other words you are not aware that you are performing a really long transaction. This was certainly the case for myself and I simply took more care on how I was writing records (either using no transactions or using smaller transactions) and the lock timeout issue was resolved.
For those having this issue with integration tests (i.e. server is accessing the h2 db and an integration test is accessing the db before calling the server, to prepare the test), adding a 'commit' to the script executed before the test makes sure that the data are in the database before calling the server (without MVCC=true - which I find is a bit 'weird' if it is not enabled by default).
I had MVCC=true in my connection string but still was getting error above. I had added ;DEFAULT_LOCK_TIMEOUT=10000;LOCK_MODE=0 and problem was solved
I got this issue with the PlayFramework
JPAQueryException occured : Error while executing query from
models.Page where name = ?: Timeout trying to lock table "PAGE"
It ended being an infinite loop of sorts because I had a
#Before
without an unless which caused the function to repeatedly call itself
#Before(unless="getUser")
Working with DBUnit, H2 and Hibernate - same error, MVCC=true helped, but I would still get the error for any tests following deletion of data. What fixed these cases was wrapping the actual deletion code inside a transaction:
Transaction tx = session.beginTransaction();
...delete stuff
tx.commit();
From a 2020 user, see reference
Basically, the reference says:
Sets the lock timeout (in milliseconds) for the current session. The default value for this setting is 1000 (one second).
This command does not commit a transaction, and rollback does not affect it. This setting can be appended to the database URL: jdbc:h2:./test;LOCK_TIMEOUT=10000