i have pivot table like this
this is my Users model
public function getHousing()
{
return $this->belongsToMany(Housing::class, 'user_housing', 'user_id', 'housing_id')->withPivot('primary');
}
this is my Housing model
public function getUser()
{
return $this->belongsToMany(Users::class, 'user_housing', 'housing_id', 'user_id')->withPivot('primary');
}
i want to save primary with 1, this is my controller
$getData = $this->crud->show($id);
if (!$getData) {
return redirect()->route('admin.' . $this->route . '.index');
}
$data = $this->validate($this->request, [
'housing_group_id' => 'required',
'housing_id' => 'required',
'primary' => 'required',
]);
$getData->housing_id = $getData->getHousing()->pluck('id')->toArray();
$getData->getHousing()->sync($this->request->get('housing_id'), ['primary' => 1]);
$id = $getData->id;
i already add array fill primary 1, but i have error like this
SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 1364 Field 'primary' doesn't have a default value
how to save additional field in pivot table laravel ?
thanks
in sync with additional column in pivot table, you should pass an associative array for each id with column name as key and field value as value
$elements_array[$this->request->get('housing_id')]=['primary' => 1]
$getData->getHousing()->sync(elements_array);
if you have more than an 'id' to sync ... you must repeat the first step for each id.
check this:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/27230803/10573560
I have the following unit test in Laravel 6.x, using SQLite:
<?php
/** #var \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Factory $factory */
use App\Entry;
use App\EntryStatus;
use Faker\Generator as Faker;
$factory->define(Entry::class, function (Faker $faker) {
return [
'user_id' => 1,
'caption' => $faker->sentence(10),
'entry_status_id' => EntryStatus::where('name', 'pending')->first()->id,
];
});
$factory->state(Entry::class, 'awaiting_payment', [
'entry_status' => EntryStatus::where('name', 'awaiting_payment')->first()->id,
]);
I have a test error of 'Trying to get property 'id' of non-object', which is for the following line:
'entry_status' => EntryStatus::where('name', 'awaiting_payment')->first()->id,
I have a few ideas on how to fix this error, but I'm wondering what the best practice here would be in terms of unit testing and 'The Laravel way'.
The way I have thought about this, I have an EntryStatus table which has static statues 'pending' => 0, 'awaiting_payment' => 1, 'paid' => 2 etc. And I create a relationship within my App\Entry model > App\EntryStatus. Ideas are as follows:
The original plan; for the unit tests, I need to seed the static EntryStatus table each time for each test. Looking at the docs, I would use something like setUp() > $this->artisan('db:seed'). But this feels like it would really slow the tests. Unless there is a way to seed the DB once before all tests are started.
Try and create a factory which creates static data ('pending' => 0, 'awaiting_payment' => 1) but I'd manually need to update the database seed and the factory each time to match which seems clunky.
Within the Laravel docs testing documents they have this example; $factory->state(App\User::class, 'delinquent', ['account_status' => 'delinquent',]). This makes me think I could just remove the relationship table EntryStatus completely and just use a string column in the Entry to represent the state. I think this would be the best solution, but I'm worried that there is a reason we use ids as statuses as I'd imagine that they are quicker in search queries. But if not, my statues will be fixed, and this seems like the most eloquent solution.
Another option would be to store the statues as integers anyway, keeping a note of what status is what integer, but again this doesn't seem correct.
The record is not created yet and its not a good idea to assign static relationships this way in factories.
You can use a factory create instead then assign the relationship inside the test case.
For example:
Entry factory
$factory->define(Entry::class, function (Faker $faker) {
return [
'user_id' => factory(User)->create()->id,
'caption' => $faker->sentence(10),
'entry_status_id' => factory(EntryStatus)->create()->id,
];
});
EntryStatus factory
$factory->define(EntryStatus::class, function (Faker $faker) {
return [
'name' => $faker->word,
'entry_status' => $faker->numberBetween(0, 2) //Its better start from 1 though
];
});
User factory
$factory->define(User::class, function (Faker $faker) {
return [
'name' => $faker->word
];
});
In your test case start linking things together (if you need to).
/**
* #test
*/
public function exampleTestCase()
{
$enteryStatus = factory(EntryStatus::class)->create(['entry_status' => 1]);
//create 6 entries
$entry = factory(Entry::class, 6)->create(['entry_status_id' => $enteryStatus->id]);
//TODO: assert something
}
You can check afterCreatingState
$factory
->state(EntryStatus::class, 'awaiting_payment', ['name' => 'awaiting_payment'])
->afterCreatingState(EntryStatus::class, 'awaiting_payment', function ($entryStatus, $faker) {
factory(Entry::class)->create([
'entry_status_id' => $entryStatus->id,
]);
});
When i use pluck with multiple columns i get this:
{"Kreis 1 \/ Altstadt":"City","Kreis 2":"Enge","Kreis 3":"Sihifeld","Kreis 4":"Hard","Kreis 5 \/ Industriequartier":"Escher Wyss","Kreis 6":"Oberstrass","Kreis 7":"Witikon","Kreis 8 \/ Reisbach":"Weinegg","Kreis 9":"Altstetten","Kreis 10":"Wipkingen","Kreis 11":"Seebach","Kreis 12 \/ Schwamendingen":"Hirzenbach"
But i need this?
["Rathaus","Hochschulen","Lindenhof","City","Wollishofen","Leimbach","Enge","Alt-Wiedikon","Friesenberg","Sihifeld","Werd","Langstrasse","Hard","Gewerbechule","Escher Wyss","Unterstrass","Oberstrass","Fluntern","Hottingen","Hirslanden","Witikon","Seefeld","M\u00fchlebach","Weinegg","Albisrieden","Altstetten","H\u00f6ngg","Wipkingen","Affoltern","Oerlikon","Seebach","Saatlen","Schwamendingen-Mitte","Hirzenbach"]
Any suggestion how can i do that? This is my method:
public function autocomplete_districts(Request $request)
{
$district = $request->input('query');
// $ass = /DB::table('districts')->select(array('district', 'region'))->get();
// dd($ass);
$data = Districts::whereRaw('LOWER(district) like ?', [strtolower('%'.$district . '%')])->orWhereRaw('LOWER(region) like ?', [strtolower('%'.$district . '%')])->pluck('region','district');
return response()->json($data);
}
You should use select() with get() and then later on modify the object as you need.
So instead of: ->pluck('region','district');
use: ->select('region','district')->get();
pluck() is advised when you need value of one column only.
And as far as possible, you should have your models singular form not plural (Districts) - to follow Laravel nomenclature.
Cos that is how pluck works. Instead try this.
$data = Districts::whereRaw('LOWER(district) like ?', [strtolower('%'.$district . '%')])->orWhereRaw('LOWER(region) like ?', [strtolower('%'.$district . '%')])->select('region', 'district')->get();
$data = collect($data->toArray())->flatten()->all();
In my case I wanted to pluck 2 values from an array of Eloquent models and this worked:
$models->map->only(['state', 'note'])->values()
That's shorter version of
$models->map(fn($model) => $model->only(['state', 'note']))->values()
This is an issue I constantly have faced and has led me to create the following solution that can be used on models or arrays.
There is also support for dot syntax that will create a multidimensional array as required.
Register this macro within the AppServiceProvider (or any provider of your choice):
use Illuminate\Support\Arr;
/**
* Similar to pluck, with the exception that it can 'pluck' more than one column.
* This method can be used on either Eloquent models or arrays.
* #param string|array $cols Set the columns to be selected.
* #return Collection A new collection consisting of only the specified columns.
*/
Collection::macro('pick', function ($cols = ['*']) {
$cols = is_array($cols) ? $cols : func_get_args();
$obj = clone $this;
// Just return the entire collection if the asterisk is found.
if (in_array('*', $cols)) {
return $this;
}
return $obj->transform(function ($value) use ($cols) {
$ret = [];
foreach ($cols as $col) {
// This will enable us to treat the column as a if it is a
// database query in order to rename our column.
$name = $col;
if (preg_match('/(.*) as (.*)/i', $col, $matches)) {
$col = $matches[1];
$name = $matches[2];
}
// If we use the asterisk then it will assign that as a key,
// but that is almost certainly **not** what the user
// intends to do.
$name = str_replace('.*.', '.', $name);
// We do it this way so that we can utilise the dot notation
// to set and get the data.
Arr::set($ret, $name, data_get($value, $col));
}
return $ret;
});
});
This can then be used in the following way:
$a = collect([
['first' => 1, 'second' => 2, 'third' => 3],
['first' => 1, 'second' => 2, 'third' => 3]
]);
$b = $a->pick('first', 'third'); // returns [['first' => 1, 'third' => 3], ['first' => 1, 'third' => 3]]
Or additionally, on any models you may have:
$users = User::all();
$new = $users->pick('name', 'username', 'email');
// Might return something like:
// [
// ['name' => 'John Doe', 'username' => 'john', 'email' => 'john#email.com'],
// ['name' => 'Jane Doe', 'username' => 'jane', 'email' => 'jane#email.com'],
// ['name' => 'Joe Bloggs', 'username' => 'joe', 'email' => 'joe#email.com'],
// ]
It is also possible to reference any relationship too using the dot notation, as well as using the as [other name] syntax:
$users = User::all();
$new = $users->pick('name as fullname', 'email', 'posts.comments');
// Might return something like:
// [
// ['fullname' => 'John Doe', 'email' => 'john#email.com', 'posts' => [...]],
// ['fullname' => 'Jane Doe', 'email' => 'jane#email.com', 'posts' => [...]],
// ['fullname' => 'Joe Bloggs', 'email' => 'joe#email.com', 'posts' => [...]],
// ]
My solution in LARAVEL 5.6:
Hi, I've just had the same problem, where I needed 2 columns combined in 1 select list.
My DB has 2 columns for Users: first_name and last_name.
I need a select box, with the users full name visible and the id as value.
This is how I fixed it, using the pluck() method:
In the User model I created a full name accessor function:
public function getNameAttribute() {
return ucwords($this->last_name . ' ' . $this->first_name);
}
After that, to fill the select list with the full name & corresponding database id as value, I used this code in my controller that returns the view (without showing users that are archived, but you can change the begin of the query if you like, most important are get() and pluck() functions:
$users = User::whereNull('archived_at')
->orderBy('last_name')
->get(['id','first_name','last_name'])
->pluck('name','id');
return view('your.view', compact('users'));
Now you can use the $users in your select list!
So first, you GET all the values from DB that you will need,
after that you can use any accessor attribute defined for use in your PLUCK method,
as long as all columns needed for the accessor are in the GET ;-)
As far as now Laravel didn't provide such macro to pick specific columns, but anyway Laravel is out of the box and lets us customize almost everything.
Tested in Laravel 8.x
in AppServiceProvider.php
use Illuminate\Support\Collection;
// Put this inside boot() function
Collection::macro('pick', function (... $columns) {
return $this->map(function ($item, $key) use ($columns) {
$data = [];
foreach ($columns as $column) {
$data[$column] = $item[$column] ?? null;
}
return $data;
});
});
Usage
$users = App\Models\User::all();
$users->pick('id','name');
// Returns: [['id' => 1, 'name' => 'user_one'],['id' => 2, 'name' => 'user_two']]
Important notes:
Do not use this macro for a really HUGE collection (You better do it on Eloquent
select or MySQL query select)
Laravel: To pluck multi-columns in the separate arrays use the following code.
$Ads=Ads::where('status',1);
$Ads=$Ads->where('created_at','>',Carbon::now()->subDays(30));
$activeAdsIds=$Ads->pluck('id'); // array of ads ids
$UserId=$Ads->pluck('user_id'); // array of users ids
I have created the model scope
More about scopes:
https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/eloquent#query-scopes
https://medium.com/#janaksan_/using-scope-with-laravel-7c80dd6a2c3d
Code:
/**
* Scope a query to Pluck The Multiple Columns
*
* This is Used to Pluck the multiple Columns in the table based
* on the existing query builder instance
*
* #author Manojkiran.A <manojkiran10031998#gmail.com>
* #version 0.0.2
* #param \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder $query
* #param string $keyColumn the columns Which is used to set the key of array
* #param array $extraFields the list of columns that need to plucked in the table
* #return \Illuminate\Support\Collection
* #throws Illuminate\Database\QueryException
**/
public function scopePluckMultiple( $query, string $keyColumn, array $extraFields):\Illuminate\Support\Collection
{
//pluck all the id based on the query builder instance class
$keyColumnPluck = $query->pluck( $keyColumn)->toArray();
//anonymous callback method to iterate over the each fileds of table
$callBcakMethod = function ($eachValue) use ($query)
{
$eachQuery[$eachValue] = $query->pluck( $eachValue)->toArray();
return $eachQuery;
};
//now we are collapsing the array single time to get the propered array
$extraFields = \Illuminate\Support\Arr::collapse( array_map($callBcakMethod, $extraFields));
// //iterating Through All Other Fields and Plucking it each Time
// foreach ((array)$extraFields as $eachField) {
// $extraFields[$eachField] = $query->pluck($eachField)->toArray();
// }
//now we are done with plucking the Required Columns
//we need to map all the values to each key
//get all the keys of extra fields and sets as array key or index
$arrayKeys = array_keys($extraFields);
//get all the extra fields array and mapping it to each key
$arrayValues = array_map(
function ($value) use ($arrayKeys) {
return array_combine($arrayKeys, $value);
},
call_user_func_array('array_map', array_merge(
array(function () {
return func_get_args();
}),
$extraFields
))
);
//now we are done with the array now Convert it to Collection
return collect( array_combine( $keyColumnPluck, $arrayValues));
}
So now the testing part
BASIC EXAMPLE
$basicPluck = Model::pluckMultiple('primaryKeyFiles',['fieldOne', 'FieldTwo']);
ADVANCED EXAMPLE
$advancedPlcuk = Model::whereBetween('column',[10,43])
->orWhere('columnName','LIKE', '%whildCard%')
->Where( 'columnName', 'NOT LIKE', '%whildCard%')
->pluckMultiple('primaryKeyFiles',['fieldOne', 'FieldTwo']);
But it returns the \Illuminate\Support\Collection, so if you need to convert to array
$toArrayColl = $advancedPluck->toArray();
if you need to convert to json
$toJsonColl = $advancedPluck->toJson();
To answer the specific question of "how to return multiple columns using (something like) pluck" we have to remember that Pluck is a Collection member function. So if we're sticking to the question being asked we should stick with a Collection based answer (you may find it more beneficial to develop a model-based solution, but that doesn't help solve the question as posed).
The Collection class offers the "map" member function which can solve the posed question:
$data = Districts::whereRaw('LOWER(district) like ?', [strtolower('%'.$district . '%')])->orWhereRaw('LOWER(region) like ?', [strtolower('%'.$district . '%')])
->map(function ($item, $key, $columns=['region','district']) {
$itemArray = [];
foreach($columns as $column){
$itemArray[$column] = $item->$column;
}
return ($itemArray);
});
dd($data);
This should give you a collection where each element is a 2 element array indexed by 'region' and 'district'.
Laravel 8.x, try to use mapWithKeys method instead of pluck, for example:
$collection->mapWithKeys(function ($item, $key) {
return [$key => $item['firstkey'] . ' ' . $item['secondkey']];
});
Expanding on #Robby_Alvian_Jaya_Mulia from above who gave me the idea. I needed it to also work on a relationship. This is just for a single relationship, but it would probably be easy to nest it more.
This needs to be put into AppServiceProvider.php
use Illuminate\Support\Collection;
// Put this inside boot() function
Collection::macro('pick', function (... $columns) {
return $this->map(function ($item, $key) use ($columns) {
$data = [];
foreach ($columns as $column) {
$collection_pieces = explode('.', $column);
if (count($collection_pieces) == 2) {
$data[$collection_pieces[1]] = $item->{$collection_pieces[0]}->{$collection_pieces[1]} ?? null;
} else {
$data[$column] = $item[$column] ?? null;
}
}
return $data;
});
});
Usage:
$users = App\Models\User::has('role')->with('role')->all();
$users->pick('id','role.name');
// Returns: [['id' => 1, 'name' => 'role_name_one'],['id' => 2, 'name' => 'role_name_two']]
Hope this is helpful to someone. Sorry I didn't add this to under #Robby's answer. I didn't have enough reputation.
Pluck returned only the value of the two columns which wasnt ideal for me, what worked for me was this :
$collection->map->only(['key1', 'key2'])->values()
I have three database table:
product (id, name)
product_has_adv (product,advantage,sort,important)
advantage (id, text)
In ProductModel I defined this:
public function getAdvantages()
{
return $this->hasMany(AdvantageModel::className(), ['id' => 'advantage'])
->viaTable('product_has_advantage', ['product' => 'id']);
}
I get the advantages without any problems.
But now I need to add a where product_has_advantage.important = 1 clausel and also sort the advantages by the sort-columen in the product_has_advantage-table.
How and where I have to realize it?
Using via and viaTable methods with relations will cause two separate queries.
You can specify callable in third parameter like this:
public function getAdvantages()
{
return $this->hasMany(AdvantageModel::className(), ['id' => 'advantage'])
->viaTable('product_has_advantage', ['product' => 'id'], function ($query) {
/* #var $query \yii\db\ActiveQuery */
$query->andWhere(['important' => 1])
->orderBy(['sort' => SORT_DESC]);
});
}
The filter by important will be applied, but the sort won't since it happens in first query. As a result the order of ids in IN statement will be changed.
Depending on your database logic maybe it's better to move important and sort columns to advantage table.
Then just add condition and sort to the existing method chain:
public function getAdvantages()
{
return $this->hasMany(AdvantageModel::className(), ['id' => 'advantage'])
->viaTable('product_has_advantage', ['product' => 'id'])
->andWhere(['important' => 1])
->orderBy(['sort' => SORT_DESC]);
}
Using viaTable methods with relations will cause two separate queries, but if you don't need link() method you can use innerJoin in the following way to sort by product_has_advantage table:
public function getAdvantages()
{
$query = AdvantageModel::find();
$query->multiple = true;
$query->innerJoin('product_has_advantage','product_has_advantage.advantage = advantage.id');
$query->andWhere(['product_has_advantage.product' => $this->id, 'product_has_advantage.important' => 1]);
$query->orderBy(['product_has_advantage.sort' => SORT_DESC]);
return $query;
}
Note than $query->multiple = true allows you to use this method as Yii2 hasMany relation.
Just for reference https://github.com/yiisoft/yii2/issues/10174
It's near impossible to ORDER BY viaTable() columns.
For Yii 2.0.7 it returns set of ID's from viaTable() query,
and final/top query IN() clause ignores the order.
For who comes here after a while and don't like above solutions, I got it working by joining back to the via table after the filter via table.
Example for above code:
public function getAdvantages()
{
return $this->hasMany(AdvantageModel::className(), ['id' => 'advantage'])
->viaTable('product_has_advantage', ['product' => 'id'])
->innerJoin('product_has_advantage','XXX')
->orderBy('product_has_advantage.YYY'=> SORT_ASC);
}
Take care about changing XXX with the right join path and YYY with the right sort column.
First you need to create a model named ProductHasAdv for junction table (product_has_adv) using CRUD.
Then create relation in product model and sort it:
public function getAdvRels()
{
return $this->hasMany(ProductHasAdv::className(), ['product' => 'id'])->
orderBy(['sort' => SORT_ASC]);;
}
Then create second relationship like this:
public function getAdvantages()
{
$adv_ids = [];
foreach ($this->advRels as $adv_rel)
$adv_ids[] = $adv_rel->advantage;
return $this->hasMany(Advantage::className(), ['id' => 'advantage'])->viaTable('product_has_adv', ['product' => 'id'])->orderBy([new Expression('FIELD (id, ' . implode(',', $adv_ids) . ')')]);
}
This will sort final result using order by FIELD technique.
Don't forget to add:
use yii\db\Expression;
line to head.
I`ve managed this some how... but it needs additional work after.
The point is that you have to query many-to-many relation first from source model and after that inside that closure you should query your target model.
$query = Product::find();
$query->joinWith([
'product_has_adv' => function ($query)
{
$query->alias('pha');
$query->orderBy('pha.sort ASC');
$query->joinWith(['advantage ' => function ($query){
$query->select([
'a.id',
'a.text',
]);
$query->alias('a');
}]);
},
]);
Then you just have to prettify the sorted result to your needs.
The result for each row would look like
"product_has_adv": [
{
"product": "875",
"advantage": "true",
"sort": "0",
"important": "1",
"advantage ": {
"id": "875",
"text": "Some text..",
}
},
As explained by #arogachev, the viaTable uses two separate queries, which renders any intermediate orderBy obsolete
You could replace the viaTable with an innerJoin as follows, in a similar solution to #MartinM
public function getAdvantages()
{
return $this->hasMany(AdvantageModel::class, ['pha.product' => 'id'])
->innerJoin('product_has_advantage pha', 'pha.advantage = advantage.id')
->andWhere(['pha.important' => 1])
->orderBy(['pha.sort' => SORT_ASC]);
}
By adjusting the result of hasMany, you are adjusting the query for the target class - AdvantageModel::find(); product_has_advantage can be joined via the advantage identity
The second parameter of hasMany, link, can be viewed as [ query.column => $this->attribute ], which you can now support via the joined product_has_advantage and its product identity
Note, when using viaTable, the link parameter can be viewed as if the intermediate query is complete and we are starting from there; [ query.column => viaTable.column ]
hence ['id', 'advantage'] in your question
public function getAdvantages()
{
return $this
->hasMany(AdvantageModel::className(), ['id' => 'advantage'])
->viaTable('product_has_advantage', ['product' => 'id'])
->andWhere(['important' => 1])
->orderBy(['sort' => SORT_DESC]);
}
I want to update my table where the input the same input fields names are array and has
add more function which generates the input fields like this:
I want to do update_batch in codeigniter
my model i created a function like this:
This is the code block:
function update_batch_all($tblname,$data=array(),$userid)
{
$this->db->trans_start();
$this->db->where('userid',$userid);
$this->db->update_batch($tblname,$data);
$this->db->trans_complete();
return TRUE;
}
it is not working.
can any one help me that how can i update tables data with update batch that has where condition?
You can read the docs for update_batch() here
Here's the short summary:
You pass in an associative array that has both, your where key, and the update value. As the third parameter to the update_batch() call, you specify which key in your assoc array should be used for the where clause.
For example:
$data = array(
array(
'user_id' => 1,
'name' => 'Foo'
), array(
'user_id' => 2,
'name' => 'Bar'
)
);
$this->db->update_batch($tbl, $data, 'user_id');
Breakdown of arguments passed:$tbl is the table name. $data is the associative array. 'user_id' tells CI that the user_id key in $data is the where clause.
Effect of the above query: Name for user with user_id = 1 gets set to Foo and name for user with user_id=2 gets set to Bar.
In your case, if you want to set the same user_id key in each array with your data array, you can do a quick for loop:
foreach ($data as &$d) {
$d['user_id'] = $user_id;
}
$this->db->update_batch($tbl, $data, 'user_id');
You can use,
$this->db->update_batch($tblname,$data,'user_id');
But all array within data must have a field 'user_id'
eg:
$data=array(
array('user_name'=>'test1','user_id'=>1),
array('user_name'=>'test2','user_id'=>2)
);
You can get more details about update_batch from here