I installed docker toolbox 1.11.2 and Laradock v.2 cloned from GitHub.
Everything seems to work except the laradock_workspace_1. When is generated it does not create files on the host machine (Windows 7 64-bit). In the docker-compose.yml I have tried playing with the volumes as suggested here
### Laravel Application Code Container ######################
volumes_source:
build: ./volumes/application
volumes:
- ../:/var/www/laravel
If I change the last line to ../.. then run docker-compose up, docker exec -it laradock_workspace_1 ls and I can see that it is traversing the folders on the host machine. I just don't see any files.
My goal here is to make the actual Laravel code external so I can edit them on the host machine and use git.
I can use the Kitematic app to make the changes I want but they seem lost if I do a docker-compose down. (and I get errors about things still being in use.)
I'm new to docker so any help is appreciated.
First, make sure your docker-machine is running. If it is, then follow below:
Open up Virtualbox GUI and right click your docker vm, and select settings, then go to Shared Folders.
Change the c\users to whatever folder your code lies in, like this:
This will mount your desired folder to /c/Users in the docker-machine vm.
After this, change the docker-compose.yml in the laradock folder to this:
### Laravel Application Code Container ######################
volumes_source:
build: ./volumes/application
volumes:
- /c/Users/pomodoro.xyz/code:/var/www/laravel
The logic behind this is, since we are running the docker in a VM, the docker-compose command looks for folder in the VM, not in the windows machines. Thats why we have provided the VM machine path to the docker-compose file.
Related
I cannot mount a local folder to a docker volume on docker-compose
so it is not accessible on docker-compose run cmd.
Here is a repo from the github https://github.com/up1/demo-k6-docker
When I follow readme on docker-compose run k6 run scripts/sample.js it gives me the following error all the time:
WARN[0000] The moduleSpecifier "scripts/sample.js" has no scheme but we will try to resolve it as remote module. This will be deprecated in the future and all remote modules will need to explicitly use "https" as scheme. ERRO[0000] The moduleSpecifier "scripts/sample.js" couldn't be found on local disk. Make sure that you've specified the right path to the file. If you're running k6 using the Docker image make sure you have mounted the local directory (-v /local/path/:/inside/docker/path) containing your script and modules so that they're accessible by k6 from inside of the container, see https://k6.io/docs/using-k6/modules#using-local-modules-with-docker. Additionally it was tried to be loaded as remote module by prepending "https://" to it, which also didn't work. Remote resolution error: "Get "https://scripts/sample.js": dial tcp: lookup scripts on 127.0.0.11:53: no such host"
Tried:
specifically sharing folder in docker app settings window,
different github repos,
different mac laptops,
different setups Dockerfile copy and -v option on docker run
looking for similar questions
and docs
https://k6.io/docs/using-k6/modules#using-local-modules-with-docker
I would really appreciate some help, banging my head against the wall for a couple of days with this
Try this.
docker-compose run k6 run //scripts//sample.js
I'm running on docker desktop version 3.1.0 Windows 10 pro.
Solution
I have tried this example out on a windows 10 box which has WSL2 installed and integrated with the latest Docker version. After following the steps in the example and downloading the code in the linux subsystem, I am able to build the image and run the container. The website is also available on the browser when I browse to it on a browser running on Windows 10. However, when I create a file or folder in the container the same doesn't reflect in the host filesystem which in this case is the linux subsystem. Similarly, a file created in the host linux subsystem is not seen in the container's cli when I use the ls command.
I ran this commands to confirm that the folder has been mounted where 44711fc95366 is my container id
docker inspect -f "{{ .Mounts }}" 44711fc95366
This gives an output like so:
[{bind /home/userlab1/my-proj/getting-started/app /usr/src/app true
rprivate}]
If the mount point expressed above is correct, I should be able to create a file or folder in host subsystem on the path /home/userlab1/my-proj/getting-started/app and be able to see it at the /usr/src/app path in the container, correct?
The docker image has been created and run from the linux subsystem command line like so:
docker run -it -v ~/my-proj/getting-started/app:/usr/src/app -p 3001:3000 --name cntr-linux-todo
img-todo:in-linux
While the application runs, the files updated in the container don't reflect on the website that is running from the container, nor does a new file/folder created in the container be seen in the host subsystem and vice versa. What am I missing?
As you are using Windows's version of docker, it cannot see files/folders from WSL.
You can move ~/my-proj into C:\Users\user20358, and mount from there :
-v 'C:\Users\user20358\my-proj\getting-started\app:/usr/src/app'
Question
How can I see symlinks of docker linux-containers from a windows host? (Even if I have to place an intermediate linux machine exposing the filesystem via NFS or Samba)
Context
In a DEVEL environment, I have this structure in a certain remote filesystem in a Linux within the office:
/files/repos/app-1
/files/repos/app-2
/files/repos/lib-x
/files/repos/lib-y
both app-1 and app-2 use those libraries which are vendored and symlinked like this:
/files/repos/app-1/vendor/my-company/lib-x => /files/repos/lib-x
/files/repos/app-1/vendor/my-company/lib-y => /files/repos/lib-y
/files/repos/app-2/vendor/my-company/lib-x => /files/repos/lib-x
/files/repos/app-2/vendor/my-company/lib-y => /files/repos/lib-y
The developers need to be in Windows.
So the developers have their IDE pointing to some mounted unit, for example Z:\ where they see all the repos and projects.
This allows us the following:
Edit any of the projects from it's own folder, and run the unit-tests for that project, including running the lib-x and lib-y.
Develope any of the libraries and have them updated in the depending applications (note I say I am in DEVEL, not PRE or PROD).
From the IDE, pointing see the "complete structure" of any of the applications (for instance app-1) also see the classes of the lib-x and lib-y so the autocompletion and so works perfectly.
This has been working like this for nearly a decade and works perfectly.
Problems
The developers need the connection to the server to develop and we wanted to mutate to local dockers so we can make the devels work from home.
Going to docker
We now decided that we are not going to use anymore the office-servers and we are going to setup all the development within docker containers.
What does actually work
We just installed docker desktop in Windows and shared C:\repos from the host into the dockers.
We now have some devel machines FROM ubuntu:xxx and run them mounting the volumes.
We made the symlinks within the app-1 and app-2 to lib-x and lib-y from inside the linux containers.
This does work perfectly and also the repositories work fine if we run the applications in the local dockers
Problem with symlinks in linux container and windows host
The problem is now the IDE: While it reads the files in C:\repos\app-1, the symlink that has been created within the linux containers can't be seen from the host.
This makes the IDE to be unable to follow C:\repos\app-1\vendor\lib-x and all the code-completion helpers are broken.
I already know Windows does not support symlink compatible with linux symlinks.
This forces us to look for an alternate solution.
Solution we've though with Samba
Initially I thought that as well as in the old topology a linux server just shared the filesystem via samba and the windows could just read the symlinks contents as they were demapped at the serverside and not the clientside, I thought that I could run another docker machine with a samba server just to locally share the "things seen from the linux" into the Windows host again.
To do so, I setup this docker-compose:
version: "3.7"
services:
samba:
container_name: samba
hostname: samba
image: dperson/samba
volumes:
- //c/Users/xavi/Documents/repos/test_samba:/mount
ports:
- "139:139"
- "445:445"
command: samba.sh -s "test_samba;/mnt/repos/test_samba;yes;no;yes;all"
restart: always
But this conflicts as 445 is locally already used.
If I turn down the local SMB, then in the next reboot, docker is unable to share C:\ into docker (I was not consciuos it does this sharing via SMB, could it be turned into a NFS or so?)
If I map to another port, like 10445:445 then the client is unable to access it, as client samba ports in windows seem to be not configurable.
Mapping an IP
So I tried to map an IP:
version: "3.7"
services:
samba:
container_name: samba
hostname: samba
image: dperson/samba
volumes:
- //c/Users/xavi/Documents/repos/test_samba:/mount
ports:
- "139:139"
- "192.168.4.83:445:445"
command: samba.sh -s "test_samba;/mnt/repos/test_samba;yes;no;yes;all"
restart: always
networks:
samba:
ipv4_address: 192.168.4.83
networks:
samba:
ipam:
driver: default
config:
- subnet: "192.168.4.0/16"
But is seems that this still creates problems:
It seems the IP is only for internal docker networking but not seen from the host
It seems the original service still listens not to 127.0.0.1:445 but to 0.0.0.0:445 so still "blocking" the attachment to listen to 192.168.4.83:445
So question
How could I make a windows host to see the "demapped contents of symlinks" to make the IDE see the vendored content that is linked from inside docker linux containers?
TL;DR
Run git-bash as administrator.
Issue export MSYS=winsymlinks:nativestrict in git-bash.
From there on, ln -s works in windows.
Links are seen from inside the docker.
Details
We'll walk thru these steps:
Preparation: Prepare a temporary dir with some files within the abc directory.
See it fail: We'll try to make a symlink and see it fail.
Create symlink: We'll create the symlink in windows and see it. We'll point xyz to abc.
Run docker: We'll then run docker with ubuntu and change contents in xyz.
Check in ubuntu container: We'll see the changes also in abc from within the docker.
Check in windows host: Well check both abc and xyz from ouside the container.
1. Preparation
In a git-bash go to /c and create a temporary dir tmp.
Inside it, create an abc dir and throw some contents there.
cd /c
mkdir tmp
cd tmp/
mkdir abc
cd abc/
echo 1111 > old_1
echo 2222 > old_2
echo 3333 > old_3
Here's a sample session:
2. See it fail
First let's try the "normal" way and see it fail.
In a git-bash, navigate to /c/tmp
Then do a symlink making xyz to point to abc: ln -s abc xyz
See it fails, by ls-ing the tmpand see xyz is a regular dir.
To be sure, create new content in xyz and see it's not there in abc.
Try to create the link. It will not become a symlink, but rather create a copy of the directory.
cd /c/tmp/
ln -s abc xyz
Create new_bad in xyz and don't see it in abc.
cd xyz/
touch new_bad
cd ../abc/
ls -l
Clear the wrong xyz
rm -Rf xyz/
Here's a sample session:
3. Create symlink
Here it comes the real stuff. The inspiration comes from #Slayvin's answer here, as well as here Git Bash shell fails to create symbolic links and the official git-for-windows repo here https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/pull/156
First open a new git-bash in Administrator mode. The reason is that only admins can create links in windows.
Once you are a CLI admin, navigate to the destination and set this evironment variable:
export MSYS=winsymlinks:nativestrict
This will tell the runtime subsytem of git-bash to actually use the symlinks feature. As we are admins we'll succeed.
The do just "normal symlinks" as you would expect: ln -s abc xyz
It works!!! Now next move is to test within docker!
NOTE: As per Sebastian's answer here https://stackoverflow.com/a/40914277/1315009 you DON'T need to be administrator to create symlinks in git-bash if you enabled the developer tools. In the search-bar write for developers and enable it:
4. Run docker + 5. Check in docker
The bash with admin privileges is no longer needed. So we'll close it and re-instantiate a "normal" bash.
In it, run an ubuntu continainer with docker. Use -it to interact with the ubuntu's bash. Use winpty to allow -it to work.
Bind-mount the /c/tmp directory so both abc and xyz are reachable. I chose to mount it to /files.
From inside, cd /files and see that xyz is actually a symlink.
Create some new content in xyz
Run and see:
winpty docker run -it --rm --mount type=bind,source="c:\tmp",target=/files --name ubuntu-link ubuntu
cd /files/
ls -l
Create content:
cd xyz
echo "yeaaahh" > new_good
Check it's really a symlink by going to abc:
cd ..
cd abc/
cat new_good
Sample session:
6. Check in windows host
Step out from the docker. Stay in the git-bash.
Again: This git-bash does not need to be privileged. The only moment we had to be admin was to "create" the symlink in windows.
From the unprivileged bash, explore abc as well as xyz and see that there's the content we created from inside the docker, appearing in both the original directory and in the symlink.
Sample session:
Final check
We can finally go to a classical CMD to see how it looks like. We can see it's clearly indicated that it's a symlink for a directory and we also see the target there:
Golden touch
If you have the "developer tools" activates as stated above, the only missing thing is the ENV VAR.
We can set this by editing the .bashrc at your windows home:
By doing this we can just use git-bash completely normally and start creating the symlinks from windows without any overload.
Caution
The symlinks created this way work from windows and are seen from inside docker. But not the oposite. If you create symlinks inside the container they don't get created in windows.
Therefore, in mounted volumes, setup the symlinks always from git-bash and consume them from the container. If you create them from the container, they still can be consumed from the container. But won't be usable from windows.
Conclussion
It can be done fully from the linux flavour commands via git-bash. Only that you need to be admin to create the links and tell the git-bash runtime to use that feature. And that the link needs to be done from windows, instead from inside the ubuntu.
I encountered a similar problem with my setup: developing on Windows 10 (where both the IDE and Docker are running), and having the website running inside the container (Linux).
I used to work on a library that is required by the website, working on both projects in parallel. And to do so, the library directory was symlinked (in host/Windows) in the vendor path.
Something like:
+ my-website
↪ vendor
↪ company
↪ my-package (->symlink here)
↪ ...
↪ docker-compose.yml
+ external-packages
↪ company
↪ my-package (real files here)
But with Docker, that setup doesn't work anymore.
So the trick is to mount a volume in docker-compose like this:
volumes:
- ./:/my-app
- ../external-packages/company:/my-app/vendor/company
So the files in vendor are 'seen' by the web server (inside the container), and we can keep the symlink (made in windows) between the my-package folders, so the IDE sees them as well.
I hope this will help you.
I initially configured my docker setup for Docker for Windows. Everything worked great. I'm using docker-compose to define 3 containers, each of which have a volume being mapped from my ./src (path on host) to /src/ (path on container).
I recently found out that the production server might have Windows 10 Home, which doesn't support Docker for Windows. So, my thinking is that I should revert to docker toolbox to be prepared for that scenario.
So I uninstalled Docker for Windows and installed Docker toolbox. I can build my images with docker-compose build just fine, but now when I run docker compose up -d, 2 of my containers immediately crash because the /src/ directory never gets mounted.
I can verify that the volumes are not getting mounted by running docker exec -it ng01 bash and seeing that the volume directory exists but is empty. 2 of my co-workers can reproduce this issue on their windows machines with docker toolbox.
Does anyone know why this is happening, or how to get around it? I've been looking at a bunch of similar SO posts, but the various solutions have gotten me nowhere. I would appreciate some guidance.
Here is my docker-compose file.
I have my source code in src/.
I have my Dockerfiles in docker/
Here is hotloader.Dockerfile.
Here is web.Dockerfile. I don't think they are the issue, but I might as well share them anyways.
Thank you in advance!
Docker Toolbox for Windows works by setting up a VirtualBox VM named default. Running any docker command forwards that command to the VM (Windows Machine → Virtual Machine → Docker).
To mount local Windows folders as Docker volumes, those folders first need to be shared and mounted on the VM that is running Docker.
By default, C:\Users is shared, so mounting volumes from that location will work without any configuration.
So you can either move your project on this already shared location(C:\Users) or you can follow the steps in this document https://headsigned.com/posts/mounting-docker-volumes-with-docker-toolbox-for-windows/
Hope this helps! :)
For the sake of simplicity, use ubuntu image as an example.
I often find it easier to use docker-compose, particularly if there's a high chance I'll want to both mount-volumes and link the container to another container at some point in the future.
Create a folder for working in, say "ubuntu".
In the "ubuntu" folder, create another folder called "files"
Create a file in that folder called "docker-compose.yml". In this file, enter:
ubuntucontainer:
image: "ubuntu:latest"
ports:
- "80:80"
volumes:
- ./files:/files
Whenever you need to start the box, navigate to "ubuntu" and type docker-compose up. To stop again, use docker-compose stop.
The advantage of using docker compose is that if you ever want to link-up a database container this can be done easily by adding another container to the yaml file, and then in the ubuntucontainer container adding a links section.
Not to mention, docker-compose up is quite minimal on the typing.
(Also, forwarding the ports with 80:80 may not be strictly necessary, it depends on what you want the box to do.)
TL;DR version:
Open Docker Quickstart Terminal. If it is already open, run $ cd ~
Run this once: $ docker run -it -v /$(pwd)/ubuntu:/windows --name ubu ubuntu
To start every time: $ docker start -i ubu
You will get an empty folder named ubuntu in your Windows user directory. You will see this folder with the name windows in your ubuntu container.
Explanation:
cd ~ is for making sure you are in Windows user directory.
-it stands for interactive, so you can interact with the container in the terminal environment. -v host_folder:container_folder enables sharing a folder between the host and the container. The host folder should be inside the Windows user folder. /$(pwd) translates to //c/Users/YOUR_USER_DIR in Windows 10. --name ubu assigns the name ubu to the container.
-i stands for interactive