Ok so I ran some stress tests on an application of mine and I came across some weird results compared to last time.
The Throughput was way off although the averages are similar.
The number of Samples did vary, however as I understood the Throughput is calculated by dividing the number of samples by the time it took.
In my understanding if the average time was similar the throughput should be similar even though the samples varied...
This is what I have:
PREVIOUS
RECENT
As you can see the throughput difference is pretty substantial...
Can somebody please explain me if my logic is correct or point me on why that is not the case?
Throughput is the number of requests per unit of time (seconds, minutes, hours) that are sent to your server during the test.
The throughput is the real load processed by your server during a run but it does not tell you anything about the performance of your server during this same run. This is the reason why you need both measures in order to get a real idea about your server’s performance during a run. The response time tells you how fast your server is handling a given load.
The time is calculated from the start of the first sample to the end of the last sample. This includes any intervals between samples, as it is supposed to represent the load on the server.
Throughput =(number of requests) / (total time).
Average: This is the Average (Arithmetic mean μ = 1/n * Σi=1…n xi) Response time of your total samples.It is the arithmetic mean of all the samples response time.
Response time is the elapsed time from the moment when a given request is sent to the server until the moment when the last bit of information has returned to the client.
So these are two different things.
Think of a trip to Disney or your favorite amusement park. Let's
define the capacity of the ride to be the number of people that can
sit on the ride per turn (think roller coaster). Throughput will
be the number of people that exit the ride per unit of time. Let's
define service time -the amount of time you get to sit on the ride.
Response time to be your time queuing for the ride
plus service time.
Related
I am in confusion here for what is the right parameter to find how many requests my service can handle in a sec..
Eg: According to docs & this post TPS(transactions/sec) is calculated based on elapsed time of the request which seems to be fair when you have one service instance. Eg: My elapsed time is 1 second so my tps is 1 which makes sense, but the calculations fail when i have 3 service instance(H-Scaled) though the elapsed time remains the same but now i can process 3 concurrent requests in that same second which should ideally read back as 3 tps but it doesnt
Q:Then what is the right parameter in jmeter report to check for this ? or is my theory wrong?
As per JMeter Glossary:
Throughput is calculated as requests/unit of time. The time is calculated from the start of the first sample to the end of the last sample. This includes any intervals between samples, as it is supposed to represent the load on the server.
The formula is: Throughput = (number of requests) / (total time).
And request is something produced by JMeter's Sampler
If you're doing some scalability testing you can measure it as follows:
Run a stress test with 1 service instance, i.e. start with 1 user and gradually increase the load at the same time looking at TPS. At some point you will reach the stage where increasing the number of users won't result in increased TPS due to some bottleneck. Measure the number of users and the TPS just before the bottleneck hits you.
Re-run your test with 3 service instances, you should see that the number of users and TPS before the bottleneck is higher now.
I am running my jmeter script for almost a week and observed an interesting thing today. Below is the scenario:
Overview: I am gradually increasing the load on the application. In my last test I gave load of 100 users on the app and today I increased the load to 150 users.
Result of 150 users test:
Response time of the requests decreased compared to the last test. (Which is a good sign)
Throughput decreased drastically to half of what I got in the previous test with less load.
Received 225 errors while executing the test.
My questions are:
What could be the possible reason for such strange behavior of throughput? Why did throughput decrease instead of increasing with the increasing load?
Did I get good response time as many of my requests failed?
NOTE: Till 100 users test throughput was increasing with the increasing load of users.
Can anyone please help me with this question. I am a new bee in performance testing. Thanks in Advance!!
Also, would like to request if anyone can suggest good articles/site etc on finding performance bottleneck and learning crucial things in performance.
Most probably these 225 requests which failed returned failure immediately therefore average response time decreased, that's why you should be looking into i.e. Response Times Over Time chart and pay more attention to percentiles as mean response time can mask the real problem.
With regards to the bottleneck discovery, make sure to collect as much information from the server side as you can, i.e.
CPU, RAM, Network, Disk usage from JMeter PerfMon Plugin
Slow queries log from the database
"heaviest" functions and largest objects from the profiling tool for your application
I am trying to stress test my server.
To do so I am using Jmeter and here is my set up:
I use
my Setup
Thread: 1000
schedule for 3 mins
So as you see I keep going with 1000 thread for a period of 3 mins.
But when I look at the throughput I only get around 230 per second
results
So what should I do to increase the through put to for example 1000000 per second? How come increasing the thread which I assume means more load does not increase throughput?
According to JMeter Glossary
Throughput is calculated as requests/unit of time. The time is calculated from the start of the first sample to the end of the last sample. This includes any intervals between samples, as it is supposed to represent the load on the server.
The formula is: Throughput = (number of requests) / (total time).
Throughput explicitly relies on the application response time. Looking into your results, the average response time is 3.5 seconds therefore you will not get more than 1000 / 3.5 = 285 requests per second
Theoretically you could use Throughput Shaping Timer and Concurrency Thread Group combination, this way JMeter will kick off extra threads if the current amount is not enough to reach/maintain the desired throughput, however looking into 8.5% error rate and maximum response time for your application > 2 minutes my expectation is that you will not be able to get more throughput because most probably your application is overloaded and cannot respond faster.
Throughput measures the number of transactions or requests that can be made in a given period of time. basically, it lists the number of requests server managed to serve in a given time period. Throughput value depends on lot of factors and maybe your application under test not able to cater the expected load.
So with 1000 threads, you can't expect a 1000 throughput.
It's up to you to find out how much throughput your application can handle. For that maybe you need to do different optimizations on your side like optimize your script, distribute load via JMeter execution, increase theard count,...etc
Do we need to adjust Throughput given by jmeter, to find out the actual tps of the system
For eg : I am getting 100 tps for concurrent 250 users. This ran for 10 hrs. Can I come to a conclusion like my software can handle 100 transactions per second. Or else do I need to do some adjustment and need to get a value. Why i am asking this because when load started, system will take sometime to perform in adequate level (warm up time). If so how to do this. Please help me to understand this.
By default JMeter sends requests as fast as it can, the main factor which are affecting TPS rate are:
number of threads (virtual users) - this you can define in Thread Group
your application response time - this is not something you can control
Ideally when you increase number of threads the number of TPS should increase by the same factor, i.e. if you have 250 users and getting 100 tps you should get 200 tps for 500 users. If this is not the case - these 500 users are beyond saturation point and your application bottleneck is somewhere between 250 and 500 users (if not earlier).
With regards to "warm up" time - the recommended approach of conducting the load is doing it gradually, this way you will allow your application to get prepared to increasing load, warm up caches, let JIT compiler/optimizer to go their work, etc. Moreover this way you will be able to correlate the increasing load with increasing/decreasing throughput, response time, number of errors, etc. while having 250 users released at once doesn't tell the full story. See
The system warmup period varies from one system to the other. Warm up period is where configurations are cached, different libraries are initialized (eg. Builder.init()) and other initial functions that usually don't happen for subsequent calls. If you study results of the load test, there is a slow period at the very beginning. For most systems, it could be as small as 5 to 10 minutes. These values could be even negligible if the test is as long as 10 hours. But then again, average calculation can be effected if the results give extremely low values at the start (it always depend on the jump from initial warming up period to normal operations).
As per jmeter configurations this thread may explain the configuration. How to exclude warmup time from JMeter summary?
I ran a JMeter test for 193 samples
where I could see my average response time as 5915ms and Throghput as 1.19832.
I just want to know how are they exactly related
All the answers are in JMeter Glossary
Elapsed time. JMeter measures the elapsed time from just before sending the request to just after the last response has been received.
Throughput is calculated as requests/unit of time. The time is calculated from the start of the first sample to the end of the last sample. This includes any intervals between samples, as it is supposed to represent the load on the server.
The formula is: Throughput = (number of requests) / (total time).
The relationship is: higher response time - lower throughput and vice versa.
You can use charts like Transactions per Second for throughput and Response Times Over Time for response times to get them plotted on your test timeline and Composite Graph to put them together. This way you will be able to track the trends.
All 3 charts can be installed using JMeter Plugins Manager
TL;DR
No, but yes.
Both aren't related directly, but when increasing Throughput, it will probably affect server response time due to load/stress on server.
If there are timeout errors response time will probably increase.
But for validation or firewall errors - response time will probably decrease.
There's a long explanation in JMeter archive, last is using Disney to demonstrate:
Think of your last trip to disney or your favorite amusement park. Lets define capacity of the ride to be the number of people that can sit on the ride per turn (think roller coaster). Throughput will be the number of people that exit the ride per unit of time. Lets define service time the the amount of time you get to sit on the ride. Lets define response time or latency to be your time queuing for the ride (dead time) plus service time.
In terms of load/Performance testing. Throughput and Response times are inversely proportional. i.e
With increase in response time throughput should decrease.
With increase in Throughput response time should decrease.
You can get more detailed definitions in this blog:
https://nirajrules.wordpress.com/2009/09/17/measuring-performance-response-vs-latency-vs-throughput-vs-load-vs-scalability-vs-stress-vs-robustness/
Throughout increases to some extent and remains stable when all the resources becomes busy. Now, if user requests increases further at this point response time would increase. But if response time increase is only because of internal queuing then due to the fact that system is taking more requests in at the same time response time is also increasing, throughout doesn't change. When queues are full more requests should fail. If response increase is due to some delay in processing or serving the request, for example running a query on database then due to the fact that system is not accepting more request and at the same time response time is also increasing, consequently throughout would drop.
Just a general explaination.
Respose Time : It is the time calculated when user send the request till request gets finnished.
Throughput : It is server property that number of transaction or request can be made during certain amount of time. here 1.19832 /minute means server cand hadle 1.19832 sample per minute.
As Respose Time increses Throughput increases.