I have an error response model in my API project:
public class ErrorResponse
{
public string ErrorId { get; set;}
public string Message {get; set;}
}
I need to generate a random ErrorId. I saw the use of Random class but just wondering what is the best way to do this. Some consideration, do I need to create the ErrorId in the constructor of ErrorResponse class and make ErrorId as read-only (no setter) or do I let the ErrorId set by the calling class.
You can create a new Guid and assign it to ErrorId in the constructor:
public ErrorResponse()
{
ErrorId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
Alternatively, you may want to give the client an http response and include the ErrorId:
return Content(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "ErrorId");
You can use the Random class or generate a Guid. But I just want to expand on what I think you are trying to do. Instead of your own custom error response - perhaps considering using the HttpResponseException or the HttpResponseMesssage. You can include a custom / random error identifier in Content / reason or in the message.
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
try
{
SomeMethod();
return new string[] { "xxx", "yyy" };
}
catch (Exception e)
{
throw new HttpResponseException(new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError)
{
Content = new StringContent("An error occurred."),
ReasonPhrase = "your custom error id"
});
// log
}
}
And:
public HttpResponseMessage Get(int id)
{
try
{
// your code
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Log exception code goes here
return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError, "your custom error id.”);
}
}
Best way to create Random number is to use Random class in C#... Here is the example
Random rnd = new Random();
int first = rnd.Next(1, 40); //Number between 1(inclusive) and 40(exclusive)
int second = rnd.Next(10); //Number between 0 and 9
Note: If you are going to create more than one random numbers then you should use the same instance of the Random class. If you create new instance too close in time, there are chances that they both will produce the same random numbers as Random class is based(seeded)on System clock.
I use Random but quite not sure if there are consequences in an API application(due to thread-safety, etc). So in the constructor, I generate the ErrorId.
public ErrorResponse()
{
var random = new Random();
const string chars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890.!+-?";
ErrorId = new string(Enumerable.Repeat(chars, 10)
.Select(s => s[random.Next(s.Length)]).ToArray());
}
Related
First time trying to use NSubstitute.
I have the following method in my Web API.
For those who don't know Couchbase, lets say that a collection/bucket is like a DB table and a key is like a DB row.
Couchbase_internal.Collection_GET returns Task<ICouchbaseCollection>
I would like to write 2 unit tests.
One that tests the returned class when the key exist and one when it doesn't (couchbaseServiceResultClass).
I don't really understand where is the part where I control whether or not the key exist in the mocked data.
public class CouchbaseAPI : ControllerBase, ICouchbaseAPI
{
// GET /document_GET?bucketName=<bucketName>&key=<key>
[HttpGet]
[Consumes("application/x-www-form-urlencoded")]
[Produces(MediaTypeNames.Application.Json)]
public async Task<couchbaseServiceResultClass> document_GET([FromQuery, BindRequired] string bucketName, [FromQuery, BindRequired] string key)
{
var collection = await Couchbase_internal.Collection_GET(bucketName);
if (collection != null)
{
IGetResult result;
try
{
// get document
result = await collection.GetAsync(key);
}
catch (CouchbaseException ex)
{
return new ErrorHandling().handleCouchbaseException(ex);
}
couchbaseServiceResultClass decryptResult = new();
try
{
// decrypt document
decryptResult = Encryption.decryptContent(result);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return new ErrorHandling().handleException(ex, null);
}
// remove document if decryption failed
if (!decryptResult.DecryptSuccess)
{
try
{
await collection.RemoveAsync(key);
}
catch (CouchbaseException ex)
{
return new ErrorHandling().handleCouchbaseException(ex);
}
}
decryptResult.Message = "key retrieved successfully";
// return result
return decryptResult;
}
else
{
return new ErrorHandling().handleError("Collection / bucket was not found.");
}
}
This is what I have so far for the first test:
public class CouchbaseAPITests
{
private readonly CouchbaseAPI.Controllers.ICouchbaseAPI myClass = Substitute.For<CouchbaseAPI.Controllers.ICouchbaseAPI>();
[Fact]
public async Task document_GET_aKeyIsRetrievedSuccessfully()
{
// Arrange
string bucketName = "myBucket";
string keyName = "myKey";
couchbaseServiceResultClass resultClass = new();
resultClass.Success = true;
resultClass.Message = "key retrieved successfully";
myClass.document_GET(bucketName, keyName).Returns(resultClass);
// Act
var document = await myClass.document_GET(bucketName, keyName);
// Assert
Assert.True(document.Success);
Assert.Equal("key retrieved successfully", document.Message);
}
}
If we want to test that we are retrieving documents from the Couchbase API properly, then generally we want to use a real instance (local test setup) of that API where possible. If we are mocking this then our tests are not really telling us about whether our code is working correctly (just that our mock is working the way we want it to).
When certain APIs are difficult to use real instances for (e.g. non-deterministic code, difficult to reproduce conditions such as network errors, slow dependencies, etc), that's when it can be useful to introduce an interface for that dependency and to mock that for our test.
Here's a very rough example that doesn't quite match the code snippets posted, but hopefully will give you some ideas on how to proceed.
public interface IDataAdapter {
IEnumerable<IGetResult> Get(string key);
}
public class CouchbaseAdapter : IDataAdapter {
/* Implement interface for Couchbase */
}
public class AppApi {
private IDataAdapter data;
public AppApi(IDataAdapter data) {
this.data = data;
}
public SomeResult Lookup(string key) {
try {
var result = data.Get(key);
return Transform(Decrypt(result));
} catch (Exception ex) { /* error handling */ }
}
}
[Fact]
public void TestWhenKeyExists() {
var testAdapter = Substitute.For<IDataAdapter>();
var api = new AppApi(testAdapter);
testAdapter.Get("abc").Returns(/* some valid data */);
var result = api.Lookup("abc");
/* assert that result is decrypted/transformed as expected */
Assert.Equal(expectedResult, result);
}
[Fact]
public void TestWhenKeyDoesNotExist() {
var testAdapter = Substitute.For<IDataAdapter>();
var api = new AppApi(testAdapter);
var emptyData = new List<IGetResult>();
testAdapter.Get("abc").Returns(emptyData);
var result = api.Lookup("abc");
/* assert that result has handled error as expected */
Assert.Equal(expectedError, result);
}
Here we've introduced a IDataAdapter type that our class uses to abstract the details of which implementation we are using to get data. Our real code can use the CouchbaseAdapter implementation, but our tests can use a mocked version instead. For our tests, we can simulate what happens when the data adapter throws errors or returns specific information.
Note that we're only testing AppApi here -- we are not testing the CouchbaseAdapter implementation, only that AppApi will respond in a certain way if its IDataAdapter has certain behaviour. To test our CouchbaseAdapter we will want to use a real instance, but we don't have to worry about those details for testing our AppApi transformation and decryption code.
I'm new to Xamarin, I have an app in Xamarin-Form that it's fetching data from web api and getting user input from Entry control.
The web api service class is working fine and reaches the deserialization in the getCourses method as seen below in Code Snippet 1.
The Entry control as well is working fine until it retrieves the user input on the MainPage class, OnOkGetCourseButton method as seen below Code Snippet 2.
What I want to achieve is, inside MainPage.xaml.cs, I create a method that takes the user input data and check agaisnt the deseriaized json data (the Id specially),
if it finds the Id in deserialized List of data, then it can send the found data to another ViewPage and display them.
if It cannot find the data, it shows a dialog box.
So far, I tried to call Task<ObservableCollection> getCourses() method from the MainPage class, inside CheckCourseComplete as seen below but it giving me no value/nothing, some kind of null value.
I don't want to filter the user input against web api json response inside getCourses(),
I want to do that in a separate method to follow S-OLID (Single Responsibility Principle).
If it's not possible in a separate method, then I just need to get it worked.
Please what is the best way to achieve it?
Code Snippet 1
public class CourseService : ICourseService
{
string Base_Url = "https://www.test.com/api/TheCourse";
public async Task<ObservableCollection<Course>> getCourses()
{
try
{
string url = Base_Url;
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
HttpResponseMessage responseMessage = await client.GetAsync(url);
if (responseMessage.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
var result = await responseMessage.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
var deserializedClass = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<ObservableCollection<Course>>(result);
// I don't want to do that here, as it will violate SRP (SOLID)
return deserializedClass;
}
return null;
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
}
}
Code Snippet 2
namespace CourseMobile
{
public partial class MainPage : ContentPage
{
private string _getEntryText;
private readonly CourseViewModel orderViewModel;
public Course FetchCourse { get; set; }
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
CheckCourseComplete();
BindingContext = new CourseViewModel();
}
public string GetEntryText
{
get => _getEntryText;
set => _getEntryText = value;
}
public async void OnOkGetCourseButton(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var inputtedCourseNumber = this.GetEntryText;
if(inputtedCourseNumber == string.Empty)
{
await DisplayAlert("", "Please enter your Course number", "OK 3");
}
else
{
CheckCourseComplete();
this.GetEntryText = inputtedCourseNumber;
await DisplayAlert("New Text", inputtedCourseNumber, "OK 2");
}
}
void Entry_TextChanged(object sender, TextChangedEventArgs e)
{
var newText = e.NewTextValue;
this.GetEntryText = newText;
}
public async void CheckCourseComplete()
{
CourseService myCourse = new CourseService();
await myCourse.getCourses(); // It doesn't return the json data (web api data)
// I need to check user input + (web api data) here
}
}
}
getCourses is async, so you need to use await when calling it
public async void CheckCourseComplete()
{
CourseService myCourse = new CourseService();
var data = await myCourse.getCourses();
// now filter data
}
I have been attempting to figure out why a Linq query that returns a list of U.S. States formatted for a drop down list will not cast to a List when the code returns to the calling method. The error that I get is:
Unable to cast object of type 'WhereSelectListIterator'2[StateListing.States,<>f__AnonymousTypea'2[System.String,System.String]]' to type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[StateListing.States]'
The namespace StateListing from the error, is a dll library that has a class called States returning an IEnumerable List of states shown below.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace StateListing
{
public class States
{
public string StateAbbriviation { get; set; }
public int StateID { get; set; }
public string StateName { get; set; }
static int cnt = 0;
public static IEnumerable<States> GetStates()
{
return new List<States>
{
new States
{
StateAbbriviation = "AL",
StateID=cnt++,
StateName = "Alabama"
},
new States
{
StateAbbriviation = "AL",
StateID=cnt++,
StateName = "Alaska"
}
//Continued on with the rest of states
}.AsQueryable();
}
}
}
In my control I make a call to GetStates that returns a List of States from the class library above.
[HttpPost]
public JsonResult GetStateOptions()
{
try
{
//Return a list of options for dropdown list
var states = propertyRepository.GetStates();
return Json(new { Result = "OK", options = states });
}
In the property repository class I have two methods one to get the StateList from the library, and another to format the listing of states for a drop down list in my view.
public List<States> GetStateList()
{
var items = (from s in States.GetStates()
select s).ToList();
return items;
}
List<States> IPropertyRepository.GetStates()
{
try
{
List<States> RawStates = GetStateList();
var stateList = RawStates.Select(c => new { DisplayText = c.StateName, Value = c.StateID.ToString() });
return (List<States>)stateList; //<=== Error
}
The error occurs when the code reaches the return within the GetStates method.
Any help with this casting problem explaining what I'm doing wrong would be appreciated.
This is the problem:
var stateList = RawStates.Select(c => new { DisplayText = c.StateName,
Value = c.StateID.ToString() });
return (List<States>)stateList;
Two issues:
Select doesn't return a List<T>
You're not= selecting States objects; you're selecting an anonymous type
The first is fixable using ToList(); the second is fixable either by changing your Select call or by changing your method's return type. It's not really clear what you really want to return, given that States doesn't have a DisplayText or Value property.
I would expect a method of GetStates to return the states - in which case you've already got GetStatesList() which presumably does what you want already.
Basically, you need to think about the type you really want to return, and make both your method return type and the method body match that.
You are projecting your LINQ query to an anonymmous object and not to a State list which obviously cannot work. The 2 types are incompatible. So start by modifying your repository layer and get rid of the GetStateList method:
public class PropertyRepository: IPropertyRepository
{
public List<States> GetStates()
{
return States.GetStates().ToList();
}
}
and then project to the desired structure in your controller:
[HttpPost]
public JsonResult GetStateOptions()
{
var states = propertyRepository.GetStateList();
var options = states.Select(x => new
{
DisplayText = c.StateName,
Value = c.StateID.ToString()
}).ToList();
return Json(new { Result = "OK", options = states });
}
I realize that a lot of questions have been asked relating to full text search and Entity Framework, but I hope this question is a bit different.
I am using Entity Framework, Code First and need to do a full text search. When I need to perform the full text search, I will typically have other criteria/restrictions as well - like skip the first 500 rows, or filter on another column, etc.
I see that this has been handled using table valued functions - see http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons/archive/2008/12/18/LINQ-to-SQL---Enabling-Fulltext-searching.aspx. And this seems like the right idea.
Unfortunately, table valued functions are not supported until Entity Framework 5.0 (and even then, I believe, they are not supported for Code First).
My real question is what are the suggestions for the best way to handle this, both for Entity Framework 4.3 and Entity Framework 5.0. But to be specific:
Other than dynamic SQL (via System.Data.Entity.DbSet.SqlQuery, for example), are there any options available for Entity Framework 4.3?
If I upgrade to Entity Framework 5.0, is there a way I can use table valued functions with code first?
Thanks,
Eric
Using interceptors introduced in EF6, you could mark the full text search in linq and then replace it in dbcommand as described in http://www.entityframework.info/Home/FullTextSearch:
public class FtsInterceptor : IDbCommandInterceptor
{
private const string FullTextPrefix = "-FTSPREFIX-";
public static string Fts(string search)
{
return string.Format("({0}{1})", FullTextPrefix, search);
}
public void NonQueryExecuting(DbCommand command, DbCommandInterceptionContext<int> interceptionContext)
{
}
public void NonQueryExecuted(DbCommand command, DbCommandInterceptionContext<int> interceptionContext)
{
}
public void ReaderExecuting(DbCommand command, DbCommandInterceptionContext<DbDataReader> interceptionContext)
{
RewriteFullTextQuery(command);
}
public void ReaderExecuted(DbCommand command, DbCommandInterceptionContext<DbDataReader> interceptionContext)
{
}
public void ScalarExecuting(DbCommand command, DbCommandInterceptionContext<object> interceptionContext)
{
RewriteFullTextQuery(command);
}
public void ScalarExecuted(DbCommand command, DbCommandInterceptionContext<object> interceptionContext)
{
}
public static void RewriteFullTextQuery(DbCommand cmd)
{
string text = cmd.CommandText;
for (int i = 0; i < cmd.Parameters.Count; i++)
{
DbParameter parameter = cmd.Parameters[i];
if (parameter.DbType.In(DbType.String, DbType.AnsiString, DbType.StringFixedLength, DbType.AnsiStringFixedLength))
{
if (parameter.Value == DBNull.Value)
continue;
var value = (string)parameter.Value;
if (value.IndexOf(FullTextPrefix) >= 0)
{
parameter.Size = 4096;
parameter.DbType = DbType.AnsiStringFixedLength;
value = value.Replace(FullTextPrefix, ""); // remove prefix we added n linq query
value = value.Substring(1, value.Length - 2);
// remove %% escaping by linq translator from string.Contains to sql LIKE
parameter.Value = value;
cmd.CommandText = Regex.Replace(text,
string.Format(
#"\[(\w*)\].\[(\w*)\]\s*LIKE\s*#{0}\s?(?:ESCAPE N?'~')",
parameter.ParameterName),
string.Format(#"contains([$1].[$2], #{0})",
parameter.ParameterName));
if (text == cmd.CommandText)
throw new Exception("FTS was not replaced on: " + text);
text = cmd.CommandText;
}
}
}
}
}
static class LanguageExtensions
{
public static bool In<T>(this T source, params T[] list)
{
return (list as IList<T>).Contains(source);
}
}
For example, if you have class Note with FTS-indexed field NoteText:
public class Note
{
public int NoteId { get; set; }
public string NoteText { get; set; }
}
and EF map for it
public class NoteMap : EntityTypeConfiguration<Note>
{
public NoteMap()
{
// Primary Key
HasKey(t => t.NoteId);
}
}
and context for it:
public class MyContext : DbContext
{
static MyContext()
{
DbInterception.Add(new FtsInterceptor());
}
public MyContext(string nameOrConnectionString) : base(nameOrConnectionString)
{
}
public DbSet<Note> Notes { get; set; }
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Configurations.Add(new NoteMap());
}
}
you can have quite simple syntax to FTS query:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var s = FtsInterceptor.Fts("john");
using (var db = new MyContext("CONNSTRING"))
{
var q = db.Notes.Where(n => n.NoteText.Contains(s));
var result = q.Take(10).ToList();
}
}
}
That will generate SQL like
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT TOP (10)
[Extent1].[NoteId] AS [NoteId],
[Extent1].[NoteText] AS [NoteText]
FROM [NS].[NOTES] AS [Extent1]
WHERE contains([Extent1].[NoteText], #p__linq__0)',N'#p__linq__0 char(4096)',#p__linq__0='(john)
Please notice that you should use local variable and cannot move FTS wrapper inside expression like
var q = db.Notes.Where(n => n.NoteText.Contains(FtsInterceptor.Fts("john")));
I have found that the easiest way to implement this is to setup and configure full-text-search in SQL Server and then use a stored procedure. Pass your arguments to SQL, allow the DB to do its job and return either a complex object or map the results to an entity. You don't necessarily have to have dynamic SQL, but it may be optimal. For example, if you need paging, you could pass in PageNumber and PageSize on every request without the need for dynamic SQL. However, if the number of arguments fluctuates per query, it will be the optimal solution.
As the other guys mentioned, I would say start using Lucene.NET
Lucene has a pretty high learning curve, but I found an wrapper for it called "SimpleLucene", that can be found on CodePlex
Let me quote a couple of codeblocks from the blog to show you how easy it is to use. I've just started to use it, but got the hang of it really fast.
First, get some entities from your repository, or in your case, use Entity Framework
public class Repository
{
public IList<Product> Products {
get {
return new List<Product> {
new Product { Id = 1, Name = "Football" },
new Product { Id = 2, Name = "Coffee Cup"},
new Product { Id = 3, Name = "Nike Trainers"},
new Product { Id = 4, Name = "Apple iPod Nano"},
new Product { Id = 5, Name = "Asus eeePC"},
};
}
}
}
The next thing you want to do is create an index-definition
public class ProductIndexDefinition : IIndexDefinition<Product> {
public Document Convert(Product p) {
var document = new Document();
document.Add(new Field("id", p.Id.ToString(), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED));
document.Add(new Field("name", p.Name, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.ANALYZED));
return document;
}
public Term GetIndex(Product p) {
return new Term("id", p.Id.ToString());
}
}
and create an search index for it.
var writer = new DirectoryIndexWriter(
new DirectoryInfo(#"c:\index"), true);
var service = new IndexService();
service.IndexEntities(writer, Repository().Products, ProductIndexDefinition());
So, you now have an search-able index. The only remaining thing to do is.., searching! You can do pretty amazing things, but it can be as easy as this: (for greater examples see the blog or the documentation on codeplex)
var searcher = new DirectoryIndexSearcher(
new DirectoryInfo(#"c:\index"), true);
var query = new TermQuery(new Term("name", "Football"));
var searchService = new SearchService();
Func<Document, ProductSearchResult> converter = (doc) => {
return new ProductSearchResult {
Id = int.Parse(doc.GetValues("id")[0]),
Name = doc.GetValues("name")[0]
};
};
IList<Product> results = searchService.SearchIndex(searcher, query, converter);
The example here http://www.entityframework.info/Home/FullTextSearch is not complete solution. You will need to look into understand how the full text search works. Imagine you have a search field and the user types 2 words to hit search. The above code will throw an exception. You need to do pre-processing on the search phrase first to pass it to the query by using logical AND or OR.
for example your search phrase is "blah blah2" then you need to convert this into:
var searchTerm = #"\"blah\" AND/OR \"blah2\" ";
Complete solution would be:
value = Regex.Replace(value, #"\s+", " "); //replace multiplespaces
value = Regex.Replace(value, #"[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]", "").Trim();//remove non-alphanumeric characters and trim spaces
if (value.Any(Char.IsWhiteSpace))
{
value = PreProcessSearchKey(value);
}
public static string PreProcessSearchKey(string searchKey)
{
var splitedKeyWords = searchKey.Split(null); //split from whitespaces
// string[] addDoubleQuotes = new string[splitedKeyWords.Length];
for (int j = 0; j < splitedKeyWords.Length; j++)
{
splitedKeyWords[j] = $"\"{splitedKeyWords[j]}\"";
}
return string.Join(" AND ", splitedKeyWords);
}
this methods uses AND logic operator. You might pass that as an argument and use the method for both AND or OR operators.
You must escape none-alphanumeric characters otherwise it would throw exception when a user enters alpha numeric characters and you have no server site model level validation in place.
I recently had a similar requirement and ended up writing an IQueryable extension specifically for Microsoft full text index access, its available here IQueryableFreeTextExtensions
Update (Stupidity Fail)
So then, in all of my convoluted formula code, I neglected the fundamental principles of C#.
Methods may return a value.
static dynamic Construct<T>(T expression){
return expression;
}
Then just use that, instead of a variable ...
Method = Construct<Action<Context, string, int>>(
(context, key, change) =>
{
context.Saved[key] += change;
Console.WriteLine("{0}'s saved value of {1} was changed by {2}, resulting in {3}",
context.Name, key, change, context.Saved[key]);
}
)
I have a situation where I need to call upon methods that don't exist as compiled methods, but rather need to be able to accept an array of parameters and execute as an anonymous function. I thought I had it worked out, but I am running into an issue with the following..
public static IDictionary<string, Function> Expressions =
new Dictionary<string, Function> {
{
"Increase [X] by value of [Y]",
new Function {
Name = "Increase [X] by [Y]",
Parameters = 2,
Types = new List<Type>{
typeof(Param),
typeof(Param)
},
Method = (Expression<Func<Context, Param, Param, bool>>)
((context, x, y) => {
Console.WriteLine("test"); // this is where I need to do stuff...
})
}
}
};
I am being told that a Method name is expected on this. The problem is that Context will be passed in by the object that takes the function and runs its method, because the Context object cannot be pre-bound (it has to be late bound). So basically I package up the trailing 2 parameters (Param) and (Param) in this case and create a function to execute against them.
The database stores those parameters, and then invokes the method passing in the appropriate Context as the first parameter by using Compile().DynamicInvoke(object[] params).
Can anyone give me a hand here as to why I cannot put any kind of logic in between my { }?
UPDATE
Okay, since I've been told this example is unclear, here is an entire program running start to finish that illustrates what I am trying to accomplish.
public class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
// simple object stored in database.
var ctx = new Context {
Name = "Ciel",
Saved = new Dictionary<string, int> {
{ "First", 10 },
{ "Second", 20 }
}
};
// simple object stored in database.
var rule = new Rule {
Equations = new List<Equation> {
new Equation {
Parameters = new List<object>{
"First",
5
},
Name = "Increase [X] by value of [Y]"
}
}
};
// =======================================
// runtime environment!!!
// =======================================
var method = Evaluations.Expressions[rule.Equations[0].Name].Method;
var parameters = rule.Equations[0].Parameters;
// insert the specific context as the first parameter.
parameters.Insert(0, ctx);
method.DynamicInvoke(parameters.ToArray());
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
public class Function {
public string Name { get; set; }
public dynamic Method { get; set; }
}
public class Equation {
public string Name { get; set; }
// these objects will be simple enough to serialize.
public IList<object> Parameters { get; set; }
public Function Function { get; set; }
}
public class Context {
public string Name { get; set; }
// this is a crude example, but it serves the demonstration purposes.
public IDictionary<string, int> Saved { get; set; }
}
public class Rule {
// again, a crude example.
public IList<Equation> Equations { get; set; }
}
public static class Evaluations {
static Action<Context, string, int> expr = (context, key, change) =>
{
context.Saved[key] += change;
Console.WriteLine("{0}'s saved value of {1} was changed by {2}, resulting in {3}",
context.Name, key, change, context.Saved[key]);
};
public static IDictionary<string, Function> Expressions =
new Dictionary<string, Function> {
{
"Increase [X] by value of [Y]",
new Function {
Name = "Increase [X] by [Y]",
Method = expr
}
}
};
}
Four problems:
You're trying to create an expression tree from a lambda expression with a statement body (i.e. braces). C# doesn't allow this - you can only convert a statement lambda into a delegate, not an expression tree
Your lambda body doesn't return a Boolean value
You're trying to call an Expression<Func<Context, Param, Param, bool>> as if it were a method with a bool parameter. It's not at all clear what you're trying to do there.
Even if the third point were valid, I suspect you'd need more brackets.
If you refactor your code to make it a little more readable and manageable, you'll probably be well on your way to solving your problem. Rather than having one mammoth C# statement with a single semicolon, split it up into several lines. Something like this:
public static Dictionary<string, Function> Expressions = getExpressions();
private static Dictionary<string, Function> getExpressions()
{
var method = (Expression<Func<Context, Param, Param, bool>>)
((context, x, y) => {
Console.WriteLine("test"); // this is where I need to do stuff...
})(true);
var func = new Function()
{
Name = "Increase [X] by [Y]",
Parameters = 2,
Types = new List<Type>
{
typeof(Param),
typeof(Param)
},
Method = method
};
var dict = new Dictionary<string, Function>();
dict["Increase [X] by value of [Y]"] = func;
return dict;
}
Note: my syntax could be incorrect, but you get the general idea.