i know that handsontable is not mobile friendly but is there a workaround that we can edit on mobile devices with the newest version?
Regards
I use Handsontable version 0.25.1, but I imagine the situation is still the same at the very latest release.
My experience is only with iPad device (iOS 9); I cannot speak about all mobile devices.
I found the rendering acceptable. But if you tap a cell to edit nothing happens, which is rather limiting! I made just two small changes to rectify:
Tracing all of this right down in handsontable.full.js, the logic in onCellMouseDown() is testing for event.button === 0 (i.e. left mouse button) to start setting up for recognising the double click to activate the mobile text editor. On a touch device, they are explicitly calling their onMouseDown/Move/Up() from their onTouchStart/Move/End(), passing the mouse events the event structure received for the touch event. However, touch events' event structure does not have a button member, so that is undefined, causing bad behaviour.
Directly setting passed-in event.button = 0 before passing to mouse event handlers solves this. Put in line:
event.button = 0; // set as left mouse button
into onTouchStart() [prior to call to onMouseDown(event), around line 1326] & onTouchEnd() [prior to call to onMouseUp(event), around line 1368].
Now tapping into a cell correctly allows editing. It brings up their MobileTextEditor. Which I did not like for a number of reasons, including the fact that often it appears behind the on-screen keyboard so the user does not even know it is there! I changed their Handsontable.TextCell [around line 4346] so that the editor: line now reads:
editor: (isMobileBrowser() && Handsontable.useMobileEditor) ? getEditorConstructor('mobile') : getEditorConstructor('text'), // only use mobile editor if explicitly called for
So it uses the standard in-place text editor, which I prefer, unless you go hot.updateSettings({useMobileEditor: true}).
Related
I am working on a Xamarin Forms project.
We are testing a Android Device running KitKat that has a 12 key keyboard.
I am trying to force the softinput keyboard from showing when focus is given to an Entry for which I created a custom Renderer which overrides the FocusChange and Clicked events.
It kinda works as I detect if the device has a physical keyboard and if the entryKeyboard is numeric. If both those conditions are true, I call
Control.ShowSoftInputOnFocus = false;
AND
imm.HideSoftInputFromWindow(Control.WindowToken, HideSoftInputFlags.None);
It mostly works, except when the view containing the Entry editor opens. the keyboard is shown for a few moments and then it disappears. That's a problem on 2 fronts. It moves up the buttons that end up at the bottom of the view while the keyboard is measured, so buttons appear, move up and then back down when keyboard ultimately disappears. Second, once in a while it doesn't work. We have put a few delays, but that only compounds the problem since the keyboard ends up on screen longer.
In a perfect world, I don't care about the delays, I just don't want the softInput to show up anywhere in this view unless I specifically ask for it,
Alternately, I would not mind writing my own invisible keyboard and have to show (invisibly) while the async process is performing.
I have been searching everywhere for a while, so any help would be greatly appreciated.
thanks in advance and have a nice day
I think you need to make a custom renderer for your EditText's. Then also create your own implementation of EditText which overrides the OnCheckIsTextEditor method, which simply returns false.
If you are only targeting Android API 21 and up, you can alternatively just call ShowSoftInputOnFocus = false on all your EditText instances. This could probably be done with an Effect in Xamarin.Forms.
First of all hi guys!
I was trying to write a mouse controller app for mac os x which is reading inputs from keyboard and moves the mouse accordingly. By garbage input i will describe the input was intented for a mouse event but it creates text on screen.
Before anyone points to the fact that there is a built in one, It was laggy even in shortest lag setting and cannot registers more than two buttons at the same time (you have to press diagonals to go to the diagonal.) If you accidentally press another button when release of the accident button your motion stops. My first and last reaction was "rubbish!". Adding customization and extra features is my goal.
I want to create a key combination that will block the garbage input to be passed to other programs while it was held. But global monitoring and seems like it always passes the event. And unfortunately I see qqqqqqqwwwwwww like text in unwanted places.
I want to see that when i press q w and up, it will make the mouse go up. But i create qqqqqqqwwwwww mess on the way. My first idea was creating a view on popover and handle events there, but whenever I want to use my mouse from keyboard seeing a popover is anoying and I couldn't find a way to show the popover without leaving any garbage keyboard input.
What should i do in this situation?
You will want to use Quartz Event Taps. Note that for an application to tap keyboard events, it has to be trusted for accessibility (as in System Preferences > Security & Privacy > Privacy > Accessibility). Your app can ask to be made trusted using AXIsProcessTrustedWithOptions().
I need to display a tooltip over a window. I'm creating a second window with the tool tip and using SDL_RaiseWindow() to bring it to the top. However, doing that causes the tooltip to steal focus which is not what I want. Is there a way to bring a window to the top without changing focus?
Also, is there a way to set focus (mouse and/or keyboard) without changing the Z order of the windows?
The answer offered by Neil will only work under X11 as SDL_SetWindowInputFocus() is only implemented for that environment. In essence, the desired behaviour is otherwise not achievable. I have seen that there is a feature request in the SDL forums for an overload of the SDL_RaiseWindow() function to include an optional bool parameter to indicate if the raised window should also receive the input focus, or not. I hope they do implement that.
In any case, the support for multiple windows under SDL 2.x is a little weak. There is no built in support for the Z-order of different windows, and trying to build one based on the "painter's method" works, but leaves one no control over the input focus.
Old question, but this came up during my own search. You could try SDL_RaiseWindow() to bring your tooltip to the top, then use SDL_SetWindowInputFocus() on the main window to switch focus back to it.
I got this working sufficiently for my tooltips on mac by using SDL_WINDOW_ALWAYS_ON_TOP flag with SDL2:
SDL_CreateWindow(tooltip_window->name, x, y, w, h,
SDL_WINDOW_OPENGL | SDL_WINDOW_BORDERLESS |
SDL_WINDOW_ALWAYS_ON_TOP);
SDL_RaiseWindow(windowThatShouldHaveFocus);
// ...render what you want on that tooltip (SDL_RenderClear, SDL_RenderCopy, SDL_RenderPresent) & hide it with SDL_HideWindow
And when showing the tooltip:
SDL_ShowWindow(tooltipWindow);
SDL_RaiseWindow(windowThatShouldHaveFocus);
In spite of there being a Human Interface Guidelines document (HIG), a lot of high quality Mac desktop applications use custom controls. My question is what is the best approach to start subclassing controls for Cocoa development? It surprises me how little (good) information there is on this topic. What path is the best to follow so you don't end up with a nice but half broken control?
Here's a checklist:
Make sure your control works correctly at double resolution. Use Quartz Debug to test this. You'll want to test both drawing sanity (in all states—normal, selected, pressed, disabled, and any others) and operation sanity (that hit testing matches where things appear on the screen/other destination device).
For extra credit, make sure your control works correctly at 1.5 (or some other, similarly non-integral) resolution.
Test how the standard control works when clicked. You'll probably do this anyway. Do as the standard control does.
Test how the standard control works when half-clicked (mouse down inside, mouse up outside).
Test how the standard control works when dark-side-of-the-clicked (mouse down outside, mouse up inside).
Test how the standard control works when dragged within.
Test above four with the other mouse buttons (right and middle).
Test what the standard control does when you scroll with a scroll wheel. Also test shift + scroll and, on a mouse that has them (e.g., most Logitech mice), scroll left/right buttons.
Test what the standard control does when you two-finger scroll in each axis and in both axes.
Test what the standard control does when you pinch and when you unpinch.
Test what the standard control does when you swipe with three and four fingers in each axis.
Test how the standard control works with “Full Keyboard Access” turned on. Can you tab into it? Can you press it with the space bar? Can you enter it with the return key? Can you tab out of it?
Test how the standard control responds to Accessibility queries. Use Accessibility Inspector. See the Accessibility Programming Guidelines for Cocoa for information on responding to accessibility queries and messages in your control.
Test your app—including, but not limited to, your custom controls—in VoiceOver. Blindfold yourself and try to use the app with VoiceOver alone.
If applicable, test printing your view. You can print to Preview if you don't want to kill a tree for your development process.
Test printing in other paper sizes. If you're in the US, test A4; otherwise, test US Letter. Test still other paper sizes (such as Legal and A3) if you're feeling thorough.
If you're implementing a scroller (poor you), test that your scroller responds correctly to the “Jump to the (next page|spot that's clicked)” preference in the Appearance pane in System Preferences. “Correctly” means it should do what the user selected.
Make sure it correctly implements all four scroll-arrow-position settings: One at each end (Mac style), both at the lower/left end (NeXT style), both at the upper/right end, and both at each end (power user style). As always, you need to both draw correctly and hit-test/react correctly. (Suggested by #radiofreelunch/by David Dunham)
Also, if you're implementing a scroller, make sure it responds to the “Smooth scrolling” preference correctly.
Test that it responds to different scrolling speed preferences correctly.
If you're implementing a text entry field of some sort, or any view that responds to some sort of special hot key (like Enter to send a message in an inputline), test right-to-left (Hebrew/Arabic) text input and alternate input methods. The Character Viewer is a good start.
Also, test that you don't break ctrl-q. For example, ctrl-q, tab should always enter a tab character. The same typically goes for option + (key), such as option-return in an inputline.
Test that it responds to different key-repeat preferences correctly.
If you implement any custom keyboard shortcuts (⌘ + zero or more other modifiers + one or more character keys) by means other than Cocoa's standard menu shortcut handling, test your custom shortcut behavior under Dvorak. There is no faster way to sour our perceptions of your app than to respond to ⌘' by quitting.
Show your app to users who've never used it nor seen any mockups before. Disqualify programmers. If they don't recognize your control as a (whatever it's supposed to be), redesign it. If you ever say “the scroller is over here” or “you need to click that”, you instantly fail.
Test that your control responds (or doesn't respond, if responding would be dangerous) when your app is in the background. (Suggested by #chucker.)
Test that your control responds, but does not bring the app forward, when your app is in the background and the user clicks on it with the ⌘ key down. (Suggested by #chucker.)
Test resizing your view. Among other things, this will ensure that you set the autoresize mask correctly. You're also looking for drawing bugs—distorted elements, gaps, etc. (Part of this suggested by #Bagelturf.)
If your control is, in fact, a control, send it sizeToFit and make sure that it does the right thing. (Suggested by #Bagelturf.)
If you work with mouse coordinates, don't assume that they will be whole numbers. Ensure that you handle fractional numbers, zeroes (positive and negative), and negative numbers correctly. (Part of this suggested by #Bagelturf.)
You might also consider splitting your control into a control and a cell. In the latter case, also perform all of these tests on your cell embedded in an NSMatrix and in an NSTableColumn.
If your control has a menu, test what happens when the control is at one or more edges of the screen. The menu should move over to not fall outside screen space.
If your control has a menu, test that the user can enter it with the down arrow key when using “Full Keyboard Access”. If it is also a text field (like a combo box), test that this only happens when the user presses the down arrow at the end of the text; otherwise, normal text field behavior should rule: Pressing down on a line that is not the last line should move the cursor down a line, and pressing down on the last line should move to the end of the line.
If your control has a menu, test that it stays open when clicked and does not immediately close when held open. There is a function you can use to do this correctly, and it is available in 64-bit.
If your control has a menu, test that it is navigable (all four arrow keys + Home, End, Page Up, Page Down), usable (spacebar/return press action), and cancellable (esc) with the keyboard.
Hard to add anything to Peter's list, but if you're doing a scroll bar, be sure it handles all the deviant placements of the scroll arrows (like DoubleBoth).
I'm developing an interactive MFC application which displays a 3D object using my own algorithm, essentially using MFC as a framework, but using lots of pDC->Polygon(), pDC->Rectangle(), pDC->DrawText(), etc. calls.
The UI has numerous clickable areas which all work well. However, the onscreen controls for rotating, spinning, etc. the 3D image motivate users to double click, triple click, and beyond.
I'm 99% positive that CWnd::OnLButtonDown() is not called until Windows (or whatever) has decided the operation is not a double click, or when double clicked, but only once. That is a series of clicks results in a notification every second click. The user experience is stuttered rotation. The temporary workaround is to have users move the mouse slightly between clicks—It solves the problem, but is rather unfriendly.
The application does no double click event hooking. Maybe there's a way to go further to disable potential double click processing? Or maybe there is a lower-level way to capture the mouse button down?
I think you have it backwards - the first click gets through as a WM_LBUTTONDOWN, the second one gets turned into a double-click.
To prevent a window from generating WM_LBUTTONDBLCLK messages, remove the CS_DBLCLKS style from the window.
This is all explained in the WM_LBUTTONDBLCLK documentation.
Edit: I misspoke, CS_DBLCLKS is a class style, not a window style. I don't think you can remove it, you have to create a new window class that doesn't include it. It's provided by MFC - see this page http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/a77269ff(VS.80).aspx.
Just to add an answer, this method worked for me:
WORD dwStyle = GetClassLongPtr(handle, GCL_STYLE);
dwStyle &= ~CS_DBLCLKS;
SetClassLongPtr(handle, GCL_STYLE, dwStyle);
You can use these functions to edit a WNDCLASSEX style structure for an specific window removing the double click event and correcting the single click behavior.
GetClassLongPtr
SetClassLongPtr