In my home dir, I have sub directories (CentOS, Ubuntu, etc) all for specific nodes I have access to.
Each OS will hold their own copy of programs, one of which is Python:
$HOME/{CentOS, Ubuntu, ...}/{python2,python3}
I am using environment modules so that when I ssh into a different computer (COMP), Python aliases will be set for that specific (COMP). For example:
COMP1 is CentOS
when I ssh into COMP1, "python3" should point to $HOME/Centos/python3/bin/python3
COMP2 is Ubuntu
when I ssh into COMP2 "python2" should point to $HOME/Ubuntu/python2/bin/python2
I can retrieve the OS name in bash using lsb_release -si, but I am working with modulefiles which are written in tcl, and haven't found something like lsb_release. Can I have a bash script that outputs lsb_release -si when called from a tcl script?
I tried doing this but no luck:
BASH SCRIPT:
#!/bin/bash
OS=$(lsb_release -si)
echo $OS
MODULEFILE SCRIPT:
#%Modulefile1.0
set OS [catch {exec bash /path/to/bash_file} output]
puts $OS
This doesn't do much.
Option A: export the variable in bash and access the environment variable in tcl.
#!/bin/bash
OS=$(lsb_release -si)
export OS
somescript.tcl
#!/usr/bin/tclsh
puts $::env(OS)
Option B: Use the platform package that comes with tcl.
#!/usr/bin/tclsh
package require platform
puts [platform::identify] ; # detailed OS-CPU
puts [platform::generic] ; # more generic OS-CPU
References: env platform
Your code mostly doesn't look obviously wrong.
But following the [catch {exec ...} output] the value that you are looking for should be in the output variable; the OS variable will have a code indicating effectively whether the bash script produced any output to stderr. Since you're definitely not interested in that debugging output which might be produced for reasons not under your easy control, you can probably do this:
catch {exec bash /path/to/bash_file 2>/dev/null} output
puts $output
Also make sure your bash script has an explicit exit at the end. Might as well ensure that it stops correctly. That's the default behaviour, but it's better to be explicit here as this is a (small) program.
Related
I've got tcl script with two ways of execution bash script:
#exec bash ./run.sh
open "|bash ./run.sh r"
The bash script is shown below:
#!/bin/bash
ls
if [ "$?" != "0" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Status failed!" > status
else
echo "Everything is OK!" > status
fi
I'm using tclsh for Windows with bash from git bash. When I use:
exec bash ./run.sh
I've got in status file:
Everything is OK!
otherwise:
open "|bash ./run.sh r"
got:
ERROR: Status failed!
Is there any possibility to correctly detect exit code when opened the tcl pipe?
You don't describe whether you get different results out of the ls part of the script. That matters; the ls command is most certainly capable of changing its behaviour according to the environment in which it is invoked. This matters because Tcl executes subprocesses (on Windows) directly using the CreateProcess() system call, rather than the various wrapped versions that Cygwin and git bash use. Other possibilities are that you're launching the script in a different directory and so on.
However, in general we'd expect a script to behave very similarly when launched via exec or via open |… r as they share a common core of functionality. The only differences are to do with how output and termination are waited for.
If you create a subprocess pipeline, by default you won't get to find out about errors from it until you close the pipeline. exec generates any errors “immediately” because it doesn't return control to you until the subprocess has terminated and all output has been read.
I'm trying to run arbitrary bash commands in the shell, but I can only access the shell buy running /bin/bash -c
Is there anyway of being able to run something like:
/bin/bash -c "export FOO=bar"
and then see FOO set in the original shell?
No.
This isn't shell-specific -- no UNIX process can change a parent process's environment variables without that parent process honoring an interface (for instance, reading new variables/values from stdout), or using unreliable and unsupportable hackery (like attaching to the parent process with a debugger and calling setenv() directly).
Consider ssh-agent as an example:
$ ssh-agent
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/var/folders/t2/t58p1nwx1g38tkhykqfhvmm80000gn/T//ssh-0HSNi1V5h9wf/agent.17313; export SSH_AUTH_SOCK;
SSH_AGENT_PID=17314; export SSH_AGENT_PID;
echo Agent pid 17314;
...thus, documented for use with a pattern akin to:
$ eval "$(ssh-agent)"
In this case, that interface is eval-able shell code; however, as this is trivially used to execute arbitrary commands, supporting this interface is a security risk.
Inasmuch as your goal is to use the result of shell commands to modify the environment of a program that isn't a shell language at all, and thus doesn't support eval or source, this gives you the ability to use a safer stream format, such as a NUL-delimited stream. For instance, if your shell program writes key=val\0 pairs, with literal NUL characters for \0, you can do something akin to the following in Python:
for env_val in s.split('\0'):
if not env_val.contains('='): continue
k, v = env_val.split('=', 1)
environ[k] = v
...ported to your language of choice. To write in this format from shell:
printf '%s=%s\0' "$key" "$val"
...will suffice.
I am trying to login on one of the remote server(Box1) and trying to read one file on remote server(Box1).
That contain the another server(Box2) details, base upon that details I have to come back to the local server and ssh to another server(Box2) for some data crunching. and so on.....
ssh box1.com << EOF
if [[ ! -f /home/rakesh/tomar.log ]]
then
echo "LOG file not found"
else
echo " LOG file present"
export server_node1= `cat /home/rakesh/tomar.log`
fi
EOF
ssh box2.com << EOF
if [[ ! -f /home/rakesh/tomar.log ]]
then
echo "LOG file not found"
else
echo " LOG file present"
export server_node2= `cat /home/rakesh/tomar.log`
fi
EOF
but I am not getting value of "server_node1" and "server_node2" on local machine.
any help would be appreciated.
Just like bash -c 'export foo=bar' cannot declare a variable in the calling shell where you typed this, an ssh command cannot declare a variable in the calling shell. You will have to refactor so that the calling shell receives the information and knows what to do with it.
I agree with the comment that storing a log file in a variable is probably not a sane, or at least elegant, thing to do, but the easy way to do what you are attempting is to put the ssh inside the assignment.
server_node1=$(ssh box1.com cat tomar.log)
server_node2=$(ssh box2.com cat tomar.log)
A few notes and amplifications:
The remote shell will run in your home directory, so I took it out (on the assumption that /home/rt9419 is your home directory, obviously).
In case of an error in the cat command, the exit code of ssh will be the error code from cat, and the error message on standard error will be visible on your standard error, so the echo seemed quite superfluous. (If you want a custom message, variable=$(ssh whatever) || echo "Custom message" >&2 would do that. Note the redirection to standard error; it doesn't seem to matter here, but it's good form.)
If you really wanted to, you could run an arbitrarily complex command in the ssh; as outlined above, it didn't seem necessary here, but you could do assigment=$(ssh remote 'if [[ things ]]; then for variable in $(complex commands to drive a loop); do : etc etc; done; fi; more </dev/null; exit "$variable"') or whatever.
As further comments on your original attempt,
The backticks in the here document in your attempt would be evaluated by your local shell before the ssh command even ran. There are separate questions about how to fix that; see e.g. How have both local and remote variable inside an SSH command. but in short, unless you absolutely require the local shell to be able to modify the commands you send, probably put them in single quotes, like I did in the silly complex ssh example above.
The function of export is to make variables visible to child processes. There is no way to affect the environment of a parent process (short of having it cooperate and/or coordinate the change, as in the code above). As an example to illustrate the difference, if you set PERL5LIB to a directory with Perl libraries, but fail to export it, the Perl process you start will not see the variable; it is only visible to the current shell. When you export it, any Perl process you start as a child of this shell will also see this variable and the value you assigned. In other words, you export variables which are not private to the current shell (and don't export private ones; aside from making sure they are private, this saves the amount of memory which needs to be copied between processes), but that still only makes them visible to children, by the design of the U*x process architecture.
You should get back the file from box1and box2 with an scp:
scp box1.com:/home/rt9419/tomar.log ~/tomar1.log
#then you can cat!
export server_node1=`cat ~/tomar1.log`
idem with box2
scp box2.com:/home/rt9419/tomar.log ~/tomar2.log
#then you can cat!
export server_node2=`cat ~/tomar2.log`
There are several possibilities. In your case, you could on the remote system create a file (in bash syntax), containing the assignments of these variables, for example
echo "export server_node2='$(</home/rt9419/tomar.log)'" >>export_settings
(which makes me wonder why you want the whole content of your logfile be stored into a variable, but this is another question), then transfer this file to your host (for example with scp) and source it from within your bash script.
In one of my bash script I want to read and use the variable value from other script which is on remote machine.
How should I go ahead to resolve this. Any related info would be helpful.
Thanks in advance!
How about this (which is code I cannot currently test myself):
text=$(ssh yourname#yourmachine 'grep uploadRate= /root/yourscript')
It assumes that the value of the variable is contained in one line. The variable text now contains you variable assignment, presumably something like
uploadRate=1MB/s
There are several ways to convert the text/code into a real variable assignment in your current script, like evaluating the string or using grep. I would recommend
uploadRate=${text#*=}
to just remove the part up and including the =.
Edit: One more caveat to mention is that this only works if the original assignment does not contain variable references itself like in
uploadRate=1000*${kB}/s
ssh user#machine 'command'
will print the standard output of the remote command.
I would tell two ways at least:
1) You can simply redirect output to a file from remote server to your system with scp command...It would work for you.Then your script on your machine should read that file as an argument...
script on your machine:
read -t 50 -p "Waiting for argumet: " $1
It waits for output from remote machine,
Then you can
sshpass -p<password> scp user#host:/Path/to/file /path/to/script/
What you need to do:
You should tell the script from your machine, that the output from scp command is the argument($1)
2)Run script from your machine:
#!/bin/bash
script='
#Your commands
'
sshpass -p<password> ssh user#host $script
And you have also another ways to run script to do sth with remote machine.
I have two shell scripts, a.sh and b.sh.
How can I call b.sh from within the shell script a.sh?
There are a couple of different ways you can do this:
Make the other script executable with chmod a+x /path/to/file(Nathan Lilienthal's comment), add the #!/bin/bash line (called shebang) at the top, and the path where the file is to the $PATH environment variable. Then you can call it as a normal command;
Or call it with the source command (which is an alias for .), like this:
source /path/to/script
Or use the bash command to execute it, like:
/bin/bash /path/to/script
The first and third approaches execute the script as another process, so variables and functions in the other script will not be accessible.
The second approach executes the script in the first script's process, and pulls in variables and functions from the other script (so they are usable from the calling script).
In the second method, if you are using exit in second script, it will exit the first script as well. Which will not happen in first and third methods.
Check this out.
#!/bin/bash
echo "This script is about to run another script."
sh ./script.sh
echo "This script has just run another script."
There are a couple of ways you can do this. Terminal to execute the script:
#!/bin/bash
SCRIPT_PATH="/path/to/script.sh"
# Here you execute your script
"$SCRIPT_PATH"
# or
. "$SCRIPT_PATH"
# or
source "$SCRIPT_PATH"
# or
bash "$SCRIPT_PATH"
# or
eval '"$SCRIPT_PATH"'
# or
OUTPUT=$("$SCRIPT_PATH")
echo $OUTPUT
# or
OUTPUT=`"$SCRIPT_PATH"`
echo $OUTPUT
# or
("$SCRIPT_PATH")
# or
(exec "$SCRIPT_PATH")
All this is correct for the path with spaces!!!
The answer which I was looking for:
( exec "path/to/script" )
As mentioned, exec replaces the shell without creating a new process. However, we can put it in a subshell, which is done using the parantheses.
EDIT:
Actually ( "path/to/script" ) is enough.
If you have another file in same directory, you can either do:
bash another_script.sh
or
source another_script.sh
or
. another_script.sh
When you use bash instead of source, the script cannot alter environment of the parent script. The . command is POSIX standard while source command is a more readable bash synonym for . (I prefer source over .). If your script resides elsewhere just provide path to that script. Both relative as well as full path should work.
Depends on.
Briefly...
If you want load variables on current console and execute you may use source myshellfile.sh on your code. Example:
#!/bin/bash
set -x
echo "This is an example of run another INTO this session."
source my_lib_of_variables_and_functions.sh
echo "The function internal_function() is defined into my lib."
returned_value=internal_function()
echo $this_is_an_internal_variable
set +x
If you just want to execute a file and the only thing intersting for you is the result, you can do:
#!/bin/bash
set -x
./executing_only.sh
bash i_can_execute_this_way_too.sh
bash or_this_way.sh
set +x
You can use /bin/sh to call or execute another script (via your actual script):
# cat showdate.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "Date is: `date`"
# cat mainscript.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "You are login as: `whoami`"
echo "`/bin/sh ./showdate.sh`" # exact path for the script file
The output would be:
# ./mainscript.sh
You are login as: root
Date is: Thu Oct 17 02:56:36 EDT 2013
First you have to include the file you call:
#!/bin/bash
. includes/included_file.sh
then you call your function like this:
#!/bin/bash
my_called_function
Simple source will help you.
For Ex.
#!/bin/bash
echo "My shell_1"
source my_script1.sh
echo "Back in shell_1"
Just add in a line whatever you would have typed in a terminal to execute the script!
e.g.:
#!bin/bash
./myscript.sh &
if the script to be executed is not in same directory, just use the complete path of the script.
e.g.:`/home/user/script-directory/./myscript.sh &
This was what worked for me, this is the content of the main sh script that executes the other one.
#!/bin/bash
source /path/to/other.sh
The top answer suggests adding #!/bin/bash line to the first line of the sub-script being called. But even if you add the shebang, it is much faster* to run a script in a sub-shell and capture the output:
$(source SCRIPT_NAME)
This works when you want to keep running the same interpreter (e.g. from bash to another bash script) and ensures that the shebang line of the sub-script is not executed.
For example:
#!/bin/bash
SUB_SCRIPT=$(mktemp)
echo "#!/bin/bash" > $SUB_SCRIPT
echo 'echo $1' >> $SUB_SCRIPT
chmod +x $SUB_SCRIPT
if [[ $1 == "--source" ]]; then
for X in $(seq 100); do
MODE=$(source $SUB_SCRIPT "source on")
done
else
for X in $(seq 100); do
MODE=$($SUB_SCRIPT "source off")
done
fi
echo $MODE
rm $SUB_SCRIPT
Output:
~ ❯❯❯ time ./test.sh
source off
./test.sh 0.15s user 0.16s system 87% cpu 0.360 total
~ ❯❯❯ time ./test.sh --source
source on
./test.sh --source 0.05s user 0.06s system 95% cpu 0.114 total
* For example when virus or security tools are running on a device it might take an extra 100ms to exec a new process.
pathToShell="/home/praveen/"
chmod a+x $pathToShell"myShell.sh"
sh $pathToShell"myShell.sh"
#!/bin/bash
# Here you define the absolute path of your script
scriptPath="/home/user/pathScript/"
# Name of your script
scriptName="myscript.sh"
# Here you execute your script
$scriptPath/$scriptName
# Result of script execution
result=$?
chmod a+x /path/to/file-to-be-executed
That was the only thing I needed. Once the script to be executed is made executable like this, you (at least in my case) don't need any other extra operation like sh or ./ while you are calling the script.
Thanks to the comment of #Nathan Lilienthal
Assume the new file is "/home/satya/app/app_specific_env" and the file contents are as follows
#!bin/bash
export FAV_NUMBER="2211"
Append this file reference to ~/.bashrc file
source /home/satya/app/app_specific_env
When ever you restart the machine or relogin, try echo $FAV_NUMBER in the terminal. It will output the value.
Just in case if you want to see the effect right away, source ~/.bashrc in the command line.
There are some problems to import functions from other file.
First: You needn't to do this file executable. Better not to do so!
just add
. file
to import all functions. And all of them will be as if they are defined in your file.
Second: You may be define the function with the same name. It will be overwritten. It's bad. You may declare like that
declare -f new_function_name=old_function_name
and only after that do import.
So you may call old function by new name.
Third: You may import only full list of functions defined in file.
If some not needed you may unset them. But if you rewrite your functions after unset they will be lost. But if you set reference to it as described above you may restore after unset with the same name.
Finally In common procedure of import is dangerous and not so simple. Be careful! You may write script to do this more easier and safe.
If you use only part of functions(not all) better split them in different files. Unfortunately this technique not made well in bash. In python for example and some other script languages it's easy and safe. Possible to make partial import only needed functions with its own names. We all want that in next bush versions will be done the same functionality. But now We must write many additional cod so as to do what you want.
Use backticks.
$ ./script-that-consumes-argument.sh `sh script-that-produces-argument.sh`
Then fetch the output of the producer script as an argument on the consumer script.