Xperido Need steps for nested loop with condtion - dynamics-crm

Using Xperido with CRM , in a way i need to bind data to table
for eg. Product with price list for yearly , Monthly
Product Loop
Pricelist loop
so i have to loop these 2 and match it and find the data

XperiDo has user guide documentation describing how to setup a loop of data here, I suggest you start there as its a bit too long to reproduce here.
Loops are one of the basic functions of the XperiDo add-in. With
loops, you have the possibility to map a set of recurring items in a
list. You can use loops when you have multiple items you want to show,
such as a list of contacts, products or services.
Looping in XperiDo is done by following these steps:
Select the zone to loop over.
Select the recurring field in your dataset.
Finalize the loop.
You can then further tweak the loop's settings.

Related

Sum value flow power automate

I have a table on azure following :
enter image description here
Can anyone help me to make a sum perday of number of users with flow power automate :
enter image description here
Thanks in advance
Ok, this is a monster of an answer but it works so follow closely.
Refer to the images for what to do.
The basic concept is, loop through all entities and fill an array with the distinct row keys. The way we determine if it's distinct or not is by adding the row key to an array IF it hasn't been added previously.
From there, we will loop through that distinct list and using an inner loop, we will sum each NumberOfUsers column IF the Inner Row Key matches the Outer Row Key that is being processed.
At the end of the outer loop, add an object to an array. That object has two fields, "RowKey" and "NumberOfUsers". The "NumberOfUsers" field contains the summation for that given RowKey.
From here, you have the distinct count.
If I've mis-used any fields (i.e. the use of RowKey) then change it up as need be.
This is just logic, you just need to apply it to the scenario. I think this is best done in an Azure Function because it'll run faster and be a lot less to maintain but if you want to avoid that and use PowerAutomate, this works.
Flow
Data / Table
Result

OBIEE Merge two queries (join)

I need help.
I am new to obiee (recently moved from business objects and re-creating all reports in obiee).
Here is an example I need help with. I have created an analysis where I am listing all orders with their target delivery dates and number of products in each order.
Order Id......Target Delivery Date...No of products
Abc....1/1/2016.....5
I want to add to a column next to No of products called "No of prods delivered on time". I want to compare delivery date of each product within a order with the target delivery date and
Give count of products delivered within the target date.. So the output should be
Abc....1/1/2016....5.....3
Where 3 is number of products delivered on time.
I could do it in BO by running two queries and merging them however in obiee I am not able to add second query to my analysis. I did try at product level using case when target date >=delivery date then 1 else 0 and wrapped this with sum function to aggregate but it didn't work ..
Appreciate your help in this. Searching for this topics give me results for running queries from multiple subject area :(
You also have unions in OBIEE, you union the results of 2 queries which return the same structure, so you have query A with Order ID, Target Date, No Products and a Dummy column with a 0 and default agregation Sum, and a second query with Order ID, Target Date, Dummy column summing 0 and the number of products delivered.
You do all this in the criteria tab of the analysis. It's important the order in which you put your columns, because that's what OBIEE is using to do the union.
Regards

How to make Tableau run query for combined multiple selections in quick filter, example attached

It is hard to describe my question in the subject line. Here is an example.
I want Tableau to run query to show only Account ID that has both 2 products i selected in Product A quick filter.In this example only the second Account ID should qualify . Is this possible?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Hmm, good question. It is not possible in the way you want (at least I can't think of a way to do that), with quick filters.
I can solve your specific problem (filtering customers that have at least 2 specific products in their history), but expanding for variable n products can be really troublesome.
So first thing, create 2 parameters. Product1 and Product2. Each is a string, and you can get a list from the [Product A] field. You will use this 2 parameters to specify the 2 products you want.
Now create a calculated field, [Product flag]:
IF [Product A] = [Product1] OR [Product A] = [Product2]
THEN 1
END
Now drag [Account ID] to the filters shelf. Open the filter options and go to condition. Now select By field, [Product flag], Sum, = 2
That will work if there are not duplicated [Product A] under the same [Account ID]. If that can happen, you need a little bit more sophisticated approach. [Product Flag] becomes:
IF [Product A] = [Product1]
THEN 1
ELSEIF [Product A] = [Product2]
THEN 2
END
And the condition should be Count (Distinct) = 2
In both cases it will keep only the Account IDs that have both the products you selected under them. They can have other products under them.
EDIT: For the N product problem, I believe you're going to use a solution outside Tableau. One possibility is to use the JS API, so you can select the products you need in a JS interface, and pass a parameter to Tableau.
In JS you could have a list you could select as many items you want, and a script to pass a parameter to Tableau based on the selection. Could be something like: product1,product2,product3...
Then you could use CONTAINS() to see if that product is in that list (and raise a flag), and make a count of ',' to see how many products were selected.
Unfortunately I have very limited knowledge on JS API, but I strong encourage you to take a look
Really interesting question. It's surprisingly trickier to list the accounts that reference every product in a list than it is to list the accounts that reference any product in a list.
If you are willing to start with a less convenient user interface (suitable for ad-hoc analysis but not published dashboards) then try the following:
Create a filter based on Account Id, select Use all on the General tab, and By formula on the Condition tab. Enter the formula
Count(if [Product A] = "Business Office Consolidation" then 1 end) > 0 and Count(if [Product A] = "Cabled Barcode Scanner" then 1 end) > 0
This will only filter to only include Account IDs that reference both products. You can extend this to a list of any number of required products. For relational data sources, it is implemented using a HAVING clause.
Of course, it can be tedious to revise this formula by hand, but it is one way to accomplish your analysis goal, and it can be instructive to understand how filter conditions work. Similar formulas are useful for many conditions.
You can create one or more dynamic sets using the same approach and then use them in calculated fields, any shelf in Tableau and combine them to create new sets. You can also move the formula to a calculated field for convenience.
Note, the 1 in the formula is not significant, any non-null value would work. Since there is no else clause, the formula evaluates to null for rows that fail the if test. And the Count() function just counts the number of rows that have non-null values for the expression.
To come up with an approach that lets you easily select products from a list without editing a formula, will probably take some combination of more advanced features. I don't have an answer for you right now, but the features that are worth learning about that may or may not be part of the solution include filter actions, context filters, top filters, count distinct, custom SQL, computed sets, table calculations, LOD expressions and the Javascript API. This would also be a good questions to pose, with an example workbook, on the Tableau online forums at http://www.tableau.com under the Support menu.

Linq to SQL - Random Select Order and Paging

We have a database with 2,00,000 vendor in 100 plus category, if someone visit the website we want to allow them to select a category and show them 25 Vendor per page, first we kept order by VendorId but it always use to get first 25, but we removed it, but now in paging it sometime repeat the vendor, is there a way to get random 25 vendor and also keep the paging.
Regards
you can randomize your result but everytime you dot he query, it will create new random list so unless you randomize and save the randomized state in your Code and page over it, it cant be done straightforward way.
refer, SQL Query results pagination with random Order by in SQL Server 2008
I believe this requirement is impossible to implement if a new random order is needed every time, there needs to be good performance and every item should have equal chance to get selected. I believe you should redesign the way your application works.
One possible workaround is to have a couple of columns in a table and fill them with random numbers. When a user requests the list assign the random column to him (stick it in the URL for example). Then do an order by that column and display the results. Randomly switch 4-5 columns to create the appearance of randomness. Update the random numbers in the columns once a day.

Not getting the correct totals using Cognos Report Studio. Need to get totals that show up in column

newparts_calc
if (([MonthToDateQuery].[G/L Account] = 4200 and [Query1].[G_L_Group] = 'NEW')) THEN ([Credit Amount]-[Debit Amount]) ELSE (0)
Data Item1
total([newparts_calc])
I need Data Item1 to return newparts_calc values only.
So for example in 1st row Data Item1 should be 8,540.8, but is 34,163.2
Whats wrong? how do i fix?
REVISED QUESTION
I apologize for not making sense on the original question.
I have many of the calc's that im trying to gather and put on a crosstab. I want to see sales by month (row) and part category (column)
[Query2] is the one shown in picture above.
It joins [MonthToDateQuery] AND [Query1]
The join is on 'Invoice' and carnality is 1..1 = 1..1
[MonthToDateQuery] is based on the package im working in. General ledger. It supplies the g/l entries for each sales g/l account
[Query1] is a SQL query i brought in to be able to break out categories even further from g/l group.
For example g/l account 4300 is rebuilt. However i needed to break out even further to see Rebuilt-Production and Rebuilt-New. I can do that with the g/l group.
I saw in my g/l account ledger entries that it referenced the invoice number. So thats how i tied in my SQL.
So as you can see from the table below (which is the view tabular data from query) i need a total. I have tried plugging newparts_calc into my crosstab and setting aggregation to total but the numbers still dont seem right. I dont think i have something set as it should be.
All the calc's im doing are based on single or multiple G/L Accounts and single or multiple G/L Groups.
Any Advice?
As you can see the problem seems to be duplicate invoice numbers.
How can i fix?
Couple things come to mind:
-Set the processing order to 2
-Since your calc is always a multiple and you are joining two queries, you may need to check your cardinality. Sometimes it helps to add derived queries to ensure you are working with the correct grain.
I'm obviously missing something, but if you want
I need Data Item1 to return newparts_calc values only.
just use newparts_calc, without total? That would give you proper value for row 1 -)
If you need a running-total for days (sum of values for previous days) — you should use a running_total function.
At a guess, one of your two queries is returning multiple rows for each invoice, which will cause this double counting. Look at the output of the two queries and see if that's happening. If so, then you just need to work out how to collapse that down to one row per invoice.
Per your new question - The underlying data has got to be causing the issue. Its clearly not 1:1 (note that even though this is what your stated cardinality is, Cognos does not enforce 1:1). Invoice number is not unique, GL Group is at a lower level.

Resources