Somewhat new to Three.js and 3d libraries in general.
I merged two geometries (a quarter cylinder and a plane) using this code:
var planeGeo = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(planeW, planeD / 2, 199, 399);
var planeMesh = new THREE.Mesh(planeGeo);
planeMesh.updateMatrix();
var cylinderGeo = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(100, 100, planeW, 199, 399, true, 0, Math.PI / 2);
cylinderGeo.rotateZ(Math.PI / 2).translate(0, 200, -100);
var cylinderMesh = new THREE.Mesh(cylinderGeo);
cylinderMesh.updateMatrix();
var singleGeometry = new THREE.Geometry();
singleGeometry.merge(planeMesh.geometry, planeMesh.matrix);
singleGeometry.merge(cylinderMesh.geometry, cylinderMesh.matrix);
var testmaterial = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial({ color: 0x666666 });
mesh = new THREE.Mesh(singleGeometry, testmaterial);
scene.add(mesh);
I then would like to use a single material (png) over the entire thing. This code doesn't work:
textureLoader.load('data/test.png', function (texture) {
material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({
map: texture
});
});
Later in the block with the merging...
mesh = new THREE.Mesh(singleGeometry, material);
scene.add(mesh);
This results in:
I would like the end result to be a single draped png over the entire merged geometry, but I can't find anything that suggests this is a normal thing to do. Is there a better way to achieve that result than merging geometries? Or am I just looking in the wrong places?
A poor-mans solution to achieve this, using the shape supplied in your post, is the following:
https://jsfiddle.net/87wg5z27/44/
Using code from this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/20774922/4977165
It sets the UVs based on the bounding box of the geometry, leaving out the z-coordinate (=0). Thats why the texture is a little bit stretched at the top, you can correct that manually or maybe its sufficent for you.
geometry.computeBoundingBox();
var max = geometry.boundingBox.max,
min = geometry.boundingBox.min;
var offset = new THREE.Vector2(0 - min.x, 0 - min.y);
var range = new THREE.Vector2(max.x - min.x, max.y - min.y);
var faces = geometry.faces;
geometry.faceVertexUvs[0] = [];
for (var i = 0; i < faces.length ; i++) {
var v1 = geometry.vertices[faces[i].a],
v2 = geometry.vertices[faces[i].b],
v3 = geometry.vertices[faces[i].c];
geometry.faceVertexUvs[0].push([
new THREE.Vector2((v1.x + offset.x)/range.x ,(v1.y + offset.y)/range.y),
new THREE.Vector2((v2.x + offset.x)/range.x ,(v2.y + offset.y)/range.y),
new THREE.Vector2((v3.x + offset.x)/range.x ,(v3.y + offset.y)/range.y)
]);
}
geometry.uvsNeedUpdate = true;
Related
To display rack structure, placing one box upon another. But y Position calculation fails.Currently creates gap between boxes. Please inform how could it be fixed, whether camera or light effect creates a problem. As per rack size, altering y position. Data contain size and starting place.
```
var data = [{"id": 10075,"size": 3,"slotNumber": 1},{"id": 10174,"size": 7,"slotNumber": 4}];
var rackListGroup;
init();
function init() {
scene = new THREE.Scene();
scene.background = new THREE.Color( 0x999999 );
var light = new THREE.AmbientLight( 0xffffff );
light.position.set( 0.5, 1.0, 0.5 ).normalize();
scene.add( light );
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera( 75, window.innerWidth / window.innerHeight, 0.1, 1000 );
camera.position.fromArray([0, 0, 140]);
scene.add( camera );
rackListGroup = new THREE.Mesh();
rackListGroup.name = "Rack List"
var i;
for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
rackListGroup.add(drawRack(10, i))
}
scene.add(rackListGroup);
render();
}
function drawRack(size, rackNo){
var rackGroup = new THREE.Group();
rackGroup.name = "rack "+rackNo;
var yPosition = -42;
var xPosition = -20 + parseInt(rackNo)*40;
var slot = 1, counter = 0;
var slotWidth = 5;
while(slot <= parseInt(size)){
var slotSize = data[counter].size;
slot = slot + slotSize;
yPosition = yPosition + slotSize* slotWidth;
var geometry = new THREE.BoxGeometry( 30, slotWidth*slotSize, 5 );
var material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0xff0000 } );
var shape = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
shape.name = data[counter].name;
shape.position.set(xPosition, yPosition, 0);
rackGroup.add(shape);
var boxGeometry = new THREE.BoxBufferGeometry( 30, slotWidth*slotSize, 5, 1, 1, 1 );
var boxMaterial = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { wireframe:true } );
var box = new THREE.Mesh( boxGeometry, boxMaterial );
box.name = data[counter].name;
box.position.set(xPosition, yPosition, 0);
rackGroup.add(box);
if(counter+1 < data.length){
counter++;
}
}
return rackGroup;
}
```
I've tried your code and I see a misunderstanding between the objects position and the objects height to be able to stack them on top of each other.
You use one variable for yPosition and you need 2 variables, the reason is that geometries are positioned based on its axes center, so it means a 15 units height mesh positioned at y=0 it will place indeed at -7.5 units below the y=0 position and the upper side of the geometry will be at 7.5. So next slot to stack will be needed to place (conceptually) at y = 7.5 + (topSlotHeight / 2).
That's why your calculation of the next slot to stack y position is wrong. I have created this fiddle with the solution, and I have added a gridHelper at y=0 for your reference and the OrbitControls to be able to check it better. Now it works perfectly doing like this, storing the accumulated base position of the previous slot in yBaseHeight and the yPosition for the slot on top:
var slotHeight = (slotSize * slotWidth);
yPosition = yBaseHeight + (slotHeight / 2);
yBaseHeight = yBaseHeight + slotHeight;
PD.- I saw you start placing objects at y=-42, I started from y=0 to show better the effect.
I want to make a 3D building using Three.js. For example, I made 6 walls and a floor by checkerboard texture. I used clippingPlanes for wall1 and wall4:
floor1.material.clippingPlanes = [plane1,plane4];
I made my planes(plane1 and plane4) by my walls(wall1 and wall4). For example, my wall4 planeGeometry and plane4 code is here:
var wallGeometry4 = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(40, Floor_Height, 1, 1);
var wall4 = createMesh(wallGeometry4, "brick_diffuse.jpg", THREE.DoubleSide, 1024, 1024);
unit1.add(wall4);
wall4.position.x = -10;
wall4.position.y = 0;
wall4.position.z = -20;
wall4.rotation.y = 1.5 * Math.PI;
wall4.add(new THREE.EdgesHelper(wall4, 0x000000));
var plane4 = new THREE.Plane();
var normal4 = new THREE.Vector3();
var point4 = new THREE.Vector3();
normal4.set(0, 0, -1).applyQuaternion(wall4.quaternion);
point4.copy(wall4.position);
plane4.setFromNormalAndCoplanarPoint(normal4, point4);
But I see an empty area between wall5 and wall6, because plane4(that used for clipping the floor) isn't the same size of wall4. I think Plane4 is whole of the scene. How to change size of my plane to clip correctly? Or Is there any way to make floor bounded in walls?
One way to achieve this as suggested is to use ShapeGeometry.
When you are creating your walls you can save the x and z co-ordinate of their starting and ending points in an array to form a loop of points of Vector2. Then you can create a new custom shape from these points using shapeGeometry.
points = [{x:0,y:0},{x:0,y:10},{x:10,y:10},{x:10,y:0},{x:0,y:0}]
function getShapeFromPoints(points){
const shape = new THREE.Shape();
shape.moveTo(points[0].x, points[0].y);
for (let i = 1; i < points.length; i++) {
shape.lineTo(points[i].x, points[i].y);
}
return shape;
}
function createPlaneFromPoints(points) {
const planeMaterial = getPlaneMaterial();
const shape = getShapeFromPoints(points);
const geometry = new THREE.ShapeBufferGeometry(shape);
geometry.rotateX(degreeToRadians(-90));
const mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, planeMaterial);
return mesh;
}
Hope that helps you!
I'm using Cannon.js with Three.js. I have set a scene which has 5 columns of 4 blocks stacked on top of each other.
I want these to be interactable with other objects I'm planning on adding to the scene. However, the blocks in the columns seem to be causing lots of micro-collisions and over time, jitter out of position. I want them to stay exactly in line until they're interacted with.
If you view the codepen and wait for about 20/30 seconds you'll see the blocks start to move. Is there something specific I need to set on these blocks to prevent this from happening?
Here is an example I've put together - https://codepen.io/danlong/pen/XxZROj
As an aside, there's also quite a big performance drop when there are these blocks in the scene which I wasn't expecting. I plan to add more objects to the scene and not sure why the performance drops?
Is it something to do with the below in my animate() loop?
this.world.step(1 / 30);
Code specifically to set up my 'Cannon world' and 'columns' is below:
Cannon World:
this.world = new CANNON.World();
this.world.defaultContactMaterial.contactEquationStiffness = 1e6;
this.world.defaultContactMaterial.contactEquationRegularizationTime = 3;
this.world.solver.iterations = 20;
this.world.gravity.set(0,-25,0);
this.world.allowSleep = true;
this.world.broadphase = new CANNON.SAPBroadphase(this.world);
Columns:
var geometry = new THREE.BoxBufferGeometry(5,5,5);
var material = new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial();
var shape = new CANNON.Box(new CANNON.Vec3(5/2, 5/2, 5/2));
for (var rows = 0, yPos = 2.5; rows < 4; rows++, yPos+=5) {
for (var i = -20; i <= 20; i+=10) {
// physics
var body = new CANNON.Body({
mass: 0.5,
position: new CANNON.Vec3(i, yPos, 0),
friction: 0.1,
restitution: 0.3
});
body.allowSleep = true;
body.sleepSpeedLimit = 0.01;
body.sleepTimeLimit = 1.0;
body.addShape(shape);
this.world.addBody(body);
this.bodies.push(body);
// material
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
this.scene.add(mesh);
this.meshes.push(mesh);
}
}
Try this?
body.sleepSpeedLimit = 1.0;
I need to apply a texture on a ExtrudeGeometry object.
The shape is a circle and the extrude path is composed of 2 vectors :
One for the top.
One for the bottom.
I didn't choose cylinderGeometry because I need to place top/bottom sections of my geometry at precise positions and because the geometry created will not be always purely vertical (like a oblique cylinder for example).
Here is a picture of a section (one top vector, one bottom vector and a shape extruded between these 2 vectors).
and a picture of the texture I'm trying to apply.
All I want to do is to wrap this picture on the vertical sides of my object just one time.
Here is my code :
var biVectors = [ new THREE.Vector3( this.startVector.x, this.startVector.y, this.startVector.z ) , new THREE.Vector3( this.endVector.x, this.endVector.y, this.endVector.z ) ];
var wellSpline = new THREE.SplineCurve3(biVectors);
var extrudeSettings = {
steps : 1,
material: 0,
extrudeMaterial: 1,
extrudePath : wellSpline
};
var pts = [];
for (var i = 0; i <= this.segments; i++) {
var theta = (i / this.segments) * Math.PI * 2;
pts.push( new THREE.Vector3(Math.cos(theta) * this.diameter , Math.sin(theta) * this.diameter, 0) );
}
var shape = new THREE.Shape( pts );
var geometry = new THREE.ExtrudeGeometry( shape, extrudeSettings );
var texture = THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture( 'textures/sampleTexture2.jpg' );
texture.wrapS = texture.wrapT = THREE.RepeatWrapping;
texture.flipY = false;
var material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { map: texture } );
var slice = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
var faceNormals = new THREE.FaceNormalsHelper( slice );
console.log("face normals: ", faceNormals);
myCanvas.scene.add( faceNormals );
slice.parentObject = this;
myCanvas.scene.add( slice );
this.object3D = slice;
}
Now, as you can see, the mapping is not correct at all.
I've read a lot of information about this problem the last 3 days. But I'm running out of options as I'm new to THREE.JS.
I think I have to redefine the UV coordinates but I have no clue how to do this.
It seems that wrapping a texture on a cylinder like object is anything but easy in THREE.JS.
Can someone please help me on this issue ?
I am trying to create a flat ring in three.js with a concentric circles texture, like Saturn's rings. I cannot manage to do anything but lines that radiate from the center (like a bicycle wheel), no matter what I put in the image. It seems that textures are applied to RingGeometry in a very different fashion than CircleGeometry.
I could easily apply a concentric circles texture to a CircleGeometry, but a ring (with a hole in the middle) is really what I need. Is anybody aware of a way to have textures on rings do something else than radiate?
I did not find a way in Three.js documentation, nor on the web, to do what I want, as it seems that rings are seldom used by anybody...
Thank you
Go here http://jsfiddle.net/theo/VsWb9/ and replace
geometry = new THREE.CubeGeometry(200, 200, 200);
material = new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial();
mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry, material);
with
geometry = new THREE.TorusGeometry( 100, .5 , 50 ,50);
material = new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial();
mesh = new THREE.Mesh( geometry, material );
If you want to change the ring color to say black for instance
change
material = new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial();
to
material = new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:0x000});
Stick any other material changes in that array input argument to the constructor
function THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({arguments here})
I found this for making the geometry. It creates a disk of theataSeegmens triangles
this.RingGeometry = function ( innerRadius, outerRadius, thetaSegments) {
THREE.Geometry.call( this )
innerRadius = innerRadius || 0
outerRadius = outerRadius || 50
thetaSegments = thetaSegments || 8
innerRadius*=Obj.Size*100;
outerRadius*=Obj.Size*100;
var normal = new THREE.Vector3( 0, 0, 1 )
for(var i = 0; i < thetaSegments; i++ ){
var angleLo = (i / thetaSegments) *Math.PI*2
var angleHi = ((i+1) / thetaSegments) *Math.PI*2
var vertex1 = new THREE.Vector3(innerRadius * Math.cos(angleLo), innerRadius * Math.sin(angleLo), 0);
var vertex2 = new THREE.Vector3(outerRadius * Math.cos(angleLo), outerRadius * Math.sin(angleLo), 0);
var vertex3 = new THREE.Vector3(innerRadius * Math.cos(angleHi), innerRadius * Math.sin(angleHi), 0);
var vertex4 = new THREE.Vector3(outerRadius * Math.cos(angleHi), outerRadius * Math.sin(angleHi), 0);
this.vertices.push( vertex1 );
this.vertices.push( vertex2 );
this.vertices.push( vertex3 );
this.vertices.push( vertex4 );
var vertexIdx = i * 4;
// Create the first triangle
var face = new THREE.Face3(vertexIdx + 0, vertexIdx + 1, vertexIdx + 2, normal);
var uvs = []
var uv = new THREE.Vector2(0, 0)
uvs.push(uv)
var uv = new THREE.Vector2(1, 0)
uvs.push(uv)
var uv = new THREE.Vector2(0, 1)
uvs.push(uv)
this.faces.push(face);
this.faceVertexUvs[0].push(uvs);
// Create the second triangle
var face = new THREE.Face3(vertexIdx + 2, vertexIdx + 1, vertexIdx + 3, normal);
var uvs = []
var uv = new THREE.Vector2(0, 1)
uvs.push(uv)
var uv = new THREE.Vector2(1, 0)
uvs.push(uv)
var uv = new THREE.Vector2(1, 1)
uvs.push(uv)
this.faces.push(face);
this.faceVertexUvs[0].push(uvs);
}
//this.computeCentroids();
//this.computeFaceNormals();
this.boundingSphere = new THREE.Sphere( new THREE.Vector3(), outerRadius );
};
this.RingGeometry.prototype = Object.create( THREE.Geometry.prototype );
The above line is important to get it to work.
Here is a sugestion how to set the ring material.assuming that you have two pictures (just a sqare section) that can be used for alphamap and for
the actual ring.
var ringMaterial = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial(
{
map: SaturnRingColor,
alphaMap:SaturnRingPattern,
color: 0xffffff,
specular: 0x555555,
shininess: 3,
emissive:10,
side: THREE.DoubleSide,
castshadow:true,
transparent : true,
opacity : 0.9,
} );
this.ringMesh = new THREE.Mesh( this.RingGeometry , RingMaterial );