I have an Unreal Engine 4 project. I have two sets of the same map, one unmerged and the other merged. THe merged map has the textures baked in. When I try to add a collision mesh in the baked level model everything works fine. When I try to add a collision mesh to the level broken down into several meshes, there isn't any option to add collision - in fact, half of the menu options aren't even there. I tried posting on the unreal forums without luck. I was hoping someone here might be able to help. Thanks - Ted
When you select an object in UE4 it shows properties of that object. When you select several objects, it shows only the properties that the selected objects have in common. So my guess is that you trying to set up a collision for several objects of different type. Try setting it one by one.
Related
I'm making an isometric city builder using Monogame Extended and Tiled. I've got everything set-up and now i need to somehow access the specific tiles so i can change them at runtime as the user clicks on a tile to build an object. The problem is, i can't seem to find a "map.GetLayer("Layername").GetTile(x,y) or .SetTile(x,y) function or something similar.
Now what i can do is edit the xml(.tmx) file which has a matrix in it that represents the map and it's drawn tiles. The problem with this is that i need to build the map in the content pipeline again after editing for the changes to be displayed. I can't really build at runtime or can i?
Thanks in advance!
Something like this will get you part way there.
var tileLayer = map.GetLayer<TiledMapTileLayer>("layername");
TiledMapTile tile;
if(tileLayer.TryGetTile(x, y, out tile))
{
// do something with tile
}
However, there's only a limited amount of things you can actually do with the tile once you've got it from the map.
There's no such thing as a SetTile method because changing tile data at runtime is not currently supported. This is a limitation of the renderer, which has been optimized for rendering very large maps by building static geometry that can't be changed once it's loaded into the graphics card.
There has been some discussion about building another renderer that would handle dynamic map changes but at this stage nothing like that has been implemented in the library. You could always have a go at implementing a simple renderer yourself, a really basic one is not as hard as you might think.
An alternative approach to dealing with this kind of problem might be to pre-process the map data before giving it to the renderer. The idea would be to effectively separate the layers of the map that are static from those that are dynamic and render the dynamic tiles as normal sprites. Just a thought, I'm not sure about the details of how this might work.
I plan to eventually revisit the Tiled API in the next major version of MonoGame.Extended. Don't hold your breath, these things can take a lot of time, but I am paying attention to the feedback and kinds of problems people are experiencing with the existing API.
Since the map data is stored in a XML (or csv) file which runs through the Content Pipeline you can not change it at runtime.
Anyways, in a city builder you usually do not change existing tiles but you place object on top of existing tiles.
I started a new Xcode project with the ARKit template and simply replaced the "ship.scn" with my "test.scn" filename asset. The object is about 16.5mm wide and 4.8mm tall. The ship worked fine of course, but my test object that reads "test" does not rotate as I move around it, or scale when I move towards or away from it, yet it does track in one location.
I compared the ship and test attribute panels, and I can't find anything that is different about them, except that the ship is textured and my test text is not. What is inherently special about scn objects that would make them behave correctly in ARKit besides their size? I've read through the documentation about anchoring, but it seems like I wouldn't have to do this in code if it's already a scn object.
In case anyone wants to test the file I'm using in the ARKit template to see how it's behaving, the file is here: https://ufile.io/ey49t
I’m answering the question because I think it could help others that are making a similar mistake, but it can be closed if it doesn’t make sense.
The problem is that the size was much too large where I could not see scaling or rotation no matter how much I moved around the room. Compare the scaled size in the last attribute panel on the ship model - not its actual size. Then get the size of your own model scaled down enough so that it is actually resonable.
I am using r82.
I have a mesh with multiple materials. I can change their opacity just fine, but how they are rendered is what I would call "splotchy". I have been using ThreeJs for a while, and EDIT: was able to get the transparency working in a past version (r67) with the same model in a significantly more consistent way. So I was wondering if there is something that now I need to set that I didn't need to set before or if I am just overlooking something. Upon revisiting my older code and testing it again, I found that the same transparency issues were present. It was simply a matter of there not being as obvious "splotches" (and not testing enough, I'm sure). Here is a screenshot.
Here are a few more pictures I took that highlight the issue a bit better. I have the outside wall in a light grey and the floors a dark grey in the model and can toggle the outside walls to be visible or not. In these pictures I have one face of the outside wall purple and a face of the floor in the room on the other side of the wall green.
Based on the angle of the camera, it makes part of the green floor face invisible even though there is only one face between the camera and it.
The materials are all double sided already and there is no sign of this until the transparency is on. I found a similar question that suggested changing the mesh.setFaceCulling (or something similar) but that seemed to be from an older version and wasn't in r82.
Thanks for any help in advance!
EDIT:
I started looking into the old version of threeJS and the current version's source code to see what is done differently regarding transparency. I found transparentObjects, which is an array of the objects (I believe faces) that are going to be rendered and are in sorted based on "reversePainterSortStable". There is another list of objects (I believe for the materials objects, maybe?) called opaqueObjects that uses "painterSortStable". So to see if changing the sort order would change the outcome of how things are looking when transparent I changed it so that transparentObjects got sorted by "painterSortStable" and it did change how things showed up significantly (granted it didn't fix my problem since it just removed some problem spots and created new ones).
So the short version, it looks like it is an issue with the renderOrder of the faces.
That being said, I tried finding how the r67 version of the code handled the "renderOrder" of the faces since it wasn't something that (to my knowledge) could be set in that version and just did it automatically. But I have had no such luck tracking down how it was done as of yet.
So I see two possibilities. 1) find out how the past version correctly did transparency (at least for my purposes) and change the logic in the current version to use that. Or 2) find how to properly set the renderOrder of the faces based on the camera position in the scene. Will look into the second option first, but figured it would be good to document this for others looking to help answer or that have a similar problem.
EDIT 2:
So digging through the source code for threeJs and noticed something about the transparentObjects array I mentioned in the previous edit. The first, that I cannot for the life of me figure out how it gets populated since it doesn't seem like it is added to anywhere in the code. The second is that I think it is being populated with duplicates of the entire building object/mesh (see screenshot below).
The z indexes all seem to be the same. as well as the ids and the objects are all of type "mesh" (of the ones I looked through, granted, since there are a few thousand). So I was going to figure out why its adding what is being added to the array, but that is when I stumbled across the issue of not finding where in the code that the transparentObjects array actually get populated.
EDIT 3:
WestLangley, I tried setting the depth test for the outer wall material to false and got this. Like I said in my response comment, even if it did work it wouldn't fix the issues experienced with the camera inside the building, but wanted to follow up none the less (see snapshot below).
So I downloaded a rigged model for 3DS Max and it had something I'd never seen before. Bones as globes and rings floating outside the mesh for easy access and convenience instead of having to constantly access the object hierarchy or switch between layers to make sure everything is animating properly. How do I set up a model like this, or change a model rigged with regular lines between points as bones into a model like this?
Rigged model with bone "helpers?"
I see you are new here, but this website is for purely programming related questions. How to use any particular software is not the focus of this particular website.
I would suggest you take 3dsmax questions to cgtalk.com or perhaps as well to autodesk's own support website. Hm... looks like their old website for discussion forums, www.the-area.com doesn't work anymore. But I found this link: http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/3ds-max/ct-p/area-c1
I want to display a lot of cubes. Their position is calculated during runtime, one more per frame. Just doing scene.add(cube) each time works but is too slow. So I want to merge their geometries each time. But when I try to add the merged geometry to the scene, it still shows the old version! I tried all kinds of .updateMatrix() and .verticesNeedUpdate=true things.
Interestingly the problem only comes up if I try to change things I have already added to the scene. It does work if I just do my merging in the background and add the result to the scene at some point! But After it has been added, merging it and adding the result still displays the old version. I've tried removing the Object from the scene first, but that doesn't change anything.
Finally came across the right command: group.geometry.groupsNeedUpdate = true;. Still can't find any good documentation on it, but it works