I have to enumerate all process running on my machine and notify if some changement will happen (for example: change of visibility of windows, open a new window, close a window).
To enumerate all processes I can use this function provided by MSDN: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682623(v=vs.85).aspxI thought that I need to save a list of running processes and check (how without polling?) if it changes. Can I do it without saving current running processes?
For the visibility changes here https://msdn.microsoft.com/it-it/library/windows/desktop/ms646274(v=vs.85).aspx I found that VM_ACTIVATE message is sent to both windows. How can I catch it? Can I do it in another way?
For whom is interested in this topic, I found that to check if a window is created or destroyed I've to use SetWinEventHook(), like in the example of its MSDN page. I simply check if event value is EVENT_OBJECT_CREATE or EVENT_OBJECT_DESTROY. For other events, check the event constants list.
Related
I want to prevent users from closing a window by Alt + F4 or by clicking the close button.
How to achieve this?
I guess the windows API can do it, but I don't have any experience, and I can't find a specific solution.
Of course, it's good to be able to implement it,don't have to use a specific API.
Background: it is very difficult to find the last place in Word after closing it for a few days. After word2013, word2013 brought with it a way to return to the previous reading position, but that thing is very unstable and often can't be saved. When word is closed, I want to stop closing and pop up a notice to remind me to add a bookmark before exiting.
EDIT: This won't work, as it turned out. At least the message hook won't work because the message is posted and not sent, and about the CBT hook I'm not sure either, and I can't test it at the moment to give an evidence-based statement. The solution is probably to subclass the window but this is also non-trivial and I can't explain it properly and with working examples right now. I can't delete this answer though because it already has a comment. See here for more info. So take it with a grain of salt. I'm turning the answer to community wiki, feel free to edit it and fix/improve the solution!
EDIT2: Seems even subclassing won't be enough because Word is doing things its own way.
You need a windows hook. Either a CBT hook or a getmessage hook will do.
You have to create a DLL for this to work. The hook handler must be located in the DLL. It must have the same bitness as Word (probably 64 Bit). Then you call SetWindowsHookEx to install a global hook.
In the hook, you will have to check whether the current action is a window-closing attempt (in a CBT hook you would check for a HCBT_SYSCOMMAND of SC_CLOSE, in a getmessage hook you would check for a WM_CLOSE message), and whether it is about a Word window (for example using the window class - not sure if it has a recognizable class, you'd have to check - or the process' executable file name which you can get using GetModuleFileName since you will run inside Word's process) and prevent the action (by returning 1 from a CBT hook or returning 0 from a getmessage hook - to allow, call CallNextHookEx).
I am developing firefox extension.
Problem is that when i open second window (Ctrl + N) my extension has new state for new opened window.
If I reacts or changes on second window it never affect on first window or vice versa.
Ex
Installed extension on Firefox
first window opened. My extension proper functioning, change state, login, view data etc
then opened second. My extension goes new state I cant get previous states (first window states).
How can maintain same state between first and second or other firefox opened windows.?
Am I correct to assume you're developing a XUL overlay add-on, and not an SDK add-on?
One way to share state between windows is to use Javascript code modules. A code module will only be loaded once (unless explicitly unloaded) and therefore will expose the same data to multiple windows. Be sure to read the "Sharing objects using code modules"., However, please note that therefore when closing a window, any state associated with it and stored within the code module must be cleaned up, or would leak otherwise.
If you're using the SDK instead, your main.js module is already the equivalent of a code module. Content scripts may use message passing to store and retrieve state from your module.
My App needs to get the focus when it get's called by an external tool (via an API), i know that the default is, that it should just flash in the Taskbar, but in this case this is absolutely not the behaviour that i want. In this case i try to get the focus by "this.Activate()" (C#).
This is where the ForeGroundLockTimeOut comes into play.
However, I got a little problem understanding the SystemParameterInfo SPI_SETFOREGROUNDLOCKTIMEOUT.
I know that it's used to set the ForeGroundLockTimeOut which defines how long your app has to wait until it gets the focus it requested.
(for further information the variable "val" is an IntPtr that is set to 0)
SystemParametersInfo(SPI_SETFOREGROUNDLOCKTIMEOUT,0,val,SPIF_SENDWININICHANGE + SPIF_UPDATEINIFILE);
this one will change the Registry key that that handles the timeout (HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop\ForeGroundLockTimout)
Since this will change the behaviour of all apps, it's really the last resort to use.
Now i thought what if i don't update the registry key. So i tried this:
SystemParametersInfo(SPI_SETFOREGROUNDLOCKTIMEOUT, 0, val, 0);
However it doesn't change the behavior of my app in any way, but
SystemParametersInfo(SPI_SETFOREGROUNDLOCKTIMEOUT,0,val,SPIF_SENDWININICHANGE);
does.
What i do not understand is why this only works for my app, which is absolutely what i want, but i do not understandit .Why do i have to broadcast a change, that only works for my app, when there has been no change made to any registry key or whatsoever, and why does this work only for my app.
Note: If you want to test this behavior, test it when Visual Studio is not running, while it's running (even if this Solution is not loaded) it changes the behavior of the App into getting focus in any case.
This is not a per-app setting, it is a global system setting. There's no way to set it for just your application, so when you call SystemParametersInfo with 0 for the last parameter, nothing happens.
On the other hand, when you use SPIF_SENDWININICHANGE, the new setting gets broadcast in the form of a WM_SETTINGCHANGE message. (Which is why manually editing the registry is the wrong thing to do; always call the documented API.)
Aside from that, this code is wrong:
SPIF_SENDWININICHANGE + SPIF_UPDATEINIFILE
To concatenate two flags, you must use the boolean OR operator (|), not the addition operator (+). In this particular case, because 0x1 + 0x2 and 0x1 | 0x2 are both equal to 3, it seems to work, but that's just an accident.
The real solution to this problem needs not involve manipulating global settings (because you surely don't want to do that on client machines, even if you're OK with it on your own). You need to work with the system, rather than trying to work against it. In the system's model, the process that currently has the focus is the one with the privilege of setting/changing the focus. So there are basically three options:
Just have the external tool call SetForegroundWindow itself and pass your application's window as the parameter. This altogether avoids your app having to activate itself.
Use the AllowSetForegroundWindow function to delegate the external tool's foreground-window-setting privileges to your application. It should call this function, passing the ID of your app's process as the parameter. That way, when your app calls SetForegroundWindow, it will work as expected.
Depending on how your tool and application are designed, you could just have the external tool launch the application. Like the documentation says, if a process is launched by the foreground process, it is allowed to set the foreground window.
SPIF_UPDATEINIFILE--Writes the new system-wide parameter setting to the user profile.
SPIF_SENDCHANGE--Broadcasts the WM_SETTINGCHANGE message after updating the user profile.
Hopefully this question has a simple answer i'm overlooking! I have an IIS webserver with multiple sites on it. In Perfmon, they show up as w3wp#1, w3wp#2, etc... I'm writing a Logman script that will collect performance counter data using the counters/instances that I specify and I want to ONLY collect any w3wp worker processes.
I've tried a couple ways, but no luck:
\.NET CLR Memory(*w3wp*)\
\.NET CLR Memory(w3wp#*)\
\.NET CLR Memory(w3wp*)\
I've looked at the documentation here, and it seems like it claims to support wildcards, but not partial matches. I'm not sure what to make of that. Is there any way accomplish what I want? Hope I explained this well enough. Let me know if more details are needed.
Thanks!
There is a way to display the instance by appending Process Id to it. Since ProcessId do not change it helps determining the correct instance. This post describes the method - Perfmon: Identifying processes by PID instead of instance.
Relevant part from the link:
Making below registry change will display processes in the format of **ProcessName_PID** instead of **ProcessName#1**.
Click Start, click Run, type regedit, and then click OK.
Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\PerfProc\Performance
On the Edit menu, click New, and then click DWORD Value.
Right-click New Value #1, click Rename, and then type ProcessNameFormat to name the new value.
Right-click ProcessNameFormat, and then click Modify.
In the Data value box, type one of the following values, and then click OK:
1: Disables PID data. This value is the default value.
2: Enables PID data.
Exit Registry Editor.
Warning: Serious problems might occur if you modify the registry incorrectly by using Registry Editor or by using another method. These problems might require that you reinstall the operating system. Microsoft cannot guarantee that these problems can be solved. Modify the registry at your own risk.
Important: If you enable this feature, you may be unable to monitor process-specific information by using third-party utilities or custom-made programs, and this functionality may change at any time in the future without notice.
Hope it helps someone.
I came up with a custom batch script that find the application pool ID, PID, and associates it with the IIS worker process in question. From there, I can manually FIND and REPLACE a generic placeholder in my perfmon configuration file to start collecting for the specific site(s). I can supply some details if there is interest.
I'm writing a DLL that is automatically injected on load in a specific application. Because I'd like to run the program while working on it, and my users might want to load the program without it in specific cases (e.g. bug hunting), I sometimes want to prevent loading the DLL.
Currently I do this by checking GetKeyState for VK_LCONTROL, VK_LSHIFT , and VK_LMENU on load, and if all are down, I silently unload myself.
However, it can take quite a few seconds for the program to load and to see if the DLL was loaded or not, so I want to inform the users when we're unloading. I've considered a MessageBox, but that's too disruptive. I've tried MessageBeep, but that didn't seem to do anything on my setup. Currently I'm using a simple dual beep (Beep, Sleep, Beep) to indicate unloading, but that will probably become rather annoying to my co workers. I've also considered a system-tray icon, but that would introduce a lot of code and bug potential, while I'm aiming for a minimal notification as to not introduce any subtle bugs.
Would anyone else know a subtle way (preferably visual) to inform the user that their input has been succesfully received?
Given the limited scope of your goal, this might actually be an appropriate use of a taskbar notification balloon tip.
Edit: Added link the Joe posted in his concurring answer. Thanks, Joe! :)
If your app has a status bar at the bottom, you could place some message text there...
Have you considered a timed messagebox that closes itself?
http://www.codeguru.com/cpp/misc/misc/messageboxhandling/article.php/c203
You could open a window with a short message and close it automatically again after 0.5 seconds or so. It doesn't need user interaction so I don't think it's very disruptive.
Change the window title, then change it back afterwards. Then you can see the change even if the user has Alt-Tabbed over to some other program in the meanwhile, without stealing the focus from the user.
Concur with Greg D.
Look here: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vclanguage/thread/15cbdc8d-fde3-44ab-bbbc-e50cb2071674/
Two ideas:
Turn it around. Have a visual indication when the DLL is loaded, and have the absence of the indicator let you know that the DLL has been unloaded. Perhaps a suffix in the title bar. That way, you can tell at any time, not just during startup.
FlashWindowEx.