I'm trying to implement a protocol and currently have problems with this step:
The big-endian binary representation of the sequence number SHALL be placed in a 16-octet buffer and padded (on the left) with zeros.
The sequence number is an int.
I think the correct way to create the 16-octet buffer is like this:
buf := make([]byte, 16)
However, I'm not sure how to place the sequence number in the buffer so it follows the requirements above?
It sounds like you want something like this:
func seqToBuffer(seq int) []byte {
buf := make([]byte, 16)
for i := len(buf) - 1; seq != 0; i-- {
buf[i] = byte(seq & 0xff)
seq >>= 8
}
return buf
}
Related
Im recently made the "Winning Lottery Ticket" coding challange on hackerrank.
https://www.hackerrank.com/challenges/winning-lottery-ticket/
The idea is to count the combinations of two lines which contain all numbers from 0-9, in the example below its 5 combinations in total.
56789
129300455
5559948277
012334556
123456879
The idea is to change the the representation of something quicker for checking if all numbers are contained.
Example representation:
1278 --> 01100001100
Example with using the first two lines from above:
56789129300455 --> 1111111111
When checking if a number is contained with the concatenation of 2 lines I can abort directly if I encounter a zero because thats not gonna be a pair with all 0-9.
This logic works, but it fails when having a huge amount of lines to compare.
// Go code
func winningLotteryTicket(tickets []string) int {
counter := 0
for i := 0; i < len(tickets); i++ {
for j := i + 1; j < len(tickets); j++ {
if err := bitMask(fmt.Sprintf("%v%v", tickets[i], tickets[j])); err == nil {
counter++
}
}
}
return counter
}
func bitMask(s string) error {
for i := 0; i <= 9; i++ {
if !strings.Contains(s, strconv.Itoa(i)) {
return errors.New("No Pair")
}
}
return nil
}
Not sure if this representation is called a bitMaks, if not please correct me and I will adjust this post.
From my point of view there is no way the improove performance on the concatenation of the strings because I will have to check each combination.
For checking if a number is contained within the string at the function "bitMask" im not sure.
Do you have an idea how this could perform better ?
Bit masks are integers, not strings of ones and zeros. It's called a bitmask because we're not interested in the numerical value of these integers but only in the bit pattern. We can use bitwise operations on integers and those are really fast because they are implemented in hardware, directly in the CPU.
Here is a function that turns a string into an actual bitmask, with each one-bit signaling that a particular digit is present in the string:
func mask(s string) uint16 {
// We need ten bits, one for each possible decimal digit in s, so int16 and
// uint16 are the smallest possible integer types that fit. For bitmasks it
// is typical to select an unsigned type because the sign bit doesn't have
// any meaning. As I said earlier, mask's numerical value is irrelevant.
var mask uint16
for _, c := range s {
switch c {
case '0':
mask |= 0b0000000001
case '1':
mask |= 0b0000000010
case '2':
mask |= 0b0000000100
case '3':
mask |= 0b0000001000
case '4':
mask |= 0b0000010000
case '5':
mask |= 0b0000100000
case '6':
mask |= 0b0001000000
case '7':
mask |= 0b0010000000
case '8':
mask |= 0b0100000000
case '9':
mask |= 0b1000000000
}
}
return mask
}
This is rather verbose, but it should be pretty obvious what happens.
Note that the binary number literals can be replaced with bit shifts:
0b0000000001 is the same as 1<<0 (1 shifted zero times to the left)
0b0000000010 is the same as 1<<1 (1 shifted one time to the left
0b0000000100 is the same as 1<<2 (1 shifted two times to the left), and so on
Using this, and taking advantage of the fact that the bytes '0' through '9' are themselves just integers (48 through 57 in decimal, given by their place in the ASCII table, we can shorten this function like so:
func mask(s string) uint16 {
var mask uint16
for _, c := range s {
if '0' <= c && c <= '9' {
mask |= 1 << (c - '0')
}
}
return mask
}
To check two lines, then, all we have to do is OR the masks for the lines and compare to 0b1111111111 (i.e. check if all ten bits are set):
package main
import "fmt"
func main() {
a := "56789"
b := "129300455"
mA := mask(a)
mB := mask(b)
fmt.Printf("mask(%11q) = %010b\n", a, mA)
fmt.Printf("mask(%11q) = %010b\n", b, mB)
fmt.Printf("combined = %010b\n", mA|mB)
fmt.Printf("all digits present: %v\n", mA|mB == 0b1111111111)
}
func mask(s string) uint16 {
var mask uint16
for _, c := range s {
if '0' <= c && c <= '9' {
mask |= 1 << (c - '0')
}
}
return mask
}
mask( "56789") = 1111100000
mask("129300455") = 1000111111
combined = 1111111111
all digits present: true
Try it on the playground: https://play.golang.org/p/mr1KqnC9phB
I try to swap the slice 0:10 and the slice 10:20 using the following code. But
data1 := make([]byte, 100)
tmp := data1[0:10]
data1[0:10] = data1[10:20]
data1[10:20] = tmp
But I got error messages like this.
../xxx.go:60:14: cannot assign to data1[0:10]
../xxx.go:61:15: cannot assign to data1[10:20]
Could anybody show me how to swap two slices in a byte array? Thanks.
You are trying to swap the contents of the underlying array. The only way of doing it is to swap individual elements:
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
data[i], data[i+10] = data[i+10], data[i]
}
Or:
j := 10
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
data[i], data[j] = data[j], data[i]
j++
}
#BurakSerdar 's answer is the most efficient for the small chunks of data to move and the swap nature of the operation.
If you're curious how to copy sections of a slice, simply use the internal copy function:
copy(data[0:10], data[10:20]) // overwrites first 10-bytes with next 10 bytes
To perform a swap with copy is a little awkward, but if you're curious:
// tmp := data[0:10] // will *NOT* work
// // as `tmp` will just reference data's underlying byte-array
tmp := make([]byte, 10) // need fresh memory
copy(tmp, data[0:10])
copy(data[0:10], data[10:20])
copy(data[10:20], tmp)
https://play.golang.org/p/ud31Gxfa19b
I'm trying to solve a couple of example programming problems to familiarize myself with the language.
I am iterating over a string as follows:
func main() {
fullFile := "abcdDefF"
for i := 1; i < len(fullFile); i++ {
println(fullFile[i-1], fullFile[i], fullFile[i-1]-fullFile[i])
}
}
In the loop I want to get the difference between the current rune and the previous rune (trying to identify lower-case - upper-case pairs by finding any pairs where the difference is == 32.
Strangely, the subtraction doesn't work properly (in fact seems to yield addition in cases where I would expect a negative number) although I would expect it to since runes are represented by int32.
Figured it out: the data type returned was a byte.
Explicitly converted to int and everything works as expected.
func main() {
fullFile, _ := ioutil.ReadFile("input/input.txt")
previous := 0
current := 0
for i := 1; i < len(fullFile); i++ {
previous = int(fullFile[i-1])
current = int(fullFile[i])
println(current, previous, current-previous)
}
}
I have a file containing two bytes, in Big Endian order, hexdump gives me:
81 50
which is 1000 0001 0101 0000 in binary. However, I want the most significant bit to be a flag, so in golang I have to load the file content, clear the most significant bit, and only then read the value.
So:
valueBuf := make([]byte, 2)
_, err := f.Read(valueBuf) // now printing valueBuf gives me [129 80] in decimal
value := int16(binary.BigEndian.Uint16(valueBuf[0:2])) // now value is -32432
Ok, I have tried to use something like:
func clearBit(n int16, pos uint) int16 {
mask := ^(1 << pos)
n &= mask
return n
}
But it apparently doesn't work as expected. The output value should be 336 in decimal, as normal int, and I cannot get it. How should I do this?
for n &= mask to work, n and mask have to be matching types. So you should write
mask := int16(^(1 << pos))
then, value = clearBit(value, 15) works fine.
Or, since constants are untyped, you can eliminate mask, and also eliminate the assignment to n since it's just returned on the following line, and shorten clearBit to
func clearBit(n int16, pos uint) int16 {
return n & ^(1 << pos)
}
I'm trying to create an RSA Public Key from a Modulus and Exponent stored in a byte array. After some experimentation I've got the following:
func bytes_to_int(b []byte) (acc uint64) {
length := len(b)
if length % 4 != 0 {
extra := (4 - length % 4)
b = append([]byte(strings.Repeat("\000", extra)), b...)
length += extra
}
var block uint32
for i := 0; i < length; i += 4 {
block = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(b[i:i+4])
acc = (acc << 32) + uint64(block)
}
return
}
func main() {
fmt.Println(bytes_to_int(data[:128]))
fmt.Println(bytes_to_int(data[128:]))
}
This appears to work (although I'm not convinced there isn't a better way). My next step was to convert it to use math/big in order to handle larger numbers. I can see an Lsh function to do the << but can't figure out how to recursively add the Uint32(block) to the big.Int.
For reference, the Public Key I'm attempting to import is a Mixmaster Key stored in a keyring (pubring.mix):
http://www.mixmin.net/draft-sassaman-mixmaster-XX.html#key-format
http://pinger.mixmin.net/pubring.mix
You want Int.SetBytes to make a big.int from a slice of []byte.
func (z *Int) SetBytes(buf []byte) *Int
SetBytes interprets buf as the bytes of a big-endian unsigned integer, sets z to that value, and returns z.
This should be quite straightforward to use in your application since your keys are in big-endian format according to the doc you linked.
import "math/big"
z := new(big.Int)
z.SetBytes(byteSliceHere)
Like Nick mentioned, you could use SetBytes, keep in mind the input is in base64 so you have to decode that first.
Example:
func Base64ToInt(s string) (*big.Int, error) {
data, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(s)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
i := new(big.Int)
i.SetBytes(data)
return i, nil
}