I recently rolled out an update for Jenkins to kick off sonar-scanner on version 5.6 of SonarQube. I'm not using the plugin, just a command line call of the sonar scanner from the directory where the sonar-project.properties file resides.
So far all of the developers have followed the same steps, and configure the properties file for their services and works great except in a few cases. Two developers have had a strange issue, when an error message prompts:
"Caused by: Not authorized. Analyzing this project requires to be authenticated. Please provide the values of the properties sonar.login and sonar.password."
I thought this to be strange because the other developers would probably have the same issue if the authentication token I used in the instructions was wrong. I compared a working copy with the version the first developer and the only difference was the project specific things such as DLL name, version, etc... I'll provide a template below. With the file looking fine, I saved off the broken copy, and copied the contents of another working copy into the broken copy. I then changed the project specific properties, and commit into subversion. Sonar scans successfully!
Out of curiosity, I then compared the old broken file and the new working copy line by line. Their was absolutely no difference between any character. I then thought this must be an encoding issue. I did a quick test by adding the sonar encoding property, commit this back and the scan failed. So I then changed back to the working copy and just continued.
The next day a second developer came to me with the same exact issue. I then tried the same previous steps where I copied the contents of a working copy, and pasted into the new, and commit this back in. However this time the workaround did not work. In fact, I tried about 5 different working copies to paste into and they all failed with that authorization error. I know the properties file is exactly correct with the token and such.
I'm not sure what to do at this point, I haven't come across any logs on the server that indicate any good information to me unless their is a log I'm unaware of.
# Token
sonar.login=SOMESECRETTOKEN
# Unique project key for sonar
sonar.projectKey=SOMESERVICE
# UI Settings for sonar
sonar.projectName=SOMESERVICE
sonar.projectVersion=SOMEVERSION
# Path to source, if not set it searches from this
# file's directory
sonar.sources=.
# Encoding of the source code. Default is default system encoding
#sonar.sourceEncoding=UTF-8
#Cop
sonar.stylecop.projectFilePath=./SOMEPROJ.csproj
sonar.cs.fxcop.assembly=./bin/Release/SOMEDLL.dll
sonar.cs.fxcop.fxCopCmdPath=C:/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Fxcop 10.0/FxCopCmd.exe
sonar.fxcop.assemblies=./bin/Release/SOMEDLL.dll
Any helps or pointers is appreciated, thanks!
This isn't about your encoding or file contents, but about permissions. The user that runs the scan doesn't have Execute Analysis permissions on the projects in question.
And to create new projects with the first analysis, the user must also have the Create Projects permission.
When encountering this issue, I loaded the file in Notepad++ which told me the file was saved under some strange encoding visual studio gave text files. I fixed it by switched the encoding to UTF-8 which resolved the problem. This probably should be handled better in Sonar!
Related
I'm trying to figure out the root cause of a strange TFS error we are seeing in our current instance. It wasn't noticed until after a server move, but I'm not sure if they're directly related, because the error seems to be showing up for check-ins about a week prior to the move, as well as all those following it.
We first noticed the problem when I tried to get latest, and got several errors indicating:
"The downloaded file is corrupt. Please get the file again."
Upon looking into the error, we have noticed that starting as of a single check-in every code update has resulted in files being replaced with the contents of other files, ranging from project files to binary executable files (presumably assembly DLLs), rather than the expected content which is still present on our local development machines.
I don't have admin access to the servers myself, but am looking for ideas on possible causes and/or fixes for our team to investigate.
After weeks of searching, I finally found another mention of this sort of thing happening, along with a solution that appears to have worked.
Clear the Application Tier cache.
MSDN Archived Forums: TFS swapping contents of files
We have several hundred SSIS packages in a Visual Studio Integration Services project. When this was originally set up it was configured to encrypt sensitive data in the packages with the user key. This caused some issues for us when the project file was checked out and we had conflicts because, of course, our different developer user keys were different.
We just attempted to change to sensitive data with password. To do that we had to update the project property and then we had to do it for every package manually (I tried looping using dtutil.exe but for some reason it did not work). To build my project I had to open every single package, change the password, and then build the project. After a few hours of this and getting every package updated and saved I was able to build and deploy my packages.
After that I did a commit/push to source control (Azure Git) and when my co-worker did a pull and opened the project they are now unable to build with the same error. If he puts the password in and checks everything in and I pull it back down, I get the error again.
The package and project passwords match, I can build, but when it's pulled down we get the error.
The error is:
"Project consistency check failed. The following inconsistencies were detected:
[package Name] has a different password than the project"
I was able to get around this issue but I was not able to figure out exactly what is occurring. I basically changed my protection level to DontSaveSensitive and made sure all of my passwords and sensitive information were parameterized and passed in using SSIS environment variables.
So after making sure all sensitive data was not saved in the packages I changed the project protection level and the protection level of every package. I changed the packages using this code:
for %f IN (*.dtsx) DO dtutil.exe /file %f /encrypt file;%f;0 /quiet
This changed the setting for the packages but I still received the error when building. I had to open each package, change the protection level property to any other value then back to DontSaveSensitive and then build. Once I did that the items fell out of the error message. After doing that manually for 650+ packages I was able to build. The most important resolution was that once I did a push and my co-worker pulled the changes down, they did not have to edit each package. When I was using encrypt sensitive with password we could not stop it from requiring a change and build on every package.
This is still a bit of a mystery, why dtutil.exe would not just change them without needing to re-build is very frustrating. But this work around ultimately got us past the problem and parameterizing was probably the best practice anyway.
I just had the same issue, my problem was that I was missing to introduce the password in the properties of every package (not only in the project), after doing that I have been able to rebuild the project.
I am in an interesting situation where I maintain the code for a program that is used and distributed primarily by our sister company. We are ready to distribute the program to all of the 3rd party users and since it is technically our sister companies program, we want to host it on their website. (in the interest of anonimity, I'll use 'program' everywhere instead of the actual application name, and 'www.SisterCompany.com' instead of their actual URL.)
So I get everything ready to go, setup the Publish setting to check for updates at program start, the minimum required version, and I set the Insallation Folder URL and Update Location to "http://www.SisterCompany.com/apps/program/", with the actual Publishing Folder Location as "C:\LocalProjects\Program\Publish\". Everything else is pretty standard.
After publish, I confirm that everything installs and works correctly when running directly from the publish location on my C: drive. So I put everything on our FTP server, and the guy at our sister company pulls it down and places everything in the '/apps/program/' directory on their webserver.
This is where it goes bad. When I try to install it from their site, I get the - File, Program.exe.config, has a different computed hash than specified in manifest. Error. I tested it a bit, and I even get that error trying to install from any network location on our network other than my local C: drive.
After doing the initial publish in visual studio, I have changed no files (which is the answer/reason I've found by doing some searching about this error).
What could be causing this? Is it because I set the Installation Folder URL to a location that it isn't initially published too?
Let me know if any additional info is needed.
Thanks.
After bashing my head against this all weekend, I have finally found the answer. After unsigning the project and removing the hash on the offending file (an xml file), I got the program to install, but it was giving me 'Windows Side by Side' Errors. I drilled down into the App Cache were the file was, and instead of a config .xml file, it was one of the HTML files from the website the clickonce installer was hosted on. Turns out that the web server didn't seem to like serving up an .XML (or .mdb it turns out) file.
This MSDN article ended up giving me the final solution:
I had to make sure that the 'Use ".deploy" file extension' was selected so that the web server wouldn't mangle files with extensions it didn't like.
I couldn't figure out why that one file's hash would be different. Turns out it wasn't even the same file at all.
It is possible that one of the FTP transfers is happening in text mode, rather than binary?
For me the problem was that .config transformations were done after generating manifest.
To anyone else who's still having trouble, five years later:
The first problem was configuring the MIME type, which on nginx (/etc/nginx/mime.types) should look like this:
application/x-ms-manifest application
See Click Once Server and Client Configuration.
The weirder problem to me was that I was using git to handle the push to the server, i.e.
git remote add live ssh://user#mybox/path/to/publish
git commit -am "committing...";git push live master
Works great for most things, but it was probably being registered as a "change," which prevented the app from installing locally. Once I started using scp instead:
scp -r * user#mybox/path/to/dir/
It worked without a hitch.
It is unfortunate that there is not a lot of helpful information out there about this.
I don't recall having this problem before I migrated to my Retina MacBook Pro, but since doing so, my projects have insisted on loading in the "old" development location. In years past, before XCode 4, we put all our products in /Development/Products. And, after migrating to the new MacBook Pro, they're going back there again. I can use 4.3 or newer and see the same problem with both, so I'm assuming it's some kind of configurable that's at work here.
Of course, the first thing I did was verify that the Preferences/Locations was set to Build Location = Unique. I confirmed this both in the GUI and by popping open the .plist to check the value of IDEBuildLocationStyle and it was set to Unique.
I tried removing my existing configuration files (everthing in ~/Library/Preferences/ named Xcode) and that succeeded in changing the behavior to putting the output in the build directory of the project itself (really not helpful in my world as I have complex multi-project workspaces). Quitting and checking the settings, they were set for IDEBuildLocationStyle=Unique.
So, I copied the working configuration from another machine I had to this one. Since it too had previously had the /Development/Products destination, but had subsequently been moved to the Unique build style, I expected that to work. It did not. It instead returned the output to /Development/Products.
Thinking it might be something with my Xcode install, I created a new user and built from the same source tree (not a duplicate, not a copy, the exact same files). In this case, the output went to the right place (unique subdirectory of the Derived Products for that user). So, I blew away the ~/Preferences/*Xcode* again and copied in the preferences from the new user. Unfortunately, this took us back to the same behavior that the uninitialized configuration had, which is to say building in the build directory of the project itself.
I restored to my backup configuration files, and now I'm back to working at /Development/Products, but this isn't a good long term solution.
When checking the script output for a test script, I can clearly see that somebody is setting SYMROOT to /Development/Products in the case of the older config, and build in the case of the default configuration file.
Clearly there's something here on this system that's influencing the configuration, but I cannot figure out what it is. Any assistance would be highly appreciated!
Also - When I try to use option-Clean to enable Clean Build Folder, it is never enabled, which makes a certain kind of sense, but I thought it might be another data point.
I tried the solution in Strange behavior of Xcode Build Products Path under Build Locations and that had the same result as deleting the preferences: build products as children of the project directory.
Has anyone else seen such a problem? Have you found a solution?
Well, after a very long time of suffering through this on my laptop, I was finally able to track down the problem.
Inside of:
project.xcworkspace/xcuserdata/<user>.xcuserdatad/
there is a WorkspaceSettings.xcsettings file.
It contained a key BuildLocationStyle, which was set to UseTargetSettings.
Deleting the file and thus resetting this value allowed me to get both the Clean Build Folder... working and to get my project building correctly.
Hopefully this will help somebody else.
We use Nant to automate our builds. Everything was working fine until about a week ago when the rains caused our power to go out and the build server had to be re-booted. Now, we get the following error whenever we attempt a build:
<internalerror>
<type>System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException</type>
<message><![CDATA[SourceSafe was unable to finish writing a file. Check your available disk space, and ask the administrator to analyze your SourceSafe database.]]></message>
<stacktrace><![CDATA[ at SourceSafeTypeLib.VSSItemClass.Get(String& Local, Int32 iFlags)
at NAnt.Contrib.Tasks.SourceSafe.GetTask.ExecuteTask()]]></stacktrace>
</internalerror>
We ran the Analyze utility on the VSS database and there appears to be plenty of room on the build server, but no luck. Any ideas? I'm at a loss.
My problem was that the current file was empty... I wrote a comment on it and everything worked ok
Ok, here is the resolution. It turns out that somehow, the version of an app.config file that was referenced in the build script was corrupted (all the previous versions, actually), which caused the VSSGet error. Updating the version to the current version fixed the errror.
I had this issue when I tried to migrate a Source Safe database to Subversion, using VSS2SVN.
This error is related to the message
There is a diff chain size mismatch in file '' (bdaaaaaa) at version (versions earlier than that version can no longer be retrieved from the database).
that may be reported by the Source Safe tool analyze.exe.
If you look into the history of the file and try to Get a version that is older than the one reported by analyze.exe, the message of this question is shown.
Microsoft provided hotfix KB927887 for cases where this was caused by XML files toggling BOM inclusion, but I did not try to apply it.
See also Message: SourceSafe was unable to finish writing a file