It's my first time using Koala.
Everything works fine so far, but when I want to use variables it starts giving me errors. I really don't know what I'am doing wrong, cause I followed all steps.
For example:
$test: #00000; would give me error (doesn't matter in which .scss file I put it in.
I have uploaded a screenshot of my structure and the error.
The actual problem with the code is that you supplied 5 digits for the value of a hexadecimal value.
You should either use 3 or 6 and not 5
$test: #000000; // not #00000
The reason why it worked by not importing _variables.scss is because it is a partial file and by not importing it, it never gets compiled and so it basically doesn't evaluate the line causing the error. That line is just ignored.
Related
not entirely important but it's kind of a flaw of the framework.
let's say i'm working on a blade file now i'm using an arrow to get a value from an array.
definitely that would return an error of something like using -> on a non-object
then it shows my code below and is trying point me the line to where the error is, but every single time I see this, its always the wrong line number. why is that?
is it just a flaw? or am I doing something wrong?
Do you have a comments line in your blade code?. laravel does not render blade page directly it creates a file in 'storage/framework/views' without comment code here you find the exact line number as you seeing in your error.
I have used apktool to decompile an apk to its smali source.
In all smali files there are .lineXYZ codes. They are random
i.e
.line 2
and somewhere next it would be like .line 33
so i am unable to get their sequence. I have created a line number modification tool which renames line number and applied to smli files. But apktool did not compile it again and exited without telling me anything.
then i created a tool to detect highest line number in the project and added my code to decompiled code. Still apk did exist without saying anything.
I know there is a file known as apktool.yml but i do not know if there is any problem in that.
Any help is appreciated and i am waiting for a solution.
.line markers are just for debugging and show up in stacktraces. You don't need to modify them when you're adding code.
I'm using Xcode 6.3.1. I'm trying to track a weird issue in an app and now I'm seeing that local variables seem to be incorrectly initialised. When I hit a breakpoint at the line where a local variable is defined and initialised at the same time, it is actually shown as an existing local variable, but with a corrupt value:
Has anyone else seen this? In another run the variable was actually showing in the variable view as being an NSDate !!!
A breakpoint is actually before the line it appears on; that line has not yet executed. You are thus looking too soon at this variable. It has no meaningful value until after you step past the line where it is initialized. You are still before that line so its value is random garbage.
make -C doc html latexpdf
yields this:
Package hyperref Message: Driver (autodetected): hpdftex.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/hpdftex.def
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/rerunfilecheck.sty))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/oberdiek/hypcap.sty))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/multirow/multirow.sty)
Writing index file Arakoon.idx
(./Arakoon.aux)
Runaway argument?
{{1.10.3}{9}{Client side support\relax }{subsection.1.10.
! File ended while scanning use of \#newl#bel.
<inserted text>
\par
l.113 \begin{document}
?
If someone is still looking for this: For me usually, when a prior build had failed due to an error, subsequent builds would fail with this error. Solved it by deleting the main .aux file and building it again.
It is impossible to say with any confidence, but it looks like a fragile (non-robust) command in a subsubsection heading or a maths label (would be label 10.1.3), because:
It occurs at \begin{document}, when the .aux files are loaded,
The error indicates a malformed directive in the .aux file, and the presence of a \relax there - typically what command reduce to after having performed their side effect.
Two suggestions:
Generate an MWE by making a new document from this with all the body of your document except that heading/ equation (and perhaps the sentence following) deleted. Does this create the same error? If so, post it here. You might need some trial and error to find out which Lat3ex command is responsible, but it should contain the text Client side support.
Do read https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/4736/what-is-the-difference-between-fragile-and-robust-commands - if I am right, you have a fragile command where it shouldn't be. Figure out what should be there instead.
Does anybody know whether it's possible to get the error-row of a file being compiled when the error occurs in an include file?
For example, I'm compiling a file, say abc.p, that uses def.i all over the place. At some point, I make a change to abc.p that causes a compile error in one of the includes, so the message says that the error occurred at line 123 of def.i, but I want to know at which line in abc.p that is. In other words, the line number where the offending include file is used.
Even though "Compiler:Get-File-Name(n)" returns def.i and "Compiler:File-Name" returns abc.p, both "Compiler:Get-Row(n)" as well as "Compiler:Error-Row" returns the line number in def.i.
Any ideas?
My guess would be to save the compiler listing or debug file and look at that.
Beyond that, I don't think there's a way to do it now - you need to submit an enhancement request to get this functionality.
My way of tracking this kind of error is with
compile source.p preprocess source.pp.
open source.pp in the procedure editor and check syntax.
This gives you the error location in the expanded source.
Once you have found that locate code that is not part of the include and search for that code in the original source.