jruby jdbc how to get id of inserted row - ruby

I have insert query that works, but I can't get ID of created row in return. How can I achieve that? having this:
conn = Java::JavaSql::DriverManager.getConnection(url)
st = conn.create_statement
rs = st.execute_update(query)
How can I get id?

more of a JDBC question that depends on the DB/driver used.
generally st.generated_keys gives you a result set of the IDs
also read: How to get the insert ID in JDBC?

Related

For table cmdb_rel_ci, I want to retrieve unique parent.sys_class_name with count for "type=In Rack::Rack contains"

For table cmdb_rel_ci, I want to retrieve unique parent.sys_class_name with count for "type=In Rack::Rack contains". I am doing practice in out of the box instance.
At table level URL is as below:
URL
I want to retrieve result from above URL with my below script.
var count = new GlideAggregate('cmdb_rel_ci');
count.addQuery('type','e76b8c7b0a0a0aa70082c9f7c2f9dc64');// sys_id of type In Rack::Rack contains e76b8c7b0a0a0aa70082c9f7c2f9dc64
count.addAggregate('COUNT', 'parent.sys_class_name');
count.query();
while(count.next()){
var parentClassName = count.parent.sys_class_name.toString();
var parentClassNameCount = count.getAggregate('COUNT','parent.sys_class_name');
gs.log(parentClassName + " : " + parentClassNameCount );
}
The issue is I am getting parentClassName empty.
Try this instead:
var parentClassName = count.getValue("parent.sys_class_name")
Since it's a GlideAggregate query (instead of GlideRecord), the query being issued isn't returning all of the fields on the target table. With GlideRecord, dot-walking through a reference field (e.g. parent.sys_class_name) automatically resolves that referenced record to provide access to its field values. This is made possible by the fact that the driving/original query brought back the value of the parent field. This is not happening with GlideAggregate. The query in this case basically looks like:
SELECT cmdb1.`sys_class_name` AS `parent_sys_class_name`, count(*)
FROM (cmdb_rel_ci cmdb_rel_ci0 LEFT JOIN cmdb cmdb1 ON cmdb_rel_ci0.`parent` = cmdb1.`sys_id` )
WHERE cmdb_rel_ci0.`type` = 'e76b8c7b0a0a0aa70082c9f7c2f9dc64'
GROUP BY cmdb1.`sys_class_name`
ORDER BY cmdb1.`sys_class_name`
So, you actually have access specifically to that dot-walked sys_class_name that's being grouped, but not through the dot-walk. The call to getValue("parent.sys_class_name") is expectedly resolved to the returned column aliased as parent_sys_class_name.
That being said, what you're doing probably should also work, based on user expectations, so you've not done anything incorrect here.

Slick/Oracle PLAIN SQL Get auto generated ID after insert

I am trying to run a query via Slick in Scala that will insert a record into an Oracle db and return the auto generated ID as the result. I see that this is possible using Slick's syntax but is this possible using a plain SQL query? With below code I can only get a return value of -1.
val name = "Bob"
db.run(sql"""DECLARE NEW_PERSON_ID;
BEGIN
INSERT INTO TB_PEOPLE (ID, NAME)
VALUES(SEQ_PEOPLE.NEXTVAL, $name)
RETURNING ID INTO NEW_PERSON_ID;
END;""".as[Int])
It seems that Slick doesn't support output parameters so using Oracle's returning syntax won't work. A workaround I found is to first generate an ID and then insert using that ID (requires 2 queries). The queries are wrapped in a transaction.
val name = "Bob"
val action = for {
newPersonId <- sql"""SELECT SEQ_PEOPLE.NEXTVAL FROM DUAL""".as[Int]
_ <- sqlu"""INSERT INTO TB_PEOPLE (ID, NAME) VALUES ($newPersonId, $name)"""
}
db.run(action.transactionally)

How to get next id in GRAILS?

I need to get the next available id in a sequence, using GORM or native query.
How can I do this?
I'm using oracle.
UPDATE:
I need this value BEFORE insert, because my row will use this value.
I have table called IMAGE, with column FILE_NAME, like this:
- ID | FILE_NAME
- 123 | foo_bar_123.png
- 124 | xxx_yyy_124.png
Tks a lot.
Why do you need the value before the insert? Could you get the information as part of the insert using the RETURNING clause, i.e.
INSERT INTO table_name( id, file_name )
VALUES( some_sequence.nextval, <<bind variable>> )
RETURNING id INTO <<bind variable>>
Or access it after the insert using
SELECT sequence_name.currval
FROM dual
The currval of a sequence returns the most recent value of the sequence produced in the current session so it is actually thread-safe. Since sequences are designed to provide numbers in a highly concurrent environment, you cannot in general find out what the nextval is going to be unless you actually fetch the nextval. Even if you could, there is no guarantee that another thread won't come along and get the value you peeked at before your INSERT took place so it wouldn't be safe to peek at the nextval in a multi-user environment.
I adapted #Cave tips.
So, my solution is:
Change my mapping from:
class Image {
...
id column: "ID", generator: "sequence", params: [sequence:"MY_SEQUENCE"]
...
}
to:
class Image {
...
id column: "ID", generator: "assigned"
...
}
And set id mannualy using this:
def getLastImageId(){
def sql = "SELECT MY_SEQUENCE.nextval FROM dual"
def query = sessionFactory.currentSession.createSQLQuery(sql);
def result = query.list()
return result[0]
}
...
newImage.id = getLastImageId()
newImage.fileName = "foo_bar_${newImage.id}.png"

Linq Contains issue: cannot formulate the equivalent of 'WHERE IN' query

In the table ReservationWorkerPeriods there are records of all workers that are planned to work on a given period on any possible machine.
The additional table WorkerOnMachineOnConstructionSite contains columns workerId, MachineId and ConstructionSiteId.
From the table ReservationWorkerPeriods I would like to retrieve just workers who work on selected machine.
In order to retrieve just relevant records from WorkerOnMachineOnConstructionSite table I have written the following code:
var relevantWorkerOnMachineOnConstructionSite = (from cswm in currentConstructionSiteSchedule.ContrustionSiteWorkerOnMachine
where cswm.MachineId == machineId
select cswm).ToList();
workerOnMachineOnConstructionSite = relevantWorkerOnMachineOnConstructionSite as List<ContrustionSiteWorkerOnMachine>;
These records are also used in the application so I don't want to bypass the above code even if is possible to directly retrieve just workerPeriods for workers who work on selected machine. Anyway I haven't figured out how it is possible to retrieve the relevant workerPeriods once we know which userIDs are relevant.
I have tried the following code:
var userIDs = from w in workerOnMachineOnConstructionSite select new {w.WorkerId};
List<ReservationWorkerPeriods> workerPeriods = currentConstructionSiteSchedule.ReservationWorkerPeriods.ToList();
allocatedWorkers = workerPeriods.Where(wp => userIDs.Contains(wp.WorkerId));
but it seems to be incorrect and don't know how to fix it. Does anyone know what is the problem and how it is possible to retrieve just records which contain userIDs from the list?
Currently, you are constructing an anonymous object on the fly, with one property. You'll want to grab the id directly with (note the missing curly braces):
var userIDs = from w in workerOnMachineOnConstructionSite select w.WorkerId;
Also, in such cases, don't call ToList on it - the variable userIDs just contains the query, not the result. If you use that variable in a further query, the provider can translate it to a single sql query.

How to perform a join with CodeIgniter's Active Record class on a multicolumn key?

I've been able to make this code work using CodeIgniter's db->query as follows:
$sql =
'SELECT mapping_code,zone_name,installation_name
FROM installations,appearances,zones
WHERE
installations.installation_id = zones.installation_fk_id
AND appearances.installation_fk_id = installations.installation_id
AND appearances.zone_fk_id = zones.zone_id
AND
appearances.barcode = ?
';
return $this->db->query($sql,array($barcode));
The 'appearances' table throws a 'not unique table' error if I try
this using the Active Record class.
I need to join appearances on
both the zone and installations tables.
How can I do this?
Take a look at $this->db->join() if you wish to use the ActiveRecord class. Right now you are just using plain SQL which has nothing to do with the ActiveRecord stuff at all.
Does this work when run through a MySQL client like phpMyAdmin, Navicat, etc?

Resources