I work on-the-side doing computer repair. Standard operating procedure is to pop out the HDD/SSD, mount it to a backup machine, and pull the client's data (i.e., in case the drive fails/something goes horribly wrong, their data is protected). More and more often, my office is seeing SSDs soldered directly to the motherboard, making this technique impossible.
I was wondering if any of you knew of a some method that would allow direct disk access without drive removal. An analogue would be mounting a phone in Mass Storage Device mode, I suppose. This may be possible already by doing something with a Linux LiveUSB, but I'm not sure how. Booting from a LiveUSB and transferring files over the network is unacceptably slow given the volume of computers we see and amount of data involved.
On Apple computers, this is simple--plug in a Thunderbolt/Firewire connector and use Target Disk Mode to pull directly from the drive.
tl;dr: making a backup of a Windows computer without opening them: how do?
Boot a live Linux from a large USB3 HDD, and use the same disk to copy the client's data to with about USB3 speed.
Related
Virtual Box SAS storage controller allows faster IO than SATA one:
SAS is to SCSI what SATA is to IDE: it allows for more reliable and faster connections.
from https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch05.html
By default new VM is created with hard disk attached to SATA controller (at least for Windows VMs). In order to make IO operations faster in guest system, one might want to move a hard drive to SAS controller.
How to do that for Windows guest OS without breaking anything?
Here is my own solution which seem to work.
Prepare (this is required to make Windows install drivers for new controller, without them Windows will fail to boot).
Add SAS controller.
Attach new hard drive to the new SAS controller.
Boot your system, wait while drivers are installed/updated. Reboot. Power Off.
Now we are ready to relocate existing hard drive:
Attach existing hard drive to SAS controller.
Detach it from old controller.
Make sure that Solid-state drive checkbox is in the same state as it was before.
Again: boot your system, wait while drivers are installed/updated. Reboot.
NB: Don't forget to backup your important files before trying this.
You might want to enable Use Host IO Cache on SAS controller.
I want to move my program to USB memory stick. It will run only on memory stick and would not be copied (written on C# and has nearly 3GB of database).
Where can I find a good source for that and/or how can I do that?
What you described can't reasonably be done. If a user can run the program, they can run it. It doesn't matter whether they loaded it from your USB stick or not. You can write it such that it assumes it's being run from the USB stick (with relative paths, per #Kos's comment) but that will in no way prevent people from copying it to their hard drives and running it. Since you don't know where a USB stick will be mounted ahead of time, you can't even use absolute paths.
Allow me to disagree with nmichaels, it is possible to check in C# if your running from removable storage or hard drive.
Check this thread: How to detect if any specific drive is a hard drive?
However, it would be too easy to reverse the thing and allow it to run on hard drives.
As an additional protection, you can read the USB drive serial and if it doesn't match, kill the program.
OR... you if want to be hardcore, use a specific USB drive model, and read the VID/PID, or the chip itself (check mass production tool).
In the end, if the program worths it, someone would still reverse it and break the protection scheme :)
When I boot up Linux Mint from a Live CD, I am able to save files to the "File System". But where are these files being saved to? Can't be the disc, since it's a CDR. I don't think it's stored in the RAM, because it can only hold so much data and isn't really intended to be used as a "hard drive". The only other option is the hard drive... but it's certainly not saving to any partition on the hard drive I know about, since none of them are mounted. Then where are my files being saved to??
Believe it or not, it's a ramdisk :)
All live distros mount a temporary hard disk in RAM memory. The process is completely user-transparent and is all because of the magic of Linux kernel.
The OS, in fact, first allocates an area of your RAM memory into a virtual device, then mounts it as a regular hard drive in your file system.
Once you reboot, you lose all your data from that ramdrive.
Ramdrive is needed by almost all software running on Live CDs. In fact, almost all programs, in particular desktop managers, are designed in order to write files, even temporary, during their execution.
As an example, there are two ways to run KDE on a Live CD: either modify its code deeply in order to disallow you to change wallpaper etc. (the desktop settings are stored inside ~/.kde) or redeploy it onto a writable file system such as a ramdrive in order to avoid write fails on read-only file systems.
Obviously, you can mount your real HDD or any USB drive into your virtual file system and make all writes to them permanent, but by default no live distro mounts your drives into the root file system, instead they usually mount into specific subdirectories like /mnt, /media, /windows
Hope to have been of help.
It does indeed emulate a disk using RAM; from Wikipedia:
It is able to run without permanent
installation by placing the files that
typically would be stored on a hard
drive into RAM, typically in a RAM
disk, though this does cut down on the
RAM available to applications.
RAM. In Linux, and indeed most unix systems, any kind of device is seen as a file system.
For example, to get memory info on linux you use cat /proc/meminfo, where cat is used to read files. Then, there's all sorts of strange stuff like /dev/random (to read random crap) and /dev/null (to throw away crap). ;-)
To make it persistent - use a USB device - properly formatted and with a special name. See here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCD/Persistence
I have two removable drives. I can set the access rights so that they can be shared and used from another network computer, but when I start my main computer the next time and the drives are switched off, they seem to lose the share settings and I have to set the access rights again.
Is there a way to prevent this and to automatically share a complete drive so that it can be accessed across the network as soon as it is switched on the next time?
The long and the short of it is "No"... I had the same issue with a removable drive and there's not a way to do it. You CAN however, write a small service that will share the drive automatically on boot-up. Short of that, Windows just simply will not re-share a removable drive after reboot.
~md5sum~
I've had this problem, and after some research came to this registry solution that increases the number of shared removable drives that windows retains (why Windows is worried about not having enough space to remember unlimited numbers of shares is beyond me). http://forums.cnet.com/7726-6122_102-3230783.html#3230783
To make things easier when switching between machines (my workstation at the office and my personal laptop) I have thought about trying an external hard drive to store my working directory on. Specifically I am looking at Firewire 800 drives (most are 5400 rpm 8mb cache). What I am wondering is if anyone has experience with doing this with Visual Studio projects and what sort of performance hit they see.
It depends on the size of the project. The throughput is low and the latency is high, so you're going to get hit every which way, but due to the latency you'll be hit harder if you have a lot of little files rather than a few large ones.
Have you considered simply carrying around a GIT or other distributed repository and updating the machine repositories as you move around? Then you can compile locally and treat the drive and a roving server. Since only changes will be moved across, it should be faster, and your code will be 'backed up' in more places.
If you forget the drive, it breaks, or is lost/stolen, then you can still sit down at a PC and program with no code missing if you're at the last PC you used, or very little code missing (which will be updated later with a resync anyway).
And it's just a hop skip and a jump away from simply using the network to move the changes between the systems if you don't want to carry the drive around later.
I use vmware and the virtual machines are on an external usb drive. Performance is fine. You might have some issues with the drive name changing - not an issue if you use virtual machines.
Granted I work in an industry were Personal Information and Intellectual Property are king, but I don't like that idea at all. That hard drive disappears and you have a big problem.
Why not Remote Desktop into the work machine?
EDIT Stipud Spelingg