In the src/test/resources folder of a maven project there's a relative symbolic link.
With the 2.6 version of the plugin, the actual file is copied.
After updating to the 3.0.1 version, it copies the link instead of the file and on a subsequent run (without clean) fails (mvn -e shows it's because of a FileAlreadyExistsException).
Is there any config option to restore the behavior from the previous version ?
I agree, having a link as a test resource is a really bad idea.
This is a known bug in the maven-resources-plugin: MRESOURCES-237 Resource plugin’s handling of symbolic links changed in 3.0.x, broke existing behaviour, unfixed but known for 1½ years.
Unfortunately, there’s not (yet) a configuration option. Introducing it (and defaulting it to “follow symlinks” instead of copy-preserving them) would fix this issue.
For now, the only solution is to downgrade the maven-resources-plugin. I also upgraded from 2.6, and have just now downgraded to 2.7 (last of the 2.x series), and can confirm that it works around this bug and properly copies the symlinks’ contents.
Update: due to the “Mark invalid” issue (a bug in maven-filtering) you should consider staying with 2.6 if you don’t need any of the new 2.7 features, or have to amend the plugin definition with an updated dependency on maven-filtering 1.3 (or maybe newer).
Related
My gradle has for some time had a dependency on the (amazing) Android library Picasso. It has always been set to version 2.5.2
implementation 'com.squareup.picasso:picasso:2.5.2'
I recently updated all my Firebase libraries from a fairly old version to the latest. At which point something odd happened.
My Picasso method calls began to error
Picasso.with(context)
Which I know from this SO article results from a change to Picasso.
cannot find symbol method with() using picasso library android and I need to change to
Picasso.get()
OK not a big deal, but it got me wondering. Obviously Firebase uses the latest version of Picasso and is making my project use the latest version as well. My question is why is my local gradle file ignored and the newer version of Picasso defaulted to?
Off the top of my head: Since you declare a specific version that requirement is not flexible. To allow for a newer version if available a + declaration is required. My guess is that another dependency is also dependent on Picasso after the updates. Gradle, when given a redundant dependency, will select the newer version.
This is in alignment with what you said, if I understand correctly. If Firebase uses a newer Picasso version, because it requires that version, then Gradle is given two versions to choose one from. This will always result in the newer version being chosen. At least this is default behavior afaik.
It seems to me that you already know Picasso is used by Firebase. If you want to see where which dependency comes from however, you can look into build scans:
gradle build --scan
https://scans.gradle.com/?_ga=2.166196030.1236003146.1565212874-222812074.1565212874
A little bit more advanced dependency management:
1) Set Gradle behavior on dependency conflict:
https://docs.gradle.org/current/dsl/org.gradle.api.artifacts.ResolutionStrategy.html
2) Declare version constraints (see Rich version declaration):
https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/declaring_dependencies.html
You can check the official doc:
Gradle resolves version conflicts by picking the highest version of a module. Build scans and the dependency insight report are immensely helpful in identifying why a specific version was selected.
My builds broke when I moved to Gradle 5 becasue Gradle v5.2 bundles with Groovy v2.5.4. These projects use the dynamic support build for Groovy.
Invoke dynamic support
groovy-all-2.5.4-indy.jar
This file is not being resolved for either JCenter or MavenCentral. However I did find a copy here:
Sonatyoe repo: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy-all/2.5.4/
groovy-2.5.4-indy.jar
but no groovy-all-2.5.4-indy.jar
I am not sure what can be done for Gradle to 'resolve' this file and actually find it.
Can someone tell me were I should be getting this JAR file from?
I'm using coordinates: "org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:2.5.4:indy"
Is that still the correct expression?
Is this a bug or am I just looking in the wrong places (see #1)?
Im ny build.gradle I was using jcenter() and tried changing that to mavenCentral().
Neither option came up with the JAR in question.
A final wrinkle is that we run an instance of Nexus. Is there some way to force Nexus to go outside and look-for this JAR?
This is not entirely conclusive, but it seems that the -indy jar was there in groovy versions prior to 2.5.0 because those versions supported java versions prior to 1.7.
The indy jar was there so that you could optionally enable support for the invokedynamic instruction introduced in java 1.7 while still supporting java versions prior to 1.7 which did not include invokedynamic (groovy docs for indy).
It seems that groovy 2.5 bumped the minimum jdk requirement to, quote:
JDK requirements changes
Groovy 2.5 requires JDK8+ to build and JDK7 is the minimum version of the JRE that we support.
(from http://groovy-lang.org/releasenotes/groovy-2.5.html)
which would make this whole duality of supporting both invokedynamic and without unnecessary.
So my guess would be that they just dumped the indy jar and always include the invokedynamic instruction in the normal groovy jar file set as the required jdk versions will always include it.
Why is the Maven user-specific settings folder .m2 called, well, .m2 in Maven 3?
I've read through the Maven Settings Reference and am still clueless, and I can't find any similar questions here. I know M2_HOME replaced MAVEN_HOME in Maven 2, so I'm guessing that is part of the reason.
The directory exists since the version 2.0 of Maven, hence the name. . means hidden files on Unix/Linux plaforms, m for Maven, 2 for version 2.0.
I guess the authors wanted to distinguish the then-new v2.0 version from the old 1.x versions, hence they created the M2 name. It's worth mentioning that Maven 2.0 was completely incompatible with Maven 1.x, while Maven 3.0 is almost fully backwards compatible with v2.0, and it only has major changes and improvements "under the hood". Since Maven 3.0 should have no visible changes from the users' perpective (to be backward compatible), the authors must not change the name of all options/directory names for the new version.
Currently, I'm looking at the springsource community download site.
It shows that 3.2.4 is the latest general release. Its zip file has dist suffix and the content is different than the latest in 3.1 branch 3.1.4 (which does not have dist ending).
3.1.4 has the following directories:
dist
projects
src
dist folder contains org.springframework...* jars.
3.2.4 has the following directories:
docs
libs
schema
lib folder contains spring-... jars
Was there a major change between 3.1 and 3.2 releases?
According to this accepted answer there was but I was not able to find anything about it.
Does anybody have any particulars?
Should I get 3.1.4 for now?
It was a spring source decision to change it. (I think there was an blog article somewhere, but I can`t found it)
The distribution archive for release 3.2 RC1 is called spring-3.2.0.RC1-dist.zip; whereas, all releases prior to 3.2 generated distribution archives called spring-framework-*-dist.zip.
It is not a bug, it is not a major change in the code, and I highly doubt that they will switch back to the old layout (so there is no reason to stay with 3.1.4).
For the changes: have a look at the feature list and change log:
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.2.x/spring-framework-reference/html/new-in-3.2.html
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.2.2.RELEASE/changelog.txt
I am trying to write my pom.xml for a multimodal flex application. I have been using this resource as an example:
http://www.sonatype.com/books/mvnref-book/reference/flex-dev-sect-creating-with-archetype.html
I am using M2E v1.01 but I am faced with a number of 'Plugin execution not covered by lifecycle configuration" errors. As far as I can see - there are no m2E connectors available to resolve this and I have tried all the Maven advice I can find - to include:
Clean
Update dependencies
Update project configuration
The problem only occurs if the project is declared as swc or swf package. My next move to ask Eclipse to 'permanently mark goal as ignored' - which seems a little brash.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
With STS 2.8.0, we have upgraded m2eclipse to be version 1.0. However, this can cause a bit of trouble with existing projects. I wrote a blog on this a couple of months ago.
http://blog.springsource.org/2011/10/18/upgrading-maven-integration-for-springsource-tool-suite-2-8-0/
Essentially, the new architecture for m2eclipse requires that each maven plugin you use must be mapped to one Eclipse plugin to handle the plugin's execution inside of Eclipse. This obviously causes problems since not every maven plugin author has the knowledge or time to create also create and maintain an Eclipse plugin.
By marking the plugin as ignored, you are saying that the plugin should never be executed inside of Eclipse (implying that whenever you need it to be executed, you will do so from the command line). Once marked as ignored, you can then change it to execute, which means that it should always be executed whenever the associated lifecycle is performed in Eclipse. This may cause performance problems, and so only do it if you know the risks.
If all this is too much for you, then STS provides a downgrade option to revert to an older version of m2eclipse. Go to the Dashboard extensions page. Unfortunately, you will have to manually revert all changes to your .project and .classpath files (we provide an auto-upgrade mechanism, but not a downgrade mechanism...presumably everything is in version control).
Any questions or problems should be sent to the STS forums:
http://forum.springsource.org/forumdisplay.php?32-SpringSource-Tool-Suite
You can check this alpha connector "Flex Maven Integration for Flash Builder" on the eclipse marketplace: http://marketplace.eclipse.org/node/648556.