I am putting together a proof of concept to help identify gotchas using Spring Boot/Netflix OSS and Kubernetes together. This is also to prove out related technologies such as Prometheus and Graphana.
I have a Eureka service setup which is starting with no trouble within my Kubernetes cluster. This is named discovery and has been given the name "discovery-1551420162-iyz2c" when added to K8 using
For my config server, I am trying to use Eureka based on a logical URL so in my bootstrap.yml I have
server:
port: 8889
eureka:
instance:
hostname: configserver
client:
registerWithEureka: true
fetchRegistry: true
serviceUrl:
defaultZone: http://discovery:8761/eureka/
spring:
cloud:
config:
server:
git:
uri: https://github.com/xyz/microservice-config
and I am starting this using
kubectl run configserver --image=xyz/config-microservice --replicas=1 --port=8889
This service ends up running named as configserver-3481062421-tmv4d. I then see exceptions in the config server logs as it tries to locate the eureka instance and cannot.
I have the same setup for this using docker-compose locally with links and it starts the various containers with no trouble.
discovery:
image: xyz/discovery-microservice
ports:
- "8761:8761"
configserver:
image: xyz/config-microservice
ports:
- "8888:8888"
links:
- discovery
How can I setup something like eureka.client.serviceUri so my microservices can locate their peers without knowing fixed IP addresses within the K8 cluster?
How can I setup something like eureka.client.serviceUri?
You have to have a Kubernetes service on top of the eureka pods/deployments which then will provide you a referable IP address and port number. And then use that referable address to look up the Eureka service, instead of "8761".
To address further question about HA configuration of Eureka
You shouldn't have more than one pod/replica of Eureka per k8s service (remember, pods are ephemeral, you need a referable IP address/domain name for eureka service registry). To achieve high availability (HA), spin up more k8s services with one pod in each.
Eureka service 1 --> a single pod
Eureka Service 2 --> another single pod
..
..
Eureka Service n --> another single pod
So, now you have referable IP/Domain name (IP of the k8s service) for each of your Eureka.. now it can register each other.
Feeling like it's an overkill?
If all your services are in same kubernetes namespace you can achieve everything (well, almost everything, except client side load balancing) that eureka offers though k8s service + KubeDNS add-On. Read this article by Christian Posta
Edit
Instead of Services with one pod each, you can make use of StatefulSets as Stefan Ocke pointed out.
Like a Deployment, a StatefulSet manages Pods that are based on an
identical container spec. Unlike a Deployment, a StatefulSet maintains
a sticky identity for each of their Pods. These pods are created from
the same spec, but are not interchangeable: each has a persistent
identifier that it maintains across any rescheduling.
Regarding HA configuration of Eureka in Kubernetes:
You can (meanwhile) use a StatefulSet for this instead of creating a service for each instance. The StatefulSet guarantees stable network identity for each instance you create.
For example, the deployment could look like the following yaml (StatefulSet + headless Service).
There are two Eureka instances here, according to the DNS
naming rules for StatefulSets (assuming namespace is "default"):
eureka-0.eureka.default.svc.cluster.local and
eureka-1.eureka.default.svc.cluster.local
As long as your pods are in the same namespace, they can reach Eureka also as:
eureka-0.eureka
eureka-1.eureka
Note: The docker image used in the example is from https://github.com/stefanocke/eureka. You might want to chose or build your own one.
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: eureka
labels:
app: eureka
spec:
ports:
- port: 8761
name: eureka
clusterIP: None
selector:
app: eureka
---
apiVersion: apps/v1beta2
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: eureka
spec:
serviceName: "eureka"
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
app: eureka
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: eureka
spec:
containers:
- name: eureka
image: stoc/eureka
ports:
- containerPort: 8761
env:
- name: MY_POD_NAME
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: metadata.name
# Due to camelcase issues with "defaultZone" and "preferIpAddress", _JAVA_OPTIONS is used here
- name: _JAVA_OPTIONS
value: -Deureka.instance.preferIpAddress=false -Deureka.client.serviceUrl.defaultZone=http://eureka-0.eureka:8761/eureka/,http://eureka-1.eureka:8761/eureka/
- name: EUREKA_CLIENT_REGISTERWITHEUREKA
value: "true"
- name: EUREKA_CLIENT_FETCHREGISTRY
value: "true"
# The hostnames must match with the the eureka serviceUrls, otherwise the replicas are reported as unavailable in the eureka dashboard
- name: EUREKA_INSTANCE_HOSTNAME
value: ${MY_POD_NAME}.eureka
# No need to start the pods in order. We just need the stable network identity
podManagementPolicy: "Parallel"
#Stefan Ocke i'm trying to the same setup the same, but with my own image of eureka server. but i keep getting this error
Request execution failed with message: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused (Connection refused)
2019-09-27 06:27:03.363 ERROR 1 --- [ main] c.n.d.s.t.d.RedirectingEurekaHttpClient : Request execution error. endpoint=DefaultEndpoint{ serviceUrl='http://eureka-1.eureka:8761/eureka/}
Here are configurations:
Eureka Spring Properties:
server.port=${EUREKA_PORT}
spring.security.user.name=${EUREKA_USERNAME}
spring.security.user.password=${EUREKA_PASSWORD}
eureka.client.register-with-eureka=true
eureka.client.fetch-registry=true
eureka.instance.prefer-ip-address=false
eureka.server.wait-time-in-ms-when-sync-empty=0
eureka.server.eviction-interval-timer-in-ms=15000
eureka.instance.leaseRenewalIntervalInSeconds=30
eureka.instance.leaseExpirationDurationInSeconds=30
eureka.instance.hostname=${EUREKA_INSTANCE_HOSTNAME}
eureka.client.serviceUrl.defaultZone=http://eureka-0.eureka:8761/eureka/,http://eureka-1.eureka:8761/eureka/
StatefulSet Config:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: eureka
spec:
serviceName: "eureka"
podManagementPolicy: "Parallel"
replicas: 2
selector:
matchLabels:
app: eureka
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: eureka
spec:
containers:
- name: eureka
image: "my-image"
command: ["java", "-Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom", "-jar","/app/eureka-service.jar"]
ports:
- containerPort: 8761
env:
- name: EUREKA_PORT
value: "8761"
- name: EUREKA_USERNAME
value: "theusername"
- name: EUREKA_PASSWORD
value: "thepassword"
- name: MY_POD_NAME
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: metadata.name
- name: EUREKA_INSTANCE_HOSTNAME
value: ${MY_POD_NAME}.eureka
Service Config:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: eureka
labels:
app: eureka
spec:
clusterIP: None
selector:
app: eureka
ports:
- port: 8761
targetPort: 8761
Ingress Controller:
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: ingress-service
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target: /
spec:
rules:
- http:
paths:
- path: /
backend:
serviceName: eureka
servicePort: 8761
You have to install a kubernetes kube-dns server to resolve names with their IPs, and then expose your eureka pods as a service. (see kubernetes docs) for more infos to how to create dns and services.
#random_dude, what will be the case if i used to create 2 or 3 replicas of eureka? it turned out that when i mount a micro-service 'X' i will be registred in all eureka replicas, but when it becomes down, only one replicas gets the update ! the others still consider the micro-service instance as running
I got exactly this problem and it got resoled by adding an environment variable for pod. This has the answer. Sample env variable for my pod is shown below,
I'm wondering where you put that config, is that on service-registry which is on the eureka, or in the client-side (where we want to connect to eureka)?
my current case is, that all configuration is placed on a repo, the eureka config as well. which makes the config static.
Related
I am trying to deploy a docker image which is in public repository. I am trying to create a loadbalancer service, and trying to expose the service in my system ip address, and not 127.0.0.1.
I am using a windows 10 , and my docker has WSL2 instead of hyper-v.
Below is my .yaml file. So, the service inside will run in port 4200, so to avoid any kind of confusion I was keeping all the ports in 4200.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: hoopla
spec:
selector:
app: hoopla
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 4200
targetPort: 4200
clusterIP: 10.96.1.3
type: LoadBalancer
status:
loadBalancer:
ingress:
- ip: 192.168.0.144
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: hoopla
name: hoopla
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: hoopla
template:
metadata:
labels:
app.kubernetes.io/name: hoopla
spec:
containers:
- image: pubrepo/myimg:latest
name: hoopla
ports:
- containerPort: 4200
Can anybody help me here to understand what mistake I am making. I basically want to expose this on my system IP address.
The loadBalancer service type require a cloud provider's load Balancer ( https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/ )
LoadBalancer: Exposes the Service externally using a cloud provider's load balancer. NodePort and ClusterIP Services, to which the external load balancer routes, are automatically created
If you want to expose your service to your local machine, use kubernetes service nodePort type for example, and if you just want to test your webapp, you can use the kubernetes service clusterIp type and make a port-forward, for example with your clusterIp service:
kubectl port-forward svc/hoopla 4200:4200
For my current distributed databases project in my studies I should deploy a CockrouchDB Cluster on Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine and run a YCSB Loadtest against it.
The YCSB Client is going to run on another VM so that the results are comparable to other groups results.
Now I need to expose the DB Console on Port 8080 as well as the Database Endpoint on Port 26257.
so far I started changing the cockraochdb-public service to kind: NodePort and exposing its ports using an Ingress. My current Problem is exposing both ports (if possible on their default ports 8080 and 26257) and having them accessible from YCSB.
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: cockroachdb-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.global-static-ip-name: cockroachdb-global-ip
ingress.citrix.com/insecure-service-type: “tcp”
ingress.citrix.com/insecure-port: “6379”
labels:
app: cockroachdb
spec:
backend:
serviceName: cockroachdb-public
servicePort: 26257
rules:
- http:
paths:
- path: /labs/*
backend:
serviceName: cockroachdb-public
servicePort: 8080
- path: /*
backend:
serviceName: cockroachdb-public
servicePort: 26257
So far I just managed to route it to different paths. I'm not sure if this may work, because the JDBC driver used by YCSB is using TCP not http.
How do I expose two ports of one service using an Ingress for TCP?
Focusing on:
How do I expose two ports of one service using an Ingress for TCP?
In general when an Ingress resource is referenced it's for HTTP/HTTPS traffic.
You cannot expose the TCP traffic with an Ingress like the one mentioned in your question.
Side note!
There are some options to use an Ingress controller to pass the TCP/UDP traffic (nginx-ingress).
You could expose your application with service of type LoadBalancer:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: cockroach-db-cockroachdb-public
namespace: default
spec:
ports:
- name: grpc
port: 26257
protocol: TCP
targetPort: grpc # (containerPort: 26257)
- name: http
port: 8080
protocol: TCP
targetPort: http # (containerPort: 8080)
selector:
selector: INSERT-SELECTOR-FROM-YOUR-APP
type: LoadBalancer
Disclaimer!
Above example is taken from cockroachdb Helm Chart with modified value:
service.public.type="LoadBalancer"
By above definition you will expose your Pods to external traffic on ports: 8080 and 26257 with a TCP/UDP LoadBalancer. You can read more about it by following below link:
Cloud.google.com: Kubernetes Engine: Docs: How to: Exposing apps: Creating a service of type LoadBalancer
The YCSB Client is going to run on another VM so that the results are comparable to other groups results.
If this VM is located in GCP infrastructure you could also take a look on Internal TCP/UDP LoadBalancer:
Cloud.google.com: Kubernetes Engine: Using an internal TCP/UDP load balancer
Also I'm not sure about the annotations of your Ingress resource:
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: cockroachdb-ingress
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.global-static-ip-name: cockroachdb-global-ip
ingress.citrix.com/insecure-service-type: “tcp”
ingress.citrix.com/insecure-port: “6379”
In GKE when you are creating an Ingress without specifying the ingress.class you are using: gce controller. The ingress.citrix.com annotations are specific to citrix controller and will not work with gce controller.
Additional resources:
Kubernetes.io: Docs: Ingress
Kubernetes.io: Docs: Service
I am trying to configure ingress resources in kubernetes, I want to know if I can access external resources via kuberntes(Example, I installed kibana in a virtual machine and I want to access through kubernetes ingress as below)
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
name: test-ingress
namespace: default
annotations:
kubernetes.io/ingress.class: "nginx"
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/ssl-redirect: "false"
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/use-regex: "true"
nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/add-base-url: "true"
spec:
rules:
- host: test.com
http:
paths:
- path: "/"
backend:
serviceName: service1
servicePort: 1000
- path: "/test"
backend:
serviceName: service2.test
servicePort: 2000
- path: "/kibana"
backend:
serviceName: <ip-address>
servicePort: 9092
Any suggested is this the right way of calling external resources(or) we cannot initiate a call as it is outside of kubernetes...
I am trying to call as test.com/kibana
Please suggest.
For external resources you should create Endpoints object.
This is explained with Services without selectors
Services most commonly abstract access to Kubernetes Pods, but they can also abstract other kinds of backends. For example:
You want to have an external database cluster in production, but in your test environment you use your own databases.
You want to point your Service to a Service in a different Namespace or on another cluster.
You are migrating a workload to Kubernetes. Whilst evaluating the approach, you run only a proportion of your backends in Kubernetes.
In any of these scenarios you can define a Service without a Pod selector. For example:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: my-service
spec:
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376
Because this Service has no selector, the corresponding Endpoint object is not created automatically. You can manually map the Service to the network address and port where it’s running, by adding an Endpoint object manually:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Endpoints
metadata:
name: my-service
subsets:
- addresses:
- ip: 192.0.2.42
ports:
- port: 9376
So once you add the Endpoint setup a Service for it, you will be able to use is inside Ingress.
I have a spring boot application which is deployed in Kubernetes on local windows machine using minikube. I also have Elasticsearch running on my local machine (http://localhost:9200).
I want to call Elasticsearch REST endpoints from this spring boot app.
I tried solving this by creating a service without selector but not sure what am i missing.
When accessing the spring boot app using http://#minikube_ip#:#Node_Port#, i get an error "No route to host".
i tried doing minikube ssh and executing curl command, from there also i get the same error. Clearly I am missing something here.
application.yaml
elasticsearch:
hosts:
- http://my-es:80
connectTimeout: 10000
connectionRequestTimeout: 10000
socketTimeout: 10000
maxRetryTimeoutMillis: 60000
deployment.yaml
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: kube-es-app
spec:
progressDeadlineSeconds: 600
replicas: 1
revisionHistoryLimit: 10
selector:
matchLabels:
run: kube-es-app
strategy:
rollingUpdate:
maxSurge: 25%
maxUnavailable: 25%
type: RollingUpdate
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
run: kube-es-app
spec:
containers:
- image: elastic-search-app:latest
imagePullPolicy: Never
name: kube-es-app
ports:
- containerPort: 8080
protocol: TCP
resources: {}
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: File
dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
restartPolicy: Always
schedulerName: default-scheduler
securityContext: {}
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
---
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-es
spec:
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9200
---
kind: Endpoints
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-es
subsets:
- addresses:
- ip: <MY_LOCAL_MACHINE_IP>
ports:
- port: 9200
Commands I executed
docker build -t elastic-search-app .
kubectl create -f deployment.yaml
kubectl expose deployment/kube-es-app --type="NodePort" --port 8080
Can anyone help please? I am stuck
If I've got the description right, the Windows machine should have vbox network adapter connected to the Host-only-network the Minikube VM is connected to.
Minikube can access the host machine directly because both are in the same network.
The Minikube is in charge of NAT-ting packages from Pods outside. What you need is to allow Elasticsearch to listen to the vbox- or all interfaces, and enable its port in the Windows firewall. Then the Elasticsearch should be available via IP address of Windows in the Host-only-network.
Apart from that, you might create a service (if you need go by name instead of IP) as discussed here:
Connect to local database from inside minikube cluster,
Minikube:Exposing mysql as a service on localhost.
I have a minikube cluster running on Mac OSX and a simple Spring Boot REST api that connects to Redis and Mongo DB, which I have installed and running locally.
I wish not to run Redis / MongoDb in a Docker container.
I will probably run them remotely in the cloud, therefore I would probably just connect to an external IP address.
What I don't understand is what IP address I should use to connect to my localhost machine.
I start up my Minikube with VM hyperkit.
Edit:
I also tried to start using virtualbox:
minikube start --vm-driver=virtualbox
In my spring boot application, I've configured:
spring.data.mongodb.host = 10.0.2.2
spring.redis.host = 10.0.2.2
But still, I get connection errors:
This works when I run the application locally on my host machine.
For the sake of completeness, this is my yaml file:
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: posts-api
labels:
app: posts-api
env: dev
spec:
type: NodePort
selector:
app: posts-api
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 8083
name: http
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: ReplicationController
metadata:
name: posts-api
spec:
replicas: 1
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: posts-api
spec:
containers:
- name: posts-api
image: kimgysen/posts-api:latest
ports:
- containerPort: 8083
livenessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /health
port: 8083
initialDelaySeconds: 120
timeoutSeconds: 3
I'll give you the answer I gave to someone with the same problem (different tech):
Kubernetes pod unable to connect to rabbit mq instance running locally
Replace the IP and port number, and the Service and Endpoints names as appropriate.