Is it possible to search an account's custom data to find a value contained in an array?
Something like:
?customData.[arrayName].{key}=value
The Stormpath docs don't mention array searching.
Yes, with Stormpath it is totally possible to search for custom data even if the values are stored as an array!
Please note that the field names are simple names, and the values are what are different data types like array, map, string etc... so the query is not as complex as one would think :-)
For example, if I want to store custom data called favoriteColors, which is an array like
"favoriteColors": [ "red", "black", "blue", "white" ]
Notice the field name is just like any other field name. The value is the array.
To search for accounts which have a value red in the favoriteColors array, you just need the normal query syntax:
?customData.favoriteColors=red
The full request (if searching a Directory of accounts), might look like this:
https://api.stormpath.com/v1/directories/<directory_uid>/accounts?customData.favoriteColors=red
You could also do the same search on the Tenant resource to search tenant-wide (across all accounts):
https://api.stormpath.com/v1/tenants/<tenant_uid>/accounts?customData.favoriteColors=red
This query would match an account that contains red in the favoriteColors array. If I changed the query to ?customData.favoriteColors=yellow it would not match unless yellow was also added to the array.
Searching for custom data in an array can definitely be done. The syntax is: customData.{fieldName}\[{index}\]=value where {index} can be the specific index you are looking for, or * if you want to find it anywhere in the array. (Note that the [] characters are escaped with a backslash or the query interpreter gets it confused with a range query.)
If you leave off the index entirely, then \[*\] is implied. More precisely, Stormpath will check for either the value in the fieldName or the value as an element in an array of fieldName. However, syntactic sugar can only work if the array field is the last element in your search. Since you can put literally any JSON object into your custom data, Stormpath cannot check every single possibility. Imagine something like customData.foo.bar.baz.qux=bingo. Stormpath would not try to guess that maybe foo is an array, maybe bar is an array or not, maybe baz is an array or not - only maybe qux is an array or not. So, if you want to search an array of objects, you cannot leave out the \[*\].
Here is an example. I have an account with the custom data:
{
"favoriteThings": [
{
"thing": "raindrops",
"location": "on roses"
},
{
"thing": "whiskers",
"location": "on kittens"
},
{
"thing": "snowflakes",
"location": "on my nose and eye lashes"
}
],
"favoriteColors": [
"blue",
"grey"
]
}
The following queries will yield the following results:
customData.favoriteColors=blue will include this account.
customData.favoriteColors\[1\]=blue will not include this account because blue is not at index 1.
customData.favoriteThings\[*\].thing=whiskers will include this account
customData.favoriteThings\[*\].thing=ponies will not include this account because it does not list ponies as one of his favorite things, but may include other accounts with custom data in the same structure.
customData.favoriteThings.thing=whiskers would not include this account or any other accounts with the same custom data structure because in that case, Stormpath would be looking for a single nested JSON favoriteThings object, not an array.
Related
I'm trying to parse an HTML document into nested set of tags and content. It needs to support arbitrary nesting depth. The object (created in
Python code) looks like:
{
"content": [
"some text about a thing, ",
{"content": "More text with additional set of tags ",
"tags": ["strong"]
}
],
"tags": ["p"]
}
ES seems to dislike this structure, because the content field is of both a text and object type, producing this error; "reason": "mapper [content] of different type, current_type [text], merged_type [ObjectMapper]"
Does anyone have any ideas on how to index this type of object, and also allow for searches on both tags and content? Ideally I'd like to search by tags associated with the ancestors of a given object too. I can reformat it to
{
"content": [
{"content": "some text about a thing, "},
{"content": "More text with a different set of tags ",
"tags": ["strong"]
}
],
"tags": ["p"]
}
But then searching isn't very effective as I need to write content.content:"search string" to get results, which will become hard with multiple levels of nesting.
Why not store the ancestor tags in a separate field? Implementing a nested set will should solve your problem too.
Edit: As requested here comes a example of a nested set
Imagine a tree structure. Every node in this tree has a set of properties like description, or other attributes. Each node holds also a reference to it's parent node. Beside this there are two numbers: left and right position in the tree when traversing with in-depth search:
A(parent:null, left:1, right:12, desc:“root node“)
B(parent:A, left:2, right:3, desc:“left child“)
C(parent:A, left:4, right:11, desc:“right child“)
D(parent:C, left:5, right:6, desc:“foo“)
E(parent:C, left:7, right:10, desc:“bar“)
F(parent:E, left:8, right:9, desc:“baz“)
Calculating all ancenstors of a node is now easy:
ancestors(F for X) = search nodes as N WHERE N.left < X.left AND N.right > X.right
For the node F you'll get [E,C,A]. Ordering them by the left value you'll get the proper order for the ancestors of F.
So now you can use this criteria for the filter query in ES and use a second query for the search in the attributes of filtered nodes.
This structure is very efficient when looking for subtrees, but has downsides when you change the node order/position.
If you need further explanation, please add a comment.
How can I use MS Flow to select an individual object, by value for a specified property, from an array?
Example array:
[
{
item_id: '1234'
},
{
item_id: '4567'
}
]
In the example above, I may only want to work with the first object and the rest of its available properties.
Happy to use the Workflow Definition Language and/or any of the Data Operations actions.
I solved this by using the "Data operations - Filter" action.
Ignore the error in red - it is an array.
My left-hand expression for "item_id" is:
item()?['item_id']
And then I statically enter the item ID I wish to access in the right-hand input.
DocumentNo Item will then be an array itself with only 0 or 1 elements and can be used like so:
body('DocumentNo_Item')?[0]?['label']
Pretty straight forward question, as soon as i use setseries data the visibility my pie chart is no longer visible. I have checked the plot object and the series were updated correctly, however since I do not find a visibility attribute anywhere in the plot object, i am at a loss.
The lack of zingcharts documentation and proper examples does not aid either. Im fairly certain this is a simple scenario to solve, but I've been unable to do so.
zingchart.exec('organismplot', 'setseriesdata', {
"data": [
{
"values":data_update.organisms,
"text":"active",
"background-color":"#2d4962",
"border-width":"1px",
"shadow":0,
"visible":1
},
{
"values":(data_update.totalorganism-data_update.organisms),
"text":"passive",
"background-color":"#2d4962",
"border-width":"1px",
"shadow":0,
"visible":0
}]
I'm a member of the ZingChart team, and I'm happy to help you out!
What is the type of data_update.organisms and data_update.totalorganism-data_update.organisms? Make sure that you are passing a single element array, or if those are simply single values, wrap the variables in brackets to create a single value array for the "values" attribute. E.G.:
"data": [
{
"values":[data_update.organisms], // If data_update.organisms is a single value.
"text":"active",
"background-color":"#2d4962",
"border-width":"1px",
"shadow":0,
"visible":1
},
{
"values":[data_update.totalorganism-data_update.organisms], // Again, single value array.
"text":"passive",
"background-color":"#2d4962",
"border-width":"1px",
"shadow":0,
"visible":0
}
]
I've created a demo using your exact method call, except I've changed the "values" attributes to use a single value array, which are needed for pie charts. Check out the demo here.
I hope that helps. Let me know if you need some more help!
While creating a document that is got from web interface, it does not rightly typecast integer date and other type. for example
{"_id": "<some_object_id>", "name": "hello", "age": "20", "dob": "1994-02-22"}
Since attributes are entered dynamically, their types can not be prejudged. Is there any way I can get them entered from client side, like
{"_id": "<some_object_id>", "name": "hello", "age": "$int:20", "dob": "$date:1994-02-22"}
Any help is highly appreciated.
Since you appear to be concerned about the strings that come in from a form such as a POST, the simple answer is that you cast them in Ruby.
If the field is what you expect to be a number then cast it to an int. And the same goes for dates as well.
Your mongo driver will correctly interpret these and store them as the corresponding BSON types in your MongoDB collection. The same goes in reverse, when you read collection data you will get it back cast into your native types.
"1234".to_i
Date.strptime("{ 2014, 2, 22 }", "{ %Y, %m, %d }")
But that's be basic Ruby part.
Now you could do something like you pseudo-suggested and store your information, not as native types but as strings with some form of type tagging. But see, I just don't see the point as you would have to
Detect the type at some stage and apply the tag
Live with the fact that you just ruined all the benefits of having the native types in the collection. Such as query and aggregation for date ranges and basic summing of values.
And while we seem to be going down the track of the anything type where users just arbitrarily insert data and something else has to work out what type it is, consider the following examples of MongoDB documents:
{
name: "Fred",
values: [ 1, 2, 3, 4],
}
{
name: "Sally",
values: "a"
}
So in Mongo terminology, that document structure is considered bad. Even though Mongo does have a flexible schema concept, this type of mixing will break things. So don't do it, but rather handle in the following way, which is quite acceptable even though the schema's are different:
{
name: "Fred",
values: [ 1, 2, 3, 4],
}
{
name: "Sally",
mystring: "a"
}
The long story short, Your application should be aware of the types of data that are coming in. If you allow user defined forms then your app needs to be able to attach a type to them. If you have a field that could be a string or a Date, then your app need to determine which type it is, and cast it, or otherwise store it correctly.
As it stands you will benefit from re-considering you use case, rather than waiting for something else to work all that out for you.
I'm using the Foursquare API, and I want to extract the "id" value from this hash
[{"id"=>"4fe89779e4b09fd3748d3c5a", "name"=>"Hitcrowd", "contact"=>{"phone"=>"8662012805", "formattedPhone"=>"(866) 201-2805", "twitter"=>"hitcrowd"}, "location"=>{"address"=>"1275 Glenlivet Drive", "crossStreet"=>"Route 100", "lat"=>40.59089895083072, "lng"=>-75.6291255071468, "postalCode"=>"18106", "city"=>"Allentown", "state"=>"Pa", "country"=>"United States", "cc"=>"US"}, "categories"=>[{"id"=>"4bf58dd8d48988d125941735", "name"=>"Tech Startup", "pluralName"=>"Tech Startups", "shortName"=>"Tech Startup", "icon"=>"https://foursquare.com/img/categories/shops/technology.png", "parents"=>["Professional & Other Places", "Offices"], "primary"=>true}], "verified"=>true, "stats"=>{"checkinsCount"=>86, "usersCount"=>4, "tipCount"=>0}, "url"=>"http://www.hitcrowd.com", "likes"=>{"count"=>0, "groups"=>[]}, "beenHere"=>{"count"=>0}, "storeId"=>""}]
When I try to extract it by using ['id'], I get this error can't convert Symbol into Integer. How do I extract the value using ruby? Also, how do I do this for multiple hashes extracting the "id" value each time?
Please pardon my inexperience. Thanks!
It's wrapped in an array, that's what the [ and ] mean on the start and end. But it also looks like this array only one object in it, which is the hash you really want.
So assuming you want the first object in this array:
mydata[0]['id'] # or mydata.first['id'] as Factor Mystic suggests
But usually when an API returns an Array there is a reason (it might return many results instead of just one), and naively plucking the first item from it my not be what you want. So be sure you are getting the kind of data you really expect before hard coding this into your application.
For multiple hashes, if you want to do something with the id (run a procedure of some kind) then
resultsArray.each do |person|
id = person["id"] #then do something with the id
end
If you want to just get an array containing the ids then
resultsArray.map{|person| person["id"]}
# ["4fe89779e4b09fd3748d3c5a", "5df890079e4b09fd3748d3c5a"]
To just grab the one item from the array, see Alex Wayne's answer
To get an array of ids, try: resultsArray.map { |result| result["id"] }