Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
like other languages?
I googled it and came up with
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=bash+specification
which did not list any specifications, just manuals and guides.
Thanks,
IEEE 1003.1 (“POSIX”) defines a standard “Shell Command Language”. You can find the 2016 edition here.
GNU Bash is an implementation of that language, with many extensions. The only specifications for the extended bash language are the bash reference manual and the bash source code.
I would consider the manual to be the spec. Bash Manual
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to find a zsh guide and I notice the guide on the official website hasn't been updated for over a decade. So I'd like to know if there are anything in that guide has been changed and should be skipped when reading, and how many new things has been added during these years. Or are there any more recent guides that I can read instead of the official one?
The official guide probably is outdated.
I would advise you to use the man command. In this case man zsh and the consult the following hyper-links:
Linux Zsh Man Page
The Zsh Wiki
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Ideally there would be a version of Intel's Software Developer's Manuals written in AT&T syntax, but I would be happy to find anything that is close enough.
Sun's manual uses gas syntax, with a correspondence table for the Intel/AMD-sanctioned opcode names (PDF).
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any tool (for win would be fine) which can check my bash syntax,
Im learning the scripting in bash so I need any tool which is capable to checj my scripts if there are any type errors.
Thnaks
See the -n argument to bash:
Read commands but do not execute them. This may be used to check a
shell script for syntax errors. This is ignored by interactive
shells.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Are there any syntax highlighters for LLVM assembly?
None that I know of. But you can always create your own using Notepad++'s User Defined Language framework. See this and that for more details.
There is a highlighting file for Vim. At the very least, you can look up a list of keywords there.
Here it is: https://github.com/Naios/notepad_llvm
To install: download and then Notepad++ > Define your own language... > Import > llvm_ir.xml
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Has anybody made a german version of the GhostDoc template textes?
As far as I am aware, GhostDoc bases its processing on a hard-coded set of parsing rules based on programmer-English conventions. I've written an alternative add-in (AtomineerUtils) which uses an Xml-based rules file that is language independent, so it would be very easy to convert the rules for use in a different language.
For more details, see http://www.atomineerutils.com/