I am trying to containerize my Go applicaton. I am using Docker to do this. I have a fully executable Docker application running in my system. To run this in a container i am have created a Dockerfile.
FROM golang:1.7
EXPOSE "portno"
I have kept my dockerfile very simple because i already have an executable file running in my system. Please help me what all contents should i add to get the go app running. I am not able to run the go app as many of the contents are not getting copied in container.
You need to add your executable file to your container using ADD command:
ADD ./app /go/bin/app
And then you need to tell docker that it should be executed as the main container process:
CMD ["/go/bin/app"]
Note that it may be better to build your application from the source code inside your container. It can be done when you build your docker image.
As an example, see this article for more information: http://thenewstack.io/dockerize-go-applications/
Related
Environment:
Docker on windows
Code in questions: COPY configure_my_app.bat .
Expected: If I run docker build multiple times, I expect the image id to be same from various runs on docker build, given that there is no change in the Dockerfile
What happens: The image id after the above command changes for each run of docker build
I read it somewhere a while ago that this might have something to do with file attributes/permissions. I wonder, how can I get around this ? I want to use layers from cache if Dockerfile is not changed.
I'm studing docker.
docker-compose is known as a role that conveniently runs multiple containers as one script.
First, since Dockerfile only handles one container, is it correct to think that Docker Compose is backwards compatible with Dockerfile?
I thought docker compose could cover everything, but I saw docker compose and docker files used together.
Let's take spring boot as an example.
Can I use only one docker-compose to run the db container required for the application, build the application, check the port being used, and run the jar file?
Or do I have to separate the dockerfils and roles and use the two?
When working with Docker, there are two concepts: Image and Container.
Images are like mini operating systems stored in a file which is built specifically with our application in mind. Think of it like a custom operating system which is sitting on your hard disk when your computer is switched off.
Containers are running instances of your image.
Imagine you had a shared hard disk (or even CD/DVD if you are old school) which had an operating system which can run on multiple machines. The files on the disk are the "image", and those files running on a machine are a "container".
This is how Docker works, you have files on the machine which are known as the image, and running instances of those files are referred to as the container. Images can also be uploaded and shared for other users to download and run on their machine too.
This brings us to Docker vs Docker Compose.
Docker is the underlying technology which manages (creates, stores or shares) images, and runs containers.
We provide the Dockerfile to tell Docker how to create our images. For example, we say: starts from the Python 3 base image, then install these requirements, then creates these folders, then switch to this user, etc... (I'm oversimplifying the actual steps, but this is just to explain the point).
Once we have done that, we can create an image using Docker, by running docker build .. If you run that, Docker will execute each step in our Dockerfile and store the result as an image on the system.
Once the image is build, you can run it manually using something like this:
docker run <IMAGE_ID>
However, if you need to setup volumes, you need to run them like this:
docker run -v /path/to/vol:/path/to/vol -p 8000:8000 <IMAGE_ID>
Often applications need multiple images to run. For example, you might have an application and a database, and you may also need to setup networks and shared volumes between them.
So you would need to write the above commands with the appropriate configurations and ID's for each container you want to run, every time you want to start your service...
As you might expect, this could become complex, tedious and difficult to manage very quickly...
This is where Docker Compose comes in...
Docker Compose is a tool used to define how Docker runs our images in a yaml file which is can be stored with our code and reused.
So, if we need to run our app image as a container, share port 8000 and map a volume, we can do this:
services:
app:
build:
context: .
ports:
- 8000:8000
volumes:
- app/:/app
Then, every time we need to start our app, we just run docker-compose up, and Docker Compose will handle all the complex docker commands behind the scenes.
So basically, the purpose of Docker Compose is to configure how our running service should work together to serve our application.
When we run docker-compose build, Docker Compose will run all the necessary docker build commands, to build all images needed for our project and tag them appropriately to keep track of them in the system.
In summary, Docker is the underlying technology used to create images and run them as containers, and Docker Compose is a tool that configures how Docker should run multiple containers to serve our application.
I hope this makes sense?
I suggest you to go deeper in what docker compose is reading at Difference between Docker Compose Vs Dockerfile.
I report part of what explained in the above article:
A Dockerfile is a simple text file that contains the commands a user could call to assemble an image whereas Docker Compose is a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications.
Docker Compose define the services that make up your app in docker-compose.yml so they can be run together in an isolated environment. It get an app running in one command by just running docker-compose up.Docker compose uses the Dockerfile if one add the build command to your project’s docker-compose.yml. Your Docker workflow should be to build a suitable Dockerfile for each image you wish to create, then use compose to assemble the images using the build command.
About your question, I answer you that docker compose is so flexible that you can fragment your composition logic in multiple yaml files, and combining by the docker compose command line as you need.
Here an example:
# Build the docker infrastructure
docker-compose \
-f network.yaml \
-f database.yaml \
-f application.yaml
build
# Run the application
docker-compose \
-f application.yaml
up
to answer your question of spring boot application. you can build complete application through Compose alone as long as you know sequence and dependency but then question will arise are you using the compose power properly? as #Antonio Petricca already given well described answer for the compose
regarding compose file and DockerFile question: it depends on how you wrote your compose file. technically Both are different.
so in short:
1- Compose and DockerFile are two different things
2- compose can use multiple modular files even DockerFile and that is why it is so popular, you can break logic into multiple modules then use compose to build it. it also help you debug and iterate faster.
Hope its answer your doubt.
I needed to create a Docker image of a Springboot application and I achieved that by creating a Dockerfile and building it into an image. Then, I used "docker run" to bring up a container. This container is used for all the activities for which my application was written.
My problem, however, is that the JAR file that I have used needs constant changes and that requires me to rebuild the Docker image everytime. Furthermore, I need to take the contents of the earlier running Docker container and transfer it into a container created from the newly built image.
I know this whole process can be written as a Shell script and exected every time I have changes on my JAR file. But, is there any tool I can use to somehow automate it in a simple manner?
Here is my Dockerfile:
FROM java:8
WORKDIR /app
ADD ./SuperApi ./SuperApi
ADD ./config ./config
ADD ./Resources ./Resources
EXPOSE 8000
CMD java -jar SuperApi/SomeName.jar --spring.config.location=SuperApi/application.properties
If you have a JAR file that you need to copy into an otherwise static Docker image, you can use a bind mount to save needing to rebuild repeatedly. This allows for directories to be shared from the host into the container.
Say your project directory (the build location where the JAR file is located) on the host machine is /home/vishwas/projects/my_project, and you need to have the contents placed at /opt/my_project inside the container. When starting the container from the command line, use the -v flag:
docker run -v /home/vishwas/projects/my_project:/opt/my_project [...]
Changes made to files under /home/vishwas/projects/my_project locally will be visible immediately inside the container1, so no need to rebuild (and probably no need to restart) the container.
If using docker-compose, this can be expressed using a volumes stanza under the services listing for that container:
volumes:
- type: bind
source: /home/vishwas/projects/my_project
target: /opt/my_project
This works for development, but later on, it's likely you'll want to bundle the JAR file into the image instead of sharing from the host system (so it can be placed into production). When that time comes, just re-build the image and add a COPY directive to the Dockerfile:
COPY /home/vishwas/projects/my_project /opt/my_project
1: Worth noting that it will default to read/write, so the container will also be able to modify your project files. To mount as read-only, use: docker run -v /home/vishwas/projects/my_project:/opt/my_project:ro
You are looking for docker compose
You can build and start containers with a single command using compose.
Windows 10. I have in folder just:
app (directory with many files)
Dockerfile (simpliest docker file)
I run "docker build ." and it just hangs.
If I remove "app" directory. Build runs ok.
In docker file just one line:
FROM node
Didn't find any issues like that. It fills like it tries to scan the directory or something.
Any advice?
UPD: It seems that I should use .dockerignore https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#/dockerignore-file
When you run docker build ... the Docker client sends the context (recursive contents of the directory) via REST to the Docker daemon for building. If that context is large, this could take some time (depending on a variety of factors, if your daemon is local / remote, platform maybe, etc...).
How long are you giving it to hang before giving up? Could be that it's still just working? Or could be that the context was so large maybe the client / daemon experienced an issue. Checking the (client / daemon) logs would help debug that.
And yes, a .dockerignore file (basically a .gitignore but for Docker context) is probably what you're looking for, unless you need the contents of the app directory during your build.
Your Dockerfile should be put in the directory that only includes it's build context. For example, if you are building a spring-boot app, you can put the Dockerfile right under /app, as shown in this official docker sample.
Docker's documentation:
In most cases, it’s best to start with an empty directory as context and keep your Dockerfile in that directory. Add only the files needed for building the Dockerfile.
Warning: Do not use your root directory, /, as the PATH as it causes the build to transfer the entire contents of your hard drive to the Docker daemon.
I've seen that simple docker examples put dockerfile in the root directory, but for complicated examples like the one I posted above, the dockerfile is put only in it's relevant directory. You can dig through the dockersamples repository and find your case.
I'm trying to create my own docker image in a ubuntu-14 system.
My docker file is like the following:
FROM scratch
RUN /bin/bash -c 'echo "hello"'
I got the error message when I run docker build .:
exec: "/bin/sh": stat /bin/sh: no such file or directory
I guess it is because /bin/sh doesn't exist in the base image "scratch". How should I solve this problem?
Docker is basically a containerising tool that helps to build systems and bring them up and running in a flash without a lot of resource utilisation as compared to Virtual Machines.
A Docker container is basically a layered container. In case you happen to read a Dockerfile, each and every command in that file will lead to a creation of a new layer in container and the final layer is what your container actually is after all the commands in the Dockerfile has been executed.
The images available on the Dockerhub are specially optimised for this sort of environment and are very easy to setup and build. In case you are building a container right from scratch i.e. without any base image, then what you basically have is an empty container. An empty container does not understand what /bin/bash actually is and hence it won't work for you.
The Docker container does not use any specifics from your underlying OS. Multiple docker containers will make use of the same underlying kernel in an effective manner. That's it. Nothing else.
( There is however a concept of volumes wherein the container shares a specific volume on the local underlying system )
So in case you want to use /bin/bash, you need a base image which will setup the nitty gritties of this command for your container and then you can successfully execute it.
However, it is recommended that you use official Docker images for say Ubuntu and then install your custom stuff on top of it. The official images are right from the makers and are highly optimised for this environment.
Base image scratch does not use /bin/bash. So you should change to:
FROM ubuntu:14.04
RUN /bin/sh -c 'echo "hello"'