When I am running DrawX sample I have an unrestored package "Realm.Database".
When I am searching this package on Nuget - there are no results.
Is "Realm.Database" removed already and I have to use something different?
SushiHangover, I understand, thank you!
Sorry, as #SushiHangover explained, this is part of an upcoming release. It will be removed from our examples folder to avoid further confusion.
We don't quite manage to commit hourly around-the-clock but the pace of development has been fairly quick in recent time ;-) The rate of API-breaking changes will probably be a lot slower from now on.
Some of the changes have been put in place to support the new Realm Mobile Platform but many were there to help with data binding.
Related
I'm preparing to open source an XCode project I've been working on privately, on Github.
I am planning on using Github's release feature and and tag the initial release as 0.1.0. This much I know.
But I have one question: What's the best practice for the version number and build id of the XCode project itself going forward?
Do I need to update the version/build-id every time raise a version on Github?
Should these numbers be synchronized?
p.s.
I know some people may try to close this saying this is "off topic" for Stackoverflow, but trust me I tried asking everywhere else and nobody answered. And I do think this type of question is relevant to Stackoverflow.
For the 2cd question, whether you need to update the version on GitHub depend on you. If you make huge changes for your code, maybe you can create a new release.
I know that the 5.0 release note say "After the migration, source syntax-highlighting won't be available on a project until it has been successfully analyzed"
BUT, i can't imagine that there is no way to activate just by running another analysis. In fact, when you have thousands of components (it's our case), you can't plan 4500 analysis just to "restore" a basic but helpful functionality ! And it's more true when you know that the majority of theses components wasn't changed since a time ago... :(
So, please, say me that we can write a little batch or program that will do the job without need to pull all the sources ! I don't know how because i don't' understand this limitation of this upgrade (why sources aren't accessible)
You should trust the release notes. Information required for syntax highlighting is computed during analysis. Note that it also requires the language plugins to support this feature. I suggest to upgrade them to latest versions.
I'm using Magento 1.4.1.1 for my webstore. The payment processor supports only 1.4.0.0. I realized this only just now when I was dreaming up of opening the store. Duh! Poor planning.
What's the way out?
Will downgrading help? Wat are the implications of that?
Thanks for any and all inputs.
I am not aware of anyone ever having successfully downgraded Magento. That said, a few considerations:
Are you using version control like you should be? If so, you should have a copy of the site and database from just before the upgrade. You should be able to use this as a starting point. This is your most optimistic route by far.
If no version control, you can download both of the versions and use diff to get the changes. Doing this in reverse theoretically creates a backwards patch.
If you've stayed out of the core code entirely, the code change could be nearly as simple as replacing app/code/core.
Even if you do downgrade the code, the data structures between versions have probably changed, so you'll need someone experienced to find those changes and tell you have to back-patch your database. This is, to say the least, perilous.
Overall, I wouldn't want to undertake this task. As Anton said in the comments, you'll probably have an easier time getting integration done than reverting the changes.
Best of luck!
Thanks,
Joe
I'm new to this so please make allowances.
I'm trying to build Audioslicer which seems to need a framework called IntervalSlider. The IntervalSlider build fails with:
framework not found InterfaceBuilderKit.
However, the framework seems to be present under the Frameworks group with the necessary headers.
Can anyone suggest what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks
Well, this looked interesting so I downloaded the source. I built it and got an entire slew of build errors.
It looks like
According to source forge, this project hasn't been update since 2006-12-04 and the default SDK is still set to 10.4.
This project uses a bunch of uncompiled libraries/frameworks which need to be compiled to work. Some of them may no longer compile now nearly 4 years later and on new hardware/OS.
This is a complex project which mixes, Objective-C, vanilla C and C++, so it's not the kind of project a novice can reasonably expect to get working. (I'm not even sure I could get it updated.)
In short, this looked like a good idea in its day but the project has gone silent, stale and out of date. You'll need to find an alternative unless you want to spend weeks or months (1) learning how to build such a complex project and (2) tracking down all the updated versions of libraries (assuming they exist.)
I advise looking for another solution. Too bad because this looked like a really neat idea. Such is the fate of a most FOSS. It takes too much drudgery coding to keep something like this up to date. All the fun in coding comes from the creation. Maintenance coding is about as fun as washing the dishes. Few are will to undertake such a chore year-in-year-out without pay.
In the future, always check the last project update date. If its more than a year or the before the last major OS rev, expect problems.
i want to port my application to CodeIgniter but i am wondering whether i should use their v2.0 or v1.72 (then when they release 2.0, upgrade it).
i have never used a framework before so i don't exactly know what implies when upgrading a framework: what does it mean practically - i just move the folders and it will work? or do i have to change a lot of settings, file structure etc? could someone enlighten me about the upgrade process.
and what would you use: v.1.72 or v2.0?
if i'm using the latest version, is there a good documentation for it somewhere so you can read about how to use the new features: packages, drivers and so on.
thanks
You can read about some of the changes in 2.0 here.
I would image the upgrade process should be straightforward as long as you do not use any features that are different/removed such as plugins. Just take your models, controllers, etc and drop them into the 2.0 framework. Then regression test you whole app, fixing any problems as you see them...
If you are selling this app or making something mission critical then of course v1.7.2 is the best choice. That said I have PyroCMS running on v2.0 and since some of my bug-fixes were merged it seems stable enough.
One should consider time frames for deployment:
If it is one week, then stick to v1.7.2
If it is three months, go with v2
Assuming three months is approximately to time for a release to stabilise?