I define saiku(3.8) schema as below:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Schema name="Zeus Offline Data" metamodelVersion='4.0'>
<PhysicalSchema>
<Table name="ZEUS_OFFLINE_DATA">
<Key>
<Column name='FB_ACCOUNT_ID'/>
</Key>
</Table>
</PhysicalSchema>
<Cube name="OfflineData">
<Dimensions>
<Dimension name="AdAccount" table="ZEUS_OFFLINE_DATA">
<Attributes>
<Attribute name="account_id" keyColumn="FB_ACCOUNT_ID" hasHierarchy="true"/>
</Attributes>
</Dimension>
<Dimension name="BM" table="ZEUS_OFFLINE_DATA">
<Attributes>
<Attribute name="bm_id" keyColumn="BM_ID" hasHierarchy="true"/>
</Attributes>
</Dimension>
</Dimensions>
<MeasureGroups>
<MeasureGroup name="Stats" table="ZEUS_OFFLINE_DATA">
<Measures>
<Measure name="clicks" column="CLICKS" aggregator="sum" formatString="#,###"/>
</Measures>
<DimensionLinks>
<FactLink dimension="AdAccount"/>
<FactLink dimension="BM"/>
</DimensionLinks>
</MeasureGroup>
</MeasureGroups>
It contains two dimension "bm_id" and "fb_account_id", and one measure "clicks".In database backend, bm_id and fb_account_id are int type. When I make query in Saiku, the result of bm_id and fb_account_id are shown in scientific notation mode, which I don't want.
Result:
bm_id clicks
1.71141391154125E14 1,091,234
Which I want:
171141391154125 1,091,234
I don't know which attribute should be changed for that, any help appreaciated
Thanks
Related
After manually editing the xcdatamodel/content due to a merge conflict I'm able to open and run the project just fine, but I'm unable to toggle the toggle the editor style to show the "object relations diagram"
I'm using Xcode 13.4.1
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<model type="com.apple.IDECoreDataModeler.DataModel" documentVersion="1.0" lastSavedToolsVersion="21279" systemVersion="21G115" minimumToolsVersion="Automatic" sourceLanguage="Swift" userDefinedModelVersionIdentifier="">
<entity name="Foo" representedClassName=".foo" syncable="YES">
...
</entity>
<entity name="Bar" representedClassName=".bar" syncable="YES">
...
</entity>
<entity name="FooBar" representedClassName=".fooBar" syncable="YES">
...
<fetchIndex name="fooie">
<fetchIndexElement property="fooeee" type="Binary" order="ascending"/>
</fetchIndex>
</entity>
<entity name="BarFoo" representedClassName=".barFoo" syncable="YES">
<fetchIndex name="byPropertyIndex">
<fetchIndexElement property="bla bla bla" type="Binary" order="descending"/>
</fetchIndex>
</entity>
<elements>
<element name="Foo" positionX="0" positionY="0" width="0" height="0"/>
<element name="Bar" positionX="0" positionY="0" width="0" height="0"/>
<element name="FooBar" positionX="0" positionY="0" width="0" height="0"/>
<element name="BarFoo" positionX="0" positionY="0" width="0" height="0"/>
</elements>
</model>
Any Idea what is going on here? How can I get xcode to open the object Diagram for this model version?
How do I make the Bag optional for class Test in the following pseudo hbm.xml?
<class name="Test" table="test">
<bag name="bag" table="example" cascade="all" fetch="join">
<key property-ref="key">
<column name="a_id" />
<column name="b_id" />
</key>
<element column="example_id"
type="my.myclass"/>
</bag></class>
my.mclass is a custom type (my.myclass implements org.hibernate.usertype.UserType)
In the moment if there is no fitting "test example" row in the example table I get an exception?
(I was hoping to find a kind of not-found attribute? But there is no)
What's the relationship between Test and myclass? 1 to many or many to many?
If it's 1 to many in your case, I will suggest you create separate mapping for myclass and use following mapping for Test class
<bag name="bag" table="example" inverse="true" cascade="all" fetch="join">
<key property-ref="key">
<column name="a_id" />
<column name="b_id" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="my.myclass"/>
</bag>
Iv'e created a simple Schema in Jaspersoft OLAP designer. Now i want to publish my Cube in a view on jasperreport Server.
I managed to get this to work before with other Schemas but now i don't get any values out of my sum measures...
Can anyone see some Problem in here?
<Schema name="AbsatzView">
<Cube name="Budget" cache="true" enabled="true">
<Table name="vBudgetDetail" schema="dbo" alias="">
</Table>
<Dimension type="TimeDimension" foreignKey="ZeitID" name="GJahr">
<Hierarchy name="" hasAll="false" primaryKey="ID">
<Table name="vBudgetTimes" schema="dbo" alias="">
</Table>
<Level name="Gjahr" column="Gjahr" uniqueMembers="true" levelType="TimeYears">
</Level>
<Level name="Monat" column="Monat" uniqueMembers="false" levelType="TimeMonths">
</Level>
</Hierarchy>
</Dimension>
<Dimension type="StandardDimension" foreignKey="VersionID" name="Aktiv Version">
<Hierarchy hasAll="false" primaryKey="VersionID">
<Table name="vBudgetVersionAktiv" schema="dbo" alias="">
</Table>
<Level name="Version" column="version" type="String" uniqueMembers="false" levelType="Regular">
</Level>
</Hierarchy>
</Dimension>
<Dimension type="StandardDimension" foreignKey="VersionID" name="Vorherige Version">
<Hierarchy name="" hasAll="false" primaryKey="VersionID">
<Table name="vBudgetVersionV1" schema="dbo" alias="">
</Table>
<Level name="Version" column="version" type="String" uniqueMembers="false" levelType="Regular">
</Level>
</Hierarchy>
</Dimension>
<Measure name="Absatz Plan" column="PlanAbsatz" aggregator="sum" visible="true">
</Measure>
<Measure name="Umsatz Plan" column="PlanUmsatzLW" aggregator="sum" visible="true">
</Measure>
</Cube>
</Schema>
I know that this for example this mdx have to give me values in my measures but it's empty and i don't know why?
select {[Measures].[Absatz Plan]} ON COLUMNS,
{[GJahr].[2013], [GJahr].[2014], [GJahr].[2015]} ON ROWS
from [Budget]
If i use the same tables in SQL and asks exact for the same Thing i get correct values
SELECT b.Gjahr,SUM(a.PlanAbsatz) FROM vBudgetDetail a
INNER JOIN vBudgetTimes b ON b.ID = a.ZeitID
GROUP BY b.Gjahr
Try this query
select {[Measures].[Absatz Plan]} ON COLUMNS,
{[GJahr].&[2013], [GJahr].&[2014], [GJahr].&[2015]} ON ROWS
from [Budget]
Or this:
select {[Measures].[Absatz Plan]} ON COLUMNS,
{[GJahr].[GJahr].&[2013], [GJahr].[GJahr].&[2014], [GJahr].[GJahr].&[2015]} ON ROWS
from [Budget]
I have a.wsdl & b.wsdl where a.wsdl imports b.wsdl.
Now I have to customize the schema inside b.wsdl using wsimport and JAXB. but using below customization is giving error that "XPath evaluation of "wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:schema[#targetNamespace='b']" results in an empty target node
I am not able to find a way to customize the inlined schema in imported b.wsdl when generating the client code using wsimport.
<jaxws:bindings node="wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:schema[#targetNamespace='b']"
xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:jaxws="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxws"
xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<jaxb:globalBindings>
<jaxb:javaType name="java.util.Calendar" xmlType="xsd:dateTime"
parseMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.parseDateTime"
printMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.printDateTime" />
</jaxb:globalBindings>
</jaxws:bindings>
A.wsdl
<definitions targetNamespace="a"
xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
xmlns:interface="b">
<import location="b.wsdl" namespace="b"/>
<service name="Service">
<port binding="interface:Binding" name="Port">
<soap:address location="https://localhost/sdk/vpxdService" />
</port>
</service>
</definitions>
B.wsdl
<definitions targetNamespace="b"
xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
xmlns:b="b"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<types>
<schema
targetNamespace="b"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:b="b"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified">
<complexType name="XYZ">
<sequence>
<element name="dynamicType" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" />
<element name="val" type="xsd:anyType" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</types>
</schema>
</definitions>
After going through given website I modified the external binding file to use wsdlLocation="b.wsdl" instead of node="wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/xsd:schema[#targetNamespace='b']" which did the magic.
This will make sure that the inline schema defined in WSDL will customized as required.
<bindings
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl"
version="2.0">
<bindings wsdlLocation="b.wsdl">
<globalBindings>
<javaType name="java.util.Calendar" xmlType="xsd:dateTime"
parseMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.parseDate"
printMethod="javax.xml.bind.DatatypeConverter.printDate"
/>
</globalBindings>
</bindings>
</bindings>
http://fusesource.com/docs/framework/2.1/jaxws/JAXWSCustomTypeMappingOverview.html
Have you tried adding the following attributes to the <jaxws:bindings> element?
xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
and
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
You're referencing the xsd and wsdl namespaces in your xpath expression, but until you define the URI's for them, they won't match up with the URI's in the target documents.
Is it possible to write a single FetchXML query that gets a root entity and multiple children? All I've been able to do is 1:1.
James Wood is correct. Fetch XML is recursive so by using the link entity you can get the information you want.
For example, the following is valid:
<fetch version="1.0" output-format="xml-platform" mapping="logical" distinct="true">
<entity name="account">
<attribute name="name" />
<attribute name="primarycontactid" />
<attribute name="telephone1" />
<attribute name="accountid" />
<order attribute="name" descending="false" />
<link-entity name="contact" from="parentcustomerid" to="accountid" alias="aj">
<attribute name="firstname" />
<attribute name="lastname" />
<attribute name="telephone1" />
<link-entity name="businessunit" from="businessunitid" to="owningbusinessunit" alias="ak">
<attribute name="name" />
<attribute name="address1_line1" />
<attribute name="address1_line2" />
<attribute name="address1_line3" />
<filter type="and">
<condition attribute="name" operator="not-null" />
</filter>
</link-entity>
</link-entity>
</entity>
</fetch>
If your question really is "Is it possible to write a single FetchXML query that gets a SINGLE root entity and multiple children" then the answer is unfortunately no. However if you are able to handle duplicates of root data (For example using the Grouping functionality of an SSRS report) then what you require is entirely possible
Unless I've misunderstood the question this is very possible.
So for example you want to find all the contacts related to a given account. This is represented in Crm by the Parent Customer Lookup on the contact to the account.
<fetch mapping="logical" count="100" version="1.0">
<entity name="account">
<attribute name="name" />
<link-entity name="contact" from="parentcustomerid" to="accountid">
<attribute name="fullname" />
</link-entity>
</entity>
</fetch>
Which gives you a result set that looks like this:
<resultset morerecords="0" paging-cookie="<cookie page="1"><accountid last="{E704FAD6-2D4B-E111-9FED-00155D828444}" first="{AD912122-6B3C-E111-9B37-00155D828444}" /></cookie>">
<result>
<name>RGD Mining Inc</name>
<accountid>{E704FAD6-2D4B-E111-9FED-00155D828444}</accountid>
<accountid.fullname>Bill Miner</accountid.fullname>
</result>
<result>
<name>RGD Mining Inc</name>
<accountid>{E704FAD6-2D4B-E111-9FED-00155D828444}</accountid>
<accountid.fullname>Green</accountid.fullname>
</result>
</resultset>
No, it is not possible.
I'm happy to report that it is possible. I have a solution that worked well for me.
The only caveat is that if you have multiple child accounts you will get multiple results for the parent. For example:
parent 1: child 1
parent 2: child 1
parent 2: child 2
This means that you would then have to run the results through a sorting function, to get either all the children under parents in a multi dimensional array, or get all the accounts as unique entries in a flat array.
Also, this only goes down one level. If your hierarchy is multi-level, this code would need to be modified.
<fetch distinct="false" mapping="logical">
<entity name="account">
<attribute name="name" />
<link-entity name="account" alias="childaccount" to="accountid" from="parentaccountid" link-type="outer">
<attribute name="name" alias="childname" />
</link-entity>
</entity>
</fetch>