I have bunch of test classes and I like to call some of them based on their types or logic. I've created a command class to achive that based on the passed parameters.
The following command should find all the test classes that their names contain "Database" and "Test.php".
sail artisan testsome database
That part works without any issue, and produces an array of classes like:
$tests = ['GeneratedDatabaseFileTest', 'StatedDatabaseFileTest'];
Then I do this to call each class:
foreach ($tests as $testClass) {
Artisan::call("test --filter {$testClass}");
}
But I see this message on the terminal:
PHPUnit 9.5.13 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.
Cannot open file "database".
I also tried to use
exec("sail artisan test --filter {$testClass}");
but it didn't work and said
sh: 1: sail: not found
So, is there a way to run Artisan::call command in Command class, or should I try a different approach to call multiple test classes?
Thanks in advance.
I am using phpunit in connection with jenkins, and I want to skip certain tests by setting the configuration in the XML file phpunit.xml
I know that I can use on the command line:
phpunit --filter testStuffThatBrokeAndIOnlyWantToRunThatOneSingleTest
how do I translate that to the XML file since the <filters> tag is only for code-coverage?
I would like to run all tests apart from testStuffThatAlwaysBreaks
The fastest and easiest way to skip tests that are either broken or you need to continue working on later is to just add the following to the top of your individual unit test:
$this->markTestSkipped('must be revisited.');
If you can deal with ignoring the whole file then
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<phpunit>
<testsuites>
<testsuite name="foo">
<directory>./tests/</directory>
<exclude>./tests/path/to/excluded/test.php</exclude>
^-------------
</testsuite>
</testsuites>
</phpunit>
Sometimes it's useful to skip all tests from particular file based on custom condition(s) defined as php code. You can easily do that using setUp function in which makeTestSkipped works as well.
protected function setUp()
{
if (your_custom_condition) {
$this->markTestSkipped('all tests in this file are invactive for this server configuration!');
}
}
your_custom_condition can be passed via some static class method/property, a constant defined in phpunit bootstrap file or even a global variable.
I am struggling to run a single test method named testSaveAndDrop in the file escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php with phpunit. I tried the following combinations:
phpunit EscalationGroupTest escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php --filter=escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php::testSaveAndDrop
phpunit EscalationGroupTest escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php --filter=EscalationGroupTest.php::testSaveAndDrop
phpunit EscalationGroupTest escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php --filter=EscalationGroupTest::testSaveAndDrop
phpunit EscalationGroupTest escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php --filter=testSaveAndDrop
In each case all test methode in the file escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php are executed. How to select just ONE method instead?
The name of the class is EscalationGroupTest and the version of phpunit is 3.2.8.
The following command runs the test on a single method:
phpunit --filter testSaveAndDrop EscalationGroupTest escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php
phpunit --filter methodName ClassName path/to/file.php
For newer versions of phpunit, it is just:
phpunit --filter methodName path/to/file.php
I prefer marking the test in annotation as
/**
* #group failing
* Tests the api edit form
*/
public function testEditAction()
Then running it with
phpunit --group failing
No need to specify the full path in the command line, but you have to remember removing this before commit, not to clutter the code.
You may also specify several groups for a single test
/**
* #group failing
* #group bug2204
*/
public function testSomethingElse()
{
}
Here's the more generic answer:
If you are sure the method name is unique you can only filter by method name (this works for me)
phpunit --filter {TestMethodName}
However it is safer to specify the file path/reference as well
phpunit --filter {TestMethodName} {FilePath}
Example:
phpunit --filter testSaveAndDrop reference/to/escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php
Quick note: I've noticed that if I have a function named testSave and another function named testSaveAndDrop using command phpunit --filter testSave will also run testSaveAndDrop and any other function that starts with testSave*, it's weird!!
Following command will execute exactly testSaveAndDrop test.
phpunit --filter '/::testSaveAndDrop$/' escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php
Run this inside your project root directory i am using in laravel root directory.
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter 'Your method name'
Example with custom method name.
/** #test //Initilize this for custom method name, without test keyword
*
* Test case For Dashboard When User Not logged In it will redirect To login page
*/
public function only_logged_in_user_see_dashboard()
{
$response = $this->get('/dashboard')
->assertRedirect('/login');
}
Example with test keyword
/**
* A basic test example.
*
* #return void
*/
public function testBasicTest()
{
$this->assertTrue(true);
}
for run phpunit test in laravel by many way ..
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter methodName className pathTofile.php
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter 'namespace\\directoryName\\className::methodName'
for test single class :
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter tests/Feature/UserTest.php
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter 'Tests\\Feature\\UserTest'
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter 'UserTest'
for test single method :
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter testExample
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter 'Tests\\Feature\\UserTest::testExample'
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter testExample UserTest tests/Feature/UserTest.php
for run tests from all class within namespace :
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter 'Tests\\Feature'
for more way run test see more
So, something like this
phpunit --filter 'EscalationGroupTest::testSaveAndDrop' EscalationGroupTest escalation/EscalationGroupTest.php
Without = and with '
https://phpunit.de/manual/3.7/en/textui.html
If you're in netbeans you can right click in the test method and click "Run Focused Test Method".
You Can try this i am able to run single Test cases
phpunit tests/{testfilename}
Eg:
phpunit tests/StackoverflowTest.php
If you want to run single Test cases in Laravel 5.5 Try
vendor/bin/phpunit tests/Feature/{testfilename}
vendor/bin/phpunit tests/Unit/{testfilename}
Eg:
vendor/bin/phpunit tests/Feature/ContactpageTest.php
vendor/bin/phpunit tests/Unit/ContactpageTest.php
The reason your tests are all being run is that you have the --filter flag after the file name. PHPUnit is not reading the options at all and so is running all the test cases.
From the help screen:
Usage: phpunit [options] UnitTest [UnitTest.php]
phpunit [options] <directory>
So move the --filter argument before the test file that you want as mentioned in #Alex and
#Ferid Mövsümov answers. And you should only have the test that you want run.
Given that you
vendor/bin/phpunit --filter=EscalationGroupTest::testSaveAndDrop
If you're using an XML configuration file, you can add the following inside the phpunit tag:
<groups>
<include>
<group>nameToInclude</group>
</include>
<exclude>
<group>nameToExclude</group>
</exclude>
</groups>
See https://phpunit.de/manual/current/en/appendixes.configuration.html
I am late to the party though. But as personal I hate to write the whole line.
Instead, I use the following shortcuts in the .bash_profile file make sure to source .bash_profile the file after adding any new alias else it won't work.
alias pa="php artisan"
alias pu="vendor/bin/phpunit"
alias puf="vendor/bin/phpunit --filter"
Usage:
puf function_name
puf filename
If you use Visual Studio Code you can use the following package to make your tests breeze.
Package Name: Better PHPUnit
Link: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=calebporzio.better-phpunit
You can then set the keybinding in the settings. I use Command + T binding in my MAC.
Now once you place your cursor on any function and then use the key binding then it will automatically run that single test.
If you need to run the whole class then place the cursor on top of the class and then use the key binding.
If you have any other things then always tweek with the Terminal
Happy Coding!
You must use --filter to run a single test method
php phpunit --filter "/::testMethod( .*)?$/" ClassTest ClassTest.php
The above filter will run testMethod alone.
I am newbie to puppet and I wonder how I can pass arguments to the command line. I will explain myself:
This is the command that I'm running (puppet apply):
C:>puppet apply --environment test -l C:\Puppet_logs\log.log C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\code\environments\test\manifests\site.pp
Site.pp:
File { backup => false }
node default {
include 'tn'
}
It means that I am running 'tn' which is one of the modules in my puppet project.
For example,
I have these modules in my puppet project:
tn
ps
av
So to run each module I need to go to this site.pp file and change it to
include 'ps'
or
include 'av'
My question is -
How do I pass these modules as arguments to the puppet apply command?
I know that I can create 3 .pp files that each one contains one module (ps, av, tn)
And then my command will look like:
puppet apply --environment test -l C:\Puppet_logs\log.log C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\code\environments\test\manifests\ps.pp
puppet apply --environment test -l C:\Puppet_logs\log.log C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\code\environments\test\manifests\av.pp
puppet apply --environment test -l C:\Puppet_logs\log.log C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\code\environments\test\manifests\tn.pp
But, I think it's not a good solution..
Is there another way to pass these modules as arguments to the puppet apply?
If I didn't mention - each module is responsible for different actions.
thanks !!!
I know that I can create 3 .pp files that each one contains one module
(ps, av, tn)
[...]
But, I think it's not a good solution.
Why isn't it a good solution? It seems perfectly sensible to me that if you have three different things you want to be able to do, then you have a separate file to use to accomplish each.
Nevertheless, if your modules do not use each other, then you could probably accomplish what you describe by relying on tags. Have your site manifest include all three modules:
File { backup => false }
node default {
include 'tn'
include 'ps'
include 'av'
}
Then use the --tags option to select only one of those modules and all the other classes it brings in:
puppet apply --tags ps --environment test -l C:\Puppet_logs\log.log C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\code\environments\test\manifests\site.pp
A pp file is a class file not a module, a module contains the classes and anything else needed to support/test those classes, take a look at https://puppet.com/docs/puppet/5.5/modules_fundamentals.html.
Look at how modules are laid out on https://forge.puppet.com/
It’s well worth looking at the PDK https://puppet.com/docs/pdk/1.x/pdk.html as it'll build a module for you, you just need to add the classes.
In your case you probably want to create a new module (let’s call it mymodule) and in that module put all your tn.pp ps.pp and av.pp class files under the C:\ProgramData\PuppetLabs\code\environments\test\modules\mymodule\manifests directory.
Then for local testing use the examples pattern, so in your module you’ll have an examples directory and in there you might have a file called ps.pp which would contain include mymodule::ps to include that ps.pp class file.
The aim of the examples directory is to give you a method of passing in parameters for local testing.
Back in your site.pp file you’d apply is with:
Node default {
Include mymodule::ps
}
So now you want to apply different classes to the nodes and there you hit the world of node classification and there are many ways you can do that. In your case I think you’re probably doing this on a small scale so you’d have;
Node psserver.example.com {
Include mymodule::ps
}
Node tnserver.example.com {
Include mymodule::tn
}
Have a look at some of the online training https://puppet.com/learning-training/kits/puppet-language-basics
I'm new to ruby and I'm trying to configure guard to monitor controllers in a nested directory.
Here is the directory structure
/app
/controllers
/manage
/my_controller.rb
Here is the watch expression that should fire when the file my_controller.rb is edited
watch(%r{^app/controllers/(.+)/(.+)_(controller)\.rb$})
{ |m| [
"spec/routing/#{m[2]}_routing_spec.rb",
"spec/#{m[3]}s/#{m[1]}/#{m[2]}_#{m[3]}_spec.rb",
"spec/acceptance/#{m[2]}_spec.rb"]
}
Note that i don't have routing or acceptance tests, I'm just trying to modify the existing controller watch statement to work with the controller in a nested directory. Also, note that I was able to successfully watch the spec file for changes by adding the following line
watch(%r{^spec/.+/.+_spec\.rb$})
Any insight would be appreciated.
Well, #rainkinz had it right. There was a typo in the specfile name that I couldn't see. I used the -d switch when running guard which printed debug statements that brought the error to my attention.