I am trying to set up multiplier in one of the forms. I have followed all the articles and I think I have the setting right regarding multiplier content. Now I need help with setting up two tables to save the data.
My first table will have all the fields and a foreign key which will point to multiplier data.
Form design:
Setup:
Your first table can be set up using the settings in the ChronoForms Create Table dialogue, but you should leave out the columns for the three multiplier elements.
The second table needs to have columns for an auto-incremented primary key plus a column for the record id from the first table plus the three multiplier elements. You could create this from the Create Table dialogue by manually editing the settings, or, if you prefer, you can use PHPMySQL or some similar database editor.
Bob
Related
I am implementing a 'form on a table' that will allow the end-user to create records in the database. I would like to generate the primary key for the underlying table based on the selections the user makes as well as the underlying sequence.
The basic formula for the primary key should be a concatenation of the 'disposal site code' + 'year of study' + str(sequence). The sequence is should start at and increment by 1 so that the first project created in the database end with -1 and the nth with -n.
For example if the user selects the 'Disposal Site' as 'Seldom', the field 'Disposal Site Code' should be dynamically populated by 'CA-AT-D130' (a 1:1 code alphanumerical code for each site) and after selecting the year, for example 2022, the project number would dynamically be populated as CA-AT-D130-2022-01 (assuming first entry in the table). After creating the new record CA-AT-D130-2022-01 would become the 'project number'.
Can anyone recommend the idiomatic way to do this in APEX? I have a feeling what I am needlessly complicated something that should be relatively straightforward.
There are 2 ways of doing this that are a lot simpler than what you are trying. There is no reason at all to use a dynamic action, this can just be done using apex page processing.
option 1: in the database: Create an trigger on the table that sets the primary key column based on the other column values & sequence
option 2: in apex: Create an after submit computation on the page item to compute the value based on the other page item values & the sequence.
option 3: what I would do instead:
In my personal opinion this isn't a good option for a primary key. The primary key should just be a unique row identifier with no business value. Just use an identity column for that and no additional work is needed in db or apex.
Sounds like you want to capture business information in the key. Well... make that a "pseudo-primary key" and store that information in a column with a unique index in your database. Or, use a virtual column in your table that calculates this value from the primary key column and the other columns you need.
I created a view for a client-independent customizing table. The primary key consists of three components - first one being a secondary key on a check table. It is also used to form subsets of the table data. Altogether, it looks something like this:
Column Key
------ --------
frmd Secondary check table and Subset
attr1 KEY
attr2 KEY
url
But everytime I try to insert a new key combination, the view dumps with DATA_LENGTH_0 CX_SY_RANGE_OUT_OF_BOUNDS, because the report tries to access a string. Apparently it is somehow related to the field generictrp being set. What does this flag tell me and how do I change it? Also non-key components like url are not being fetched - the column is totally empty.
Modifying the customizing table via transaction SM30 works fine, but I don't want that ugly first column.
I've tried to recreate the view multiple times and I also compared the settings with existing customizing views.
Access is set to read,change, delete and insert
Display/Maintenance is allowed
Selecting everything from the View with SELECT works fine
EDIT
Picture 1: what I have
Picture 2: what I want; without the first key column...
The most likely reason I faced this problem, is that I had a foreign key of type i. I changed the type to n and regenerated everything.
Seems to work for now.
I have looked for an answer here among other places but havent quite been able to find what I need to know.
I have 3 tables, Order_Details, Products_Ordered and Product_Details. The first two are being used in a master detail form to show the order and the items ordered together. The Products_Ordered table has a composite primary key made from two foreign keys, the first being the primary key from the Order_Details table, and the second being the primary key from the Product_Details table. Together they ensure that a type of product can only be added to an order once. If someone wants to order more than one product then the quantity field in the record can be altered to reflect this. All that seems fine so far.
My issue is that when adding products to the order in the master detail form i have used a drop down list of values to select the product to add to the order. the display value for this is the product name and the return value for it is the primary key for the product from the Product_Details table.
I like this because its easier for the user to simply select the product and add a quantity of it to the table. And it works fine for both insert and update operations apart from one situation.
If the user selects the same product in to rows then submits the table the database then tries to add the product to the order twice, throwing a "ORA-00001: unique constraint violated." error. Obviously this is because of the product ID being used in the primary key of the table.
I don't want to allow the user to add two records to the table like that, rather id like to force them to alter the quantity field accordingly. The error message that comes up isn't very user friendly so my question is how can I detect this error and display a more user friendly one instead telling them to alter the quantity field instead?
*If this isn't possible then is there a way that I can hide any already selected products from the dropdown list of values in the following table rows? I haven't looked into this too much because surely it would get complicated when the user tries to add more rows than products available in the dropdown and there are no more products values to show?
I am quite new to this so please be nice. Any help is greatly appreciated :D
Here is a link where all is nicely described:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/A97630_01/appdev.920/a96624/07_errs.htm
Section
Predefined PL/SQL Exceptions
in combination with:
Defining Your Own PL/SQL Exceptions
and
Defining Your Own Error Messages: Procedure RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR
Hope it helps...
I have a database which I've opened in phpMyAdmin. I clicked the "Insert" button, which has an icon showing one row being inserted between two others.
When I actually try to insert a row, I get the following error:
1062 - Duplicate entry '294' for key 'PRIMARY'
How do I get phpMyAdmin to insert a row (presumably by increasing all the higher-numbered rows by 1) as the icon and the term "Insert" implies? It only seems to want to "Add" a row to the end, not "Insert" it.
As I said, the icon specifically shows one row being inserted between two others, and this is what I want to do. How do I get it to do what it claims it will do?
First, "INSERT" is standard SQL terminology for putting something in the database; it doesn't specifically mean "putting it between two existing values". I see how the icon can be a bit confusing, but when "insertting" data there is no difference between putting something at the end or in the middle of the database. For that matter, there's no real inherent order to data stored in a database; you can select many different ways to sort it when you display the data (and phpMyAdmin generally does a good job of guessing what's reasonable), but data just exists. You can select to sort it by the primary key or alphabetically by user name or any means you wish.
Second, your primary key shouldn't change. It's the key that holds your data together; if you start changing that your references from other tables will be messed up (see below). So don't change that.
Third, if you have your primary key set up with auto_increment (the A_I checkbox in phpMyAdmin), then you shouldn't ever need to set it or worry about it yourself. It's all managed by MySQL. If you aren't happy with the order and want to move 294 to 295 so you can insert something else at 294, then your database design needs tweaking because that's not how auto_incrementing primary keys are designed to work. As a simple solution, you may wish to create another field called "sort_value" or something that you can change.
Which all brings me to the root cause of your trouble: you're trying to create a new row while reusing an existing auto_increment value, and MySQL is smart enough to know this is a bad idea.
So as I said above, changing your primary key (whether or not it's auto generated) is a bad idea, but it may not be obvious why if you only have one table. But relational databases are designed so that you can reference tables from other tables, so for instance a customer database might have a table for "customers", "products", and "purchases" where the purchases table references the primary key ID from both customers and products...imagine the carnage your data would see if you then change the value of those keys in the customer table. You'd show customers associated with some other customer's purchases. So it might not make sense in your database, but overall that's the best way to handle things.
If you really, really don't want to change your database structure, don't reference that key from any other tables, and don't want to listen to my advice, you should be able to simply turn off the auto_increment function on your primary key and reorder them however you wish.
This is my first post ever and haven't come across any other questions related to this. I am attempting to try and create a hybrid validation type and add it to an existing oracle form. We have a super/subset type of thing going on. When one chooses something from a dropdown, there are 5 options. If 4 of those options are chosen, the data is pulled from one validation table dataset, table A. If the other option is chosen, it comes from a different table's dataset, table B. These (along with others items) are saved in Table C. Table C has a FK constraint regarding these validations. I have added another column to table C to attempt to bypass the FK constraint, but the field still tries to save in the FK column. I can't seem to figure out if I need to add a database trigger, an item level trigger, or a form level trigger to reroute the data to correct columns in the database. Thanks in advance for any help!
If your items are select lists, you would use an item level trigger (when-validate-item) on the superset list item to populate/repopulate the list for the subset item.
Alternatively, you could use a popup LOV on the subset item which has a query which is filtered by the value of the superset item.