Writing parquet data can be done with something like the following. But if I'm trying to write to more than just one file and moreover wanting to output to multiple s3 files so that reading a single column does not read all s3 data how can this be done?
AvroParquetWriter<GenericRecord> writer =
new AvroParquetWriter<GenericRecord>(file, schema);
GenericData.Record record = new GenericRecordBuilder(schema)
.set("name", "myname")
.set("favorite_number", i)
.set("favorite_color", "mystring").build();
writer.write(record);
For example what if I want to partition by a column value so that all the data with favorite_color of red goes in one file and those with blue in another file to minimize the cost of certain queries. There should be something similar in a Hadoop context. All I can find are things that mention Spark using something like
df.write.parquet("hdfs:///my_file", partitionBy=["created_year", "created_month"])
But I can find no equivalent to partitionBy in plain Java with Hadoop.
In a typical Map-Reduce application, the number of output files will be the same as the number of reduces in your job. So if you want multiple output files, set the number of reduces accordingly:
job.setNumReduceTasks(N);
or alternatively via the system property:
-Dmapreduce.job.reduces=N
I don't think it is possible to have one column per file with the Parquet format. The internal structure of Parquet files is initially split by row groups, and only these row groups are then split by columns.
Related
I have number of small files generated from Kafka stream so I like merge small files to one single file but this merge is based on the date i.e. the original folder may have number of previous files but I only like to merge for given date files to one single file.
Any suggestions?
Use something like the code below to iterate over the smaller files and aggregate them into a big one (assuming that source contains the HDFS path to your smaller files, and target is the path where you want your big result file):
val fs = FileSystem.get(spark.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration)
fs.listStatus(new Path(source)).map(_.getPath.toUri.getPath).
foreach(name => spark.read.text(name).coalesce(1).write.mode(Append).text(target))
This example assumes text file format, but you can just as well read any Spark-supported format, and you can use different formats for source and target, as well
you should be able to use .repartition(1) to write all results to 1 file. if you need to split by date, consider partitionBy("your_date_value") .
if you're working within HDFS and S3, this may also be helpful. you might actually even use s3-dist-cp and stay within HDFS.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/seven-tips-for-using-s3distcp-on-amazon-emr-to-move-data-efficiently-between-hdfs-and-amazon-s3/#5
There's a specific option to aggregate multiple files in HDFS using a --groupBy option based n a regular expression pattern. So if the date is in the file name, you can group based on that pattern.
You can develop a spark application. Using this application read the data from small files and create dataframe and write dataframe to big file in append mode.
I've got a pig job that analyzes a large number of log files and generates a relationship between a group of attributes and a bag of IDs that have those attributes. I'd like to store that relationship on HDFS, but I'd like to do so in a way that is friendly for other Hive/Pig/MapReduce jobs to operate on the data, or subsets of the data without having to ingest the full output of my pig job, as that is a significant amount of data.
For example, if the schema of my relationship is something like:
relation: {group: (attr1: long,attr2: chararray,attr3: chararray),ids: {(id: chararray)}}
I'd really like to be able to partition this data, storing it in a file structure that looks like:
/results/attr1/attr2/attr3/file(s)
where the attrX values in the path are the values from the group, and the file(s) contain only ids. This would allow me to easily subset my data for subsequent analysis without duplicating data.
Is such a thing possible, even with a custom StoreFunc? Is there a different approach that I should be taking to accomplish this goal?
I'm pretty new to Pig, so any help or general suggestions about my approach would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Multistore wasn't a perfect fit for what I was trying to do, but it proved a good example of how to write a custom StoreFunc that writes multiple, partitioned output files. I downloaded the Pig source code and created my own storage function that parsed the group tuple, using each of the items to build up the HDFS path, and then parsed the bag of ids, writing one ID per line into the result file.
how to work on specific part of cvs file uploaded into HDFS ?
I'm new in Hadoop and i have an a question that is if i export an a relational database into cvs file then uploaded it into HDFS . so how to work on specific part (table) in file using MapReduce .
thanks in advance .
I assume that the RDBMS tables are exported to individual csv files for each table and stored in HDFS. I presume that, you are referring to column(s) data within the table(s) when you mentioned 'specific part (table)'. If so, place the individual csv files into the separate file paths say /user/userName/dbName/tables/table1.csv
Now, you can configure the job for the input path and field occurrences. You may consider to use the default Input Format so that your mapper would get one line at time as input. Based on the configuration/properties, you can read the specific fields and process the data.
Cascading allows you to get started very quickly with MapReduce. It has framework that allows you to set up Taps to access sources (your CSV file) and process it inside a pipeline say to (for example) add column A to column B and place the sum into column C by selecting them as Fields
use BigTable means convert your database to one big table
Does mapreduce and any of the other hadoop technologies (HBase, Hive, pig etc) lend themselves well to situations where you have multiple input files and where data needs to be compared between the different datasources.
In the past I've written a few mapreduce jobs using Hadoop and Pig. However these tasks were quite simple since they involved manipulating only a single dataset. The requirements we have now, dictates that we read data from multiple sources and perform comparisons on various data elements on another datasource. We then report on the differences. The datasets we are working with are in the region of 10million - 60million records and so far we haven't manage to make these jobs fast enough.
Is there a case for using mapreduce in order to solve such issues or am I going down the wrong route.
Any suggestions are much appreciated.
I guess I'd preprocess the different datasets into a common format (being sure to include a "data source" id column with a single unique value for each row coming from the same dataset). Then move the files into the same directory, load the whole dir and treat it as a single data source in which you compare the properties of rows based on their dataset id.
Yes, you can join multiple datasets in a mapreduce job. I would recommend getting a copy of the book/ebook Hadoop In Action which addresses joining data from multiple sources.
When you have multiple input files you can use MapReduce API FileInputFormat.addInputPaths() in which can take a comma separated list of multiple files, as below:
FileInputFormat.addInputPaths("dir1/file1,dir2/file2,dir3/file3");
You can also pass multiple inputs into a Mapper in hadoop using Distributed Cache, more info is described here: multiple input into a Mapper in hadoop
If i am not misunderstanding you are trying to normalize the structured data in records, coming in from several inputs and then process it. Based on this, i think you really need to look at this article which helped me in past. It included How To Normalize Data Using Hadoop/MapReduce as below:
Step 1: Extract the column value pairs from the original data.
Step 2: Extract column-value Pairs Not In Master ID File
Step 3: Calculate the Maximum ID for Each Column in the Master File
Step 4: Calculate a New ID for the Unmatched Values
Step 5: Merge the New Ids with the Existing Master IDs
Step 6: Replace the Values in the Original Data with IDs
Using MultipleInputs we can do this.
MutlipleInputs.addInputPath(job, Mapper1.class, TextInputFormat.class,path1);
MutlipleInputs.addInputPath(job, Mapper2.class, TextInputFormat.class,path2);
job.setReducerClass(Reducer1.class);
//FileOutputFormat.setOutputPath(); set output path here
If both classes have a common key, then they can be joined in reducer and do the necessary logics
how do we design mapper/reducer if I have to transform a text file line-by-line into another text file.
I wrote a simple map/reduce programs which did a small transformation but the requirement is a bit more elaborate below are the details:
the file is usually structured like this - the first row contains a comma separated list of column names. Second and the rest of the rows specify values against the columns
In some rows the trailing column values might be missing ex: if there are 15 columns then values might be specified only for the first 10 columns.
I have about 5 input files which I need to transform and aggregate into one file. the transformations are specific to each of the 5 input files.
How do I pass contextual information like file name to the mapper/reducer program?
Transformations are specific to columns so how do I remember the columns mentioned in the first row and then correlate and transform values in rows?
Split file into lines, transform (map) each line in parallel, join (reduce) the resulting lines into one file?
You can not rely on the column info in the first row. If your file is larger than a HDFS block, your file will be broken into multiple splits and each split handed to a different mapper. In that case, only the mapper receiving the first split will receive the first row with column info and the rest won't.
I would suggest passing file specific meta data in separate file and distribute it as side data. Your mapper or reducer tasks could read the meta data file.
Through the Hadoop Context object, you can get hold of the name of the file being processed by a mapper. Between all these, I think you have all the context information you are referring to and you can do file specific transformation. Even though the transformation logic is different for different files, the mapper output needs to have the same format.
If you using reducer, you could set the number of reducers to one, to force all output to aggregate to one file.