I've got a software i'm working on that pulls in emails from an exchange account. I use the ItemId.UniqueId to save to db. This allows me to check all incoming messages to see if they've been processed before.
The problem is that i'm seeing some messages come in twice. I can't work out why, though i can see that the UniqueId is different, so it's been updated.
I know if you move an email to a folder it give is a new UniqueId - which will then look like a new message...
Is there a way that I can get around this? Is there an ID that doesn't change?
PidTagSearchKey https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/cc815908.aspx doesn't change be isn't guaranteed to be unique (see table in doc) eg if somebody copies a Message between folders then the PidTagSearchKey will be the same, but for what you want to use it for it should do the trick.
Related
I am trying to push a event towards GA3, mimicking an event done by a browser towards GA. From this Event I want to fill Custom Dimensions(visibile in the user explorer and relate them to a GA ID which has visited the website earlier). Could this be done without influencing website data too much? I want to enrich someone's data from an external source.
So far I cant seem to find the minimum fields which has to be in the event call for this to work. Ive got these so far:
v=1&
_v=j96d&
a=1620641575&
t=event&
_s=1&
sd=24-bit&
sr=2560x1440&
vp=510x1287&
je=0&_u=QACAAEAB~&
jid=&
gjid=&
_u=QACAAEAB~&
cid=GAID&
tid=UA-x&
_gid=GAID&
gtm=gtm&
z=355736517&
uip=1.2.3.4&
ea=x&
el=x&
ec=x&
ni=1&
cd1=GAID&
cd2=Companyx&
dl=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.nl%2F&
ul=nl-nl&
de=UTF-8&
dt=example&
cd3=CEO
So far the Custom dimension fields dont get overwritten with new values. Who knows which is missing or can share a list of neccesary fields and example values?
Ok, a few things:
CD value will be overwritten only if in GA this CD's scope is set to the user-level. Make sure it is.
You need to know the client id of the user. You can confirm that you're having the right CID by using the user explorer in GA interface unless you track it in a CD. It allows filtering by client id.
You want to make this hit non-interactional, otherwise you're inflating the session number since G will generate sessions for normal hits. non-interactional hit would have ni=1 among the params.
Wait. Scope calculations don't happen immediately in real-time. They happen later on. Give it two days and then check the results and re-conduct your experiment.
Use a throwaway/test/lower GA property to experiment. You don't want to affect the production data while not knowing exactly what you do.
There. A good use case for such an activity would be something like updating a life time value of existing users and wanting to enrich the data with it without waiting for all of them to come in. That's useful for targeting, attribution and more.
Thank you.
This is the case. all CD's are user Scoped.
This is the case, we are collecting them.
ni=1 is within the parameters of each event call.
There are so many parameters, which parameters are neccesary?
we are using a test property for this.
We also got he Bot filtering checked out:
Bot filtering
It's hard to test when the User Explorer has a delay of 2 days and we are still not sure which parameters to use and which not. Who could help on the parameter part? My only goal is to update de CD's on the person. Who knows which parameters need to be part of the event call?
We are working on an application in the compliance/monitoring space where we are monitoring the activity of an individual. Because of this, we want to pull EVERYTHING in a user's Office 365 mailbox - if it has text the user wrote or received, we want it if it is there, even if it was deleted, purged, etc.
We are using the Graph API and have an existing implementation that uses the standard "messages" GET command:
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/messages
We are making use of the GraphApiClient (Microsoft.Graph v1.9.0), so the code actually looks like this:
IUserMessagesCollectionPage pageOfMessages = _graphClient.Users[userId].Messages.Request(options).Top(batchSize).Expand("attachments").GetAsync().Result;
However, at the very least this does not return any items from any of the RecoverableItems folders. After looking into it, I am now suspicious that there might be other folders that are not returned by this command either. There is quite the list of Well-known folder names and I'm not sure what others might not be included in a generic Messages request.
Based on this post, I know you can request the messages in the missing folders by WellKnownFolderName one at a time like this:
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/MailFolders/RecoverableItemsDeletions/messages
It even works with the GraphApiClient:
IMailFolderMessagesCollectionPage pageOfMessages = _graphClient.Users[userId].MailFolders["RecoverableItemsDeletions"].Messages.Request(options).Top(batchSize).Expand("attachments").GetAsync().Result;
The problems with this are:
I don't know how to build a comprehensive list of every folder that has messages for the user
Some of the folders (like RecoverableItemsDeletions and ArchiveRecoverableItemsDeletions, for example) can contain duplicates so I would need to use a dictionary to get rid of the duplicates
It would be a lot more expensive to first build a list of relevant folders and then request their contents and their childrens' contents one request at a time.
At scale, a folder-by-folder implementation could be subject to throttling (if we are monitoring enough users with big enough mailboxes)
Does anyone know the best way to do this? Thanks!
In my project I have the following code snippet
if(strcmp(msg->getName(),"failedAck") == 0 || ......)
{
msg->removeControlInfo();
msg->setControlInfo(info);
recvControls++;
sendDirect(msg, table, "ackIn");
}
Essentially the a message arrives at its final destination (lets call it A*), and if it is a type of specified messages, it is sent to another module (B*) which uses the information it carries to perform an operation.
The problem I am having is that after sending the message to the other B*, I delete the message after I am done using it. However, it still appears as part of A* when I look in the inspector. And when I try and delete the message in A* I get an error message saying can't delete the message because it is currently scheduled.
I can't figure out why this happens, Does this mean that sendDirect() does not change the ownership of the message (contrary to the manual)?
Help in this matter will be greatly appreciated, currently dealing with memory management issues in my simulation, and this is a part of it.
I would like to withdraw this question and say thanks to everyone who looked at it. I just recently discovered that the items were being deleted when they were supposed to be. however, i had forgotten that i was making a clone of the object for other uses, that why it was showing up in the inspector. My apologies.
My pipedrive deals are sorted in different pipeline that I can find easily with this kind of request :
api.pipedrive.com/v1/pipelines/ID_PIPELINE?api_token=######
So what I was doing until now is to send data to
api.pipedrive.com/v1/organizations
api.pipedrive.com/v1/persons
api.pipedrive.com/v1/deals
api.pipedrive.com/v1/notes
And I send it to the user info#, which is link to a form type "contact-us"
What happen is that it goes by default to the primary pipeline, associated to info#
We created a second pipeline, also associated to info# and when I am sending organizations / persons etc, I am asked if it's possible to send it directly into the new pipeline instead of the "default one".
Like api.pipedrive.com/v1/pipelines/ID_PIPELINE/organizations?api_token=######
etc
At the moment I haven't find a clue about it, I wanted confirmation.
I get it now. You can't add a deal straight to a Pipeline. But you can do so in Stage.
So what I did was get the specific Pipeline and then get the first Stage in its list and then use that Stage ID to add the Deal in.
PS. I'm going to improve this answer later. But basically that's the gist of how to achieve what you want to do.
A web application sends an email on behalf of a UserA to UserB, using the new Gmail API (Users.messages: send).
The synchronous response contains threadId, messageId which are stored in the database.
We then query the history API for any changes in user's inbox (Users.history: list).
Is there an efficient way to get all the updates since last sync (new replies, read/unread changes)?
One implementation that we tried was to filter the history API results through a custom label. Unfortunately, we noticed that once a thread/message is tagged with a specific label any subsequent responses are not labeled automatically and new replies are not included in the history API response.
A second approach was to query threads using gmail advanced search for a particular label and date (e.g. after:2014/08/29 label:MY_LABEL). The problem was that gmail does not return threads that were created before 2014/08/29 but had a reply on that date.
Any scalable suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Not sure I understand here, users.history.list was made exactly for this. Given a previous historyId, you can then call history.list(previousHistoryid), iterate through the results to find all the message Ids that have been updated since the previous historyId. Then call messages.get() on all of those--for any messages you already knew about you can just call format=MINIMAL (to see label updates), and for new messages you can use a different format to get the message content if you need it.