I am trying to use leaks tool in osx for detecting memory leaks in C++ code I have.I am executing as below:
leaks <pid>
but I couldn't get the way like valgrind does (I.e) collecting the reports till I end the process.With above command, leaks tool terminates in few seconds reporting no leak. I am missing something on how to use this tool. Anybody has any suggestions?
Also, my requirement is to get some memory leak detection in macbook for an application from command line tool like valgrind.So, I am going with leaks tool. If anyone has any other tool known, please let me know.
Related
I have a program that runs under windows. I only have the binary and no symbol information, and I have VS2008. When I run this program, it hangs for around 60 seconds doing something, and I would like to understand what it is doing. Under Linux, I would use ltrace, strace and gdb, but on Windows I have no experience whatsoever.
I found Process Monitor to solve my problem. It's a very nice program with great filtering capabilities.
I am doing some analysis work on some software we are running where I work. The software seems to have memory issues some where along the line which are proving difficult to track down. We have decided to use Sysinternals VMMap to track the memory being used by the software.
We have VMMap exporting the usage every 20 seconds using Windows scheduler to launch a batch script which pulls back the target process PID and launches VMMap with it. The process runs for a while, output appearing the out directory but after a while it stops. Windows scheduler reports the job ran fine and will start another instance when the trigger is meant, once again with no output.
After a bit of investigation it looks like VMMap is failing to open the process and is trying to report an error through its GUI. Since we are running in batch, we cannot see this error to dismiss it. This is causing numerous process' to be spawned but not actually doing anything.
Has anyone come across this issue when using VMMap, or know of anything that may help? I am thinking there may be some flag I can pass which suppresses messages or maybe some way I can handle it in the batch but Google hasn't helped nor has the Sysinternals forum. Any help would be really appreciated.
VMMap is a GUI tool, so trying to capture its output in an automated way will be difficult. Instead, try using another SysInternals tool, Handle, that captures a lot of the same information, but exports/reports on it in command line, where it can be captured much easier. Alternatively, don't run the output in an auto-repeating way when using VMMap, but instead have your script somehow detect the error or missing expected results/data and stop so the GUI output can be examined.
All Sysinternals tools do pop up a consent dialog for the first time they are started on a new machine to accept their license. I think you did deploy the tool to a production machine and it was trying to show the consent dialog but nobody did press ok.
They do basically create a registry key on the machine which you can fake if you need a fully automated deployement or you can start in once on the target machine for the user in question.
I have a timing bug in my application which only occurs when I use valgrind, because valgrind slows down the process so much.
(it's actually a boost::weak_ptr-exception that I cannot localize)
Now I wonder how to reproduce the bug with gdb. I don't see a way to combine gdb + valgrind.
Thanks.
You can start gdb when an error is detected by valgrind (--db-attach=yes). Even if the exception doesn't trigger a memory error at the moment, it's easy to fake a bad memory access in that path.
Well, fortunately I haven't written many applications that cause a BSOD but I just wonder about the usefullness of the information on this screen. Does it contain any useful information that could help me to find the error in my code? If so, what do I need, exactly?
And then, the system restarts and probably has written some error log or other information to the system somewhere. Where is it, what does it contain and how do I use it to improve my code?
I did get a BSOD regularly in the past when I was interacting with a PBX system where the amount of documentation of it's drivers were just absent, so I had to do some trial-and-error coding. Fortunately, I now work for a different company and don't see any BSOD's as a result of my code.
If you want a fairly easy way to find out what caused an OS crash that will work ~90% of the time - assuming you have a crash dump available - then try the following:
Download WinDbg as part of the Debugging tools for Windows package. Note, you only need to install the component called Debugging Tools for Windows.
Run WinDbg
Select "Open Crash Dump" from the file menu
When the dump file has loaded type analyze -v and press enter
WinDbg will do an automated analysis of the crash and will provide a huge amount of information on the system state at the time of the crash. It will usually be able to tell you which module was at fault and what type of error caused the crash. You should also get a stack trace that may or may not be helpful to you.
Another useful command is kbwhich prints out a stack trace. In that list, look for a line contains .sys. This is normally the driver which caused the crash.
Note that you will have to configure symbols in WinDbg if you want the stack trace to give you function names. To do this:
Create a folder such as C:\symbols
In WinDbg, open File -> Symbol File Path
Add: SRV*C:\symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols
This will cache symbol files from Microsoft's servers.
If the automated analysis is not sufficient then there are a variety of commands that WinDbg provides to enable you to work out exactly what was happening at the time of the crash. The help file is a good place to start in this scenario.
Generally speaking, you cannot cause a OS crash or bug check from within your application code. That said, if you are looking for general tips and stuff, I recommend the NTDebugging blog. Most of the stuff is way over my head.
What happens when the OS crashes is it will write a kernel dump file, depending on the current flags and so on, you get more or less info in it. You can load up the dump file in windbg or some other debugger. Windbg has the useful !analyze command, which will examine the dump file and give you hints on the bucket the crash fell into, and the possible culprits. Also check the windbg documentation on the general cause of the bug check, and what you can do to resolve it.
I have big system that make my system crash hard. When I boot up, I don't even have
a coredump. If I log every line that
get executed until my system goes down. I will find that evil code.
Can I log every source code line in GDB to a file?
UPDATE:
ok, I found the bug. It was nasty. The application I started did not
take the system down. After learning about coredump inspection with mdb, and some gdb stepping I found out that the systemcall causing the dump, was not implemented. Updating the system to latest kernel will fix my problem. Thanks to all of you.
MY LESSON:
make sure you know what process causes the coredump. It's not always the one you started.
Sounds like a tricky little problem.
I often try to eliminate as many possible suspects as I can by commenting out large chunks of code, configuring the system to not run certain pieces (if it allows you to do that) etc. This amounts to doing an ad-hoc binary search on the problem, and is a surprisingly effective way of zooming in on offending code relatively quickly.
A potential problem with logging is that the log might not hit the disk before the system locks up - if you don't get a core dump, you might not get the log.
Speaking of core dumps, make sure you don't have a limit on your core dump size (man ulimit.)
You could try to obtain a list of all the functions in your code using objdump, process it a little bit and create a bunch of GDB trace statements on those functions - basically creating a GDB script automatically. If that turns out to be overkill, then a binary search on the code using tracepoints can also help you zoom in on the problem.
And don't panic. You're smarter than the bug - you'll find it.
You can not reasonably track every line of your source using GDB (too slow). Besides, a system crash is most likely a result of a system call, and libc is probably doing the system call on your behalf. Even if you find the line of the application that caused OS crash, you still don't really know anything.
You should start by clarifying which OS is crashing. For Linux, you can try the following approaches:
strace -fo trace.out /path/to/app
After reboot, trace.out will contain syscalls the application was doing just before the crash. If you are lucky, you'll see the last syscall-of-death, but I wouldn't count on it.
Alternatively, try to reproduce the crash on the user-mode Linux, or on kernel with KGDB compiled in.
These will tell you where the problem in the kernel is. Finding the matching system call in your application will likely be trivial.
Please clarify your problem: What part of the system is crashing?
Is it an application?
If so, which application? Is this an application which you have written yourself? Is this an application you have obtained from elsewhere? Can you obtain a clean interrupt if you use a debugger? Can you obtain a backtrace showing which functions are calling the section of code which crashes?
Is it a new hardware driver?
Is it based on an older driver? If so, what has changed? Is it based on a manufacturer's data sheet? Is that data sheet the latest and most correct?
Is it somewhere in the kernel? Which kernel?
What is the OS? I assume it is linux, seeing that you are using the GNU debugger. But of course, that is not necessarily so.
You say you have no coredump. Have you enabled coredumps on your machine? Most systems these days do not have coredumps enabled by default.
Regarding logging GDB output, you may have some success, but it depends where the problem is whether or not you will have the right output logged before the system crashes. There is plenty of delay in writing to disk. You may not catch it in time.
I'm not familiar with the gdb way of doing this, but with windbg the way to go is to have a debugger attached to the kernel and control the debugger remotely over a serial cable (or firewire) from a second debugger. I'm pretty sure gdb has similar capabilities, I could quickly find some hints here: http://www.digipedia.pl/man/gdb.4.html