maven-shade-plugin includes the dependencies unpacked within the uber jar, which makes sense because of the shading that is involved.
Is there a way to allow for a specific 'safe' dependency to be included as a whole jar (not unpacked into classes)? I could not see such a thing in the docs.
Related
My project inherits it's compile dependencies from parent and I have no control over it - can't change them to provided. Additionally, I have added another dependency 'a:b:1.0.0' to my project's pom. I want to include only 'a:b:1.0.0' with it's own dependencies (recursively ) to my uber jar.
Seems like neither assembly nor shade plugin doesn't support such case.
How this could be done ?
Thanks
Shading recursively has some significant disadvantages. Especially, the problem of duplicate files from multiple dependencies being overwritten with only a single version of the file. This can cause some pretty annoying problems to troubleshoot at runtime. You'd be better off using something like spring boot to build a standalone jar where instead of shading files into a single hierarchy, will embed dependent libraries into itself as a subdirectory and include on the classpath for you.
http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/maven-plugin/repackage-mojo.html
I am currently working in a Java project, and we use maven to build the final jar. There are two ways to build the jars as we all know, i.e. one single jar with-dependencies, and a jar without dependencies. In the latter case, we need to add dependent jars to the classpath as well.
In principle both can work, personally I prefer one jar with dependencies, but in the project team members decided to use separate jar without dependencies. So hereby I would like to know which choice is better?
This question has no answer, since it depends on what you need to do.
If you're writing an utility package or component, that could be a dependency of another project, then there's no point in having all the dependencies inside it - it's better to leave dependency resolution to a dependency manager, like Maven.
If you, instead, are writing a full application packaged as a jar, I mean something with a MainClass that can be executed with java -jar myjar, then having the dependencies together will make distribution easier.
Consider that, for instance, if you're writing a webapp, that'll be packaged as a WAR, it normally comes with dependencies.
Why does jar built with maven-jar not contain all dependencies libs by default (you need to use jar-with-dependencies option)
Because the vast majority of JAR modules have the use case of being in the end modules of an application (WAR, EAR, executable JAR).
The use case of directly having a fat executable JAR is rather limited compared to that modularity use case
.
And think about it, when you have a slim JAR, you always have the ability to create another module that will assemble that JAR with another in order to create an application. If you directly generate a fat JAR, you will reduce the ease of way your module can be integrated to others.
My project inherits default configuration from spring-boot-starter-parent . The command mvn package generates so-called uber Jar, which contains all the application compiled code plus all the dependencies from the dependency tree.
The problem is that there are too many dependencies copied into the target Jar file. I tried to control that by setting some of dependencies' scope to compile, but that didn't work.
Is it possible to control what dependencies will be taken into the final Jar file?
Thanks!
The ueberjar only contains the dependencies that you specifically asked for. I'm not sure what else you are looking for. If you are using "starter" poms as dependencies (no-one forces you to do that) then you are perhaps selecting more than you will strictly need at runtime. We do try to be conservative about the transitive of the starters, but the whole point of them is that they have transitive dependencies that might be useful. Like I said, you don't have to use them if you don't like them.
We have a small project with some heavy-weight dependencies (e.g. Spring) of which we only use small parts. Therefore, the JAR we get when packing with all dependencies weighs several megabytes, even for out two-class-server. This seems unnecessary.
Is there a way to restrict JAR assembly to actually used (class) files?
You can use the maven-shade-plugin to create a Jar-with-dependencies (your project and the dependencies merged into one big jar) while limiting the classes or packages that are added to that jar. See the includes / excludes page for reference.
If you don't want to manually specify what needs to be included, perhaps there is a way to integrate ProGuard with your build.
It's not possible to include only classes which are used. But you can exclude dependencies from your depencies to reduce the JAR size. Only drawback: you need to know what you can exclude and what not.