I just can't figure out how to ask a yes/no question while filling a form with FormFlow. You can't use the Confirm method to fill a bool,
var builtForm = new FormBuilder<BuyingACar>()
.Field(nameof(NewCar))
.Field(nameof(Model))
.Field(nameof(Brand))
.Build();
I need the field "NewCar" to be a prompt with buttons "yes" and "no". I don't want to use an enum since it will send a 0/1 when a button's pressed.
edit: My final goal is to fill a bool field.
It should work perfecly with booleans. It accepts "Yes", "No", "y" and "n" as possible answers. If you use the special Pattern Language {||} you can edit the prompt to include the options.
Here is an example.
public enum Brands
{
Volvo, BMW
}
[Serializable]
public class BuyingACar
{
[Prompt("Would you like to buy a car? {||}")]
public bool NewCar { get; set; }
public Brands? Brand { get; set; }
public static IForm<BuyingACar> BuildForm()
{
return new FormBuilder<BuyingACar>()
.Build();
}
}
And the result:
Related
My bot is displaying in Skype, but the 6 and 8 appear as emoji.
This is just a normal FormFlow form:
public class WeightsForm
{
public Weight FromUnitType { get; set; }
public double Amount { get; set; }
public Weight ToUnitType { get; set; }
public static IForm<WeightsForm> BuildForm()
{
return new FormBuilder<WeightsForm>()
.Message("Now you can select weight conversion details.")
.AddRemainingFields()
.Build();
}
}
with Weights based on an enum:
public enum Weight
{
None,
Ton,
Slug,
Pound,
Ounce,
Grain,
Picogram,
Nanogram,
Microgram,
Milligram,
Centigram,
Decigram,
Gram,
Dekagram,
Hectogram,
Kilogram,
Megagram,
Gigagram,
Teragram
}
What is the best way to get this to display, on Skype, without the emoji?
To fix this you need to change the template used for generating the numbers so that Skype does not interpret this as an emoji. If you add this annotation on your class:
[Template(TemplateUsage.EnumSelectOne, ChoiceFormat = "{0}. {1}")]
That would fix the problem for single selections. Alternatively you could change the default template in builder.Configuration.Templates. If you wanted to fix EnumSelectMany you could add that as well.
What version of the SDK are you running? If you are running the latest and unless you have tweaked the choice style you should get buttons on skype by default. (The next release will have more style options as well.)
We have a lot of Dto classes in our project and on various occasions SELECT them using Expressions from the entity framework context. This has the benefit, that EF can parse our request, and build a nice SQL statement out of it.
Unfortunatly, this has led to very big Expressions, because we have no way of combining them.
So if you have a class DtoA with 3 properties, and one of them is of class DtoB with 5 properties, and again one of those is of class DtoC with 10 properties, you would have to write one big selector.
public static Expression<Func<ClassA, DtoA>> ToDto =
from => new DtoA
{
Id = from.Id,
Name = from.Name,
Size = from.Size,
MyB = new DtoB
{
Id = from.MyB.Id,
...
MyCList = from.MyCList.Select(myC => new DtoC
{
Id = myC.Id,
...
}
}
};
Also, they cannot be reused. When you have DtoD, which also has a propertiy of class DtoB, you would have to paste in the desired code of DtoB and DtoC again.
public static Expression<Func<ClassD, DtoD>> ToDto =
from => new DtoD
{
Id = from.Id,
Length = from.Length,
MyB = new DtoB
{
Id = from.MyB.Id,
...
MyCList = from.MyCList.Select(myC => new DtoC
{
Id = myC.Id,
...
}
}
};
So this will escalate pretty fast. Please note that the mentioned code is just an example, but you get the idea.
I would like to define an expression for each class and then combine them as required, as well as EF still be able to parse it and generate the SQL statement so to not lose the performance improvement.
How can i achieve this?
Have you thought about using Automapper ? You can define your Dtos and create a mapping between the original entity and the Dto and/or vice versa, and using the projection, you don't need any select statements as Automapper will do it for you automatically and it will project only the dto's properties into SQL query.
for example, if you have a Person table with the following structure:
public class Person
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string FamilyName { get; set; }
public string GivenName { get; set; }
public string Initial { get; set; }
public string PreferredName { get; set; }
public string FormerTitle { get; set; }
public string FormerFamilyName { get; set; }
public string FormerGivenName { get; set; }
}
and your dto was like this :
public class PersonDto
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string FamilyName { get; set; }
public string GivenName { get; set; }
}
You can create a mapping between Person and PersonDto like this
Mapper.CreateMap<Person, PersonDto>()
and when you query the database using Entity Framework (for example), you can use something like this to get PersonDto columns only:
ctx.People.Where(p=> p.FamilyName.Contains("John"))
.Project()
.To<PersonDto>()
.ToList();
which will return a list of PersonDtos that has a family name contains "John", and if you run a sql profiler for example you will see that only the PersonDto columns were selected.
Automapper also supports hierachy, if your Person for example has an Address linked to it that you want to return AddressDto for it.
I think it worth to have a look and check it, it cleans a lot of the mess that manual mapping requires.
I thought about it a little, and I didn't come up with any "awesome" solution.
Essentially you have two general choices here,
Use placeholder and rewrite expression tree entirely.
Something like this,
public static Expression<Func<ClassA, DtoA>> DtoExpression{
get{
Expression<Func<ClassA, DtoA>> dtoExpression = classA => new DtoA(){
BDto = Magic.Swap(ClassB.DtoExpression),
};
// todo; here you have access to dtoExpression,
// you need to use expression transformers
// in order to find & replace the Magic.Swap(..) call with the
// actual Expression code(NewExpression),
// Rewriting the expression tree is no easy task,
// but EF will be able to understand it this way.
// the code will be quite tricky, but can be solved
// within ~50-100 lines of code, I expect.
// For that, see ExpressionVisitor.
// As ExpressionVisitor detects the usage of Magic.Swap,
// it has to check the actual expression(ClassB.DtoExpression),
// and rebuild it as MemberInitExpression & NewExpression,
// and the bindings have to be mapped to correct places.
return Magic.Rebuild(dtoExpression);
}
The other way is to start using only Expression class(ditching the LINQ). This way you can write the queries from zero, and reusability will be nice, however, things get harder & you lose type safety. Microsoft has nice reference about dynamic expressions. If you structure everything that way, you can reuse a lot of the functionality. Eg, you define NewExpression and then you can later reuse it, if needed.
The third way is to basically use lambda syntax: .Where, .Select etc.. This gives you definitely better "reusability" rate. It doesn't solve your problem 100%, but it can help you to compose queries a bit better. For example: from.MyCList.Select(dtoCSelector)
I'm having trouble with my ASP.NET MVC 3 application. I have 2 propertiesin my model whereby I only want 1 of them required in my view based on whichever one is empty. So for example, if I enter a phone number then email is no longer required and vice versa, but if I leave both empty, then either 1 should be required, below is my model:
[Display(Name = "Contact Phone Number:")]
[MaxLength(150)]
public string ContactPhoneNumber { get; set; }
[Display(Name = "Contact Email Address:")]
[MaxLength(100)]
public string ContactEmailAddress { get; set; }
Would I need to create a custom attribute to validate my model and if so, how would I achieve this?
You can implement IValidatableObject on your class and provide a Validate() method that implements your custom logic. Combine this with custom validation logic on the client if you prefer to ensure that one is supplied. I find this easier than implementing an attribute.
public class ContactModel : IValidatableObject
{
...
public IEnumerable<ValidationResult> Validate( ValidationContext context )
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhitespace( ContactPhoneNumber )
&& string.IsNullOrWhitespace( ContactEmailAddress ))
{
yield return new ValidationResult( "Contact Phone Number or Email Address must be supplied.", new [] { "ContactPhoneNumber", "ContactEmailAddress" } );
}
}
}
To get everything working at client side you'll need to add the following script to your view:
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function() {
$('form').validate();
$('form').rules('add', {
"ContactPhoneNumber": {
depends: function(el) { return !$('#ContactEmailAddress').val(); }
}
});
});
</script>
Annotation-based conditional validation can be defined using ExpressiveAnnotations:
[RequiredIf("ContactPhoneNumber == null",
ErrorMessage = "At least email or phone should be provided.")]
public string ContactEmailAddress { get; set; }
[RequiredIf("ContactEmailAddress == null",
ErrorMessage = "At least email or phone should be provided.")]
public string ContactPhoneNumber { get; set; }
Here is a MSDN blog entry about conditional validations: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/simonince/archive/2011/02/04/conditional-validation-in-asp-net-mvc-3.aspx
I know you already have a solution, but I had a similar situation, so maybe my solution will prove helpful to someone else. I implemented a custom attribute with client-side validation. Here is my blog post: http://hobbscene.com/2011/10/22/conditional-validation/
(couldn't think of a better title, sorry)
So I've got my layout page, on this page there is a searchbar + options. Choosing whatever, should take you through to the search page, with the results etc. Fairly standard. What I've done to get this working is to create a MasterModel class, with a SearchDataModel class member on it. This SearchDataModel contains the various parameters for the search (search term, what fields to search on etc).
I've then strongly typed my layout page to the MasterModel class, and using a Html.BeginForm... I've constructed the search form for it. However all the checkboxes relating to the fields aren't checked by default, even though the default value for all the fields is true (via a private getter/setter setup).
Yet when I submit the form to the SearchController, all the checkboxes are set to true. So I'm a bit confused as to why it knows they should be true, yet not set the checkboxes to be checked?
Putting breakpoints in key places seems to show that the model isn't insantiated on the get requests, only the post to the Search controller?
I may be going about this all wrong, so if so, pointers as to the right way always appreciated.
public class MasterModel {
public SearchDataModel SearchModel { get; set; }
}
public class SearchDataModel{
private bool _OnTags = true;
private bool _OnManufacturers = true;
private bool _OnCountries = true;
[Display(Name= "Tags")]
public bool OnTags {
get { return _OnTags; }
set { _OnTags = value; }
}
[Display(Name= "Manufacturers")]
public bool OnManufacturers {
get { return _OnManufacturers; }
set { _OnManufacturers = value; }
}
[Display(Name= "Countries")]
public bool OnCountries {
get { return _OnCountries; }
set { _OnCountries = value; }
}
[Required]
[Display(Name="Search Term:")]
public string SearchTerm { get; set; }
}
Then in the _layout page:
#Html.CheckBoxFor(m => m.SearchModel.OnTags, new { #class="ddlCheckbox", #id="inpCheckboxTag" })
#Html.LabelFor(m =>m.SearchModel.OnTags)
Make sure you return a MasterModel with initialized SearchModel from your views:
public ActionResult Index()
{
var model = new MasterModel
{
SearchModel = new SearchDataModel()
};
return View(model);
}
Another possibility to implement this functionality than strongly typing your master layout to a view model is yo use Html.Action as shown by Phil Haack in his blog post.
MVC 3, EntityFramework 4.1, Database First, Razor customization:
I have an old database that sometimes uses Int16 or Char types for a field that must appear as a CheckBox in the MVC _CreateOrEdit.cshtml View. If it is an Int, 1=true and 0=false. If it is a Char, "Y"=true and "N"=false. This is too much for the Entity Framework to convert automatically. For the Details View, I can use:
#Html.CheckBox("SampleChkInt", Model.SampleChkInt==1?true:false)
But this won't work in place of EditorFor in the _CreateOrEdit.cshtml View.
How to do this? I was thinking of a custom HtmlHelper, but the examples I've found don't show me how to tell EntityFramework to update the database properly. There are still other such customizations that I might like to do, where the MVC View does not match the database cleanly enough for EntityFramework to do an update. Answering this question would be a good example. I am working on a sample project, using the following automatically generated (so I can't make changes to it) model class:
namespace AaWeb.Models
{
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public partial class Sample
{
public int SampleId { get; set; }
public Nullable<bool> SampleChkBit { get; set; }
public Nullable<short> SampleChkInt { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> SampleDate { get; set; }
public string SampleHtml { get; set; }
public Nullable<int> SampleInt { get; set; }
public Nullable<short> SampleYesNo { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public byte[] ConcurrencyToken { get; set; }
}
}
I figured it out. Do not need a model binder or Html Helper extension:
In _CreateOrEdit.cshtml, I made up a new name SampleChkIntBool for the checkbox, and set it according to the value of the model SampleChkInt:
#Html.CheckBox("SampleChkIntBool", Model == null ? false : ( Model.SampleChkInt == 1 ? true : false ), new { #value = "true" })
Then, in the [HttpPost] Create and Edit methods of the Sample.Controller, I use Request["SampleChkIntBool"] to get the value of SampleChkIntBool and use it to set the model SampleChkInt before saving:
string value = Request["SampleChkIntBool"];
// #Html.CheckBox always generates a hidden field of same name and value false after checkbox,
// so that something is always returned, even if the checkbox is not checked.
// Because of this, the returned string is "true,false" if checked, and I only look at the first value.
if (value.Substring(0, 4) == "true") { sample.SampleChkInt = 1; } else { sample.SampleChkInt = 0; }
I believe a custom model binder would be in order here to handle the various mappings to your model.
ASP.NET MVC Model Binder for Generic Type
etc
etc
Here is the way to go from checkbox to database, without the special code in the controller:
// The following statement added to the Application_Start method of Global.asax.cs is what makes this class apply to a specific entity:
// ModelBinders.Binders.Add(typeof(AaWeb.Models.Sample), new AaWeb.Models.SampleBinder());
// There are two ways to do this, choose one:
// 1. Declare a class that extends IModelBinder, and supply all values of the entity (a big bother).
// 2. Declare a class extending DefaultModelBinder, and check for and supply only the exceptions (much better).
// This must supply all values of the entity:
//public class SampleBinder : IModelBinder
//{
// public object BindModel(ControllerContext cc, ModelBindingContext mbc)
// {
// Sample samp = new Sample();
// samp.SampleId = System.Convert.ToInt32(cc.HttpContext.Request.Form["SampleId"]);
// // Continue to specify all of the rest of the values of the Sample entity from the form, as done in the above statement.
// // ...
// return samp;
// }
//}
// This must check the property names and supply appropriate values from the FormCollection.
// The base.BindProperty must be executed at the end, to make sure everything not specified is take care of.
public class SampleBinder : DefaultModelBinder
{
protected override void BindProperty( ControllerContext cc, ModelBindingContext mbc, System.ComponentModel.PropertyDescriptor pd)
{
if (pd.Name == "SampleChkInt")
{
// This converts the "true" or "false" of a checkbox to an integer 1 or 0 for the database.
pd.SetValue(mbc.Model, (Nullable<Int16>)(cc.HttpContext.Request.Form["SampleChkIntBool"].Substring(0, 4) == "true" ? 1 : 0));
// To do the same in the reverse direction, from database to view, use pd.GetValue(Sample object).
return;
}
// Need the following to get all of the values not specified in this BindProperty method:
base.BindProperty(cc, mbc, pd);
}
}